An amusing news item from the BBC website illustrates a real difficulty with censorship.
A devout Baptist couple who bought a Doris Day DVD from a supermarket were shocked to find a sex film instead.
“It was a pretty raunchy, explicit film, it certainly pulled no punches,” Mr Leigh-Browne said.
“My wife and I were very shocked but we watched it until the end because we couldn’t believe what we were seeing.
“The film became progressively more graphic, there was no plot to it, it was just sex.”
Alan and his wife Anne, 60, a retired teacher, complained to Safeway the next day and all copies of The Pajama Game were removed from the store.
What was interesting about this news item was that at the first sign of sex in the film this couple, despite being described as devout Baptists, did not stop watching but kept viewing right through to the end. Although they say they were â€œvery shockedâ€?, they clearly did not feel that they had compromised their souls by seeing this film.
This highlights a practical problem for would-be moralists and censors. In order to keep the world “pure” for the rest of us, they have to believe that they themselves will be uncorrupted by the things they have to view to check for content suitability. But how do we decide a priori who will or won’t be corrupted by this kind of experience? I can understand not allowing children to have free access to certain kinds of material, but how do we choose among adults? I have the feeling that most people, if asked, would say that they can watch such a video without being “harmed”, whether they would freely choose to do so or not.
Also, the news item said the couple complained to Safeway but did not say they actually returned the DVD…