In a comment to one of PZ’s posts, jeanmeslier wrote:
Imagine being reduced to a resource …
Don’t get me started on the “Human Resources” paradigm of business management.
OK, you got me started.
<rant>
The Human Resources paradigm is fundamentally flawed because it denies the moral distinction between people and things.
Oh, it makes operational distinctions: it recognizes that people are more complicated than “other things”; and it recognizes that people are more “costly” than “other things”; but it asserts positively that managers ought to treat their employees decently for the same set of reasons that, say, carpenters sharpen their saws.
It’s that “for the same set of reasons” bit that’s the error; and it’s an error that can’t be fixed. You can’t wash it off and peel the skin; it’s rotten to the core. All you can do is throw it away and hope that the next one isn’t so disgusting.
</rant>
OK, having gotten that off my chest, I’ll back off slightly and allow as how the Human Resources paradigm does have one bit of utility: it presents an argument that the Mr. and Ms. WIIFMs* of the world can comprehend.
*WIIFM — pronounced WIFum — “What’s in it for me?” — actually taught as a Good Thing in pseudoscientific pop psychology classes at the American Management Association.