Go away, racist HBD freaks


Ever since I antagonized the HBD nuts, it’s been Happy Fun Time on twitter and in email. They claim to be all sciencey, but then the kind of crap I get sent looks like the same old racism and anti-semitism.

It’s no secret that the (very misnamed) feminist ideology is has been disproportionately Jewish almost since its inception , in the first part of what will be a series of posts I will discuss how it, and related ideologies and movements, are also Jewish in character, and how this puts them at odds with the Western spirit. Hence, while many Jewish feminists were also Marxists and probably saw their feminism as another weapon in the Marxist assault on Western civilization, it should also be noted that feminism and the attack on traditional sex roles is also an effort to inject Jewish characteristics into the host society: an amorphous and androgynous mass of soft, selfish, degenerates is unnatural, repulsive, and easy for a predatory alien caste to control, yes, but it is also a projection of Jewish traits.

I would have happily lived my entire life without seeing the ugly side of humanity, except that it seems that would require closing my eyes and never setting foot outside my house, ever.

Comments

  1. Rey Fox says

    I wonder if those people have any awareness that all their hatred stems from one stupid old book.

  2. says

    I will discuss how it, and related ideologies and movements, are also Jewish in character, and how this puts them at odds with the Western spirit.

    Uh huh. I’m not Jewish. I am however, half Lakota, and you can take your ‘western spirit’ and shove it.

  3. garnetstar says

    Oh yes! Like those famous Jewesses Mary Wollestonecraft, Susan B. Anthony, and Elizabeth Cady Stanton. So totally contrary to the “Western spirit” (whatever that may be).

  4. says

    Wait – Is the same Judaism that separates men and women during worship and menstruation and doesn’t even allow men to hear women singing and…

  5. Crip Dyke, Right Reverend Feminist FuckToy of Death & Her Handmaiden says

    @garnetstar:

    yeah, that was my first reaction, but you know, none of them are still as relevant to the complicated intersectional discussions current in feminism today as the great Rabbi Sojourner Truth, Gdolei Hador.

    from the OP:

    an amorphous and androgynous mass of soft, selfish, degenerates is unnatural, repulsive, and easy for a predatory alien caste to control, yes, but it is also a projection of Jewish traits.

    Which is why we Jews are no threat at all to Western Civilization, because we’re so easy for the alien WC to control.

    Wait, what?

  6. gog says

    Judaism, Marxism and Feminism: Three ‘Isms at odds with the Western, White Man’s World.

    Protocls of the Learned Elders of Amazon?

  7. weatherwax says

    #1: Rey Fox “I wonder if those people have any awareness that all their hatred stems from one stupid old book.”

    I would disagree. My own experience with these people is that the hatred is already there, just looking for something to focus it on and justify it.

  8. says

    As is often the case I wonder why these guys never blame Lutheranism for all that stuff. After all Karl Marx was raised a Lutheran. His collaborator, Friedrich Engels, came from a Pietist background, another facet of Lutheranism. Or why they don’t blame Germans, since both Marx and Engels were Germans. Instead Marx’s Jewish ancestry always trumps those facts for bigots, and the fact Engels wasn’t from a Jewish background gets ignored completely.

  9. ck says

    He must be a leftist, because I understand it’s leftists that are anti-semitic.

    […] Marxist assault on Western civilization […]

    Okay, I know that looks bad and he is repeating right wing talking points, but he’s still a leftist, because… um… er… Quick, look over there! BENGHAZI!!!
    <quickly exits/>

  10. Crip Dyke, Right Reverend Feminist FuckToy of Death & Her Handmaiden says

    @gog:

    Protocols of the Learned Elders of the People’s Utopia of Amazonia

    FTFY

    An excerpt:

    In order to elaborate satisfactory forms of action it is necessary to have regard to the rascality, the slackness, the instability of men, their lack of capacity to understand and respect the exploitation of their own lives, or their own means of production. It must be understood that the might of the masculine proletariat is blind, senseless and un-reasoning force ever at the mercy of a suggestion from any side. The blind cannot lead the blind without bringing them into the abyss; consequently, men of the proletariat, upstarts from the people even though they should be as a genius for wisdom, yet having no understanding of the political, cannot come forward as leaders of the mob without bringing the whole nation to ruin.

    Behold the alcoholic animals, bemused with drink, the right to an immoderate use of which comes along with membership in the owning class. It is not for us and ours to walk that road. The peoples of Capital are bemused with alcoholic liquors; their youth has grown stupid on classicism and from early immorality, into which it has been inducted by our special agents – by tutors, lackeys, governesses in the houses of the wealthy, by the “Judeo” in “Judeo-Christian”, by our women in the places of dissipation frequented by the Capitalists. In the number of these last I count also the so-called “society ladies,” voluntary followers of their men in corruption and luxury.

  11. gog says

    @Crip Dyke

    I wonder if that could be published at full-length and be taken for serious by the neoreactionaries.

  12. says

    Hence, while many Jewish feminists were also Marxists and probably saw their feminism as another weapon in the Marxist assault on Western civilization

    -Which is obviously why the most Westernized societies have the most rigid gender roles and why the Marxist states were so against the traditional family.

    Sarcasm intended.

  13. says

    I suspect that by “Western civilization” marcusaemilius means the “civilization” portrayed among the Spartans in 300, not the “Western civilization” that brought us, say, the scientific method and modern astronomy.

  14. laurentweppe says

    I suspect that by “Western civilization” marcusaemilius means the “civilization” portrayed among the Spartans in 300, not the “Western civilization” that brought us, say, the scientific method and modern astronomy.

    I’m sure Galt Gulch denizens would be granted honorary citizenship.

  15. ck says

    Enopoletus Harding wrote:

    -But how can anyone be sure none of these denizens are Jewish?

    Trial by bacon (something similar to this has historical precedent).

  16. mnb0 says

    “It’s no secret that the (very misnamed) feminist ideology is has been disproportionately Jewish ….”
    No need to quote more than just this for understanding that the author is a sicko.

  17. lorn says

    Reads like this guy is jerking off. He is playing games in his own mind. He doesn’t seem to know what masculine/ feminine mean.

    ie: He associates masculinity with driving a pickup truck. I’m down here in the south and there are ahell of a lot of pickup trucks, which, I suppose, defines all those women driving them as male? Go figure.

  18. says

    It’s telling that substitution is so easy. If you look at bigots’ suffixes – -ification, -ization, and so on – the prefixes – effemin-, ghetto-, gay-, Jew-, barbar-, athe-,… – can so easily be interchanged.*

    And of course speciesism and the exploitation and oppression of nonhuman animals is always at the center of things:

    I concluded that women are flawed. There is something mentally wrong with the way their brains are wired, as if they haven’t evolved from animal-like thinking. They are incapable of reason or thinking rationally. They are like animals, completely controlled by their primal, depraved emotions and impulses.That is why they are attracted to barbaric, wild, beast-like men. They are beasts themselves. Beasts should not be able to have any rights in a civilized society. If their wickedness is not contained, the whole of humanity will be held back from advancement to a more civilized state. Women should not have the right to choose who to mate with. That choice should be made for them by civilized men of intelligence. If women had the freedom to choose which men to mate with, like they do today, they would breed with stupid, degenerate men, which would only produce stupid, degenerate offspring. This in turn would hinder the advancement of humanity. Not only hinder it, but devolve humanity completely. Women are like a plaque that must be quarantined.When I came to this brilliant, perfect revelation, I felt like everything was now clear to me, in a bitter, twisted way. I am one of the few people on this world who has the intelligence to see this. I am like a god, and my purpose is to exact ultimate Retribution on all of the impurities I see in the world. (p117)

    *In conspiratorial paranoia, Jewish people are central due to the nature of specific stereotypes.

  19. Akira MacKenzie says

    I’m sorry, but I was always under the impression that, given its European origins, Marxism WAS a “Western” idea.

  20. laurentweppe says

    And of course speciesism and the exploitation and oppression of nonhuman animals is always at the center of things:

    Well, when your worldview can be summarized as “Everyone who isn’t like me is either a moron or a thug“, sooner or later, you’ll want treat everyone like cattle.

  21. says

    And we overall tend to treat cattle like we do because there is no respect or empathy for animals generally circulating in the culture. Which is wrong in itself. Even a lot of people who “love pets” treat them like toys or accessories. It’s a thing deeply rooted. Even in people without worldviews like that.

  22. alexanderz says

    It’s amazing, really. That person is talking like an actual Nazi. Not a neo-Nazi, or any other right-wing radical, but actually quoting Nazi propaganda word for word. It never ceases to amaze me how people can still think like that after WW2.

    Enopoletus Harding #14:

    -Which is obviously why the most Westernized societies have the most rigid gender roles and why the Marxist states were so against the traditional family.

    Sarcasm intended.

    Careful there. Traditional families did come under attack in the early phase of Soviet Union. Furthermore, all communist states opened new positions for women (relative to what was available in their region at the time of the revolution), mainly in military and production. Communism is a very peculiar way of creating a totalitarian state with a supposedly egalitarian ideology. Your sarcasm is misplaced.

  23. Jonathan Tweet says

    Gross. Sorry you have to deal with that sort of stuff. People should have more shame, enough not to write stuff like this. If the Nobel prize committee is any judge, Jews are overachievers when it comes to embodying the Western spirit.