This is the fourth part of a series about symmetry in origami.

Given an origami model, what are the possible symmetric colorings?

This is a question I posed in an earlier post, and I said I didn’t know the solution.  I thought about it a lot, and I found the solution. I will write up a mathematical proof in a later post.  Here I will just explain the result.

A brief review: Each origami model has an associated shape symmetry group, which is the set of all transformations (rotations and reflections) which leave the shape unchanged. There is also an associated color symmetry group, which leaves the shape and colors unchanged. Then there is the pattern symmetry group, which may swap the identities of some of the colors, but leaves the color patterns unchanged. In this post, C is the color symmetry group, and P is the pattern symmetry group.

I defined a “symmetric coloring” to be one where P is “large” and C is “small”. I didn’t say how large P needed to be, or how small C needed to be, but it doesn’t matter. I found a method that can construct any and all symmetric colorings.

Fundamental domains

Suppose we want to find a symmetrical coloring of a cube. First question: Are we assigning a color to each face, each vertex, or each edge? We want to find a general solution that will work in all three cases, as well as any more complicated case. So the first thing we need to do is divide the cube into fundamental domains.

A fundamental domain is the smallest unit that can be copied (via symmetry transformations) to create the whole object. In the above image, I show one possible way to draw fundamental domains, using triangles. A cube has a symmetry group of order 48, so that means we need 48 copies of the triangle to make the cube. There are 8 triangles on each face, and 6 faces, so that adds up to 48.

(No matter what symmetry group we consider, it is possible to draw fundamental domains. Wikipedia has plenty of images illustrating them. For our purposes, we want the fundamental domains associated with P.)

Suppose we assign each of the fundamental domains a number. We number them 1, 2, 3, etc. all the way up to 48. Each symmetry transformation is a permutation of these 48 fundamental domains. For example, if I rotate the cube by 90 degrees, we might find that domain 1 goes to domain 2, and domain 2 goes to domain 3, and so on. There are 48 symmetry transformations, and these correspond to 48 different permutations of the 48 domains.

You can use multiple colors for each fundamental domain. I looked through my photo archives, and found an example:

This Impatient Trillium Bouquet has cubic symmetry. Each unit has two colors (not counting white). There’s petal color (blue, light blue, green, or purple), and the insert color (red, pink, and light pink). This forms a symmetric coloring.

I’m going to make a distinction between “simple” symmetric colorings and “compound” symmetric colorings.  In a simple symmetric coloring, each fundamental domain has only one color, while in a compound symmetric coloring, each domain may have multiple colors. It turns out that we only really need to figure out how simple colorings work, because each compound coloring merely consists of multiple simple colorings.  For example, the Impatient Trillium Bouquet has a compound coloring consisting of two simple ones.  The petals (blue, light blue, green, and purple) have one simple coloring, while the interts (red, pink, and light pink) have a different simple coloring.

So from this point on, I will only talk about simple colorings, and we just need to remember that some models may combine multiple simple colorings.

Constructing a symmetrical coloring

In this section, I explain how to construct a symmetrical coloring of the fundamental domains.  All symmetrical colorings can be constructed in this way.  My construction starts by choosing the following three things:

1. A pattern symmetry group P.
2. Any subgroup of P. We’ll call this subgroup P₁.
3. A single fundamental domain. We’ll call this domain x.

The first step is to give x a color. Let’s make it green.

The second step is to apply each of the transformations in P₁ to x. For example, suppose that P₁ is a simple rotation group, including rotations by 0, 90, 180, and 270 degrees. We apply each of these transformations to x, and this results in fundamental domains x, y, z, and w. These will be the only domains colored green.

The third step is to rotate this pattern using each transformation in P. Whenever a transformation causes the pattern to be in a new location, choose a new color that hasn’t been chosen before. Now assign that color to all the fundamental domains in the pattern. In our example, the pattern is shaped like a windmill. So we want to rotate and reflect this windmill pattern every which way. We’ll end up with differently-colored windmills all over the cube.

So, now we have a symmetric coloring. How many colors? In this case, each color is assigned to 4 domains, and there are 48 domains total. So that means there are 12 colors. In general, the number of colors is equal to the order of P divided by the order of P₁.

Last question: what’s the size of C, the color symmetry group? It turns out that C is the largest normal subgroup of P such that C is contained in P₁. In group theory terminology, C is called the normal core of P₁ in P.  Remember normal subgroups? I said they were important!

Hierarchy of subgroups

Wikipedia has a handy diagram listing all the subgroups of the cubic symmetry group (although Wikipedia refers to it as the Octahedral group). I’m not going to explain how to read this diagram, I’m just going to point out that if P is the full cubic symmetry group, then you can find an exhaustive list of all possible choices of P₁.

Polypolyhedra

One last thing. Take a look at this model.

This is a very famous model. It literally consists of five tetrahedra arranged in a symmetrical way. Robert Lang, origamist and mathematician, has asked: are there other similar models we can make? For example, could we arrange 6 pentagons, or 5 octahedra? He explored this class of models, and calls them polypolyhedra.

It turns out that there is a direct correspondence between polypolyhedra and symmetric colorings.  If you look closely, you will see that each of the 5 tetrahedra is identical, but in a different color.  This implies that no matter how you rotate the object, if the rotation preserves the shape then it also preserves the color pattern.

So, after figuring out how to construct symmetric colorings, I discovered that Robert Lang had already solved what is mathematically the same problem.  He exhaustively listed out all possible polypolyhedra, and as far as I can tell, used the same construction as I did.  I was very excited to discover that this technique could be used not just to design colorings, but to design more complicated models with multiple polyhedra.