The ‘Honeybadgers’, a group of women affiliated with the MRA brigade at A Voice For Men, infiltrated the Calgary Comic and Entertainment Expo, applying for a booth by pretending to be somehow affiliated with nerd culture, instead — they were Fake Geek Girls, for real (although at least one of them authors a webcomic, so not totally fake)! Apparently they set up a booth promoting Gamergate and their version of ‘ethics’ and being anti-censorship before derailing at least one panel on Women in Comics with a lot of “What about the Menz?” and victim blaming.
I truly believe in freedom of speech, but coming to a panel with the entire purpose of derailing it and shooting down the voices on the panel isn’t constructive. It appears that was their plan for the expo, to come and to loudly take over the spaces of other people – although it was not violent or threatening, it’s disrespectful, disappointing and offers a prime example of why these panels need to exist in the first place.
Charming. They’ve now been kicked out of the con.
Also charming: they raised about $10,000 crowdsourcing their invasion. At least that’s $10K drained from the MRA budget on an embarrassing flop.
jambonpomplemouse says
So, do those women actually give a shit about GamerGate or were they just using the logo to shit disturb? Obviously they were shit disturbing the panels on purpose, but I don’t follow them to know if they give a damn about video games, and MRA’s have a habit of using logos without permission (although I don’t know who you’d get permission for a GG logo from?). It’s obvious from the get-go that they wanted to get kicked out to look like victims to their fanboys who are constantly “defending” the poor dears from criticism in every comment section (I’m sure you’ll be stuck banning a bunch of them any minute now) on the internet while they go around accusing other women of trying to be victims.
anteprepro says
Wait, “What about teh menz” and victim blaming is considered a derail from the topic that is Pro-Gamergate? Sounds on topic to me. Revealingly on topic, as usual, and again making it clear that their “ethics” figleaf of choice is very, very flimsy.
Giliell, professional cynic -Ilk- says
So, they went there to “liberate” all those nerds and geeks and gamers who didn’t want anything to do with them. Right.
anteprepro says
Hey, look, here’s some bullshit!
Basically, they are just anti-feminist trolls. Surprise surprise, I know.
anteprepro says
Oh Jesus fucking Christ, I missed this tweet. From a male gator:
Fucking scumbags.
Crip Dyke, Right Reverend Feminist FuckToy of Death & Her Handmaiden says
bwahahahahhahahahahahahhah!
brianpansky says
This equivocation needs to go away. Being wronged (by geek culture or anything else) does not mean you are weak or lesser. It means someone other than you wronged you. That’s it.
anteprepro says
Also PZ’s might OP might be inaccurate: the only part in the linked piece about them being fake and infiltrating gamer culture is from their own quote. If you read it the quoted part in the link, it sounds like they are being sarcastic (it comes right before snarkily saying their message is “totalitarian”). They mention that part of their infiltration has been being involved with games and comics for decades. As in, they are genuine “nerds”.
brett says
What’s the psychology with this crowd? Cool Girl-ism? Conservatism?
gijoel says
That says everything about MRAs and gamergate.
anteprepro says
brianpansky: It does need to go away. But it is broader than just that. The insinuation that “being a victim” is a character flaw, or a cynical attempt to get sympathy or leverage, and shit like that also has to go. People on all kinds of issues talk about how terrible it is that people point out how they are treated unfairly by saying that they are “playing the victim”, playing “the victim card”, or just use the word “victim” in general with a sneer. Because either they aren’t Real Victims, or they haven’t suffered enough and life ain’t fair anyway, so suck it up and move on. It’s bullshit. It’s a sneering, knee-jerk defense of the status quo and an attempt to excuse a person’s lack of empathy or to prevent themselves from taking accountability, or to simply justify their apathy in regards to righting wrongs. It is literally fucking everywhere, from the issue of rape to the issue of poverty to the issue of police brutality. That’s how the assholes work and it is how the unthinking “moderates” reflexively follow suit: sneering at the very idea of victimhood. It is fucking disgusting.
anteprepro says
brett:
Lot of the former, dash of the latter. Looks like maybe a little bit of gibbertarian Freeze Peach and 4chan lulzification sprinkled on top.
oolon says
Probably not that much of a flop though, they’ve riled up the GamerGoats with a “censorship” by “SJWs” narrative now. So their next invasion of a con will probably be even better funded by the reactionary goats. That this shows GG and a hate group, as defined by the SPLC, are one and the same. That GG actually pretend to be geeks so they can invade nerd spaces to spread their conservative ideology. etc. etc. Will be lost on them, just freeze peach! SJWs! Arglebargle!!
anteprepro says
And look what I found when I googled these folks: http://honeybadgerbrigade.com/2014/09/25/honey-badger-radio-shit-feminists-say-gamergate-edition/
Warning: Not just anti-feminist, also rape apologetics!
Also, podcast about the Sad Puppies: http://honeybadgerbrigade.com/radio/badgerpod-gamergate-11-sad-pound-puppies/
Claiming that the term toxic masculinity is dehumanizing: http://honeybadgerbrigade.com/2015/04/06/toxic-to-the-xtreme/
Also what in the name of fuck:
http://honeybadgerbrigade.com/badgerfesto/
So they literally say the same thing as people like Anita Sarkeesian, while hating people like Anita Sarkeesian because feminism sux and CENSORSHIP.
By god.
Marcus Ranum says
At least AA didn’t troll CPAC. Otherwise it’s part of an honorable tradition of going where you’re not wanted.
Giliell, professional cynic -Ilk- says
Problem is, they don’t want to write a new story, they just want to write the old story and pretend it’s not true (instead they claim victimhood for the menz, which is about as old as patriarchy itself)
consciousness razor says
Marcus Ranum:
Well, that’s not crystal clear either….
I have no doubts whatsoever that (1) this plan is utterly preposterous, and that (2) Silverman doesn’t actually want progressive secular liberals to win.* But if that was one of the many farcical motivations for the organization generally, then “trolling” fits pretty well.
Or maybe Silverman was trolling his own convention. I don’t know.
*Except, possibly, with respect to some very limited items, mostly related to first amendment rights. In any reasonable sense of the words, he doesn’t want progressive secularism.
Funny Diva says
Hmmmm…
I’ve never been to a con, but I have a hard time believing that in that universe “Panel Discussion” is an exact synonym of “Open Mic”.
IOW, I could be wrong but [I don’t think so!]: that panel was INVITED to have their say, and the attendees were there to listen to the panel, dumbasses. Then maybe have some of their reasonably-informed questions answered by panelists…not listen to your rambling, gotcha diatribes-masquerading-as-questions.
Jeebus.
brianpansky says
@14, anteprepro
Their words you quote will probably mislead a lot of people. It looks like they stand for good things….until you notice they are talking about “a system of analyzing”, and not a goal to achieve. Basically I think their “system” means they look at the current media out there and simply don’t “see it as” being wrong in any way.
The part you bolded looks nice, but notice what it says right before it. They don’t want to oppose the status quo. Do you know what that means? It means the part you bolded is a very weak statement indeed. They will “promote” whoever makes egalitarian games (I guess), but that’s it. They won’t voice any opposition to any games that are indeed sexist. Hush, no criticism. At least that’s what it looks like to me.
irisvanderpluym says
consciousness razor 17:
11-dimensional chess, anyone?
brianpansky says
*well I might be wrong in my second paragraph there, they do say they won’t “shy away from a fight” after all…so it might not all be hush. But it just looks like their fight won’t be about criticizing sexist games. Their fight will be criticizing people who criticize sexist games. Which is not great. Unless I’m still reading them wrong…
brianpansky says
Ah, from their Men-ifesto:
Funny Diva says
from my earlier comment @18
I shouldn’t have comic-sans’d that quote. It’s from a panel member talking about the HoneyBadgers, not the HoneyBadgers playing the victim card. Which still doesn’t make the HoneyBadgers look like anything but an entire fleet of douche-canoes. They were, in fact, de-railing and trying to shout down the panel and other attendees, but that particular quote isn’t a good demonstration of that.
oops.
consciousness razor says
It’s sort of funny that they cast themselves as a bunch of super-naive New Critics/Freeze Peachers. Isn’t a social good like free expression outside of the text — so what business is it of theirs to support it? Or does this infection reside entirely in their inability to cope with such morally-guided criticism — while presented metaphorically as something that corrupts their precious artform?
Holms says
#14
So they literally say the same thing as people like Anita Sarkeesian, while hating people like Anita Sarkeesian because feminism sux and CENSORSHIP.
A stunning example of coopting the language of their opponent while acting in the opposite manner.
#18
If you had read the article, you would know that the GGer / Honey Badgers were attending a panel discussion not as panelists but as members of the audience, and here is what they did:
“We were about fifteen minutes into the panel when a woman in the second row stood up and identified herself as a Men’s Rights Activist. She and her male companion both came to raise issues they felt would not be covered by our panel.”
So not only were they interrupting, they even state that they intended to raise ssues not covered by the panel, i.e. offtopic derail. Fucking lousy conduct.
brianpansky says
Their page about their members/leader people:
“Founding Hosts” are Karen Straughan and two other women I don’t recognize…
8 confirmed as women in total, 9 men (all of the artists and animators), ….plus one person called “Observing Libertarian” (yes, that’s Observing Libertarian) who has a bio in the first person, and has no mugshot. Not surprising, lots of the writing sounds noticeably libertarian.
Funny Diva says
brianpansky,
so, not just GamerGators, but AVFM-ers as well. Quelle Suprise…NOT!
Becca Stareyes says
“We were about fifteen minutes into the panel when a woman in the second row stood up and identified herself as a Men’s Rights Activist. She and her male companion both came to raise issues they felt would not be covered by our panel.”
So, basically, they interrupted a con event by being loud and unruly. Even switching the sides — feminist geeks crashing a pro-GamerGate panel to shout at them — I would expect to be kicked out*. Because the con committee doesn’t care what you are shouting about, they care the con runs smoothly.
* Also, I’m having trouble of thinking about circumstances where I’d do this but not be annoyed enough at the con to just boycott them. Because it’s one thing to use the Q&A to critique the panel’s conclusions, and another to disrupt the panel. The latter strikes me as ‘I think this event is invalid’, which… yeah, boycott.
drken says
When I read their manifesto claiming that nerd culture is awesome just the way it is, so it doesn’t have to change anything to accommodate anybody else, it reminds me of the character of “Never” on Season 3 of Louis C.K.’s show on FX. The story revolves around Louis getting roped into looking after him after school. The kid throws his rug out the window (the least horrifying thing he does), and generally acts like he has no impulse control whatsoever. At the end of the show, Never asks Louis why Louis’ daughter (and everybody else) wants nothing to do with him. Louis replies that it’s because of all the weird (a charitable description) stuff he does. Never is confused. He states:
“But my mom says any choice I make is OK as long as I love myself”.
I always think of that scene when Christina Hoff Summers talks about Gamergate. “Gamers aren’t sexist, I met some and they’re wonderful people”. It explains why they call her “Mom”. Who else would tell them they’re perfect the way they are and It’s the people who object to the awful way they act who have the problem.
Trav Mamone says
I guess it’s true–Honeybadgers don’t give a shit.
Lady Mondegreen says
…is a deliberate attempt to drown out others’ speech.
Lady Mondegreen says
We are the stealers of familiar lines, the writers of hackneyed prose, the smug, the ego-inflated, and those whose hunger for recognition far exceeds their talents. #rewrittenfortruth
Rey Fox says
I was just about to try to say something half-formed about peoples’ extreme aversion to the word “victim”, but then anteprepro said it all so much better in comment #11.
Except that maybe sometimes I think that the whole rigmarole about “I ain’t no victim” is just a denial of how powerless most of us are in society.
UnknownEric the Apostate says
The 2nd Doctor gambit? Act a fool, but pull all the strings while no one’s looking?
Hj Hornbeck says
I’m surprised no-one’s linked to the obligatory We Hunted The Mammoth article, because this story does get worse: it turns out they were making light of sexual assault.
anteprepro says
Rich. Bleated from the mouth of gator in response to this event: “Orwell’s 1984 is now a documentary”
Such sensitive souls, these gamergaters.
Hj Hornbeck says
Oh geez, and a GamerGater in the comments just posted the full audio recording of the panel these jerks crashed. Haven’t listened to it myself, but apparently the two MRAs are left confused when the panelists don’t follow their script.
Holms says
Couldn’t help but be amazed that they had the gall to describe the video thus:
“Trigger Warning. At 18:30 the conversation turns to dangerous and unacceptable harassment.”
Note that this is the point at which they interrupt a panel discussion from their audience seats. It boggles the mind that they are so far removed from rationality.
Quixotic James says
CCEE broke attendance records with 102,000 attendees this year and I have no doubt they’ll do it again next year. As a first-time attendee, I had a blast. The vast majority of people there weren’t even aware of this manufactroversy. I think the organizers handled a no-win situation very well.