Unjected?


When you are creatively bankrupt, and you want to make money off the internet, what do you do? Make a dating site, the most hackneyed idea of the modern age. The crackpots have created a dating site called “Unjected,” which is exclusively for people who haven’t been vaccinated. Imagine: in addition to getting a venereal disease, you could get measles, polio, covid, smallpox, or ebola from a date! You can trust your partner to be ignorant, deluded, and uninterested in hygiene or good health. If you’re really lucky, maybe you can go on a date with RFK jr!

The only reason they give for wanting to avoid vaccinated people is their slogan, unvaxxed are hotter, a subjective opinion that can have no evidence to back it up. Unless, that is, they mean that the unvaxxed are more likely to run a fever.

I’m not interested in dating ever again, but if I were, education and intelligence would be my major criteria for a partner, and this is a site that excludes that category.

Comments

  1. Reginald Selkirk says

    If you’re really lucky, maybe you can go on a date with RFK jr!

    Would his wife, Cheryl Hines, be coming along as a chaperone?

  2. raven says

    The crackpots have created a dating site called “Unjected,” which is exclusively for people who haven’t been vaccinated.

    This is actually a really great idea.

    It means that the blatantly stupid and crazy people now have a flashing red neon sign on their foreheads that says, “Danger, stay away”.
    Don’t walk away, run.

  3. Hemidactylus says

    A way to filter out the plague rats from your orbit. We the vaxxed get our DNA altered the easier and much safer way thank you very much nutcases. We force our immune systems to do their own research on the stuff that may make you sicker or kill you.

    I wonder what the unjected think of tetany or preventable cancers. Higher chances of dementia. Iron lungs. Blissfully unaware.

  4. stuffin says

    Shouldn’t that read “the uninjected?”

    So, they plan on narrowing the gene pool further and transmitted deadly diseases to one another. What could go wrong?

  5. zetopan says

    Since ha has had 3 marriages and over 40 affairs, which he brags about, the potential “chaperones” would constitute a crowd. As well as not actually being able to stop him, he even propositions women at his phony “Children’s Health Defense” “nonprofit” that helped to make him so wealthy.
    https://www.sheknows.com/entertainment/articles/3111886/rfk-jr-three-women-alleged-affairs/
    https://ew.com/biggest-bombshells-from-new-rfk-jr-book-11950880

  6. Hemidactylus says

    stuffin @4
    Problem is their recklessness will make the vaccinated sicker. Vaccines vary in effectiveness. Much of the benefit comes from herd immunity.

    The more measles becomes prevalent, the higher the chance a vaccinated person contracts the virus and becomes sick. Vaccination however long ago will keep them maybe from getting super ill. Has a vaccinated person ever died from measles? Perhaps not:
    https://www.today.com/health/disease/mmr-vaccine-measles-deaths-rcna200097

    They can at least spread it in some cases:
    https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/childhood-vaccines/although-it-s-uncommon-vaccinated-people-can-spread-measles-study-finds

  7. says

    I agree with other commenters that said:
    I hope it succeeds wildly. That may help relieve our decaying society of some absolutely destructive imbeciles!

  8. christoph says

    It’s a movie trailer. I’m pretty sure it’s a parody of unvaxxed dating sites. Although in the current political climate it’s hard to tell.

  9. birgerjohansson says

    Addendum. Encourage them to get guns and tell them holsters are for sissies. As they stick their magnum 44s inside their belts we can look forward to the gene pool getting improved.

  10. Hemidactylus says

    Not exactly sure what’s getting weeded out in the gene pool of the ignorant and gullible, by unjected unfortunately dying due to preventable illnesses. Getting close to eugenics rhetoric there…

    They do miss out on exploiting the neat evolutionary trick which gives our immune systems the ability to make up for the vastly different generation times between microbes and us known as adaptive immunity. Vaccines help weed out immunocyte genetic variants that aren’t quite matched to injected antigens and the surviving populations in B cells get more finely tuned by matching their antibody genes to potential pathogens. Pathogens can do the same thing as vaccines but at much greater cost in illness, suffering, and potential death.

    In some cases measles can clean the slate on immune memory. Not a good place to be. Amnesia.

    Stuff like SARS-CoV-2 seems to be awakening dormant viruses previously held at bay.

    https://www.science.org/content/article/covid-19-can-wake-dormant-viruses-body-large-study-confirms

  11. John Morales says

    christoph, easy enough to check. So I just did.
    I see it’s both a site (apps for Android and for Apple) and a prospective promotional movie.

    They are crowdfunding it: Goal $100,000 USD, Raised $1,887 USD
    (https://www.givesendgo.com/unjected)

    Quite niche, of course.

    I pity the fools (heh) who use/used it, but:
    https://www.theverge.com/2022/7/25/23277788/unjected-anti-vax-dating-debug-mode-data-covid

    Anti-vax dating site exposed data for 3,500 users through ‘debug mode’ bug
     
    Anyone could become an administrator of “Unjected” if they knew where to look

  12. stuffin says

    @7 – Hemidactylus

    According to your linked articles I am not too concerned.

    -Measles infections after vaccination are rare, and there are no documented cases of healthy, fully vaccinated people dying from the virus.

    -Breakthrough infections are very rare but do happen — usually because the person did not develop an immune response after vaccination (rare in healthy people) or their immunity waned over time.

    -Measles transmissions from vaccinated cases, although relatively uncommon, must be considered in public health investigations, as such transmissions can contribute to outbreaks.

    -The most common symptoms among the 19 transmitters with symptom information were rash (16 people), fever (11) and cough (11). Most vaccinated people who spread measles experienced milder symptoms and a shorter illness than those who weren’t vaccinated. Most often, cough, breathing, or talking likely caused measles to spread.

    I’m guessing these last statements means transmission from infected vaccinated people is to unvaccinated people (causing the potential outbreak).

  13. indianajones says

    Fucking plague rats. Imagine claiming to be worried about a tyrannical government that will hunt you down while at the same time putting yourself into a data base that will last forever? When this data base is leaked, and it inevitably will be, it will be a great way to eliminate an awful lot of plague rats from a lot of private lives and public places. You signed up here voluntarily? You don;t get to be served/employed/treated/whatever here.

    AND a great list of people to be first into the quarantine gulags when a real plague, again inevitably, comes along.

    A sane society would take all these people and force vaccinate them against the everything right now so as to protect the rest of us. Then any disease caused by them in the past would be investigated , they would be charged with murder or attempted murder for starters and we could work out the rest of the list later. But that’s too much to hope for.

    These irresponsible swine are the worst. More so than Magats or Nazis or anyone else. Simply because theirs is a body count that is so easy to tabulate and verify. They’ll be extra hot after I brand ’em with their vaccine certificates right on their antivax foreheads. In Minecraft or a sane society.

  14. John Morales says

    A sane society would take all these people and force vaccinate them against the everything right now so as to protect the rest of us.

    That is equivalent to claiming ‘A sane society must be coercive so as to protect the rest of us.’, which is, um, adjacent to certain authoritarian values.

  15. microraptor says

    christoph @12: Remember last summer when RFK Jr posted pictures and videos of himself swimming in a sewage-contaminated stream with his grandchildren?

  16. roughcanuk says

    They are obsessed and delusional. Pure blood and pure semen, not that they have any way of telling either apart from a sample from someone who has been vaccinated.

  17. christoph says

    @ microraptor, # 17. Yep, I remember that. And yet a lot of MAGA types still think he’s a good choice for his job at HHS.

  18. stevewatson says

    @15: Bodily autonomy — which includes consent and refusal of medical intervention — is an important value. You may be aware of a certain other hot button issue that it applies to. We don’t get to invoke or ignore such values based on whether we agree with the consequences for particular cases.

  19. Akira MacKenzie says

    @ 21

    Let me put it another way:

    Taking away a woman’s reproductive rights or a trans person’s access to gender-affirming care is BAD.

    Forcing people to take a vaccine to protect the population from life threatening diseases is GOOD.

    What’s that? Hypocrisy? Double-standards? Authoritarian?

    I really don’t give a fuck.

  20. Jazzlet says

    Akira @#21
    I’d say it’s balancing the rights of the individual against the rights of the community they live in, and I come down on ‘vaccinate or you don’t get the right to interact freely with your community.’

  21. StevoR says

    @22. Akira MacKenzie : Yup. Spot on.

    Social contract. We live in a society and we agree to not jeopardise others and live by certain reasonable rules like, among others, don’t threaten other peoples lives by being fucking douchebag reality / science deniers.

    If someone poses a threat to the rest of us by choosing so poorly that their choice puts the lives of amy other people in danger needlessly then, well, we stop them doing that.

    Your freedom to swing your fist in the air / choose to spread virii and other pathogens end at my nose / body.

    if your behaviour puts the lives of others in society at risk especially without their consent, well, NO, you do NOT get to get away with that.

    Oh and two words here :

    Typhoid Mary.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Mallon

    You don’t get the freedom to choose which side or the middle of the road you drive on or to be mentally impaired or unlicensed at the wheel of vehicles. You shouldNOT get the choice to ignore epidemiological reality and spead potentially fatal diseases to ohsr who did not choose to risk death by contact with willfully ignorant reality deniers.

  22. StevoR says

    PS. I’d give them a choice – get vaccinated or get out and don’t coem back unless you do choose toget vaccinated.

    Don’t want the vaccine? Then then you don’t get to live here – find somehwere else to go. That simple.

    Exile as an option – voluntary or compulsory – does seem under rated these days. Maybe the ancient Athenians were on to something there?..

  23. StevoR says

    I’d even extend that to science deniers and thsoe that lad misinfo / disinfo campaigns generally ideally.

    Also, yeah, I’m tired now & yeah, hit submit instead of preview again. Hope y’alll get the gist anyhow.

    Being part of a society – and looked after by that – means you don;t always get to be a totally selfish douche who ignores the intrests of everyone else in society and causes them harm or risk of that. Ethics #101 I’d have thought.

  24. StevoR says

    @ ^ Fix : lad = spread.

    Those that spread misinfo / disinfo knowingly and run campaigns doing such to advance their own intrests at everyone else’s expense and risk.

    Yes, denyng reality and lying about it should b considered a crime at leats in some contexts where doing so leads to serious harm and risk of that to everyone else. .

  25. stevewatson says

    @22 et al: I was certainly in favour of the kind of vaccine mandates implemented during covid — health care, certain other workplaces, etc. And I’d make a point of avoiding the unvaxxed, and maybe tell them why — social penalties are also appropriate. But coerced medical treatment? That’s a bridge too far.

  26. Rob Grigjanis says

    stevewatson @29: Maybe I’m missing something, but how are vaccine mandates (even if only for certain people) not coerced medical treatment? (and absolutely justified coerced treatment, IMO).

  27. Rob Grigjanis says

    John, ‘forced’ (in the physical sense of tying down, etc) is not the same as ‘coerced’.

    “I will fire you unless you do X” is not forcing by your definition, but it certainly is coercion.

  28. John Morales says

    Semantics are my playground, Rob, and I did not provide an idiosyncratic definition.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coercion

    One can argue that not all coercion is forcing, but surely all forcing is coercion. Categories.
    Right? Physical forcing (vis absoluta) and coercive forcing (vis compulsiva) are both forcing, but what what I quoted @16 is clearly the former.

  29. stevewatson says

    ….and I unfortunately used “coerced”. OK, let’s not get tied up in arguments over definitions: I am in favour of enforcing vaccination through social and employment (including for this purpose, school attendance) penalties, against actually imprisoning people or physically restraining them to administer the shot.

  30. indianajones says

    Looks like others have said what I wanted to say to defend my 15 pretty adequately. Ta guys, partic Akira, as usual. I’d force, tie down, whatever, all anti vaxxers. To equate this to forced abortion or eugenics (not here, but seen it by anti-vaxxers) is contemptibly idiotic, the false equivalence does not need explaining.

    @stevewatson in particular: When your loved one dies of a preventable plague talk to me then. Or go look at a video of a dying 2 month old whooping cough victim. When that’s your kid, bleat about ‘forced medical interventions’ then. Too emotional, how dare I? Stevor beat me to it, but Typhoid Mary was a literal asymptomatic carrier who refused to get treated. Killed an obvious and countable bunch of people who would otherwise be alive and well. The stereo-type comes from an actual thing that happened. Body. Count. In the millions for COVID, and that was/is the training wheels version of what is inevitably coming.

  31. indianajones says

    I feel similarly as I do to anti abortion protestors outside clinics

    Protestor: ‘But my freedom of speech is being infringed’
    Judge: ‘Yeah dude, that’s what happens when you harass vulnerable young women on what might well be the worst day of their life. Fucking deal with it. Next!’

  32. Hemidactylus says

    I lean toward heavy handedness when it comes to vaccine policy. Measles outbreaks are getting ridiculous and at some point can’t we say parents who refuse to vaccinate their own kids are negligent and endangering their lives? Shouldn’t someone step in to protect the kids from parental ignorance?

    COVID was pretty bad for older people, but let’s say we get a future influenza, coronavirus, or other pandemic where the pathogen has a 30-50%+ kill rate. There’s a decently effective vaccine developed yet people are spreading lies and refusing to get vaccinated. Should they be forcefully coerced violating their precious rights and body fluids?

  33. indianajones says

    @37 Hemidactylus Why wait? They should be forced right now! Because right now they are being wilful petri dishes for pathogens that are mutating, as opposed to dying, as we speak. They are walking death labs. IMO we were lucky that COVID mostly got more transmissible instead of more deadly, No thanks to the religious and the stupid who flouted crowd mandates. First to get the tie down and blow dart treatment for mine.

  34. StevoR says

    @36. indianajones : “Protestor: ‘But my freedom of speech is being infringed’
    Judge: ‘Yeah dude, that’s what happens when you harass vulnerable young women on what might well be the worst day of their life. Fucking deal with it. Next!’”

    Me to the anti-choice protestors: Your freedom to speech is NOT bein infringed – your NOT-a-right to harass and attack others is being prevented. Speak all you like but elsewhere NOT where you are causing problems for others who have their right to peace, security and respect. Oh and stop lying and bullying others.

    Also note you have the right to bodily autonomy, everyone does. You get to decide for yourself for your body but you do NOT get to control someone else’s body. What’s so hard to understand about that?

  35. StevoR says

    On that bodily autonomy question regarding anti-vaxxers; they have the right to their bodily autonomy but so too does everyone else.

    Again, the “right to swing fists in air ending at other people’s noses” principle applies if your choices threaten the bodily autonomy of others, then you don’t get to do that at least not in society.

    Choosing not to get vaccinated is like to choosing to drive on the wrong side or right in the middle of the road.

    You don’t get to legally do that because it puts the lives of others as well as just yourself at high risk.

    So iof you don’t get vaccinated then you face the conseqeucnes which should keep you away form everyone else and prevent you from harming them imfringing ontheir bodiuly autonomy to not get sick potentially fatally. So total physical isolation and social pressure wuld be my suggestion along with education and, well, what they did to Typhoid Mary. Prevntative imprisonment until they decide to dothe right thing. Or exile somewhere else preferably far away from all others until they see reason and agree to respect everyone elses right to not have their live sput at risk by wilful plague carriers by choice.

  36. John Morales says

    TLDR; “It’s for the greater good”.

    Unapologetic people demanding forced vaccinations are basically voting for the face-eating leopard party normalising forced precautionary measures, creating a structural precedent that future governments will use to restrict further personal liberties. Habituation is pernicious.

    (I could do a reductio but if my point is still opaque, there is not much point)

    cf. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/political-science/articles/10.3389/fpos.2022.929991/full

    Becoming authoritarian for the greater good? Authoritarian attitudes in context of the societal crises of COVID-19 and climate change

  37. Silentbob says

    @ Morales

    Histrionic slippery slope argument. Stevo nailed it

    Choosing not to get vaccinated is like to choosing to drive on the wrong side or right in the middle of the road.

    Unless you’re going to argue road rules “normalise forced precautionary measures, creating a structural precedent that future governments will use to restrict further personal liberties”, you can consider your argument refuted.

  38. John Morales says

    StevoR, “You don’t get the freedom to choose which side or the middle of the road you drive on or to be mentally impaired or unlicensed at the wheel of vehicles.”

    Actually, you do. Sure, there are consequences, but you are not physically constrained and forced to drive properly.

    Right? Coercion via punishment, but not forcing.

    It’s really not that complicated. Concept at hand is physical autonomy.
    Punishment for breaching road rules/vaccine rules, one thing.

    (Obs, some people don’t get that distinction, but there it is nonetheless)

  39. lotharloo says

    Vaccination is also one of the areas where liberal and leftist Americans have generally lost their mind and have become mad. Forced vaccination is violation of personal freedom and bodily autonomy. Even coerced vaccination borders on that. Obviously, this is only with respect to the adults.

  40. erik333 says

    They might earn a decent buck on the side/main hustle of selling user data to insurance companies.

  41. erik333 says

    @40 StevoR
    Ising that same argument you could say nobody should be allowed to walk outside at all. Vaccinated or not, you’re a vector for disease.

  42. indianajones says

    @erik333 @46 No, And it is obvious why.

    @lotharloo @44 Yes, it is ‘violation of personal freedom and bodily autonomy’. I don’t care. So are most crimes taken to their extreme. Stupid driving will get you in jail, too. Lots of things will get you restrained. Forced vaccination is not unprecedented, nor should it be. Ok erik333, I have changed my mind, I’ll indulge you with the obvious. If you don’t take reasonable measures to minimise your vectoricity in the face of known and extreme risk to others under your own steam, then yeah, you don’t get to walk around. Outside, inside or anywhere else. Cos yr a wilful fucking plague rat.

    Suppose one has to paint a power pole

    Ever done any Occ Health and Safety training erik333? In Australia, one does ones best, by law, to minimise hazards. So, painting a power pole. One of the big metal ones, 66kV or whatever. E.S.I.A.P First option is Elimination. Don’t do the painting at all. If not that then Substitution. Substitute the falling hazard by painting via drone. Isolation. Put a physical barrier between you and the power lines. Administration. Train to know what you are doing, have a spotter to know when you are up, when you come down, and to keep an eye on things and respond if something happens. Personal Protective Equipment. Wear an approved harness and hook it on properly.

    Or screw it: Send a kid up there in board shorts with a spray can and hope for the best. That’s the difference. Capiche?

  43. indianajones says

    Oops, it’s been a few years for me, I forgot Engineering, between Isolation and Administration. Umm, in this case a safety switch on the power lines so if you do earth them it kills the power in less than a 50th of a second. Not used cos in this case (66kV) you’d be dead anyway, but it’s just an example to demonstrate the wider point.

  44. lotharloo says

    @indianajones

    I have no idea what that deranged drivel that you wrote means. It certainly does not help your case against my argument that Covid made a lot of American liberals lose their fucking mind to think it’s okay for a government to forcefully inject it’s citizens with medications that they don’t want.

  45. indianajones says

    @49 It should be ok ‘for a government to forcefully inject it’s citizens’ rather than let them go around endangering others to the point of killing them in some pretty impressively nasty ways. If you disagree, fine. I suggest you do better than calling it deranged drivel or accusing people of losing their minds though.

    Or if that’s the bit you didn’t understand, then very very quickly: OH&S legislation says, approximately, that everyone shall take reasonable measures to ensure everyone don’t hurt themselves. The regulations that sit under the legislation and are drafted to give guidance to everyone how to do it say ESIEAP. And if you don’t follow the regulations, that breaches the legislation and bet yr arse that you can go to jail for that and that everyone will be forced to follow rules. I’d treat vaccines the same way. Only instead of jail, it’d be a jab. With a lollipop to follow so as to make you feel better about the lil booboo.

  46. John Morales says

    indianajones:

    @49 It should be ok ‘for a government to forcefully inject it’s citizens’

    … or to forcefully sterilise them, or to forcefully lobotomise them, or to forcefully inseminate them*.
    It is the very justification used for eugenics, you know.

    You clearly missed my point about principles, you have gone full utilitarian.
    Those are historic examples, for the ‘greater good’, and it is people like you that enable that, by endorsing the practice.

    * https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/RelatedRecords/CR2022_01224.PDF

  47. Silentbob says

    There’s a lot of nonsense being talked in this thread about “forcefully injecting”, lol.

    No. But there is this concept of the “social contract”. Don’t want to vaccinate? Fine. Bye. You don’t get to use public roads, schools, hospitals, police, fire department, currency. These things are for people who sign up to the social contract that you don’t knowingly endanger others.

    Don’t like it? Fine. No probs. Fuck off and live in the wilderness. You are not welcome in society.

  48. Silentbob says

    No one is making you vaccinate. You choose whether you will do the bare minimum to be accepted in society or not.

  49. lotharloo says

    @Silentbob:

    You are another brain dead American leftist. Covid has broken your brain if you think that is a reasonable position.

    You also misunderstand the concept of social contract.

    In a free society, people are allowed to have wrong opinions, be suspicious of medical companies and so on.

    You don’t get to force your way down their throat.

  50. Tethys says

    Silentbob isn’t American, they are Aussie.

    I’m fine with government having vaccination as a prerequisite for school attendance, traveling internationally, being a member of the military, etc…

    I’m not ok with forced vaccinations. Public education is a much better method, as was done with making polio vaccination a public health issue. It would be more effective to enact some criminal penalties for pushing misinformation. Lying that results in dead people shouldn’t be protected by free speech.

Leave a Reply