Posturing buffoon


Trump wants to destroy the Department of Education. Can he actually do that?

Technically, yes.

However, “It would take an act of Congress to take it out,” Don Kettl, professor emeritus and former dean of the School of Public Policy at the University of Maryland, told Vox. “It would take an act of Congress to radically restructure it. And so the question is whether or not there’d be appetite on the Hill for abolishing the department.”

That’s not such an easy prospect, even though the Republicans look set to take narrow control of the Senate and the House. That’s because abolishing the department “would require 60 votes unless the Republicans abolish the filibuster,” Jal Mehta, professor of education at the Harvard Graduate School of Education, told Vox.

So probably not. If it gets to the point that Trump’s whims of all sorts can be implemented, we’ll be so screwed that we’ll be praying for the Canadians to invade. If he did manage to get his wish, I don’t think he’s aware of the consequences.

Closing the department “would wreak havoc across the country,” Valant said. “It would cause terrible pain. It would cause terrible pain in parts of the country represented by congressional Republicans too.”

Much of that pain would likely fall on the country’s most vulnerable students: poor students, students in rural areas, and students with disabilities. That’s because the department’s civil rights powers help it to support state education systems in providing specialized resources to those students.

As usual, the Republican electorate was too stupid to realize that they were hurting themselves. Or maybe they think it was worth it to hurt their citizens who are handicapped, or gay, or trans, because while it is taking money away from them, it’s taking that money specifically from people they hate.

Even if the DOE isn’t abolished, they can worm their way into it and wreck all kinds of policies. For instance…

Trump officials could also attempt changes to the department’s higher education practices. The department is one of several state and nongovernmental institutions involved in college accreditation, for example — and House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-LA) has threatened to weaponize the accreditation process against universities he believes to be too “woke.”

I’m at a university that I would generally class as “woke,” and that’s a good thing. I have so many students who I wouldn’t get to know if we were anti-woke, which generally involves only supporting straight white Christian men.

Comments

  1. StevoR says

    Dunno if Trump can do it but sure he’s going to try to do so. He loves the poorly educated – the poorer educated the better far as he’s concerned..

  2. says

    I think the Republicans will want to keep the filibuster and will welcome any initiative to kill the DOE, because they won’t want the consequences, but would love to be able to campaign on the Democrats not allowing them to destroy the evil DOE.

  3. nomaduk says

    If it gets to the point that Trump’s whims of all sorts can be implemented, we’ll be so screwed that we’ll be praying for the Canadians to invade.

    I’ve been praying for the Canadians to invade for decades.

  4. StevoR says

    @ ^ Erlend Meyer : Fuck nationality, humans are human. All too fucking human and thus flawed as fuck.

    Lost so much faith in people this last few weeks. Sigh.

  5. raven says

    Closing the department “would wreak havoc across the country,” Valant said. “It would cause terrible pain. It would cause terrible pain in parts of the country represented by congressional Republicans too.”

    I’m not seeing how this could happen.

    Public education is a state and local matter by the constitution and the vast majority of the funding is local.
    The Federal part is only 11%.

    Yeah, it will hurt.
    Education is always low on funds and could use more.

    “Wreaking havoc across the country?”
    This might be an exaggeration.

  6. Ridana says

    DOE “manages all sorts of programs for both public schools and higher education, including Title I funding for K-12 schools serving low-income communities, funding for special education (and enforcement of laws requiring equal access to education for students with disabilities), and on the higher ed side, processing applications for student aid and running the federal student loan program.” More than just funding would be lost.

  7. raven says

    I don’t get this attack on public education.
    It’s by and large has been amazingly successful and brought the USA to where it is.

    It’s free for one thing.
    Of course it isn’t really free.
    It’s paid for by the vast majority of people like me who don’t have young kids in school. The taxpayers. Old people whose kids are grown up. The childless 20% of the USA. Young people without children.
    Which means it is essentially free to people who do have school age children.

    The alternative?
    I just looked up the tuition for the local private xian school which isn’t the worst and you can probably get an average education. It isn’t going to be better than the local public schools which in my area, which are well supported and good schools.
    Primary school is $8,000 a year, going up to $10,000 for high school.
    Two kids in school and you are talking a new compact car every year.

    Good luck MAGAts.
    You can add that $20,000 a year to your F150 truck loan payments and your student loans from a decade ago that you will by paying off for the rest of your life.
    And wonder why you are in debt and broke despite working full time.

  8. kevinv says

    He isn’t going to do jack shit to use the “official” or “legal” way. He’ll donit the same way he destroyed the Supreme Court – sabotage. He’ll appoint loyal incompetents that will ignore the law & do what he says, and when he doesn’t tell them what to do they’ll fuck it up so bad it’ll be the same thing as destroying it.

  9. raven says

    Segregation academies across the South are getting millions in taxpayer dollars

    The Texas Legislature will debate programs to funnel public dollars to private school…

    Update:
    This story was originally published by ProPublica.
    Private schools across the South that were established for white children during desegregation are now benefiting from tens of millions in taxpayer dollars flowing from rapidly expanding voucher-style programs, a ProPublica analysis found.

    In North Carolina alone, we identified 39 of these likely “segregation academies” that are still operating and that have received voucher money. Of these, 20 schools reported student bodies that were at least 85% white in a 2021-22 federal survey of private schools, the most recent data available.

    Those 20 academies, all founded in the 1960s and 1970s, brought in more than $20 million from the state in the past three years alone. None reflected the demographics of their communities. Few even came close.

    Northeast Academy, a small Christian school in rural Northampton County on the Virginia border, is among them. As of the 2021-22 survey, the school’s enrollment was 99% white in a county that runs about 40% white.

    Here is one goal of the GOP for public funding of schools.

    They want to funnel taxpayer money to private segregated white only schools and xian private schools.

    Follow the money.

  10. Dunc says

    The alternative?

    Good, old-fashioned child labour. The poors don’t need no education if they’re just going to be working in the fields, down the mines, in garment factories and in meatpacking plants. And children have nimble little fingers, so they’re idea for working around machinery.

  11. acroyear says

    Title IX funding is part of the Dept of Ed funding as well. Girls and womens sports are going to just be shutdown entirely as many of these states just can’t afford it at all.

  12. says

    If he did manage to get his wish, I don’t think he’s aware of the consequences.

    We can be almost certain that he doesn’t know what it will do. We can also be almost certain that if he knew what it will do he would not care.

    By the way, abolishing the Department of Education has been a somewhat quiet talking point in Republican circles for decades.

  13. seachange says

    Education isn’t mentioned in the US Constitution. The courts and particularly SCOTUS have made some fuck the Constitution and fuck your little dog stare decisis too decisions. There are no cutesy ‘checks and balances’ happening here.

    @raven #7

    wut
    The chart shows 4-20 %. Dunno what your personal budget’s response was to the monopolies’ massive mercantile price gouging (and telling their pet fake news ‘iT iS infLatIon’) was, but 11 % is non-trivial for most people. Umm… good for you that it’s not?

Leave a Reply