Trump still lying about covid-19 danger

After he was exposed as publicly playing down the seriousness of the virus even though he knew it was highly contagious and dangerous, Trump said that he only did so so as not to create panic. That explanation has been blasted as dangerous by creating a false sense of complacency at a time when accurate information was essential so that steps could be taken to minimize the spread.

But it appears that even now his administration is trying to minimize the danger by pressuring the scientists who work for the Centers for Disease Control to change their reports to comport with his optimistic statements.

The health department’s politically appointed communications aides have demanded the right to review and seek changes to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s weekly scientific reports charting the progress of the coronavirus pandemic, in what officials characterized as an attempt to intimidate the reports’ authors and water down their communications to health professionals.

In some cases, emails from communications aides to CDC Director Robert Redfield and other senior officials openly complained that the agency’s reports would undermine President Donald Trump’s optimistic messages about the outbreak, according to emails reviewed by POLITICO and three people familiar with the situation.

CDC officials have fought back against the most sweeping changes, but have increasingly agreed to allow the political officials to review the reports and, in a few cases, compromised on the wording, according to three people familiar with the exchanges. The communications aides’ efforts to change the language in the CDC’s reports have been constant across the summer and continued as recently as Friday afternoon.

The CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Reports are authored by career scientists and serve as the main vehicle for the agency to inform doctors, researchers and the general public about how Covid-19 is spreading and who is at risk. Such reports have historically been published with little fanfare and no political interference, said several longtime health department o

But since Michael Caputo, a former Trump campaign official with no medical or scientific background, was installed in April as the Health and Human Services department’s new spokesperson, there have been substantial efforts to align the reports with Trump’s statements, including the president’s claims that fears about the outbreak are overstated, or stop the reports altogether.

One of the best ways to create panic during a public health emergency is for the government to get caught lying to people because then they will not believe anything you say and will switch to other sources of information that do not have the authority of science behind them and thus can indulge in wild speculations.


  1. says

    One of the best ways to create panic during a public health emergency is for the government to get caught lying to people because then they will not believe anything you say

    This is 95 percent of the challenge in the United States, a vast majority of Americans simply don’t believe a single word coming out of Washington.

    As President Reagan quipped: “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: I’m from the Government, and I’m here to help.”

  2. Ridana says

    Added on to all of the false information coming out of Washington are all the ads I’ve been seeing over the last couple of weeks sounding like everything’s fine and it’s all over with, you can come out now, business as usual! People claim they don’t listen to ads, but they do, even on a subconscious level. Many people still believe advertisers aren’t allowed to lie in their ads. Also the people who see this as political don’t see ads that way. So when the general atmosphere becomes Bunko’s lie machine and your tv machine both agreeing “No worries! We won!” people will buy into it.

    At this point I think about the only thing that might save us is if Liar Von Flameypants finally catches it and actually gets really sick from it. If he dies, he’s a martyr, but if he lives, with the lasting effects we’ve seen in so many, maybe that will convince his cult it’s real.

  3. sonofrojblake says

    Wouldn’t help. Alexander Johnson got it, and got it so bad they prepared his obit, and it didn’t make a fuck of difference, either to his attitude or those of the public. His chief advisers’ blatant flaunting of lockdown rules didn’t help. Covidiots gonna covidiot.

  4. Pierce R. Butler says

    This is, of course, a pattern:

    ‘This Is a Travesty’: Climate Denier Who Has Argued in Favor of Fossil Fuel Emissions Named to Leadership Role at NOAA

    Climate scientists were aghast Monday at the news that David Legates, a University of Delaware professor who has repeatedly questioned the scientific consensus that human activity is causing the climate crisis and has claimed that carbon dioxide emissions are beneficial, has been named by the Trump administration to a top leadership role at the federal government’s climate research agency. …
    The appointment, which one anonymous NOAA official referred to as a surprising “midnight hire over the weekend,” comes as the agency is monitoring the approach of Hurricane Sally. …
    … Legates … counts among his climate science work a paper called “The IPCC Reconsidered,” a Heartland Institute-funded project which called for more, not fewer, fossil fuel emissions. …
    “The juxtaposition of the apocalyptic wildfires and the announcement of David Legates’ appointment is mind-boggling,” Jane Lubchenco, who served as NOAA administrator under President Barack Obama, told the Post.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *