I forgot all about this debate.
These signs will be going up around campus, so I guess I’m committed. Or should be committed.
At least I insisted that “god” needed to be defined, so I’m going to be debating the nonexistence of “an omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent being.” The other side has to defend the absurdly difficult proposition that such a being exists in the absence of any evidence for it, so at least I’ve got that going for me.
I am going up against a philosopher, though, so I dread the haymaker deepities he’ll throw at me.