Ashley Miller has posted a “Best of” article, and reminded me that she doesn’t like Ron Paul and her vagina is destroying America. No wonder we signed her up!
Pharyngula
Evolution, development, and random biological ejaculations from a godless liberal
I’d forgotten she was the one who wrote that post about Ron Paul. That was very good. I look forward to reading more from her here.
This seems somewhat appropriate…
Holy crap, the comments on her Paul post are a cesspit. Good thing she’s on the Freethought network now; hopefully the readership here will heighten the discourse on her blog. She obviously deserves better.
Are you kidding? The comments are the best part! They provide direct confirmation about what she said about Randdroids blindingly just defending Paul regardless of what the topic is. Not a single one actually addressed the points raised!
This is the equivalent of calling someone a pants wetter and them getting so mad in yelling at you in response that they wet themselves in front of everyone.
Except no one feels bad for the Randdroids when they shit their pants in public.
It is quite depressing, I know several, otherwise rational and intelligent people, who will go through the kind of mental gymnastics that will make William Lane Craig dizzy in order to defend Ron Paul from any kind of criticism. The way I see it is, they are so heavily invested in the character “Ron Paul”, played on TV by Ron Paul, the one who is all about personal freedom ,ending the war on drugs and legalizing heroin that they refuse to see the racist theocrat standing in front of them.
I want to forestall the Pauloids who’ll say their hero isn’t a racist by quoting some of the racist remarks from his newsletters:
The Pauloids will claim that Paul didn’t write these things. However they appeared in newsletters with his name on the banner. The Pauloids will also claim that he says he didn’t read what was put in newsletters with his name on the banner. That tells me that either Paul is a liar or he’s such a sloppy manager that he doesn’t know what statements are being attributed to him. And I have a lot of trouble believing that a politician doesn’t know what’s being put in a newsletter with his name on the banner.
Surprisingly, her piece on Ron Paul contained no invective directed at Paul’s age, sex, or occupation. It had no suggestions that Paul should be imprisoned or have surgery on his reproductive organs. Instead, she focuses entirely on his beliefs, voting record and policies, extending Paul a courtesy that many commenters didn’t bother applying to her. Miller’s approach can only be explained by that vagina of mass destruction she carries around.
The comments from that post is why, ladies and gentlemen, the reason we call libertarians Randroids. They truly are robots spouting BS as if it were a programming command by their master.
I’m rather surprised. Usually when PZ puts up an anti-libertarian post the liberturds show up in droves to tell us how great their politico-economic ideologies are and why liberals should convert to libertarianism. Possibly they’re just seeing the post’s title and thinking the thread will infested by MRAs.
I’m shocked that her “Best of…” post doesn’t have at least one Paulbot dishing out abuse yet. For that matter, I’m surprised this post doesn’t have one yet either.
A deep-wade into the shit of the Ron Paul thread (comment threading – urrrghk!) yielded this (recent) little gem from one “William Delano Gaston”
If it’s a poe it’s pure beauty, if not it’s more than a little sad…
After a while you don’t even know what to say. It’s just hard to imagine a support base more deeply and profoundly insane, and I’ve argued with Green Party purity trolls.