Jun 28 2012

I endorse this rant

Categories:

It’s truly lovely. How can anyone support the Republican Party after reading the Texas platform? It’s a national embarrassment.

This post has no tag

62 comments

Skip to comment form ↓

1

billygutter01

28 June 2012 at 8:12 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

Ugh!

I think I just threw up in my mouth.
2

Katherine Lorraine, Chaton de la Mort

28 June 2012 at 8:17 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

The only problem I have with the rant is that he honestly thinks Republican parents would be against their children having higher education skills that challenge parental authority.

Lots of Republican parents (mine included) would be thrilled to kill the public education system. They think it’s indoctrinating their children, they think it’s turning them against good ol’ Buybull teaching.

I was at home a few weeks ago, and my sister, brother-in-law, and mother (mostly the first two, my mother tried to stay out of the argument) were talking to me about my atheism. They were saying things like “logic and reasoning are bad” which made no sense to me at all, but it makes sense to people consumed by thoughts of keeping people in the system.
3

holytape

28 June 2012 at 8:20 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

Well this could led to several new marketing slogans to increase.

Texas – Big state, small thoughts.
Texas – I-donna-know.
Texas – Come visit the middle ages.
Texas – A vacation for both mind and body, or at least just for your mind.
Texas – Don’t ask. We really don’t know.
Textask – Coom and fele smarnt.

Sasquatch Jesus
4

darrelle

28 June 2012 at 8:21 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

That is thoroughly disgusting. It is scary that they don’t even try to disguise their intentions anymore. I fear for my society.

On a side note. Wouldn’t it be great to have those two towering Texan intellectuals, Bush Jr and Rick Perry face off in a battle of wits? I’d pay to see that. Perhaps they could debate on how the fuck people as stupid as they are consistently get voted into high office.
5

Katherine Lorraine, Chaton de la Mort

28 June 2012 at 8:21 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

@my 2:

That is:

[...]against their children not having higher education skills[...]
6

machintelligence

28 June 2012 at 8:28 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

Bush Jr and Rick Perry face off in a battle of wits? I’d pay to see that.

Most people aren’t interested in half armed combatants.
7

Improbable Joe

28 June 2012 at 8:29 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

Now, look… let’s not allow our skepticism to lead us to make judgments about politics. You’re just asking for another Deep Rift here. Stick to Bigfoot and the Loch Ness Monster… which are probably part of the Texas education standards. But don’t make it political!!
8

Porco Dio

28 June 2012 at 8:38 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

so, the GOP wants to be a party of dumb racists?

i thought they already were.
9

Daz

28 June 2012 at 8:38 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

Meanwhile, in Kentucky.

Floods and abortions are distinctly different topics — except to Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), who is trying to attach an anti-choice amendment to the Senate’s flood insurance bill.
10

darrelle

28 June 2012 at 8:39 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

Katherine Lorraine, Chaton de la Mort said

“The only problem I have with the rant is that he honestly thinks Republican parents would be against their children having higher education skills that challenge parental authority.”

Yes. The authoritarian mindset looks to the past as being greater than the present or future. Children are conditioned to be less than the parents. The golden age already happened.

The anti authoritarian mindset looks to the future and strives to enable their children to be greater than they are in every way. The golden age is in the future.
11

w00dview

28 June 2012 at 8:45 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

Judging by the freakshow this year, I really shudder to think who the GOP candidates for the 2016 election are going to be.

I imagine the Insane Clown Posse might run as a President-Vice President duo. “Fucking miracles” seems to sum up the Republican mindset in relation to science education.
12

Uncle Glenny

28 June 2012 at 8:52 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

My favorite part is the switch from wanting the kiddies to be able to “evaluate the evidence” (against evolution) to eliminating critical thinking. Precious.
13

anteprepro

28 June 2012 at 8:57 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

This should be shouted from the roof tops. They shouldn’t be allowed to get away with this. This should be political suicide. It should be all the proof needed to vindicate any Democrat who was sneered at for suggesting that Republicans are anti-education and pro-racism. It should get Republicans slowly backing away from their party, or at very least get them looking deep inside themselves and feeling a tinge of self-disgust when they force themselves to continue voting Republican.

All of this should be the case. Not just in an ideal world, but in a world that made a lick of sense. In any world where all humans had the slightest bit of self-awareness, rationality, and basic decency. As a result, it will probably not be the case in our world. Fuck . Just fuck .
14

Bernard Bumner

28 June 2012 at 8:58 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

The mainstream political choice in America is now between weak-tea conservatives and nakedly reactionary, bigoted, plutocrats.

Is progressivity completely unknown in the political classes?
15

Anri

28 June 2012 at 9:02 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

Judging by the freakshow this year, I really shudder to think who the GOP candidates for the 2016 election are going to be.

It may be that Pres. Obama looked unbeatable earlier on, when the GOP party brass was working out just who’d be getting into the ring to get whupped. You know, throw a bone to the party faithful who you have to kiss up to, but who you don’t actually want running the place. Grab some Natural Born Losers, give ‘em their day in the sun, and when they’ve failed, they’ll toe the line better next time around.
However, with constant pivoting to the center, the President has damaged his progressive base support to the point where he might actually face losing – and this is the crop of Icons of Living Fail the GOP has now have wedded itself to for the nationals.

That’s one theory I’ve heard a few times.

Another is that they’re concentrating on the House and Senate issues and not worrying about the Executive, as they’ve figured they can shut the White House down totally with Legislative do-nothing strategy.

Lastly, there is always the theory that Mitt is, in fact, the very best they could come up with this time around, and that they’re serious about trying to get him all the way.

We’ll know come 2016 – if we see someone put forward with a certain amount of sensible gravitas, who tells the right-wingers to Shut Up or Get Out, we’ll know 2012 was a gimme.
If we see another Unload The Clown Car, Boys! then Mitt was their real pick.
Either one is pretty scary, actually.
16

Rev. BigDumbChimp

28 June 2012 at 9:05 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

I’ve seen a few things from the Young Turks recently and I’ve liked most everything. For some reason it had stuck in my mind that they were a conservative media outlet.

Has that changed or am i just “mis-remembering”?
17

Akira MacKenzie

28 June 2012 at 9:09 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

Back in the 90s, “Outcome Based Education” was a huge boogie man in right-wing circles. Apparently, the public schools were going to stop teaching facts and let little Johnny and Jane make up their own answers. As I remember the propaganda, OBE was going to be all touchy-feely and and those evil socialist teachers were just going to promote class after class of brainwashed dullards whose heads where filled with Left-wing New Age psychobabble but couldn’t read or do basic math because correcting their mistakes would hurt their “self-esteem.”

Pot, kettle, “black.”
18

Akira MacKenzie

28 June 2012 at 9:16 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

This should be shouted from the roof tops. They shouldn’t be allowed to get away with this.

“But… but… that would make us look extreme and drive away conservative Democrats and Independent voters (i.e. racists) and endanger our chances at victory. No…. No… gotta take baby steps… baby steps… ROMNEY WOULD BE WORSE…. baby steps… baby steps… YOU DON”T REALLY CARE ABOUT CIVIL RIGHTS… baby…. steps… gotta take…”
19

Tualha

28 June 2012 at 9:25 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

I think many or most Republicans would justify their continued support for the GOP by pointing out that this platform represents an extreme position, which neither they personally, nor (in their opinion) most of the party, necessarily agree with. That’s been more or less the argument I get from certain family members. So far, I haven’t been able to come up with a good answer to that. Suggestions are welcome.
20

DanDare

28 June 2012 at 9:50 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

“this platform represents an extreme position, which neither they personally, nor (in their opinion) most of the party, necessarily agree with”

You can’t make that claim about a platform statement. That is what is being held up for people to agree or disagree with. That is what they are voting to accept if they do so.
21

Tualha

28 June 2012 at 9:54 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

Perhaps I should clarify that I am speaking of Republicans who do not live in Texas. Republicans living in Texas are implicitly endorsing the Texas GOP platform; those outside Texas are not.
22

Aquaria

28 June 2012 at 10:06 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

Wouldn’t it be great to have those two towering Texan intellectuals, Bush Jr and Rick Perry face off in a battle of wits? I’d pay to see that.”

Why, when you know the outcome? Bush Fils would kick Perry’s ass and have another bourbon and branch.

He was dumb, but not quite as dumb as he let on. His dumb was from laziness and a sense of entitlement, but I can guarantee you that he’s not dumb about money, or where to educate his kids, or what tailor on Savile Row is the best value for the money, or how to to orchestrate a campaign of hate and dirty smears against assorted candidates running against Republicans. From the Willie Horton incident with Michael Dukakis, to Al Gore invented to Internet to the swiftboating of John Kerry–he was in the middle of it all and egging it on.

Y’all underestimated that sack of shit, every single time. Texans kept telling you that you had to watch out for him, that there wasn’t any trick he wasn’t scummy enough to pull, tricks that dumbass Americans would fall for every single time.. But nobody would listen.

Perhaps they could debate on how the fuck people as stupid as they are consistently get voted into high office.

Because the people voting for them–all across America, not just in Texas–are even dumber, on average, than either of those two scumbags.

Did you really need that spelled out for you?
23

Aquaria

28 June 2012 at 10:07 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

Shit. My HTML fu is weak today.

I’m going grocery shopping.
24

tccc

28 June 2012 at 10:25 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

@Rev. BigDumbChimp:

You are mis remembering, Cenk has been a liberal for long time now, I don’t think he was ever on air as a conservative.

He is from the Air America days.

Between Cenk and Sam Seder, there are not two better political talk shows out there.
25

baal

28 June 2012 at 10:31 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

“Has that changed or am i just “mis-remembering”?”

I think it’s mis-remembering. The Young-Turks had a stint on MS-NBC but were thrown out / or left for not being corporate enough. The Turks don’t necessarily like the Obama administration and attack it now and then on points much like Ed does. It could be those attacks on the admin that come off as conservative but the group is firmly left of center.

I’ve been sharing the platform around. The most common response is disbelief that the Texas-(R) is so blatant in its regressiveness.

They want to do away with early childhood development programs – I read that as including free/reduced price food that kids get. For some (too many!) kids those meals make up a big part of their diet.
26

Balstrome

28 June 2012 at 10:32 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

Americans never landed on the moon, your people prove this.
27

unclefrogy

28 June 2012 at 10:36 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

the louder they shout about what they really want the better the more they pander to the lowest motives of their base the better.
what ever can be done to encourage them to drop all the pretense of moderation, of caring about anyone else should be done.
How can we get the “leaders” of the GOP to come out in public in favor of all of this?
Get Mitch McConnell on record get Boner to endorse it get Mittens in public to admit it is what he believes is correct policy.

I am tired of all this playing to the “middle” of both parties it is such BS it is one of the major things that give the political process such a low public opinion.
uncle frogy
28

Gnumann, quisling of the MRA nation

28 June 2012 at 10:37 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

Americans never landed on the moon, your people prove this.

As non-sequitur-trolling, this is a small beauty.
29

lasius

28 June 2012 at 10:44 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

I imagine the Insane Clown Posse might run as a President-Vice President duo. “Fucking miracles” seems to sum up the Republican mindset in relation to science education.

Already happened in a webcomic:
http://www.mspaintadventures.com/?s=6&p=006765
30

a3kr0n

28 June 2012 at 10:50 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

FUCK OBAMACARE
31

davidjanes

28 June 2012 at 10:51 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

However, with constant pivoting to the center, the President has damaged his progressive base support to the point where he might actually face losing

And if progressives are that stupid, then they deserve the Republican Majority and the damage that it does, because they are bigger idiots than the people who wrote that platform.
32

Gnumann, quisling of the MRA nation

28 June 2012 at 10:53 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

FUCK OBAMACARE

I can understand that you feel it’s woefully inadequate – but is it worse than nothing? (Genuine question, I haven’t studied the current iteration).
33

Lycanthrope

28 June 2012 at 10:53 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

Please explain something to me. (I’m Canadian, I don’t know these things.) Suppose the Voter Rights Act is indeed repealed – what exactly would happen?
34

Matt Penfold

28 June 2012 at 10:54 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

I think many or most Republicans would justify their continued support for the GOP by pointing out that this platform represents an extreme position, which neither they personally, nor (in their opinion) most of the party, necessarily agree with. That’s been more or less the argument I get from certain family members. So far, I haven’t been able to come up with a good answer to that. Suggestions are welcome.

You could ask just where this silent majority is hiding, and why given the damage being done to the party by extremists they are not doing anything about it.
35

AlanMac

28 June 2012 at 10:56 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

“Kids are wonderful – you can teach them to hate the things you hate.” ~ Homer Simpson
36

Anri

28 June 2012 at 10:57 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

I think many or most Republicans would justify their continued support for the GOP by pointing out that this platform represents an extreme position, which neither they personally, nor (in their opinion) most of the party, necessarily agree with. That’s been more or less the argument I get from certain family members. So far, I haven’t been able to come up with a good answer to that. Suggestions are welcome.

Ask them what specific parts of it they would like to see be come law. If they say “Well, none of it,” or “Well, just one or two things,” then you can ask why they are supporting the people who made this wishlist. Ask them if they think that the people who wrote this list up would balk if, given the chance, they could make it all law. Ask them if that’s the kind of people they want running the country.

In other words, ask them if these extreme positions are being prevented from being law by a lack of desire or just a lack of power. Then double-check to see if they want to give the writers more power or not.

You will at least know where your family members stand.
37

darrelle

28 June 2012 at 11:12 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

Aquaria said

“Did you really need that spelled out for you?”

No. I didn’t. The first was a rhetorical question, the second was not a question at all. I hope you feel a little better though. I did, a tiny bit, and my rant wasn’t half as ranty as yours.
38

Caerie

28 June 2012 at 11:13 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

Lycanthrope:

Please explain something to me. (I’m Canadian, I don’t know these things.) Suppose the Voter Rights Act is indeed repealed – what exactly would happen?

I am not a lawyer, so take my explanation with a grain of salt. It’s entirely possible I have details wrong, but this is my understanding:

The Twenty-Fourth and Fifteenth Amendments would still make it unconstitutional to take away voting rights based on non-payment of poll taxes or race, but federal oversight to ensure that discrimination wasn’t being carried out would be severely limited.

The Voting Rights Act ensures that tests and other practices that might be used to disenfranchise specific groups are not allowed, with states and counties that have a history of discrimination and voter suppression requiring preclearance by the Department of Justice on any changes to voting practices. The VRA also requires multilingual ballots be made available on request. Jurisdictions lacking protection for non-English speakers could essentially disenfranchise any of them overnight.
39

ImaginesABeach

28 June 2012 at 11:13 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

If only this were limited to Texas.

From the Minnesota GOP platform:

We support phasing out of Social Security while allowing Americans the flexibility of investing their Social Security payments while continuing to fulfill our obligation to older Americans

members of the Minnesota House and Senate should introduce and support legislation defining conception as: “when the DNA (Deoxyribonucleic Acid) of Mankind is joined.” We should also urge them to introduce and support ‘right to life’ legislation that establishes ‘personhood’ at the time of conception.

Action should be taken leading to legislative guarantees and protection of the father’s inalienable right to decide against any unilateral or preemptive decision to terminate his child’s developing life.

We support protecting the right to religious expression for all peoples, including the public display of the Ten Commandments and the right to prayer at government events in the name of a specific deity.

Parents (or legal guardians) should maintain access to all of their minor child’s health records, including sexual health records, without the minor child’s consent.

educators who discuss creation science should be protected from disciplinary action and science standards should recognize that there is controversy pertaining to the theory of evolution.

As Republicans we support the nullification of unconstitutional federal law in accordance with state sovereignty and we support restoring states rights under the 10th amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The rule of Law in Minnesota is solely based on the United States and Minnesota Constitutions, not on international or Sharia law.

We support maintaining clean air, water and land by addressing threats proven by peer-reviewed scientific research using sensible and economically reasonable solutions. We oppose policies, legislation and mandates that are based on the theory that humans are responsible for global climate change including the Theory of Man-Made Global Warming, as well as any energy policies that raise the cost of energy to consumers and do nothing to protect the environment.

We should reduce or restrict government ownership of our land to no more than 40%. We believe that there should not be a net gain of land by the Minnesota DNR or nonprofit land trusts and that all conservation easements should have a sunset.

we believe the United States should end its participation in the United Nations, Agenda 21, the World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund altogether.
40

ChristineRose

28 June 2012 at 11:21 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

Please explain something to me. (I’m Canadian, I don’t know these things.) Suppose the Voter Rights Act is indeed repealed – what exactly would happen?

Possibly nothing. But it would make it legal to impose tests like literacy tests on potential voters, literacy tests being the most common. Back in the day every white voter turned out to be literate and almost no black voters did. There were other variants like poll taxes and clauses which made it easier to vote if you grandparents voted (i.e., if your grandparents were not slaves).

I am not sure what they were thinking. Even if they could get the rights act removed they’d still have to get tests imposed and they’d still have to come up with some sort of test that favored whatever group it is that they think should be able to vote. Most black people are literate nowadays, so if they really wanted a literacy test they’d have to apply it unevenly to get rid of the blacks without getting rid of a substantial number of white republicans.

Most likely it is aimed at Spanish speakers–impose a English literacy requirement on voters which would disenfranchise a substantial number of Hispanics but only a small percentage of whites.
41

Marcus Ranum

28 June 2012 at 11:38 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

Wouldn’t it be great to have those two towering Texan intellectuals, Bush Jr and Rick Perry face off in a battle of wits? I’d pay to see that.

You probably also enjoy bum fights and bear baiting.
42

DLC

28 June 2012 at 11:40 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

For what it’s worth, I think Cenk Uygur is right on the money.
I’d be slamming that thing out into the public’s eye with every newspaper and in every news cycle I could. “The Republicans Want your Kids to be STUPID! “
43

robro

28 June 2012 at 11:41 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

How can anyone support the Republican Party after reading the Texas platform?

By “anyone” I assume you mean anyone other than white, dumb-fuck, good-old-boys. I’m sure to them these planks of the platform, if they understood them at all, would sound like a good idea. Repeat the Voters Right Act? Oh, yeah, we can stop them “undesirables” from voting. They’re mostly criminals anyway. Don’t teach thinking? Oh yeah, who needs it. My grandpappy taught me everything I need to know. And we don’t need any of that new-fangled sciencey stuff that’s always changing anyway and scarin’ us about beach front property in Austin.

Of course, mostly folks don’t read the platforms or even know they exist. They vote Republican because of their mantra: Reduce taxes. Get government out of our lives. Reduce taxes. Stop abortions. Reduce taxes. End regulation. Reduce taxes. States rights. Reduce taxes.
44

Tualha

28 June 2012 at 11:47 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

Quoth ChristineRose:

Most black people are literate nowadays, so if they really wanted a literacy test they’d have to apply it unevenly to get rid of the blacks without getting rid of a substantial number of white republicans.

I read somewhere that’s how they applied it back in the bad old days; the voter would have to read part of the state constitution, and somehow, white voters were always given easy parts while black voters always got the most difficult.

Instead of that, maybe they’ll just forbid ex-felons to vote, and disproportionately arrest and convict blacks. Oh, wait.
45

markabbott

28 June 2012 at 12:02 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment

“But it would make it legal to impose tests like literacy tests on potential voters, literacy tests being the most common.”

Ironically, this may actually have the unintended consequence of Republicans preventing themselves from voting. They need to be careful what they ask for.
46

Caerie

28 June 2012 at 12:11 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment

ChristineRose:

Most black people are literate nowadays, so if they really wanted a literacy test they’d have to apply it unevenly to get rid of the blacks without getting rid of a substantial number of white republicans.

Well, not quite. The way it had been done before was that there would be ways around giving the tests to whites, while blacks would be presented with literacy tests like this. The link has a link to further sample tests in a PDF.

There would either be two different tests used or a loophole specifically designed to ensure the “right” people would be exempt from the test. If your grandfather could vote and things like that. Poor access to education did disadvantage the blacks from the start, but they weren’t taking any chances. The tests were to weed out blacks, not the poorly educated.
47

tonyagudo

28 June 2012 at 12:58 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment

Oh it get even nastier. I read their platform last night, and they also want to repeal the Freedom of Access to Clinical Entrances Law. They basically want to allow protesters of Planned Parenthood to physically block clinic entrances and threaten people trying to obtain Planned Parenthood services, and allow protesters to physically damage the clinics with impunity.

Here’s the platform(the FACE bit is on page 22): http://s3.amazonaws.com/texasgop_pre/assets/original/2012Platform_Final.pdf

FACE Law: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_Access_to_Clinic_Entrances_Act
48

New England Bob

28 June 2012 at 1:12 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment

It is not just a national disgrace, it is an international one; a galactic one, a multiverse disgrace.
49

Aquaria

28 June 2012 at 1:35 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment

hope you feel a little better though. I did, a tiny bit, and my rant wasn’t half as ranty as yours.

Then don’t ask, unless you leave a /rhetorical tag next to it. Because someone like me, stuck in this awful state, will respond.

And fuck you, too.
50

Alex the Pretty Good

28 June 2012 at 2:24 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment

Word of advise to the GOP … you know something about your program is seriously fucked up when the party platform of Hamas sounds more reasonable than yours.
51

grumpyoldfart

28 June 2012 at 2:26 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment

It’s like watching an oil tanker heading towards a reef. You know it’s going to be a disaster, but you’re still glad you were there to see it happen.
52

NitricAcid

28 June 2012 at 4:14 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment

@9- I have never understood why the USA allows riders to be slapped on any bill like that. It seems an act of sabotage against the parliamentary system.
53

nonny

28 June 2012 at 4:19 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment

I think the Republicans should hire Darth Vader as their spokesperson. It might make them seem less evil.
54

Khantron, the alien that only loves

28 June 2012 at 4:23 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment

Your application was then reviewed by the three-member Board of Registrars — often in secret at a later date. They voted on whether or not you passed. It was entirely up to the judgment of the Board whether you passed or failed. If you were white and missed every single question they could still pass you if — in their sole judgment — you were “qualified.” If you were Black and got every one correct, they could still flunk you if they considered you “unqualified.”

I got this from this site here, http://www.crmvet.org/info/lithome.htm

I’ll admit I’m not completely sure of its accuracy but, one thing is certain, literacy tests weren’t failed by black voters because they couldn’t read.
55

pelamun, the Linguist of Doom

28 June 2012 at 5:51 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment

Cenk used to self-identify as a moderate Republican, and I think he’s on record as having voted for Republican presidents, but that’s of the past. Now he just sees the Republican party as a party of crazies.
56

darrelle

28 June 2012 at 5:59 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment

At Aquaria

No thanks, but do fuck off yourself asshole.
57

koliedrus

28 June 2012 at 6:04 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment

I made it half-way through the video before I felt compelled to take this up a notch. I showed it to my offspring.

My children think that if I take away their ability to think for themselves, I would be designated as an “Asshole”.

They’re not eloquent or verbose at this stage.
58

chasbo

28 June 2012 at 6:38 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment

Missing from this year’s platform is the statement from the 2002 Platform (and maybe other years as well):

“The Republican Party of Texas reaffirms the United States of America is a Christian nation, which was founded on fundamental Judeo-Christian principles based on the Holy Bible.”

They pretty much say the same thing in this platform, but not as explicitly. Wonder why?
59

jjeii

28 June 2012 at 7:19 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment

It’s not as if this sort of thing is new. It goes back at least as far as the roots of Protestantism—probably much, much further.

Here are some quotes from Martin Luther:

“Faith must trample under foot all reason, sense, and understanding.”

“Reason is the greatest enemy that faith has; it never comes to the aid of spiritual things, but—more frequently than not—struggles against the divine Word, treating with contempt all that emanates from God.”

“Reason is the Devil’s greatest whore; by nature and manner of being she is a noxious whore; she is a prostitute, the Devil’s appointed whore; whore eaten by scab and leprosy who ought to be trodden under foot and destroyed, she and her wisdom… Throw dung in her face to make her ugly. She is and she ought to be drowned in baptism… She would deserve, the wretch, to be banished to the filthiest place in the house, to the closets.”

Consider also a Luther comment on “lying for Jesus”:
“What harm would it do, if a man told a good strong lie for the sake of the good and for the Christian church … a lie out of necessity, a useful lie, a helpful lie, such lies would not be against God, he would accept them.”
60

sadunlap

28 June 2012 at 9:28 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment

FWIW Rachel Maddow had an interesting take on this. She pointed out that the same “sort of process” happens on the left as the farther than acceptable lefties sometimes formulate the platform at the state level but more rational heads prevail at the national level.

But here’s the difference: The lefty platforms often prove impractical, out-of-touch with the mainstream (or reality) and make silly promises like free lattes and puppies for everyone. But they are idealist, focused on improving people’s lives, promoting education, etc. Now contrast that with what the farther to the right than acceptable demand in their platforms. Talk about someone going medieval on your ass. Yikes!
61

michaelpowers

29 June 2012 at 9:43 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment

Rebellion against parental authority is part of the process in which children turn into adults. Later, experience and critical thinking skills allow them to tell the difference between a difference of opinion, and teenage angst. What you end up with, is an individual human being with their own thoughts, not some clone of yourself. That’s kind of the point, isn’t it?

When my daughter turned 18, and told me of her plans to be a showgirl in Vegas, my head almost exploded (I may have had a stroke, too. It’s kind of a blur). But end the end, the decision was hers. Luckily, I raised her to think critically. That, and a wise investment in some martial arts training when she was 12, kept her safe. She ended up all but paying for her own college education. Today she has her own career, a good man for a husband, and, someday (if there’s any justice), children that will give her the same number of gray hairs that she gave me.
62

nescafe

29 June 2012 at 10:48 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment

Nice rant. It inspired me to parody the whole damn thing here.