Dinesh D’Souza is coming back to the big screen, with a new movie called Hillary’s America. It looks like a real loser. Watch for his persecution complex; the trailer includes clips of poor Dinesh in prison, surrounded by angry burly biker-type dudes, and looking rather pathetic. It all began when the Obama administration tried to shut me up,
he says. It doesn’t mention that it wasn’t to shut him up, but to punish him for blatant violations of campaign finance laws. It also doesn’t mention, perhaps because it would diminish the drama of those scary gangsta dudes, that his sentence was served on probation. He wasn’t put in prison.
It’s all about those perfidious Democrats. The first words:
Who are these Democrats?
Then come scenes of the KKK and Andrew Jackson and corrupt politicians (didn’t I already tell you that Neiwert had rebutted that lie?), and it ends with the liberals’ dramatic scheme.
What if their plan was to…steal America?
Hang on there, Dinesh. You do realize that liberals already have as much right to America as you do, don’t you? We don’t have to steal it, we just have to share it.
Oh, well. One more movie I can skip.
What if their plan was to…steal America?
See, D’Souza wasn’t breaking campaign finance laws – he was trying to steal it back.
I kind of was hoping the administration had shut him up. But mostly because the dumbass shit he says grates on my nerves. I’m disappointed to learn that he’s still a thing.
No much how much duck tape (or gaffer’s tape or <insert favourite tape here> tape) you use, the expelled vapidity would eventually leak out. It’s tempting to try and tap it as a source of energy, but having no substance, being comprised of nothing, you’d have better success tapping neutrinos.
Is this a remake?
I hate remakes.
This must be an example of what Shermer told the judge was D’Souza’s contribution to our society’s exchange of ideas.
chigua @3:
Worse, I think it’s a sequel.
Remake of a yet-to-made sequel?
I was just a little surprised to see in the opening of the trailer that D’Souza took credit (credit?) for his previous exposé: 2016: Obama’s America. It warned us all that the president’s re-election in 2012 would have us all living in the smoking ruins of American civilization by 2016. But the only smoking ruins I see are running for the Republican nomination. And isn’t it fun to see D’Souza hanging on every word of wisdom being dispensed by the brilliant Jonah Goldberg, best known for the oxymoronic (or just “moronic,” if you prefer) book Liberal Fascism. Unmitigated dreck.
Some parts of America are smoking ruins:
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/gop-failures-set-backdrop-for-next-primaries-636740675886
It’s amazing how he presents well known historical facts as if there is a big cover up of them. I’ve listen to his debates and I always get nauseated by his lack of cogent arguments.
I just watched it a second time. It should get a nomination by the academy for the “Worst Piece of Propaganda Dreck” but that category doesn’t exist.
Dishonest D’Souza lives down to his name once again.
Mebbe Kirk Cameron was a production assistant on this?
I thought the Founding Fathers did that already?
It would be possible to make a serious documentary named “Hillary’s America” exposing the corporate ties to the Clintons…but that would put the searchlight too close to the corporate sugar daddies who own the Republican party, too.
See Mano Singham’s blog post, “Hillary Clinton, Wall Street, and the neoconservatives” http://freethoughtblogs.com/singham/2016/03/07/hillary-clinton-wall-street-and-the-neoconservatives/#more-35903
“Liberal Fascism” -as in, being liberal with using the “f” word to describe political opponents? So D’Souza is into liberal fascism in a big way. With this definition it would at least not be an oxymoron. Not that I think he cares about definitions.
What if their plan was to…steal America?
Mr. Largo in “Thunderball” : “Hand over America or we will use the H bomb we stole from the Vulcan bomber that crashed into the sea. Bwahahahahaha!”