The attack of the mega-farm!


A local dairy proposed building the largest herd of cows in the entire state of Minnesota right here in my county — a massive enterprise that would suck our aquifer dry and turn the water into giant stinking fecal pools that will breed more flies. Much of the local population is opposed, and Riverview Dairy has never made a case for why we need so much milk. I was motivated to attend a packed meeting of Stevens County officials where they were considering giving the dairy a permit.

The outcome of the meeting was that the county officials did not issue a permit, but adjourned to think about it. At the time, I made a prophecy.

In the end, a small group of old white men, the planning commission, will retreat into a meeting room and make the decision, and I predict that they will decide that Riverview doesn’t need any more studies of their environmental impact. The county has a total population of 10,000, and this one dairy operation will be pumping out waste equivalent to the output of a city of 750,00 people, but we’ll just let them do their thing and then find out the consequences. Short-sightedness will win again.

Am I a true prophet? The Land Stewardship Project shares the latest news.

On Tuesday, Sept. 1, Stevens County officials approved Riverview’s conditional use permit for the proposed West River Dairy expansion near Morris. This decision largely clears the way for what will become the largest concentrated animal feeding operation (CAFO) in Minnesota history. Once completed, this 18,855-cow facility will be more than 60 times the size of the average Minnesota dairy.

The county’s approval comes after farmers and other rural residents expressed deep concerns over the past several months about the potential environmental and economic impacts of this facility. More than 1,400 people submitted official public comments about West River Dairy to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), and 1,140 people signed LSP’s petition calling for a full environmental impact statement (EIS).

Despite deep community concerns regarding incomplete local water data, massive water usage (319 million gallons per year), and 250 million gallons of liquid manure storage near impaired waterways, local officials declined to impose protective groundwater conditions. We are deeply disappointed in the county commissioners’ decision.

I have a gift.

Comments

  1. trevorn says

    You may have a gift, but I expect the elderly white men on the planning commission got bigger ones

  2. flex says

    As I commented at the time, having been on the other side of that table, I suspect the County received advice from their lawyers that they couldn’t defend a lawsuit by West River Dairy to force the County to accept their proposal. The choice they made was probably between granting conditional approval or using $100,000 of the Counties money to fight, and losing the battle in court. What the choice they made correct? I can’t say. But that was probably the choice they were offered.

    However, that doesn’t mean that the project is going to progress. If the MPCA does get involved they can order an EIS and delay the project for several years. Just because conditional approval was granted doesn’t stop state or federal agencies from getting involved and halting a project. As I wrote before, if the County has enough evidence they can take to court, to defend the inevitable lawsuit seeking to overturn their decision, they may revoke their conditional approval. Conditional approval does not mean ground-breaking, it’s a limbo where details will still need to be worked out. It avoids a court order which would force the County to accept while also avoiding giving full approval to move ahead. If you know you are going to lose a battle, don’t fight.

    I faced similar decisions on a few occasions when I was a Township Trustee, and I’ve watched neighboring communities do the same. There was a huge Pulte subdivision development which was intended to go into the township just north of us, it was granted conditional approval, on the condition they had a proper human waste disposal system. In the last six years nothing has happened because no surrounding community is willing (and in some cases they are unable) to accept the waste from this development. Pulte has floated the idea of a force main through my township, which we managed to kill in the courts. They have suggested building a processing plant on site, which has been rejected, and they have even looked at creating a holding take and using weekly trucks to move it to a processing plant. They even dug the hole for that. But none of that was ultimately approved.

    It probably is not over yet.

  3. cheerfulcharlie says

    Google claims that last year 22 people in the U.S. lost their lives to cows. An angry 600 pound cow is no laughing matter. Stay safe.

  4. raven says

    Now that this 18,855 cow dairy facility is approved, it is time for the next project.
    Could I interest Stevens county in an AI mega-data center?

    The huge size of this animal feeding facility seems out of place with a single county.
    “…massive water usage (319 million gallons per year), and 250 million gallons of liquid manure storage near impaired waterways, local officials declined to impose protective groundwater conditions. ”

    The burden of proof that the groundwater, water table, in that area can support withdrawing 319 million gallons per year should be on the Riverview dairy. Every year for the foreseeable future. If it can’t, what will happen is that all the rural household water wells around the area will go dry and any farmers using groundwater irrigation will see the same.
    It costs tens of thousands of dollars to redo a dry well.

    This is what has happened in a lot of rural areas such as in Oklahoma and central California.

    Really, the Stevens county commissioners should just issue them a conditional permit for 1, 800 cows and tell them to spread the other 16,000 + cows more evenly around Minnesota and the surrounding states.

  5. raven says

    South Dakota is the next state west from Minnesota.

    Shallow wells running dry across western South Dakota as drought enters worst stretch in memory
    September 3, 2026 / 4:13 PM CDT / AP CBS News

    Each morning this summer, Gordon and Connie Howie have awoken on their cattle ranch in central Pennington County and turned on the kitchen faucet, unsure if any water will come out.

    “We can’t do laundry or dishes or take showers other than with a little trickle,” said Connie Howie, 76. “Other times we have a little water because it seems to come and go.”

    Like many ranchers and residents in rural areas of western South Dakota, the Howie family relies on a well to provide them with water for their lives and livelihood.

    But this year, perhaps the worst in recent memory, many shallow wells are running slow or have gone completely dry, forcing people to go to great lengths and expense to provide clean water for themselves or their livestock — a pattern that has also played out in other drought-hit parts of the country, including California’s Central Valley, where farm wells have been drying up.

    and
    All across the plains of western South Dakota, some residents who rely on shallow wells — generally 1,000 feet deep or less — are being forced to find alternative water sources.
    and
    Gordon Howie said he expects a sizable bill for the project, with well drilling costing about $100 per foot and possibly a new pump ranging from $20,000 to $50,000.

    This is the future for a lot of rural areas every where in the USA.

    Drier climate, hotter summers, more wells pumping from the aquifers, what could go wrong?
    Wells are drying up in a many places in the USA.

    In this article they are calling shallow wells, anything that goes down up to 1,000 feet.
    A thousand foot well is going to cost $100,000 according to this article. Even a well that deep might not produce enough water.

Leave a Reply