No! Don’t use an octopus for bikini bottoms!


This link is NSFW or for anyone who knows anything about octopus anatomy—it’s a couple of nudes with dangerously draped octopuses. I don’t mind the nudity but I cringe inside at the thought of where those beaks are.

Comments

  1. Bride of Shrek says

    What’s up with the flesh coloured training bra the bloke seems to have on? I find that more disturbing than the octopus undies.

    Just proved there’s a fetish out there for everyone. If you don’t believe me just google “booger fetish”.

  2. Grewgills says

    His does seem dangerously placed. Hers seems to be missing most of its head in or under, but the beak is not dangerously positioned.

  3. Bride of Shrek says

    Oh boy, just had a look around the rest of that site. I’m not sure what’s more disgusting, the use of semen as “art” or the “pornscapes” page which demonstrates that, even in artistic porn,there is a case to be had for photoshopping out the odd errant haemerrhoid. Uuuurrgghhh.

  4. Jsn says

    So they’re using octopusses as crotch covers – OK, HOLD THE PRESSES. Did anyone notice the really strange thing? The dude is wearing a MANKINI top.
    Any fans of “The Soup” will love this.

  5. Sven DiMilo says

    No, Randall, I doubt you are the only one.

    And hey–was that Elvira? No, no–the woman, I mean.

  6. denise says

    you know, it’s not the octopus near the private parts that freaks me out. It is the DEAD FISH that happens to be an octopus near the private parts that gives me the screaming willies!

  7. octopod says

    The lady in the second photo, at least, has her octopus beak-side-up. Slightly less alarming, I suppose.

  8. Kenneth McFarlane says

    I agree that the most disturbing part of these photos is the ‘dead fish on crotch’ part.
    In the photo with the girl you can even see what seems to be the bag that they pulled to octopus out of, on the floor beside the table. Either that or it is the largest discarded condom ever.

  9. rhian says

    I love the comment at the bottom:
    “Macché “polipi”, quelli son polpi. Ignorantone.”

    It makes me weirdly happy to know that even in Italy, and even in the face of octopus bikinis, people obnoxiously correct each other’s spelling on the internet. It’s a nice universal theme.

  10. Doug says

    Just proved there’s a fetish out there for everyone. If you don’t believe me just google “booger fetish”.

    Disgusting! That’s a phrase that should have remained a googlenope.

  11. f says

    Bride of Shrek: Neither all the money in the world, nor a gun to my head could ever get me to google “booger fetish.”

  12. says

    Octo-dude looks like Jim Carrey. Which is almost as disturbing as his flesh-colored training bra.

    Sadly, the “anticlericale” section was 100% cephalopod-free. I was sort of looking forward to a monsignor-squid mashup.

  13. fcaccin says

    “Macché “polipi”, quelli son polpi. Ignorantone.”

    In Italian “polipi” (plural of “polipo”) refers to Cnidarians or to a tumoral tissue growth. That is, nothing to do with “polpi” (octopuses).
    Sadly, even dictionaries are being updated so: a sure sign that accuracy is no more fashionable.
    BTW, the blog title reads:

    Annoyance
    I hate blogs, they are the shit of the net

    Pyre’s comment (the second) is “where are the octopuses’ beaks?

  14. stogoe says

    The dude is wearing a MANKINI top.

    I love The Soup. I get all my necessary (and also all my completely unneccesary) entertainment news from Joel McHale, and I’m a better person for it.