Incels and misogynists seem to have missed out on a lot of genetics, so they freely make it up as they go along.
[Theory] if you have a daughter, you areren’t a real man (100% male). you’re 1% female.
the fact that your daughter was a fetus inside your mother, which is because she was originally a sperm in your testicles, means there was a foid in your testicles,therefore not all of your body was male because there was a part of your body that was female. now before you think this means mothers with sons aren’t 100% male, that argument doesnt work and its different because the male fetus was originally a sperm in the dad’s balls and therefore came from the dad’s balls originally NOT the mom’s womb, thus it was part of the dad’s body NOT the mom’s body. therefore,if you have a daughter, you aren’t 100% male. you’re 99.9% male and 1% female, Real men can only have sons. and it’s also cucked to have a daughter because you raise her for 18 years to become a slut who has sex with dozens of chads but that’s just water is wet the sky’s biue grass is green.
“BRB forcibly removing my X chromosomes from my body:”
The other prevailing theory is that the foid’s egg selecively bars X or Y from entering in through the walls, depending on her own femininity/masculinity. But since slightly more males are born than females, even Y chromosome sperm seem to be physically faster and more powerful than X chromosome sperm, mirroring ‘what we see IRL in terms of physiality. Given that, it seems that a more testosteroned or hypermasculine male will produce, if not more Y chromosome sperm, a least Y chromosome sperm with greater mobilty and physical strength
this doesn’t surprise me. why would hypermasculine men have daughters?
Your daughter (or your son) was not a fetus inside your mother. I think this is this guy’s foundational error: he thinks women are like matryoshka dolls, carrying a nested series of their descendants in their ovaries. That’s not true, as I don’t need to tell you. It’s fascinating to see that this antiquated notion is still festering in the brains of certain benighted individuals.
If that’s your model, though, it doesn’t make sense to claim that a male fetus was originally a sperm in the dad’s balls
, because he would also have been an ovum in your grandmothers ovary.
He’s also deeply misogynistic, as you can tell by the fact he is calling women foids
, and also thinks that having a whiff of feminine biology is a terrible condition. He doesn’t seem to be aware that 51% of all babies born are male, which would imply that most people would be half and half.
There’s a grain of truth in the Y chromosome sperm seem to be physically faster and more powerful than X chromosome sperm
. Statistically, Y-bearing sperm are faster, but they’re also weaker — X-bearing sperm last longer.
But really these are all bad claims badly justified. I will assure you that no student of my university who has taken genetics would ever say something so stupid.
“Foids.” The internet has truly given a voice to the little guy, which in hindsight is not such a good thing.
For a community that loves to pat itself on the back for being so observant, and truly understanding how society works (unlike us normies), the incel community sure are a bunch of lackwits.
Bloody hell, I can’t even make sense of half of that. Yeah, somewhere in there seems to be a vestige of the old theory that the sperm contains a tiny fetus, but he’s somehow mashed it together with X and Y chromosomes and the result is an incomprehensible mess. I get flerfer posts on FB that make more sense. He flunks basic writing skills, along with middle school biology.
WTF has gone wrong with these people?