The protectors of Wall Street criminality


Matt Taibbi has a new article in the latest issue of Rolling Stone whose title Is the SEC Covering Up Wall Street Crimes? pretty much says it all.

It recounts the story of Darcy Flynn, a staff attorney at the SEC (the Securities and Exchange Commission that is supposed to regulate Wall Street) who blew the whistle about how the SEC has been systematically destroying documents about matters that it had investigated, thus destroying the chances of seeing patterns of criminal behavior.

Imagine a world in which a man who is repeatedly investigated for a string of serious crimes, but never prosecuted, has his slate wiped clean every time the cops fail to make a case. No more Lifetime channel specials where the murderer is unveiled after police stumble upon past intrigues in some old file – “Hey, chief, didja know this guy had two wives die falling down the stairs?” No more burglary sprees cracked when some sharp cop sees the same name pop up in one too many witness statements. This is a different world, one far friendlier to lawbreakers, where even the suspicion of wrongdoing gets wiped from the record.

That, it now appears, is exactly how the Securities and Exchange Commission has been treating the Wall Street criminals who cratered the global economy a few years back.

The article also relates how the SEC is particularly prone to the revolving door, where SEC regulators get lucrative jobs at the very firms that they are supposed to be regulating, and then come back and lobby their colleagues to drop investigations.

Cenk Uygur talks with Matt Taibbi about the revolving door following an earlier article by Taibbi.

Comments

  1. JAW says

    The revolving door phenomenon, as well as the bias against prosecuting fraud committed against average citizens, demonstrate that the legal rules of professional conduct prohibiting conflicts of interest are often used as so much window dressing.

  2. P Smith says

    Where’s the surprise in this? It’s been common knowledge for years that the SEC was as much in bed with Wall Street banks and firms as KPMG and other auditors were in bed with Enron, Worldcom and their ilk. Schemes and scams like those can’t be orchestrated by one company, let alone one man.

    September 2003:
    http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/03_37/b3849047.htm

    March 2009:
    http://www.counterpunch.org/whitney03302009.html

    Eliot Spitzer screwed himself by screwing a prostitute, but if he hadn’t been doing the SEC’s job for them, does anyone really believe his dirty secrets would have been publicized? The scandal was publicized to silence him and turn the public’s attention away from what’s really going on.

    .

  3. mayalibre says

    Just going over to the SEC’s Inspector General’s bio page right now corroborates this. H. David Kotz, SEC Inspector General, didn’t work for banks prior, but he worked for private law firms and his bio says, right there, that: “While working in private practice, Mr. Kotz successfully represented and advised numerous Fortune 500 companies and major universities.”

    Helped Fortune 500 companies…..
    http://www.sec-oig.gov/Administration/IG.html

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *