Ted Cruz supports — and opposes — a national marriage amendment


We’re used to politicians flip-flopping on the issues as public opinion shifts, but it takes real skill to flip to both positions simultaneously. According to advocate.com, however, Ted Cruz has managed to do exactly that. Faced with an impending Supreme Court decision that is likely to end marriage discrimination against gay couples, Cruz announced that he is absolutely opposed to having the federal government overrule state laws regarding marriage, while simultaneously supporting the idea of having the federal government overrule state laws regarding marriage.

“I’m a constitutionalist,” Cruz continued. “From the beginning of this country, marriage has been a question of the states, and we should not have the federal government, or unelected judges, setting aside the policy judgment of the elected legislatures and imposing their own instead.”

Cruz also confirmed to the D.C.-based LGBT outlet that he is still planning to introduce a federal constitutional amendment that would ban same-sex marriage nationwide…

Ta-da! The amazing inverted double back flip with a front flip and a twist. So as long as the federal government is telling the states they must discriminate against gays, he’s for it, but if the federal government insists on justice and equality for gays, then he’s resolutely opposed. He believes states rights trumps the federal government while believing at the same time that the government should decide the issue for all 50 states. I’d give it an 8.4 out of ten. It’s a difficult move, and he did pull it off, but it still looks like shit no matter how you do it.

Comments

  1. Al Dente says

    Cruz, being a lawyer, recognizes that the only way to wriggle out of the 14th Amendment’s equal protection requirement is another Constitutional amendment. Actually this whole thing is grandstanding on Cruz’s part. He knows there’s no chance that his proposed amendment would be ratified by 3/4s of the states.

    • Deacon Duncan says

      But of course, he only despises them when they disagree with him. He’d be perfectly delighted to have them rule that Obamacare was somehow unconstitutional, even if it wasn’t.

Leave a Reply to Naked Bunny with a Whip Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *