My Day Job is Threatened by AI, and I Don’t Care


I can’t talk much about my day job on here. It’s nothing exciting or wild, but you know, there are a million boring reasons why that’s a good idea for lots of people. My day job is a kind of social work / bureaucracy type thing, where in a call center environment I help people with issues related to social programs.

This is the most emotionally and intellectually challenging job I’ve ever had, and the more emotional a call gets, the more likely I am to make mistakes on the intellectual side. Gotta be a cool-ass customer. When you’re in a tight situation and you’re talking to a bureaucrat, you want to plead with them to see you as human, so they give you a good deal. That is a mistake. Convey the seriousness of your situation accurately but try not to make the bureaucrat genuinely sad for you, because their job is complicated as balls and they are more likely to make mistakes that fuck you over if they are not thinking clearly.

People make mistakes, because of emotional and intellectual challenges like this. Administering laws and policies related to multiple programs federal and local and the interactions between them, it’s a snarl of contradictory shit driven by the conflicting political imperatives of “having bare minimum human decency” and “never give anybody a nickel they didn’t break their body in half for.” AIs make mistakes because their intelligence is alien and simplistic, their relationship to their output about math rather than true understanding. Between humans and AIs, who makes more mistakes?

Humans, are you fucking kidding me? The public will benefit by everybody in my position being replaced with AI.

If this is done with wisdom, which hardly seems likely given the Klown Kar Kabinet, it will move in stages. First people like me will be able to use internally trained AIs to seek the policy and procedural information we’ll need to handle a call. In parallel, there will be an automated phone AI to handle easier things if people are willing, thus getting its training in. When the AI looks good enough and enough people are willing to use the automated system, it should graduate to having bureaucrats like me take responsibility for all critical inputs, for the reasons of checking hallucinations, fraud caused by bad actors manipulating silly bots, and to have a human that can be held to account for bad mistakes. Lastly, if you can go a few years with an acceptably low rate of failures for the system, you let the AI take over completely, and only retain a small core of highly trained humans for support.

The biggest risk to the program I think is “AI whisperers” that can talk the bots into accepting con jobs. Another significant risk is the system being programmed with bad values, discriminating against callers on various grounds. Something I didn’t know well before I took this job is that some cisgender women sound like men on the phone – especially older black women – and you cannot reasonably judge age by a person’s voice. Some people young enough to be my child sound like seventy-year-olds, some eighty-year-olds sound like me. The pitch and grit in a voice can give you a clue, but you need more than a clue to judge if a voice on a line belongs to a person of a given demographic. I could see misguided anti-fraud measures causing bots to treat trans women and black women like they’re con artists, to speak nothing of the risks others have noted in AI being used by insurance companies like (see image in my sidebar yo). But my employer does not have the profit incentive of private business, so the last should, in theory, not happen.

In a country with reasonably funded social services, you’d have a large contingent of standby people waiting to take over during system outages, who can spend all day studying the ins and outs of the policies, get to where they can do really well in the edge cases where their involvement is necessary. But the US will never be that country, so the AI will be an excuse to downsize everyone like me into the streets.

I’m the resident pro-AI weirdo on a typically anti-AI leftist blog network. How do I feel about it? If the public is better served by bots, bring on the bots. I’ll have to desperately work three jobs to pay my mortgage, I’ll feel the pain really badly. But if the public is better served by bots, they deserve what better helps them – especially if it’s more economically efficient, allowing those social programs to make the best use of their limited funds.

I will have to eat shit on that deal. I don’t imagine this is going to happen until several years from now, but like I said earlier, who knows with these clowns? Maybe I eat these words around the time I’m eating my hat to survive, but from where I stand now, I say do what’s best for the most people.

Likewise, I find it impossible to believe that we can’t develop a self-driving car that makes fewer mistakes than a human. When that happens, the haters should maybe acquiesce to the good of saving literally tens of thousands of lives a year with AI. Call me wacky.

In a sense that last one is a strawman. Many AI detractors are situationally OK with the tech, and could be moved by common sense and hard numbers, on a case-by-case basis. That’s fine. The same way I’m glad there are anti-death penalty absolutists working to make the world a less nasty place, even while I don’t have very strong feelings about it, I’m OK with there being a reflexively anti-AI contingent that looks for all the possible failings of such systems and hectors The Man about it.

But I’m pretty sure there are literally millions of jobs that AI is going to kill over the next decade, and society is going to have to figure out what to do about that. Because if a human can be *reasonably* be replaced by an AI, increasing the benefit to society, that should happen. Even if I’m wrong about that? It’s going to happen, and the problem is worse – because we’ll be unemployed with essential services administered by a pyramid of flaming cybertrucks.

Good luck to everybody, whatever the future brings. Perhaps I’m a little unreasonably optimistic about the possibilities.

Comments

  1. flex says

    A couple comments, and then I have to get back to cooking for family today.

    1. There are things AI will be good at, and navigating a positive path through hundreds of conflicting human laws is one. Who knows, there may be ways to help people even within the existing framework of legislation, companies, special interests, and charities which no one really know about. For all I know there is a fund set up to help 80+ year-old black women in the Chicago area, but only the fund managers know about it. Getting that information into an AI may be difficult, but once it is there, the AI will be able to recall that it exists better than an human will.

    2. There will be some things AI will be middling at, for example AI creativity. Creativity in the AI realm is dependant on prompts and the learning-set of AI. This means that a creative person will be able to generate some creative prompts and get AI to generate a screenplay/art at a high level of output quality. Better than a lot of humans who are not trained/skilled/inspired, but not as good as those humans who work hard at their craft to add things/connections to their works which are unlikely for an AI to use, or even outside of the AI training set.

    3. There will be area where an AI performs badly. Specifically in those areas where situations arise outside of their training set. Some of these areas may get smaller as the AI training algorithms advance, and, of course, humans also perform poorly when asked to do tasks outside of their training set. This appears to be where we are with AI taking vehicles for a spin. The world is still stranger than any of the driverless cars AI can compute, and maybe stranger than the programmers have imagined.

    As for AI taking your job? I think 10 years is a little optimistic. Having lived through the PC revolution, I’d say between 10 and 30 years and closer to 25 years than 10 years to get a good system in place.

    Your comment about bad actors being able to manipulate an AI system reminded me of John Brunner’s Shockwave Rider. I think you would enjoy it. It’s a bit dated, considering it was written 50 years ago, but the protagonist is doing exactly what you describe. Brunner also is credited with the invention of the idea of a computer virus from this novel. I notice that my copy is no longer on my shelf, so I must have once again given away my copy. Time to fire up Abebooks and get another one.

    Finally, I find the image of retired cybertrucks working in call-centers quite amusing. We really should start thinking of retirement plans for our obsolete AI. 😉

    Happy Holidays!

  2. says

    When I worked on AI, I was trying to address call center issues. (Lotsa respect for folks who do phone work!) We weren’t trying to replace agents, just assist them around the margins, and even that was extremely difficult. I’m pessimistic about the performance of the technology, skeptical of its ability to really replace workers, although in ten years who knows?

    If it takes ten or more years, that’s plenty of time for new jobs to appear and replace the old ones. Maybe it’s just as well if the technology’s performance is poor for now. So then my concern shifts to thinking about an economic recession when investors figure out they made a bad bet.

    I’m very ambivalent about people’s reactionary labor protectionism. It sucks that our society requires people to get jobs to get healthcare, to survive. But labor protectionism makes it worse for everyone else. I think of airport security, and I take solace in the fact that it employs a lot of people, and they’re honorable, efficient workers. It’s still a waste of society’s resources. I feel much better about fighting for a robust welfare system than fighting to keep around useless jobs.

  3. says

    very excellent comments and i might have more to say to them later, but on the last note you made siggy, you know exactly what i’m about. if not UBI, some way to allow an underemployed society to exist with health and dignity. i’d hit that line with george michaels’ character from the Wham! rap in a heartbeat lol.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.