Why Lamarck was wrong


I teach (in the distant future) a first year class in genetics and evolution. I’m going to have to use this comic when I discuss the inheritance of acquired characteristics — I think the bit about helicopter moms might resonate.

But not now! No teaching until January 2026! I’ll just file this away for now.

Comments

  1. submoron says

    I once pointed out that Jewish males required genital mutilation every generation only to be told that that was different. I never found out why.

  2. birgerjohansson says

    Please do not mention Lamarkism while you-know-who is in power. We know what happened in ghe Soviet Union when a crank got the ear of Stalin.

  3. robro says

    What’s this “mate” business Evolution refers to? Are we talking about chess?

  4. JimB says

    robro@3
    Ummm. He used “mate” instead of “meet a woman and have consensual sex that produced offspring”.

    On the other hand you could just replace it with the word “fuck”.

  5. silvrhalide says

    @2 I’ve been thinking of Vavilov ever since the pandemic, seeing as how Cheetolini treated Dr. Fauci.
    All the more so, since Brainworm was put in charge of most of our human health and science agencies.

    https://www.themarginalian.org/2023/03/08/nikolai-vavilov/

    Stalin, having no understanding of science, was blinded by the luster of the young man’s instant gratification claims. So began the greatest anti-science campaign of the twentieth century.

    With the distinct possibility that we are now witnessing the 21st century version, albeit with human health rather than cultivated crop seed preservation.

Leave a Reply