It’s an online awards thing that is accepting nominations and votes online — another online poll, in other words. I always feel brutish and clumsy around these phenomena, so it is with trepidation that I mention the The Skeptic Awards 2011 — it’s a poll for a good cause, increasing skepticism, and it’s one I’d rather not damage. You’ll vote your conscience, right?
Dec 14 2011
Who is your favorite skeptic?
This post has no tag
Comments have been disabled.
DONORS CHOOSE CHALLENGE
About the Author
Freethought Blogs
- A Million Gods
- Ace of Clades
- Alethian Worldview
- Almost Diamonds
- Ashley Miller
- Biodork
- Black Skeptics
- Blag Hag
- Brute Reason
- Butterflies and Wheels
- Comradde PhysioProffe
- Dispatches from the Culture Wars
- En Tequila Es Verdad
- Greta Christina's Blog
- Heteronormative Patriarchy for Men
- Lousy Canuck
- Mano Singham
- Maryam Namazie
- Nirmukta on FTB
- No Country for Women
- Pharyngula
- Reasonable Doubts
- Richard Carrier Blogs
- Rock Beyond Belief
- The Atheist Experience
- The Crommunist Manifesto
- The Digital Cuttlefish
- The Indelible Stamp
- The Zingularity
- This Week in Christian Nationalism
- YEMMYnisting
- Zinnia Jones
PostsCommentsArchives
Recent Posts
- And once it’s fracked, vomit it over the landscape
- Go frack this poll
- We’re all doomed now
- Putting the profit in rape
- I wish there really were a tree of the knowledge of good and evil
- Everything is officially manly now
- A quick note
- Skepticon makes a principled sacrifice
- A child can see through it
- Darn UK show-offs
Recent Comments
- unbound on And once it’s fracked, vomit it over the landscape
- throwaway, extra beefy super queasy on Skepticon makes a principled sacrifice
- chrislawson on Failing upwards
- Chris Clarke on Go frack this poll
- Jacob Schmidt on Skepticon makes a principled sacrifice
Archives
FTB RecentFTB Active
FTB Recent
- Fighting evil by promoting the good by Martin Wagner
- Alleged Klansmen arrested for trying to sell homemade ray gun to synagogue by Stephen "DarkSyde" Andrew
- Tell Kickstarter Not To Fund This Gross Book About How To Get Laid By Assaulting Women by Miri, Professional Fun-Ruiner
- Forced birther, gun nut, & secessionist by Stephen "DarkSyde" Andrew
- What does 'IHS' stand for? by Mano Singham
- CDC reports HPV vaccine working as predicted by Stephen "DarkSyde" Andrew
FTB Active
- More documenting the harassment by Ophelia Benson
- Just how racist is America? by PZ Myers
- Malestrom pt 1: The rights and wrongs of anger by Ally Fogg
- An Open Letter to the Center for Inquiry, Withdrawing My Participation and Support by Greta Christina
- Why Your Daughter's Marriage Shouldn't Be Your Biggest Dream For Her by Anita J
- News from down under: the TRUE skeptical women side with the guys! by Jason Thibeault
Profile
Frequently Read Threads
Commenting Rules
The Desert Tortoises With Boltcutters Civility Pledge
[Introductions]: Meet the other commenters
The [Lounge]: a safe space; friendly chat; moderated
The [Thunderdome]: no-holds-barred unmoderated chaos

PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
• my calendar
• Nature Network
• RichardDawkins Network
• MySpace
• Atheist Nexus
• the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)
•
![]()
Chris Clarke is a science and natural history writer, editor, and
environmental protection activist in Joshua Tree, California.
• Coyote Crossing
• my writing
at KCET
• Desert Biodiversity
• Facebook
• Twitter
• Google
Plus
• Walking
With Zeke
• Walking
With Zeke (iBookstore)
Recent Comments
- unbound on And once it’s fracked, vomit it over the landscape
- throwaway, extra beefy super queasy on Skepticon makes a principled sacrifice
- chrislawson on Failing upwards
- Chris Clarke on Go frack this poll
- Jacob Schmidt on Skepticon makes a principled sacrifice
- John Horstman on And once it’s fracked, vomit it over the landscape
- jerthebarbarian on Go frack this poll
- throwaway, extra beefy super queasy on Hey, Ken Ham: don’t run away!
- LykeX on Putting the profit in rape
- Amphiox on I wish there really were a tree of the knowledge of good and evil
- carlie on A quick note
- ischemgeek on Putting the profit in rape
- carlie on [Lounge #422]
- John Morales on Hey, Ken Ham: don’t run away!
- Tony! The Virtual Queer Shoop on [Lounge #422]




20 comments
Skip to comment form ↓
Glen Davidson
14 December 2011 at 10:49 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Can’t announce it without influencing it, can’t refuse to announce it, either.
Glen Davidson
Marcus Ranum
14 December 2011 at 10:51 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
One would think that skeptics would know better than to have an online poll regarding skepticism…
Sextus Empiricus FTW!
michaelcarson
14 December 2011 at 11:00 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
ah. nope.
Dick the Damned
14 December 2011 at 11:03 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
How about the Pope, the chief Rabbi, the head Ayatollah, the Dalai Lama, ….? They’re all skeptics, some of the time. Nahhhhhh. I guess those goobers don’t really qualify.
Emrysmyrddin
14 December 2011 at 11:30 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Sorry, PZ, I have to go with some UK bloggers and podcasters – you’re famous enough, my dear :)
crocswsocks
14 December 2011 at 11:34 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
“Conscience”?
Dave, the Kwisatz Haderach
14 December 2011 at 11:46 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
I did vote my conscience, and I voted Pharyngula. I’m not just being a loyal member of the horde, this blog has easily been my top most visited this year. Sorry PZ, it isn’t just your brilliant posts and magnificent facial hair, its the community and the commenters here as well.
a3kr0n
14 December 2011 at 11:46 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
I’ll have to do this later at home. They want you to work at this thing!
Brownian
14 December 2011 at 1:59 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
What have I ever done to give you idea that I have one, PZ?
Zugswang
14 December 2011 at 2:27 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
I nominated Skepchick, for unwittingly, but quite necessarily, bringing an unpleasant fact into the light – a misguided sense of privilege that persists amongst some skeptics, and being the impetus for widespread introspection on this issue.
PZ Myers
14 December 2011 at 2:34 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Don’t apologize! I tried hard to make it clear that I’m not dispatching a mob of minions to exercise my will on this poll.
I actually voted for Skepchick, too.
celeste
14 December 2011 at 2:43 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Normally you would have my vote, but this year JT Eberhard tackled mental health AND polyamory…just wow.
(I feel like a bad little lurker though. You’ll get the next vote, I promise!)
Abbot nigelTheBold of the Hoppist Monks
14 December 2011 at 2:53 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
I cannot vote, as I am my favorite skeptic.
Maybe I can vote for my second favorite, though.
Rey Fox
14 December 2011 at 3:05 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
The Man in the Shack.
sansscience
14 December 2011 at 7:48 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
I went over to the Skeptic Awards website and was looking at the cartoons across the top banner when I noticed that they are all male. I don’t know why this is, eg that as a society we’re more inclined to put men up on a pedestal and make them famous, or that women are less likely to put themselves forward. I don’t know. I’m not normally a whinging feminist or anything, it just seems a bit wrong that 8/8 people who represent ‘pursuing truth through reason and evidence’ are male; is there not even one female who fits this description?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2011/dec/04/why-british-public-life-dominated-men
macallan
14 December 2011 at 8:10 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
I’m an atheist, what’s this ‘conscience’ you mentioned? :p
Classical Cipher, Murmur Muris, OM
14 December 2011 at 9:03 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Voted for skepchick.
You can fuck off.
sansscience
15 December 2011 at 2:53 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Yeah, poor hasty choice of words. And thank you for so politely pointing that out. I guess I was just being a bit defensive – in my otherwise egalitarian workplace there’s one thing likely to provoke a disagreement, that will split along gender lines, and it’s the suggestion of inequality for women in science careers. Just a couple of weeks ago at our work christmas party, I and another young woman got stuck in an argument for an hour with our boss for having the audacity to think even using the word ‘feminist’ was okay. And as for the whinging thing – well in Australia complaining equates to the heinous crime of ‘whinging’ (see whinging pom) and some people seem to have a massive hang-up about Germaine Greer – I would never normally dare use the word feminist for fear of having my head bitten off, so, sorry I was defensive, no offense meant.
Oh, and fyi I did vote for a woman – http://www.melbourneskeptics.com.au/past-events/melbourne-skeptics-in-the-pub-june-2011-featuring-dr-rachael-dunlop/
ariamezzo
15 December 2011 at 9:43 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
All those heads are men? James Randi is the only one I recognize, but I thought the 5th person was a woman.
StevoR
15 December 2011 at 10:19 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
FWIW, for me its a tie between Isaac Asimov & Carl Sagan for my all-time favourite skeptics and for living ones, well, PZ Myers and Phil Plait with Randi (who I’ve heard of more than seen / read directly) in third place.