The comparison to jabberwocky is inevitable

Table 1. Gyromodel Lexicon

Alternagyre

A gyrosystem whose gyrapex is not triquantal

Dextragyre

A right-handed gyre or gyromodel

Focagyre

A gyre that is the focal point of analysis or discussion

Gyradaptor

The gyre singularity—a quantum—that exerts all forces on the gyrosystem

Gyrapex

The relativistically high potential, excited, unstable, learning state of a particle

Gyraxiom

A fact, condition, principle, or rule that constrains and defines the theoretical framework

Gyre

The spacetime shape or path of a particle or group of particles; a quantum

Gyrequation

Shorthand notation for analysis, discussion, and understanding gyromodels

Gyrobase

The relativistically low potential, ground, stable, memory state of a particle

Gyrognosis

The thermodynamically demanding process of learning and integrating IEM

Gyrolink

The mIEM particle that links two gyromodules in a gyronexus

Gyromnemesis

The thermodynamically conserving process of remembering and recovering IEM

Gyromodel

The core model undergirding the theoretical framework

Gyromodule

A dIEM particle in a gyronexus

Gyronexus

A polymer of dIEM particles linked by mIEM particles

Gyrostate

The potential and/or kinetic state that a particle occupies in its gyratory path

Gyrosystem

A gyromodel with specific IEM composition, organization, and purpose

IEM

Information, energy, and/or matter

I can’t help myself. You knew this was coming.

Twas brillig, and the slithy toves

Did gyre and gimble in the wabe:

All mimsy were the borogoves,

And the mome raths outgrabe.

Now I know that you are in lexical shock right now, but I’m about to make it worse. Witness the use of these terms in figure 1 of the paper, which will also reveal the kinds of diagrams he’s using.

“The levorafocagyre, in turn, is antichiral to the dextrasupragyre” is a nice sentence that about sums up the experience of reading this thing. Don’t believe me? Here are more excerpts that illustrate the grand, cosmic, and entirely uninformative nature of gyroexplanatory gyrobabble. Andrulis purports to explain everything from learning and memory (learning and memory by gyres, not the poor people trying to understand his paper):

The ultimate state of gyromnemesis is the stably adapted particle or gyronexus in the gyrobase. A particle thus adapts through learning and memory by completing one full cycle—a revolution— around the singularity. Taken together, gyrognosis defines IEM integration and assessment whereas gyromnemesis defines IEM storage and recovery. Finally, although a diquantal IEM (X”) undergoes gyrognosis as the gyrobase of a primary majorgyre, it undergoes gyromnemesis as the gyrapex of an alternagyre. Thus, gyre learning and memory are relative to the gyradaptive singularity.

To the formation of Earth’s moon:

Lunar Formation. The favored hypothesis for the formation of Earth’s Moon is from planetesimal impact on a proto-Earth proceeded by matter ejection, accretion, and gravitational capture [189,190]. However, the question of lunar origin has not been settled since there are competing, albeit antiquated hypotheses [191,192]. I also discovered the stunning admission that, “…shamefacedly, [astronomers] have little idea as to where [the Moon] came from. This is particularly embarrassing… [193].” The oxygyre models the Moon as a macroxyon that has a macroelectron within itself; this simple gyrosystem accounts for the known chemical composition of the Moon surface, oxides [194]. Regarding lunar origin, the macroxyon that is the Moon emerges from the macroelectron that is the Earth, concomitant with the emergence of Earth’s macroxyon [195,196].

Page 2 of 3 | Previous page | Next page