Missing submersible is still in the news


We’re in the countdown phase: newspapers are now reporting estimates of the number of hours of oxygen left in the device. That’s like estimating the degree of misery and suffering five people might currently be experiencing on the basis of practically no information.

It’s fairly roomy for a crypt

What little information we do have tells me that all five are dead and died virtually instantaneously. The stories that matter are about the shortcuts and problems this company’s submersibles. Did you know that little porthole in front was only rated for a depth of 1300 meters while the big carbon fiber tank was going down to 4000 meters? Oops.

The tourist submersible that went missing while exploring the Titanic wreck was previously the target of safety complaints from an employee of OceanGate, the parent company that owns the sub and runs tourist expeditions of the wreck. That employee complained specifically that the sub was not capable of descending to such extreme depths before he was fired.

That’s according to legal documents obtained by The New Republic. According to the court documents, in a 2018 case, OceanGate employee David Lochridge, a submersible pilot, voiced concerns about the safety of the sub. According to a press release, Lochridge was director of marine operations at the time, “responsible for the safety of all crew and clients.”

I’ll make two bold predictions: 1) the submersible and its occupants are the victims of a catastrophic implosion. 2) Hoo boy, the lawsuits that are about to land on OceanGate means that company will catastrophically cease to exist.

Comments

  1. robro says

    OT but speaking of sinking ships…thanks to ProPublica there’s another Supreme Court justice in trouble for failing to report a $100k airplane ride on a billionaire’s private jet to go fishing in Alaska. This time it’s one of our favorite conservatives, Joseph Alito. And a different billionaire, Paul Singer, who has had multiple cases before the court. Of course, Alito did not recuse himself. I haven’t seen it yet, but apparently Alito was contacted by ProPublica for comment so instead he scoops them and writes a piece for the New York Times. I bet it’s a winner.

    I’ve decide that “RNC” stands for Repulsive National Crooks, and remember “Conservative” always begins with a “con”.

  2. KG says

    If the occupants are indeed dead, and the cause was corner-cutting by the company, I hope its directors will be charged with manslaughter. Given that the passengers were from the very rich class, it might even happen.

  3. imback says

    Another reason OceanGate will likely cease to exist is that its founder and CEO Stockton Rush was the pilot on this ill-fated voyage.

  4. says

    I would not willingly get into a vehicle that required someone outside the craft to let me out again. I know you need some serious hatch integrity, those seals have to hold under tremendous pressure, and you don’t want any Gus Grissom incidents with the hatch being blown prematurely, but holy crap…
    People who think the universe was made for mankind don’t understand how little of our own planet is amenable to our particular form of life, to say nothing of conditions away from Earth.

  5. chrislawson says

    Lawsuits will be the least of their problems. As KG says, if this report is correct then the executives could be charged with manslaughter.

  6. says

    1) I’ve been thinking this same thing since the start.
    2) It can’t happen soon enough.
    3) WHO THE HELL THOUGHT TOURING THE WRECKAGE OF THE TITANIC WAS A GOOD IDEA.

  7. chrislawson says

    @7–

    Yes indeed. Humans are adapted to middle latitudes of Earth and from sea level to about 5 km elevation. With simple technology like furs and hunting tools we can extend the latitudes to the Arctic and Antarctic circles. Everywhere else requires significant technology to survive long term. As you say, our habitable space is a small sliver of our home planet let alone the universe.

  8. birgerjohansson says

    Chrislawson @ 10
    …and we cannot hold our breath for long, nor can we dive deep without risk of having nitrogen form bubbles blocking small blood vessels on the return.
    Just “uplift” the seals and whales, and outsource the underseas work to them.

  9. says

    Given the grifting culture and the evidence so far what are the odds someone tries to offer this without testing?
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trimethylamine_N-oxide
    “TMAO is found in the tissues of marine crustaceans and marine fish, where it prevents water pressure from distorting proteins and thus killing the animal. The concentration of TMAO increases with the depth at which the animal lives; TMAO is found in high concentrations in the deepest-living described fish species, Pseudoliparis swirei, which was found in the Mariana Trench, at a recorded depth of 8,076 m (26,496 ft).[1][2]”

  10. tacitus says

    WHO THE HELL THOUGHT TOURING THE WRECKAGE OF THE TITANIC WAS A GOOD IDEA.

    Because when your richer than the dreams of avarice, what else is left in life to fulfill you?

    (This assumes a pathological lack of imagination, of course.)

  11. birgerjohansson says

    The idea of paying the Roskosmos for flying you to the Moon and back (in an elongated ellipse, like the 1970s Zond craft) looks like a safer way for a millionaire to brag-use his money.

  12. Dr. Pablito says

    @StevoR — the banging noises are either nothing at all, or if they are related to the sub, are just little pieces of the wreck continuing to crinkle as various pieces crush more. Overwhelmingly likely scenario: they were crushed like an empty beer can.
    Carbon fiber: not the world’s most reliable material, and repeatedly stress cycling the stuff is a bad idea. And the mere suggestion of voids or layup sloppiness in the carbon fiber construction would be enough for me to nope out of ever using that particular sub.

    That sub and the remains of its unfortunate occupants will henceforward be a grim landmark for future tourists to the Titanic at the bottom of the ocean in much the same way as the freeze-dried corpses lining the summit trail to Mt. Everest.

  13. birgerjohansson says

    In some kinds of water, human corpses can be preserved. This is the case of a wreck in one of the great lakes.
    The ocean floor is another matter. Even bones eventually disappear. I assume the calcium is dissolved.

  14. birgerjohansson says

    If you could tow a sonar array underneath the termocline, you could build up a very detailed synthetic aperture image of the sea floor. You might even be able to retrieve the wreck and the bodies.

  15. Luftritter says

    We’ll this is a thing. A number of billionaires and dependents volunteered to go to the bottom of the sea in a steel sinking coffin after paying $250k a pop. It ended poorly and giant rescue operation and media circus followed. Meanwhile almost at the same time hundreds of poor migrants die drowned in the Mediterranean after the Greek coastguard couldn’t bother to respond to their distress calls. Barely worthy of a headline.
    It’s really telling how class and race determine whether you get rights and personhood status or the press even bother to cover your story.
    By the way I can already tell you how the submarine story ends: they’re dead and their remains won’t ever be recovered.

  16. wzrd1 says

    The company won’t catastrophically cease to exist. After all, one of the pharma companies that got nailed for opioid hawking damages is filing bankruptcy to seek to have the damages that were awarded discharged by the bankruptcy court, while the corporate officers receive their record bonuses and employees get stiffed.

    The sub was carbon fiber and titanium (not sure which alloy, but based upon what we’ve been reading so far, it’s likely to be cheaper in type and entirely inappropriate for the task). The viewport is rated for 1/3 of the task’s depth, Rush refused to pay for the custom viewport that was rated for that depth.
    ‘In the article, Rush is described as having said the U.S. Passenger Vessel Safety Act of 1993 “needlessly prioritized passenger safety over commercial innovation”.’
    Another Libertarian earns a Darwin Award.
    I miss the old days, when commercial innovation wasn’t fatal innovation and relabeled progress.

  17. says

    Another reason OceanGate will likely cease to exist is that its founder and CEO Stockton Rush was the pilot on this ill-fated voyage.

    If they’re stuck down there, intact but running out of oxygen, the passengers could kill Rush to make their oxygen last longer. It would certainly be a fair and fitting end for a CEO who so knowingly disregarded basic safety warnings in the name of “innovation.” Hell, he deserves it more than the captain of the Titanic.

  18. gijoel says

    @15 For some reason I thought of this scene from “On the beach”. I read somewhere that the tapping noises occur every half hour, if true then they’re probably alive. Given that, I don’t think another sub is going to get there, much less affect a rescue, before they run out of oxygen.

  19. wzrd1 says

    Reginald Selkirk @ 20, not quite accurate. Only 10 subs can dive to that depth and survive. All can dive to that depth, if one ignores that entire crush and die thing. ;)

    gijoel @ 22, they’ve heard noises, but the ocean is a noisy place to begin with, with odd sound channels that can make distant things seem close and vice versa. Add in things like cyclical currents and eddies, that knocking could be a crew in distress, some shrimp fucking or some object on the wreck occasionally knocking about in the current. Given the inability to locate the source, for all we know it’s Ahab’s arm slapping on Moby Dick’s side.
    I remember the Kursk sinking, reports said knocking was heard, but it was later found that when that knocking was allegedly heard, the crew was long dead.

  20. StevoR says

    @15. Dr. Pablito : “@StevoR — the banging noises are either nothing at all, or if they are related to the sub, are just little pieces of the wreck continuing to crinkle as various pieces crush more. Overwhelmingly likely scenario: they were crushed like an empty beer can.”

    Ah. Even with the regularity in timing? I expect you’re probly right but. Thanks.

  21. dangerousbeans says

    birgerjohansson @16

    The ocean floor is another matter. Even bones eventually disappear. I assume the calcium is dissolved.

    Actually there are things down there that eat bones, such as worms of genus Osedax. They are usually found eating whales, but I’m sure they’ll eat a human.
    I agree that they probably won’t find the bodies, and they’ll eventually disappear, but I don’t get enough chances to talk about cool worms

  22. StevoR says

    @18. Luftritter

    We’ll this is a thing. A number of billionaires and dependents volunteered to go to the bottom of the sea in a steel sinking coffin after paying $250k a pop. It ended poorly and giant rescue operation and media circus followed. Meanwhile almost at the same time hundreds of poor migrants die drowned in the Mediterranean after the Greek coastguard couldn’t bother to respond to their distress calls. Barely worthy of a headline. It’s really telling how class and race determine whether you get rights and personhood status or the press even bother to cover your story.

    Yes, yes it is.

    At least 79 migrants have drowned and hundreds more were missing and feared dead after their overloaded boat capsized and sank in open seas off Greece, in one of Europe’s deadliest shipping disasters in recent years.As a painstaking search for survivors continued, a European rescue-support charity said it believed around 750 people were on board the 20- to 30-metre-long vessel when it sank early on Wednesday (local time). The UN’s migration agency estimated there were up to 400 passengers. So far, 104 people have been rescued. Coast guard spokesman Nikos Alexiou told state ERT TV that it was impossible to accurately estimate the number of passengers.

    Source : https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-06-15/dozens-killed-in-greece-s-deadliest-migrant-shipwreck-this-year/102481088

    Whilst in today’s news, well, seen it today in my case anyhow :

    All 120 passengers and crew members aboard a Philippine ferry that caught fire at sea were rescued safely and the fire was extinguished, the coast guard said.All 120 passengers and crew members aboard a Philippine ferry that caught fire at sea were rescued safely and the fire was extinguished, the coast guard said.

    Which is the (kinda) good news we didn’t hear much about but buried further down in that report :

    Sea accidents are common in the Philippine archipelago because of frequent storms, badly maintained vessels, overcrowding and spotty enforcement of safety regulations, especially in remote provinces.

    In March, a fire broke out and raged overnight on a ferry carrying about 250 people and killed at least 31 passengers and crew members off the southern island province of Basilan, the coast guard said.

    In December 1987, the ferry Dona Paz sank after colliding with a fuel tanker, killing more than 4,300 people in the world’s worst peacetime maritime disaster.

    Source : https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-06-18/philippine-ferry-carrying-120-catches-fire/102493942

    At least one media outlet – NBC – has noted the disparity in coverage and attention here :

    A tale of two disasters: Missing Titanic sub captivates the world days after deadly migrant shipwreck
    A fishing boat crowded with migrants traveling from Libya to Italy sank in Greek waters last week. While hundreds are still missing and feared dead, it has garnered far less attention and resources than the Titan rescue efforts for five people.

    ..(snip)..

    “The willingness to allow certain people to die while every effort is made to save others … it’s a, you know, really dark reflection on humanity.”

    Judith Sunderland, Human Rights Rights Watch

    Source : https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/syria-migrants-boat-sinking-titanic-submersive-missing-rcna90336

    Although its an article I had to find by searching for.. & you gotta wonder what they plan to do about it?

  23. StevoR says

    @ ^ Note from that last article that the rescued Refugees from the shuiopwreck off Greece were (are?) being housed in warehouse after their traumatic ordeal. Reckon they’ll make the billionaires on their ‘Titanic’ tour do that in the very unlikely event they get rescued here?

    @27. dangerousbeans : You beat me to it. Also a lot of strange deep sea fish there that I’m sure would consume the remains too. Tangentail but since you raised cool ocean worms have you seen this 10 min clip on how worms ended the Ediacaran and changed the world for good by PBS Eons here?

    @23. wzrd1 :

    they’ve heard noises, but the ocean is a noisy place to begin with, with odd sound channels that can make distant things seem close and vice versa. Add in things like cyclical currents and eddies, that knocking could be a crew in distress, some shrimp fucking or some object on the wreck occasionally knocking about in the current. Given the inability to locate the source, for all we know it’s Ahab’s arm slapping on Moby Dick’s side.
    I remember the Kursk sinking, reports said knocking was heard, but it was later found that when that knocking was allegedly heard, the crew was long dead.

    Fair points there too, thanks.

  24. Ichthyic says

    here’s a thought experiment for you:

    Based on the fact that the CEO was a self proclaimed “libertarian”, and so were most of his supposed guests at the time.
    …and the fact that apparently there was no official report of the sub missing from the surface operation until 11 hours AFTER it lost communication.

    What if this entire thing is just an elaborate “fake your own death” scheme?

    after all, they don’t even EXPECT to find the sub, ever. It’s a pretty good scheme if you want to make a clean break with your old life. None of the individual participants are famous enough to warrant attention, but they all have plenty of money to disappear if they want…

  25. Ichthyic says

    ““Effecting a rescue” would mean lifting the sub all the way back up to the surface. How long would THAT take?”

    about 3 hours according to an interview with a rear admiral today I read.

    but what if they aren’t dead. what if they even left on the sub to begin with?

  26. Ichthyic says

    @11
    “Just “uplift” the seals and whales, and outsource the underseas work to them.”

    wasn’t that the plot to one of Willard Price’s “Hunt family” adventure books?

  27. StevoR says

    @1. Erlend Meyer : “Lets take a sub called Titan to the wreck of Titanic. What could possibly go wrong?”

    Most inaccurate name given the size of the sub too – unless it refers to the billioniares ego maybe?

    In an odd and eerie piece of ‘Titanic’ lore, there ‘s also a fictional liner named ‘Titan’ that was described as being the the longest and fastest ship in the world and unsinkable. So, guess it what it goes full speed into the fiog and hits a .. another ship and sinks it. Oh and then the next night it hits an iceberg and sinks killing most on board. Some intresting paralells but sadly quite anti-Semitic see :

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wreck_of_the_Titan:_Or,_Futility

  28. John Morales says

    StevoR:

    Most inaccurate name given the size of the sub too – unless it refers to the billioniares ego maybe?

    Has it occurred to you that maybe (just maybe) it’s called that because it was used to visit the Titanic?

  29. jo1storm says

    Has it occurred to you that maybe (just maybe) it’s called that because it was used to visit the Titanic?

    Should have been called “Tit” then and not Titan because it is still innacurate, like ironically nicknaming a skinny guy Fats . Titanic was the biggest ship of its type in the world. Could have been called Gigantic, Majestic or Olympic and it would have still fit due to size of the vessel. This is just puny for the name Titan.

  30. John Morales says

    That anyone has the misapprehension that vessels are invariably named after some aspect of their nature lest they be misnamed is remarkable.

    Anyway. In this case, the Titan was on its way to the Titanic (again) when this unfortunate tragedy struck.

    Well, tragedy to some, boon to others, who have already quaffed deep from the draught of schadenfreude.

  31. dangerousbeans says

    @29 StevoR
    Yeah, that’s really cool. Such a large effect from messing up the bacterial mats
    I bet the crabs would also enjoy the snacks too

  32. Silentbob says

    I assume all the “man should not venture where he cannot survive” crew in this thread have never flown on an airliner.

  33. Ichthyic says

    airliners have vast networks of redundancies and safety checks.

    ironically, those would have “stymied” the development of this boat, according to the guy who supposedly is captaining it as I write this. Or is squished into a broad pancake. or is on a tropical beach somewhere.

  34. Ichthyic says

    “That anyone has the misapprehension that vessels are invariably named after some aspect of their nature lest they be misnamed is remarkable.”

    You know, just because you are you, I decided to look up where the Titanic got its name from.

    The irony is palpable.

  35. John Morales says

    Ichthyic, are you under the impression that I expressed the opposite of what I expressed? I think so.

    Kinda adorable you had to look up the origin of the name just then. :)

    (BTW, the LOUISA SCHULTE Container Ship is expected to arrive in Brisbane soon)

    The irony is palpable.

    Heh heh heh.

  36. Silentbob says

    @ 40 Ichthyic

    airliners have vast networks of redundancies and safety checks.

    Gee, I wonder what
    could have inspired
    this “vast network”. (Spoiler: accidents)

    Lest I be misunderstood; I do not defend rich people visiting the Titanic.

    I just laugh at the Luddism of the opinion that humans must keep to their prescribed domain.

  37. Silentbob says

    @ 47 Morales

    Weird that you’d respond to a comment about how the media ignore some tragedies, with a link explaining that the media ignore some tragedies, as though that’s a refutation. (?)

    StevoR was not expressing puzzlement at refugees being ignored, but lamenting that it is so.

  38. StevoR says

    @35. John Morales : “Has it occurred to you that maybe (just maybe) it’s called that because it was used to visit the Titanic?”

    Yes but then the Titanic got its name from being a huge ship for the time whereas this sub was tiny as well as dangerous and violating safety laws and precautions.

    @36. jo1storm :

    Should have been called “Tit” then and not Titan because it is still innacurate, like ironically nicknaming a skinny guy Fats . Titanic was the biggest ship of its type in the world. Could have been called Gigantic, Majestic or Olympic and it would have still fit due to size of the vessel. This is just puny for the name Titan.

    Yup. Somehow your suggestion reminds me of what Musk would likely name it with his juvenile humour using same rationale. You probly already know that the original tuerned out to be very sinkable RMS Titanic had two sister ships named ‘Olympic’ and one they were going to name ‘Gigantic’ but post 1912 iceberg disaster changed to the Britannic instead. Two out of these three ships sank killing at least some of their passengers and crew albeit the Britannic hit a mine during wartime use as a troop or hospital ship and the Olympic had a pretty troubled history too.

    @38. dangerousbeans : Glad you liked it! FWIW whilst pelnty of otehrcritetrs no doubt enjoyed the ancks, there were no true crabs back then although in another tangent here :

    The joke—that everything will eventually look like a crab—comes from an actual truth. The crab shape has evolved so many times that scientists had to come up with a special term for it: carcinization.

    https://www.popsci.com/story/animals/why-everything-becomes-crab-meme-carcinization/

    .* Wonder if that would fly – so to speak – today with the IOC super-controlling super-jealous copyright claims?

  39. John Morales says

    It’s not a refutation, Silentbob; it’s concurrence.
    I’m noting the prosaic reason why.

    (I reckon StevoR is old enough to remember “children overboard”; that got news coverage)

  40. jo1storm says

    @49 That’s the point. Big ships get big names. Glad you got my references.

    Yup. Somehow your suggestion reminds me of what Musk would likely name it with his juvenile humour using same rationale. You probly already know that the original tuerned out to be very sinkable RMS Titanic had two sister ships named ‘Olympic’ and one they were going to name ‘Gigantic’ but post 1912 iceberg disaster changed to the Britannic instead. Two out of these three ships sank killing at least some of their passengers and crew albeit the Britannic hit a mine during wartime use as a troop or hospital ship and the Olympic had a pretty troubled history too.

  41. says

    Three words uttered by the Oceangate CEO sum up their chances: “Safety is waste.” He actually took and espoused the view that “nothing has happened before, so nothing will happen!” and that redundant safety systems aren’t necessary.

  42. says

    I assume all the “man should not venture where he cannot survive” crew in this thread have never flown on an airliner.

    No such “crew” exists, so you can assume whatever you want about them.

  43. says

    Just “uplift” the seals and whales, and outsource the underseas work to them.

    Just don’t uplift them too much, or they’ll get uppity and form a union. And if there’s anything worse than sea-lions, it’s UNIONIZED sea-lions!

  44. says

    Ichthyic @30: Your “fake their own death” scenario sounds intriguing and kinda plausible. I presume the sub would dive as planned, and go down part-way toward the wreck, at least enough to send back realistic signals to that effect. Then, after “losing” contact with the surface, the sub would have to come back up and intercept, or be intercepted by, another surface ship — one that had both the means to catch the sub and offload its occupants, and a plausible “cover-reason” to be there; and they’d have to make contact with no telltale signals being emitted by either vessel. Then, after getting everyone out of the sub, they’d have to scuttle it in deep ocean well outside of the anticipated search radius. My question then is, how many people would have to knowingly participate in such a conspiracy, and how much money would be needed to ensure their permanent silence? And would any of those posh twits (let alone all of them at once) really derive a benefit from faking their own deaths that exceeds the cost and sacrifices of making it work? We’d have to do a deep dive (pardon the pun) into all of their business dealings to find any possible motive for such an elaborate and laborious plot.

  45. StevoR says

    @50. John Morales : “.. I reckon StevoR is old enough to remember “children overboard”; that got news coverage.”

    Yes it did as did the whole Tampa govt military piracy of a ship trying to help refugees.

    It got huge media coverage as a political story about our pliticans using lies, force and brute power against vulnerable brown -skinned people for their own political expediency torturing, lying about and demonising those human individuals (same as me, you and everyone here but the bots but for luck of birth and circumstances) because they could.

    They still getting away with it now.

    So, thanks I guess for noting that?

  46. StevoR says

    What the “Children overboard” and Tampa and other refugee ships sinking killing a lot more than just 5 people stories didn’t get of course was live, tense, hopeful, empathetic human survival story headline coverage and massive, public attention on their victims and survivors and suffering and torment as and during they died so.. yeah?.

  47. StevoR says

    Oh and the lies that refugees threw their children off sinking ships as if staying and clinging onto ships as they sink taking you and them down to drwon and die horribly is a good idea .. yeah.

    I remember that very well.

  48. says

    @54 Raging Bee remarked about: “man should not venture where he cannot survive” crew in this thread have never flown on an airliner.
    I reply: obviously, if ‘man’ were intended to fly, they would have all been born with lifetime free passes on Pan Am! /s
    @60 StevoR pointed out the debris field has been found
    I reply: Oh, great another titan(ic) disaster strewing pollution on the sea floor! /s
    Yet, in accordance with sensitivity shown by StevoR and others that I agree with, yes, it is sad they all died. But, their arrogance was a major contributing cause. As documented on this site and elsewhere, it was a terribly, poorly designed ‘disaster waiting to happen’ and some of those on board did not bother to find out how truly dangerous it was.

  49. says

    birgerjohansson@17

    If the submersible suffered a catastrophic implosion (which I egree seems likely), there might not be recoverable remains.

    Apparently, a debris field was found on the sea floor near the Titanic by an ROV.

  50. wzrd1 says

    What’s notable is, the USCG reported that debris field, which is within the Titanic debris field. That suggests something of note observed that distinguished it from the much older ocean liner’s debris field.

    I suspect that that may well be what remains of the sub. Most likely scenario being a failure of the ridiculously underspecification viewport, which imploded. Such a failure would be in excess of looking down the muzzle of a cannon while it was fired for the passengers, anything torn loose by the slug of water entering acting as projectiles upon the craft and occupants, the sudden mass entry rebounding on the interior of the hull, essentially shredding it.
    Basically, they’d have been lucky to realize something was amiss before they knew nothing whatsoever, as unlike Hollywood, such failures are instantaneous, making even high speed films/videos challenging.
    The “every 30 minutes banging”, either random oceanic noise and the ocean is a noisy place or random component failures to the pressure and a human desire to find patterns in randomness.
    It’s just a shame that that kid had to get dragged into the debacle.

    Apparently, there are a number of groups who organized to offer certification of vessels and operations for deep sea operations and internally, there was concern for this company and CEO, basically predicting a disaster involving OceanGate and potential deleterious impact upon their sensible members. Since OceanGate declined certification or membership.
    Basically, like many professions, self-regulating, alas, without such being mandatory by their hosting and members nations.

  51. wzrd1 says

    OceanGate announced that the vessel’s occupants are believed to be dead. Likely, they reviewed the debris field the USCG was examining and issued the statement.

  52. wzrd1 says

    Landing skids and rear cover, the part that looks like a beak found.
    They suggest implosion, which I agree, but if the viewport imploded, the pressure wave entering, followed by a massive slug of water would rebound within the pressure hull. That would fail, as the stresses are entirely opposite what the vessel was designed to withstand and contain. It’d likely tear the vessel apart.