At last! Here is the much delayed Carnival of Evolution 48!
I must begin by apologizing for my tardiness, especially since John Wilkins managed to post the last one on time. I was traveling in the 2½ weeks preceding the deadline for CoE, and the combination of spotty internet access, extreme jetlag (British Columbia to Germany to Iceland, where the sun hovered around the horizon all night long, just messed me up), and of course, the incredible distractions of exotic foreign lands, meant that I was disgracefully dilatory in putting it all together.
To reward your patience (or punish you all for allowing me to do this carnival), I thought I’d sprinkle the listing with some of my travel photos. Iceland is a lovely place; it’s also a strange place to consider evolution, in a land that’s only about 60 million years old and that is lacking in large animals (other than humans and their livestock), and mainly seems to be a place for rocks, lichens, mosses, fish, and small insects, as well as the busy bacteria…so in a sense it’s a place where we get back to the roots of evolution. Anyway, I’m just splattering the text with my photos; ignore them or get motivated to visit this gorgeous place.
On to the linkfest!
Bacteria
Wait a minute here…bacteria are where all the action is. I expected lots and lots of submissions about bacterial evolution, and this is all you give me? Come on, microbiologists, molecular biologists, and biochemists — give more next time.
-
While the big beasts were evolving, their bacterial diseases were evolving right along with them.
-
Bacteria evolving alone or in communities — it makes a difference!
-
Go deep into a cave and examine the bacterial resistome of species isolated for over 4 million years, and you discover they are resistant to many antibiotics.
Plants
I’m a little disappointed here, too. As an evo-devo kind of fellow, I’m often castigated for neglecting the importance of botany in understanding evolution and development…and here again we see an important group underrepresented on the Carnival of Evolution. Get to work blogging, plant biologists!
-
Dandelions! The interactions between the environment and genetic diversity
-
What’s the connection between gigantic genomes and high mutation rates in flowering plants?
Charismatic megafauna
Here we go. Animals are clearly very popular.
-
Gigantism in sauropods — all the details behind growing huge.
-
Birds are paedomorphic dinosaurs?
-
Fish tradeoffs: bigger gills or more efficient swimming?
-
Carl Zimmer and Ed Yong both got into Ichthyostega: How Ichthyostega was like a mudskipper, and Ichthyostega wasn’t very good at walking.
-
How arthropod segmentation mechanisms lead to lots of legs. Tetrapods, pay attention.
-
Clearing up the confusion about gills, gill slits, and pharyngeal arches. I’ve never been confused about it, but lots of people are.
-
A brief summary of the entirety of mammalian evolution. Ambition is good.
Humans
Why do we have more posts about people than about bacteria? Man, we’re a self-centered bunch.
-
It’s a peculiar exceptionalism that makes people even ask if humans are still evolving.
-
Considering the two big hypotheses about human evolution: Continuity vs replacement in the evolution of the human species
-
Vegetarians may not like this: meat-eating contributed to human success by allowing for early weaning, allowing for an earlier return to fertility for their mothers.
-
The rise of Christianity and Islam had an effect on the genetics of Jews.
Charismatic organs in charismatic megafauna
You know what’s really popular? The evolution of brains and penises.
-
Why did we evolve such big brains, and what does a hole in our head have to do with it?
-
The biochemistry of fatty brains may affect cardiovascular health.
-
Thank an error that leads to more synapses in the human brain for our smarts. Well, in part.
-
Apophallation. You probably don’t want to know what it is.
Theory
-
People are always confusing fact and theory in evolution. Let’s straighten them out.
-
Here’s a battle that’s been fought for many years: Kin selection vs group selection — it’s complicated.
-
The Black Queen Hypothesis is the idea that there are necessary complex functions that some species must get stuck with in order to maintain a viable ecology. We’ve got two posts on it.
-
Constructal theory tries to explain one way complexity can arise from natural processes.
-
It’s not all natural selection! Think about the neutral theory of genome evolution
-
If you don’t know the difference between orthologs and paralogs, read this post.
-
Something unusual has to happen for an invasive species to be successful: consider the difficulties of weediness.
-
Is the Carnival of Evolution evolving? (Answer: yes. Just about everything that replicates is evolving.)
History
It’s helpful to know where our ideas are coming from.
-
Atheists have replaced theists in discussing the incompatibility of god and evolution.
-
Diagramming relationships: sometimes a network is better than a tree.
Simulations
-
Using Avida to figure out how organisms could evolve navigation abilities.
Idiots
Here’s another popular category. Evolution is sociologically and politically contentious, even if it is scientifically rock-solid, so we have to spend a lot of time battling misconceptions and outright lies. Sometimes it’s aggravating, and sometimes it’s a source for hilarity.
-
Knee joints are not irreducibly complex. Comparative anatomy shows that they’re actually nothing new.
-
Intelligent design creationism lacks a mechanism, even if Casey Luskin claims they do. Hint: “God” is not a mechanism.
-
Evo-psych people might not want to read this one: biologists and evolutionary psychologists amusingly contrasted. If you’re as disgusted with most of evo-psych as I am, though, it’s required reading.
-
Is it Intelligent Design? Or is it photoshop?
-
Creationists are still waiting for cat to turn into a dog. Keep waiting, guys.
-
Creationists love “living fossils”. They shouldn’t.
-
So simple even a creationist ought to be able to understand it.
-
A letter to the AMNH: please stop pandering to god belief.
-
Oh, man, even when they mean well, bad journalism can make a mess of evolution. Here’s an example of entertainingly bad science journalism.
A little bit of everything
-
Bora summarizes the Society for Research on Biological Rhythms meeting. It hits just about every category I’ve put in here.
-
I counted. There are actually 101 Reasons Why Evolution is True listed on this one page.
I have to thank Hope, Einar, Þorsteinn, and Friða of Siðmennt for taking me about Iceland and instructing me on geology, and also thanks to Háskóli Íslands and Vantru for hosting me.
You can follow the Carnival of Evolution on Facebook, Twitter, or the CoE blog, and you can submit links to the next edition.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: There is currently no host scheduled for July or thereafter. Volunteer! It’s a good way to be compelled to carefully read a lot of excellent posts about evolution, so think of it as a learning experience.
Gregory in Seattle says
Gorgeous pictures.
I’m sorry, you were saying…?
bjornostman says
Thanks for hosting!
otrame says
Quite a few of those wonderful pictures look like areas that were, until very recently, under ice year round. I wonder why there is no ice there now?
johnscanlon says
This is a comment for Ken Weiss @ The Mermaid’s Tale in regard to part II of the Single Species Hypothesis post (here because Blogger ate it there when I tried to preview, post or sign in)
I just read this in the post:
Methinks you should have taken a harder look at the phrasing, because it reads like you either didn’t read the relevant articles properly, or assume that people of non-Eurasian descent (who have no Neandertal or Denisovan ancestry, as far as we know) can’t be reading your blog.
It has to be said that eliding the distinction between chimpanzees and subsaharan African humans, when both are critical to the pattern of the evidence, looks really bad on you.
Mattir says
PZ, you seem determined to make us all more informed. Isn’t that illegal?
=8)-DX says
…tardiness forgiven. Um does that mean your being late had something to do with a Tardis? Or lack of one?
thorjonsson says
Those pictures are distracting
Stella says
Awesome! I think some of the brain cells I lost watching that IDiocy video just grew back.
frankathon says
You went to the penis museum in Reykjavik! I’m so jealous! I went to Iceland a few months ago and it was dark all the time, it’s nice to see the same sites but with light. Thanks for sharing.
Evader, the parasite-infested branch on the evolutionary tree says
No my god that’s beautiful.
I’ll have to get there eventually.
Hmm, penis museum ey? o_o
And that cathedral… WOW. Reminds me of Prague. Possibly my favourite style of architecture.
Nice pics. Thanks for sharing Professor.
Alethea H. "Crocoduck" Dundee says
What does it say about me that the first link I read was the one labelled “You probably don’t want to know what it is”? (Perhaps that I’m like everybody else??)
suzanneelvidge says
Cracking CoE, and fantastic pics. Thanks for including us at Genome Engineering – we’ve posted on it at http://www.genome-engineering.com/genome-engineering-in-coe-48.html