I blame Jason Colavito. He told me to look up the Solutrean hypothesis, and I did, and now I can’t unsee it — this stuff is flamingly racist, stupid, and wrong.
Here is the shit. The ‘hypothesis’ is that 20,000 years ago, white Europeans, the Solutreans, peacefully settled in the empty wilderness of North America (there is no evidence for any of this). And then…
And it was the American Indians who came way later, ten thousand years later, around 10,000 BC, crossing over from Siberia into Alaska and then down through Canada to what is now the USA. It was those American Indians from Asia, a merciless, slant-eyed people related to the Mongols, a race given to horrific tortures and genocides, who killed them off, just as the Asiatic Indians did horrific tortures to American pioneers in the 1600s, 1700s and 1800s, and Asians committed indescribable atrocities to white soldiers, sailors and marines during WWII in the Pacific, during the Korean War and the Vietnam War.
You may close your mouth now. I know you’re sitting there slack-jawed with shock.
We didn’t know about the horrors that Asians committed against pure, white European peoples because, as this bozo claims, the
jew-owned press won’t publish it. However, he has no evidence for any of the above — there is no archaeological evidence of an advanced Aryan culture inhabiting the Americas 20,000 years ago, nor evidence that non-white people are more savage than Europeans; I think the Nazis are a persuasive counter-example. There is also no evidence for this story:
The Amerindians from Asia unfortunately prevailed over our kinfolk, the Solutreans in North America, who had immensely superior technology, but only by sheer weight of numbers. Man for man, then, as now…..our people were immensely more advanced in technology, and our women incomparably more beautiful.
Wait, how does he know that these non-existent women were more beautiful? Where is the evidence of “superior technology”?
Most of his myth seems to be derived from a 2005 Discovery Channel “documentary”, which employed white Canadians to play the role of European settlers of the continent, and we all know how reliable those are.
And what about this claim that the Solutreans were smarter than Asians? More stereotyping and bogus pseudoscience. This gets even uglier.
Today, the IQ of Amerindians is the same as that of American blacks, about 75. The average white IQ is 100, and our race has produced many geniuses far beyond that, with IQs in the 140s or 160s. In ten thousand years after the Amerindians genocided almost all of the original white Solutreans in North America, after wiping out the spark of civilization and invention that we represented, they never invented a written language, never even invented the WHEEL, or learned to hoist a sail to help their canoes plow through ten thousand years of windy waters, and they never found any use for the metals in which North America abounds, such as copper and iron. They just stared at them as a buffalo stares at a star. The red man talks slow not because he is wise, but because he is dull. And he won by brutality and sheer quantity.
Oh dog make it stop. This is pure garbage. The only places you find this crap about sub-normal Indian IQs is on racist websites, like VDARE or Rense. I teach at a university with a significant proportion of Indian students — they don’t have an intelligence two standard deviations below the mean of our white students, nor do they exhibit significant cognitive impairments.
The clearest examples of a mainstream, average people exhibiting severe deficiencies in reasoning or comprehension seem to be found among white people, on racist web sites like that, or at Trump rallies.
It’s the kind of person featured in this video clip.