A Baptist theologian from the neoconfederacy (Where else?) writes about the two schools of thought on Islam and then:
[G]ives his own reasons why Islam is a bad religion doomed to ruin: “When you start with an adulterous warrior-profit, who is literally anti-Christ (though touting a non-biblical version of Jesus), mix in generous helpings of totalitarianism and the marginalization/persecution of women and non-Muslims, and cultivate tribalism, legalism, and victimism, you have a recipe for disaster.”
I might have had more respect for the author if he or she just wrote “My religion is better than your religion, neener neener neener.”
It brings up a good topic of discussion though, because I sometimes find myself conflicted when it comes to Islam. On the one hand it’s a colorful and historically significant collection of primitive supernatural myths starting in the Bronze Age about magic invisible sky wizards and super heroes, and anyone who actually believe that stuff today is as good a target for pity and skepticism as any other. The same could be said for Christians beliefs of course, and yet that’s exactly where some of the best (And by far the worst) criticism for Islam originates.
I’m sure if I lived in Saudi Arabia or Egypt I would fear right-wing Muslim bullies, they would represent the dominant mythical madness after all, but I don’t live there, I live in America, so I fear right-wing dominionist bullies. So like many of you reading this, I find myself sticking up for Muslims when they’re being bashed from time to time even though their religion is as implausible to me as any other, and even though some of the fundamentalist regimes based on it frankly give me the creeps.