Chick-fil-A alienates its right-wing Christian supporters

Some of you may recall the big Chick-fil-A controversy that emerged some years ago. The owners of this fast-food franchise are evangelical Christians who disapprove of homosexuality and opposed the efforts to legalize same-sex marriage. This made them the target of boycotts by the LGBT+ community but also the darling of right-wing evangelical Christians in the US who campaigned to have people eat there to show their support.

So I was surprised to read that the company has just stopped funding the Salvation Army and the Fellowship of Christian Athletes, two organizations that were prominent in also opposing giving equal rights to the LGBT+ community. The company has also contributed to the Southern Poverty Law Center, a civil rights group that strongly supports LGBT+ rights and is a group that right-wingers hate.

These moves have caused consternation among the Christian right who feel betrayed.

Leading US conservatives have turned on the fast-food restaurant chain Chick-fil-A after the company decided to cut its ties to two Christian groups that have long opposed same-sex marriage.

The restaurant has “badly lost its way”, tweeted the Republican senator Ted Cruz, a prominent religious conservative. “Millions of Christians have been proud of ChickFilA’s courageous stands for religious liberty. To fund those who hate your customers is just sad.”

The former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee, another devout Republican, accused Chick-fil-A of having “surrendered to anti- Christian hate groups”.

Having been boycotted by protesters who accused it of discrimination against the LGBTQ+ community, Chick-fil-A now faces the prospect of being shunned by some of its most enthusiastic former backers.

“It’s time for Christians to find a fast-food alternative to Chick-fil-A,” said Tony Perkins, president of the conservative Family Research Council organization. “Not only has Chick-fil-A abandoned donations to Christian groups including the Salvation Army, it has donated to one of the most extreme anti-Christian groups in America.”

I cannot believe that the company was unmindful of the reaction this move would cause among their erstwhile allies on the right but they went ahead anyway. The company has not said what made it change its policies, saying only that it would focus its future efforts on “education, homelessness and hunger”. With any business, you would not be far off if you speculated that money played a role. Being boycotted by a significant sector of the population in the US might have been a consideration. Its expansion plans in Europe had come under pressure recently, forcing it to close its first retail outlet in Reading, England.

As for the potential loss of its former supporters, it is not clear where lovers of chicken sandwiches can go that opposes same-sex marriage, and that may have been a factor too.


  1. mailliw says

    With any business, you would not be far off if you speculated that money played a role.

    I don’t think we should necessarily exclude them making a thorough philosophical analysis of their position leading to a change in their moral perspective.

  2. DonDueed says

    I guess this counts as a minor victory in the culture war, but it seems like a strange battlefield. How odd that one’s tribe could be defined by which brand of fast food one chose to eat.

    But then, who would have predicted that the World War Two conflict against Japan would be decided by a campaign in an obscure island group in the South Pacific?

  3. says

    The frustrating thing is that all the fried chicken chains in the US are founded and owned by exceedingly white people. As a friend of mine said “white chicken is all that’s for sale.” Chick fil-a went for the “suburban market” -- e.g.: evangelical homophobic racists. Pull up a map of chicken store locations and incomes and you’ll see what I mean.

  4. John Stevens says

    Our family has stopped eating at CfA as we did for Target some 2+ years ago. We used to spend $800-$1,000/month between food, personal hygiene and misc items but have since switched to other stores. Money talks no matter which side of the battle you side. Almost forgot cheers and TRUMP 2020!!

  5. Matthew Currie says

    I’m a supporter of marriage rights for all, and not a particular friend of Chick Fil-A or its founders’ philosophy, but I think it’s still reasonable to point out that their opposition to gay marriage, and even a religious disdain for homosexuality, does not always translate into denial of at least some basic civil rights. Apart from sensitivity to the economic climate, it’s possible that they’re trying to find some middle ground that compromises between their religious bias and some residual Christian ethic of tolerance. I’d like to think they can manage to do this, but also doubt that it will change their position on marriage rights.

    Of course the more cynical presumption is that they’re trying to maximize profits and judging what they need to avoid trouble, but even so, if that ends up with them coming at least a little closer to doing the right thing, it’s probably not such a bad idea. If a conservative business determines that the best way to make money is to woo the segment of the public that supports gay rights, that is at least a somewhat encouraging bit of demographic news.

  6. ColeYote says

    They also didn’t gain much good will from the left considering it took them all of twelve hours before they went “we won’t rule out donating to homophobic organizations in the future.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *