Gotta say, this whole thing is rather unimpressive from a conspiracist point of view.
I see similarities here:
— the 9/11 documents: what’s been declassified is non-convincing either way;
— the UFO (now UAP!) documents: what’s been declassified is non-convincing either way.
The origins of SARS-CoV-2: A critical review. Cell. (published online Aug. 19, 2021) [doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.08.017]
Since the first reports of a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-like coronavirus in December 2019 in Wuhan, China, there has been intense interest in understanding how severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged in the human population. Recent debate has coalesced around two competing ideas: a “laboratory escape” scenario and zoonotic emergence. Here, we critically review the current scientific evidence that may help clarify the origin of SARS-CoV-2.
This should drive the COVID was engineered in a Wuhan lab nut jobs into a veritable frenzy.
Reginald Selkirksays
@1: the UFO (now UAP!) documents: what’s been declassified is non-convincing either way.
I disagree. The recent evidence, i.e. the three military videos released, are truly abysmal. If this is the best evidence in favor of UFOs then I am prepared to rule them out.
Also, I am deeply concerned that no one on the Pentagon understands common photographic artifacts like bokeh.
Gotta say, this whole thing is rather unimpressive from a conspiracist point of view.
I see similarities here:
— the 9/11 documents: what’s been declassified is non-convincing either way;
— the UFO (now UAP!) documents: what’s been declassified is non-convincing either way.
But I do like her take; nicely snarky.
Holmes, E.C., Goldstein, S.A., Rasmussen, A.L., Robertson, D.L., Crits-Christoph, A., Wertheim, J.O., Anthony, S.J., Barclay, W.S., Boni, M.F., Doherty, P.C., Farrar, J., Geoghegan, J.L., Jiang, X., Leibowitz, J.L., Neil, S.J.D., Skern, T., Weiss, S., R, Worobey, M., Anderson, K.G., Garry, R.F. and Rambaut, A. (2021)
The origins of SARS-CoV-2: A critical review. Cell. (published online Aug. 19, 2021) [doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.08.017]
Since the first reports of a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-like coronavirus in December 2019 in Wuhan, China, there has been intense interest in understanding how severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged in the human population. Recent debate has coalesced around two competing ideas: a “laboratory escape” scenario and zoonotic emergence. Here, we critically review the current scientific evidence that may help clarify the origin of SARS-CoV-2.
This should drive the COVID was engineered in a Wuhan lab nut jobs into a veritable frenzy.
I disagree. The recent evidence, i.e. the three military videos released, are truly abysmal. If this is the best evidence in favor of UFOs then I am prepared to rule them out.
Also, I am deeply concerned that no one on the Pentagon understands common photographic artifacts like bokeh.
Siding with Reggie. <a href=" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHDlfIaBEqw"Video effects artists also consider the footage unconvincing.
er, oops