The new strategy in Afghanistan, same as the old

I just finished listening to Donald Trump’s highly promoted speech about what he plans to do in Afghanistan and to say that it was underwhelming is to put it mildly. There was absolutely nothing concrete in his 25-minute speech. About half of it was devoted to the obligatory pandering to the military and America, saying how they are the greatest and noblest fighting force in the world protecting the greatest and noblest nation on Earth.

Like his predecessors, Trump vowed to win the war because that is what they all say. He said that he had a new strategy for winning the war but was not going to tell anyone what it was, reminding me of Richard Nixon’s secret plan for winning the Vietnam war and we saw how well that turned out. He said that the military would be given a freer hand to prosecute the war and that Pakistan had to stop providing shelter for Taliban fighters but did not say how he would get them to do that. He said that India had to provide support to Afghanistan and the other US allies would be doing more but again, there was nothing at all concrete.

Much of his speech was devoted to explaining why he was not carrying out his repeated pledges to pull out of Afghanistan. He also said that he was not going to specify a timetable for withdrawal except to say that the US will leave only after they win the war. This means that he is actually committing to an indefinite presence there.

The only other thing he said that I thought was newsworthy was in the opening segment where he seemed to backtrack from his Tuesday press conference where he failed to condemn neo-Nazis and white supremacists. He did not do so in this speech either but he did condemn hate and bigotry in general.

So basically I thought that the speech was a waste of time, basically the same old policy with some secret sauce that he claims to have added that he promises will produce a different outcome.


  1. says

    Is it just me, or did 45 strike anyone else during that speech as resembling a petulant 10 year old ordered to read a written apology written by someone else? He had so little of his customary frenetic insanity that I found myself looking for pods.

  2. Mano Singham says


    I too felt that half the speech wad forced, especially the statements against bigotry and hate and the reasons for his change of mind about leaving Afghanistan.

  3. jrkrideau says

    As Einstein, or someone, said, “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results”

    Viet Nam, Afghanistan, Iraq, ISIS. Yep, a few more troops is all that is needed for victory.

    Bernard Montgomery said, “Rule 1, on page 1 of the book of war, is: “Do not march on Moscow”. Rule 2 of war is, “Do not go fighting with your land armies in China”.

    He either forgot to add Rule 3, “Do not invade Afghanistan” or given Anglo-Indian versus Afghanistan history may have taken it for granted that no one in his audience would be that stupid.

    I will say I caught about 30 seconds of Trump’s speech on the radio: He sounded reasonably sane. Someone must have really sold him on using the teleprompter.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *