Wonder why I’ve come to despise debate? Because people who can’t logic their way through a T-maze they’ve run a hundred times before think your refusal to waste time with them is an endorsement.
Are they not aware that the one who makes the assertion, is the one who has to prove the assertion they just made? I may be mistaken but I thought that was how this worked.
rpjohnstonsays
The soundest “logic and reason” for those types is the argument ad cranial chair leg.
But that’s truein context!. You can’t take me out of context, because you’re mis-characterizing my argument. And besides, you’re tedious.
Uh, sorry, I’ve been listening to Sam Harris talks again.
Saadsays
Marcus, #3
That’s some good discourse right there.
cartomancersays
In the civilised parts of the English-speaking world “debate” is not a transitive verb. One debates “with” an interlocutor “about” the topic at hand.
Will nobody think of the poor people slaving away in the preposition mines? They took ages unearthing all those prepositions for you, and now you ignore them?
rpjohnston
I prefer the argumentum ad cricket bat.
wcorvisays
I think if I were called upon to debate with someone, I would stand up and say, “He’s a f*cking idiot. I’ll yield the rest of my time so he can prove me right.”
piscadorsays
wcorvi, #10
Similar to an old tagline I once saw:
“The problem with arguing with idiots is that they drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.”
snuffcurrysays
In the civilised parts of the English-speaking world “debate” is not a transitive verb
In the end, I expect we’ll have debated about that for years, only to reach stalemate. There’ll be those of us that are correct, and then there’ll be sticklers holding close their ahistorical hypercorrections. About this latter point I can’t imagine precisely with whom I shall debate, but to me it seems likely that to me they are probably closer than I expect, perhaps in the next room even, or maybe from me they are further still.
Nemosays
I cringed to see David Corn doing exactly this on The Last Word last night. I forget who he was calling out. But I thought of you, PZ.
Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trollssays
Nemo #13, That was, if IIRC, Rep. Jordan of the OSU wrestling team scandal, who accused Corn of both giving the Steele dossier to the FBI, and receiving the leaked by the FBI Steele dossier to publish in hopes of making hurting Trump in the election. SC in the Political Madness thread posted Corn’s rebuttal.
lakitha tolbert says
Are they not aware that the one who makes the assertion, is the one who has to prove the assertion they just made? I may be mistaken but I thought that was how this worked.
rpjohnston says
The soundest “logic and reason” for those types is the argument ad cranial chair leg.
Marcus Ranum says
But that’s true in context!. You can’t take me out of context, because you’re mis-characterizing my argument. And besides, you’re tedious.
Uh, sorry, I’ve been listening to Sam Harris talks again.
Saad says
Marcus, #3
That’s some good discourse right there.
cartomancer says
In the civilised parts of the English-speaking world “debate” is not a transitive verb. One debates “with” an interlocutor “about” the topic at hand.
Will nobody think of the poor people slaving away in the preposition mines? They took ages unearthing all those prepositions for you, and now you ignore them?
Bronze Dog says
Enjoy this comic, cartomancer: https://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/noun
blf says
The comic is not in Latin, so he may be confused.
wontbehere4long says
This is how I feel about so-called “free speech.” People have lorded it over me for decades to the point that I more than happily reject it.
WMDKitty -- Survivor says
rpjohnston
I prefer the argumentum ad cricket bat.
wcorvi says
I think if I were called upon to debate with someone, I would stand up and say, “He’s a f*cking idiot. I’ll yield the rest of my time so he can prove me right.”
piscador says
wcorvi, #10
Similar to an old tagline I once saw:
“The problem with arguing with idiots is that they drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.”
snuffcurry says
In the end, I expect we’ll have debated about that for years, only to reach stalemate. There’ll be those of us that are correct, and then there’ll be sticklers holding close their ahistorical hypercorrections. About this latter point I can’t imagine precisely with whom I shall debate, but to me it seems likely that to me they are probably closer than I expect, perhaps in the next room even, or maybe from me they are further still.
Nemo says
I cringed to see David Corn doing exactly this on The Last Word last night. I forget who he was calling out. But I thought of you, PZ.
Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says
Nemo #13, That was, if IIRC, Rep. Jordan of the OSU wrestling team scandal, who accused Corn of both giving the Steele dossier to the FBI, and receiving the leaked by the FBI Steele dossier to publish in hopes of making hurting Trump in the election.
SC in the Political Madness thread posted Corn’s rebuttal.
microraptor says
While we’re on the subject of webcomics, I’m not sure if this is funny or too realistic: http://ffn.nodwick.com/?p=1770