Comments

  1. says

    Remember when Donald Trump told the debunked story about a U.S. General dipping bullets in pigs’ blood to shoot Muslim prisoners in the Philippines?

    Well, never one to learn from his mistakes, Trump told the same story again today at a rally in Virginia. His reason? “We are going to have to get tough.”
    Right Wing Watch link.

  2. says

    Democrats who live abroad are voting in the Super Tuesday election. The results from the New Zealand voting site, the Public Bar and Eatery in Wellington, are in. The voting began at midnight New Zealand time and closed at 12:30 a.m.
    Total ballots cast: 28
    Bernie Sanders: 21
    Hillary Clinton: 6
    Spoiled Ballots: 1

    22 countries (104 cities) are hosting “Democrats Abroad” voting.

  3. says

    Kris Kobach is an awful person to have in an elected office. He is lacking in good governance skills, and he is sneaky as hell when it comes to purging voters he doesn’t like from the voting rolls. When you add his influence over xenophobic anti-immigration laws you really have to hold your nose. This doofus has endorsed Donald Trump for president. Of course he has.

    Kris Kobach, the Kansas secretary of state known for his push for strict voter ID laws and his authorship of Arizona’s controversial immigration legislation, endorsed Donald Trump’s presidential bid on Monday.

    “For me, the most important issue in the Republican presidential contest is immigration and its effect on our national security. On that issue Mr. Trump stands head and shoulders above the other candidates,” Kobach said in a written statement. “He has made it clear that ramping up the enforcement of our immigration laws will be his top priority. And he has forcefully rejected the notion of giving amnesty to illegal aliens living in the United States.” […]

    “On the subject of building the wall on our southern border, Mr. Trump is correct when he says that the United States has the ability to compel Mexico to pay for it,” Kobach wrote.

    He said that Trump should be able to use the Patriot Act as “leverage.”

    “We have the ability to shut down the flow of remittances to Mexico from illegal aliens working in the United States,” Koach said in his statement. “Mexico will then have to make a choice: either make a single payment of $5-10 billion to the United States to pay for the wall, or lose most of the $23 billion in remittances that Mexico receives every year from its national working illegally in the United States.” […]

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/kris-kobach-donald-trump-endorsement

  4. says

    This is a followup to comment 3.

    Here are a few of Kris Kobach’s favorite things:

    […] Some of the key provisions in Alabama’s H.B. 56, [Kobach wrote the anti-immigration state laws for both Arizona and Alabama], for instance, required schools to check and report the immigration status of children, barred undocumented students from post-secondary education, and allowed police to demand proof of immigration status from anyone they suspected of being in the country without legal documents.

    The undocumented workforce fled en masse, and the state lost an estimated $10.8 billion — including 140,000 jobs in the state, $264.5 million in state tax revenue, and $93 million in local tax revenue. Just seven months after the law went into effect, the state legislature passed a round of revisions, weakening requirements for residents to show proof of immigration status.

    Arizona’s S.B. 1070 underwent a similar kind of failure, with the U.S. Supreme Court eventually striking down key provisions of the law. A joint study by the Center for American Progress and the Immigration Policy Center found that Arizona’s economy lost $141 million. […]

    Link.
    Yep. Kobach not only helped to implement xenophobic state laws, he also succeeded in putting a big financial dent in the economies of those states.

    In a way, the Kobach escapades foretell what would happen if Trump tried to implement his anti-immigrant policies nationwide.

  5. says

    Ben Carson said some more stupid stuff:

    While speaking today with Pat Robertson at Regent University, Ben Carson said that he would work “very hard on eliminating the ban on Christianity in our public schools” if elected president.

    Carson, who has repeatedly claimed that he would direct the government to monitor the speech of professors and withhold federal funding from schools that demonstrate “bias,” revived the myth that Christianity and religious expression are banned at public schools. (Students are allowed to pray in school, but government-sponsored and compulsory prayers are prohibited.) […]

    Right Wing Watch link.

    There’s a video at the link that also features Carson trying to explain his “fruit salad” remark at the most recent public debate. He quoted the bible, “by their fruit you will know them.”

  6. says

    Legislators in the state of Alabama do not want minimum wage workers to get a raise. They really are adamant about that.

    Birmingham, Alabama, raised the city’s minimum wage to $10.10 an hour on Tuesday. Two days later, the state took it away.

    Alabama passed a bill Thursday, largely along party lines, that bars cities and counties from raising the minimum wage or requiring employers to provide leave or other benefits. Because the law applies retroactively, it wipes out Birmingham’s raise.

    Republican legislative leaders fast-tracked the bill in order to pass it before Birmingham’s raise was set to take effect March 1. The GOP enjoys super-majorities in both houses. Within an hour or so of the bill’s passage, Gov. Robert Bentley (R) announced he had signed it. […]

    MSNBC link.

  7. says

    Oh, FFS. A state representative in Idaho made a Todd-Akin-like remark about rape.

    Representative Pete Nielsen (a Republican doofus) said during a Thursday hearing that rape “does not involve any pregnancy because of the trauma of the incident.”
    The Spokesman-Review link.

    […]” Now, I’m of the understanding that in many cases of rape it does not involve any pregnancy because of the trauma of the incident. That may be true with incest a little bit.” […]

    Nielsen stood by his remarks after the hearing, saying pregnancy “doesn’t happen as often as it does with consensual sex, because of the trauma involved.” […] “I read a lot of information. I have read it several times. … Being a father of five girls, I’ve explored this a lot.” […]

  8. Saad says

    American white supremacist Donald Trump orders black people to be removed from his rally in Georgia

    Donald Trump ordered Secret Service agents to remove a number of black students from his Georgia rally on Monday evening, according to The Des Moines Register.

    Before Trump spoke in Valdosta, Ga., about 30 black students who were quietly standing on the top of the bleachers were told to leave the GOP front-runner’s event.

    Those students complied and were escorted by the Secret Service outside, where they were told they needed to vacate the area of the rally.

    “We didn’t plan to do anything,” said Tahjila Davis, a 19-year-old Valdosta State University student who was removed. “They said, ‘This is Trump’s property; it’s a private event.’ But I paid my tuition to be here.”

    Earlier Monday, black students at a Trump rally in Virginia were removed by Secret Service after chanting, “No more hate! No more hate! Let’s be equal, let’s be great!”

    The removal of the students comes as Trump faces a firestorm for not disavowing former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke’s support during a Sunday interview on CNN. Trump blamed a faulty earpiece for misunderstanding the question and said he’s previously repudiated the support.

  9. tomh says

    @ #8
    More like a foregone conclusion. For a look at how the GOP delegate selection process, which was drawn up to avoid the messy fight of 2012, now favors Trump, this NYT analysis does the math. The process is working just like they had hoped, it just favors the candidate they don’t want.

  10. says

    Trump is racking up some more supporters from mainstream Republican politicians:
    – Rep. Tom Marino, from Pennsylvania
    – Rep. Scott DesJarlais, from Tennessee

    Adding these to past endorsements, Trump now has four members of the U.S. House of Representatives, one U.S. senator, and two sitting governors. This total doesn’t come close to the endorsements racked up by Rubio, but it does show that Republicans are starting to come around to idea of Trump as their candidate.

  11. says

    It looks like Rubio is going to lose in Florida. I think this will be the end of his campaign.

    Early voting in Florida in favors Trump. Polls also show Trump winning in Florida.

  12. says

    Rachel Maddow discussed the changes the Republican Party made to their primary calendar in order to avoid some of the mistakes they made in 2012. The problem is, the changes favor a candidate like Donald Trump.

    This segment also covers the fact that one Republican debate prior to the 2012 elections was cancelled. News Max was supposed to host it, but the candidates refused to show up. They were protesting over a moderator, Donald Trump. Nobody would participate in a debate moderated by Trump.

  13. says

    Sanders and Clinton both beat Trump in the latest CNN/ORC poll.
    Sanders led Trump 55 to 43 percent.
    Clinton led Trump 52 to 44 percent.

    Polls are a snapshot in time. No doubt these numbers will change several times before the November election. However, the trend is reassuring: both Sanders and Clinton have increased their leads over Trump.

  14. says

    Oh, FFS. Some rightwing news hosts have labeled Romney a “Liberal” for questioning Trump’s response to the KKK. Talking Points Memo link.

    […] Tucker Carlson, Fox News host and editor of the Daily Caller, linked’s Romney’s statement to President Obama. […]

    And conservative radio host Laura Ingraham suggested Romney’s tweet could have been written by Mother Jones.

  15. says

    Donald Trump is trying to back away more from his KKK connection. He told a host of “Good Morning America” that he is renouncing support from white supremacists.

    To prove his “equality for everyone” bonafides, Trump touted his Mar-a-Lago club:

    “There’s nobody that’s done so much for equality as I have,” he said. “You take a look at Palm Beach, Florida. I built the Mar-a-Lago club, totally open to everybody. A club that, frankly, set a new standard in clubs and a new standard in Palm Beach and I’ve gotten great credit for it. That is totally open to everybody.”

    Members to the Mar-a-Lago must pay a $100,000 initiation fee and annual fee of $14,000 […]

    Link.

    Equality, Trump style.

  16. says

    More weirdness and bigotry lining up behind Donald Trump:

    Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan on Sunday praised Donald Trump as the only presidential candidate who hasn’t taken money from the “Jewish community,” […]

    Farrakhan said during his annual Saviors’ Day sermon [that] Trump “is the only mem­ber who has stood in front of Jew­ish com­mu­nity, and said, ‘I don’t want your money,'” as quoted by the Anti-Defamation League, which monitors anti-Semitism and bigotry. “Any time a man can say to those who con­trol the pol­i­tics of Amer­ica, ‘I don’t want your money,’ that means you can’t con­trol me.”

    Farrakhan also reportedly called Jewish people the “Syn­a­gogue of Satan” and blamed them for 9/11 and the Iraq War.

    Link

  17. says

    NASCAR CEO Brian France has decided to endorse Donald Trump.

    On Monday, […] Brian France, Hall of Famer Bill Elliot, and drivers Ryan Newman, David Ragan, and Chase Elliot (Bill’s 20-year-old son), took the stage at a Donald Trump rally in Georgia and endorsed Trump for president.

    “You know about his winning, and business and success,” France said. “He wins with his family. Any of his children, you’d be proud of having them as part of your family. That’s how I judge a winner, how somebody manages their family and raises their family.”

    While NASCAR said that this was a “private, personal decision” by France, Trump is touting this as an endorsement by the entire sport. […]

    Other NASCAR supporters are not happy with this endorsement, and are pushing back.

    Last July, NASCAR pulled its end-of-year banquets from Trump’s Doral resort in Miami after his comments about Mexican immigrants being rapists and drug dealers. At the time, Marcus Lemonis, the CEO of Camping World, the title sponsor of NASCAR’s Truck Series, denounced Trump’s comments as “blatantly bigoted and racist” in an open letter to NASCAR and France.

    “Our company will not stand to support any person or organization that associates with such beliefs and we feel strongly about distancing ourselves from any negative and discriminatory comments made against any gender, ethnicity, age group or so forth,” he said. “I would hope that the entire NASCAR organization would agree with my sentiments.”

    Lemonis, whose company is reportedly paying NASCAR $35 million over seven years, was clearly unhappy with France’s endorsement of Trump on Monday. […]

    I snipped Lemonis’ tweet, which a repetition of earlier sentiments.

    […] In recent years, NASCAR has been actively trying to broaden its appeal beyond its overwhelmingly white and southern roots.

    Twelve years ago, the organization founded Drive for Diversity, a program that aims to give opportunity and support to minority and female drivers. After a rough start, Drive for Diversity has begun seeing success stories, such as Darrell Wallace Jr., who in 2013 became the first African American driver to win a NASCAR national series race in nearly 50 years, and Daniel Suarez, a Mexican driver who was the 2015 NASCAR XFinity Series Rookie of the Year. […]

    http://thinkprogress.org/sports/2016/03/01/3755041/nascar-endorses-trump/

  18. Saad says

    Lynna, #18

    Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan on Sunday praised Donald Trump as the only presidential candidate who hasn’t taken money from the “Jewish community,” […]

    That just makes my head hurt.

  19. says

    Extraordinary figures from the Sanders campaign:

    Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont raised more than $42 million during February, his campaign said on Tuesday. More than $6 million of that money was raised on Monday, the last day of the month, when the campaign issued a push for donations with the goal of bringing February’s total to $40 million.

  20. says

    More white supremacist kudos for Donald Trump are making news. As Seth Meyers said in one his segments last night, Trump lets just enough racism slip through to get white supremacists to say, “Oh, yeah. That’s our guy.” And then Trump backtracks and complains about faulty earpieces, etc.

    (The earpiece excuse is so much bullshit it is laughable. Trump repeated “David Duke” and “white supremacists” several times, so he heard the main topic. If you hear “white supremacists” and “KKK,” why do you have to think it over before you say no?)

    The latest kudos from white supremacy land:

    “God bless this man,” exulted the Daily Stormer, a white supremacist website. […]

    “I’ve never met him, and I cannot read his mind any better than you can,” said Mr. Taylor, 64, the Virginia-based founder of the New Century Foundation and editor of its website, American Renaissance. “But someone who wants to send home all illegal immigrants and at least temporarily ban Muslim immigration is acting in the interest of whites, whether consciously or not.”

    NY Times link.

    “You can’t help who admires you, but when white supremacists start endorsing you for president, you ought to start asking why,” said Richard Cohen, the president of the Southern Poverty Law Center, which tracks white-power groups.

  21. says

    Trumpishness is infecting other parts of U.S. culture, including high schools. Some students chanted “build a wall” at a basketball game where their opponents were Hispanic.

    The Catholic bishop in northern Indiana on Monday denounced students who waved a picture of GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump and shouted “build a wall” at opponents during a basketball game.

    […] students from Andrean High Schoolin Merrillville shouted at students from Bishop Noll Institute, a heavily Hispanic school in nearby Hammond, on Friday evening. […]

    “Any actions or words that can be perceived as racist or derogatory to others are antithetical to the Christian faith and will not be tolerated in any of our institutions,” Hying said. […]

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/andrean-high-school-basketball-border-wall-trump-chants

  22. says

    More pro-Trump love from David Duke:

    We must understand that we are now in a struggle for the survival of European mankind. We must never mince our words about that. We are going down in numbers, all over the world.

    Mass immigration is going to completely remake our countries, our politics, our values, our religious beliefs, everything in which we identify with; everything and every value we have and the most critical issue facing the United States of America is whether or not we are going to remain an overwhelmingly European nation with the values of western Christian civilization or whether we’re going to become some sort of Third World nation and whether or not we’re going to be continued to be robbed and exploited and oppressed by the ultimate ethnic supremacists, of course, we’re talking about the Zionists and the Jewish tribal extremists.

    […] The top seven Super PACs of Hillary Clinton are all Jewish Zionists. […] We have the same thing going on with the Republican Party today. The only person who has stepped out of that agenda has been Donald Trump. […]

    Right Wing Watch link.

  23. says

    Saad @20, I agree. I had the same reaction. And now David Duke has decided to push harder on the anti-semitic buttons of Republican voters. Yuck.

  24. blf says

    Peruvian Nobel laureate Mario Vargas Llosa: Trump is a ‘clown and a racist’:

    Author calls Republican frontrunner dangerous in a country that is ‘too important’ worldwide to have a demagogue in power

    Peruvian Nobel prize-winning author Mario Vargas Llosa has said that Donald Trump is a “clown” and a “racist” who would doom the Republican party to defeat if it choses him as its candidate for November’s US presidential election.

    “He is a danger to the United States,” said Vargas Llosa, who himself ran as a centre-right candidate for the Peruvian presidency in 1990.

    “It is a country that is too important for the rest of the world to have in the White House a clown, a demagogue and a racist like Mr Trump,” he told a news conference in Madrid […]

    […]

    Vargas Llosa […] won the Nobel Literature Prize in 2010 and now lives mainly in Madrid. He is known for books such as The Time of the Hero that explore Latin America’s structures of political power.

    Some readers’s comments:

    ● “Let’s put it this way, if American Republicans / Tea Party folks think the Donald is the best candidate for such an ‘important country for the rest of the world’ perhaps the global community should rethink the whole idea of the US being such an ‘important country for the rest of the world’. They seem to be more dumbed down than ever before.”

    ● “Bomb the following countries.
      “‘First day, Mister President, are you sure—’
      “That’s an order.

    ● “We need to hear the same from Joe the plumber then perhaps the message will resonate”.

    ● “Most of Trump supporters have no idea where Peru is.”

    ● “There’s nothing ‘precious’ about any political party. Let them have their euthanasia, there’s always something else that will fill the vacuum. […]”

    ● In response to a comment from a possible trum-prat supporter, there are no real alternatives: “I saw a dead pigeon that had been run over on the way to work today that would be a viable alternative.
      “I’ll grant you that it’s grasp of macro and micro economics wasn’t too good — but it sure as hell wasn’t going to start a war or push any red buttons.”

    ● “Voting for Trump is like voting for Jean Marie Le Pen […]”.

    ● “clowns are fun. this person is not funny he’s fasist”.

    ● “I can`t wait for Trump to design for himself, a ‘Great Dictator’ uniform, with all kinds of medals covering it — that he earned in the militarized reform school his parents sent him to !!”

  25. microraptor says

    Lynna @14:

    Boy, you want to talk about getting hoisted by your own petard…

  26. blf says

    This is a brilliant quote from the article, Texas fears ‘brain drain’ now that public universities will allow guns on campus:

    “In the absence of any evidence beyond Hollywood movies starring Bruce Willis, we have leaders basically capitulating to fantasy and stupidity in this weird belief that untrained, unprepared individuals can somehow react to the most horrible and sudden of circumstances in a sober and appropriate way,” [professor Siva Vaidhyanathan] said. “For an institution of higher learning to be forced to capitulate to such stupidity is truly shameful.”

    Professor Vaidhyanathan “was a finalist for the role of dean at the University of Texas’s college of communication and in many ways would have relished a return to the place where he earned two degrees. […] However, when it became clear that guns would be allowed in classrooms, he withdrew from consideration.”

  27. blf says

    Just before discovering the fresh pasta I’d planned to kill and eat for dinner had become rather too lively and was attacking the other critter in the refrigerator — a loudly-complaining duck I wasn’t prepared to prepare tonight — and hence had to make an “emergency” trip to a restaurant, I spotted this opinion piece in the Grauniad, Donald Trump’s disrespect for the military is appalling — and unprecedented:

    So far, Trump has only insulted, abused and patronized service members and veterans on the trail. That’s no way to win our support

    Donald Trump has disparaged many a group — most recently, he refused to flat-out denounce white supremacy — but his transgressions against the military have been less remarked upon.

    The disrespect that the Republican frontrunner for the presidential nomination has consistently shown towards veterans and service members is unprecedented, especially for a member of the party that, at least nominally, prides itself on being more supportive of the troops.

    On Friday […] former head of the CIA and NSA Michael Hayden said that the American armed forces would “refuse to act” if a President Trump actually gave some of the orders that he’s been proposing on the campaign trail. Troops are required to refuse unlawful orders (as would be Trump’s proposed targeting of terrorists’ family members), but the statement reveals a deep antipathy that the defense establishment harbors for Trump. It’s an antipathy that I share as a former US army infantry soldier.

    Trump’s disrespect of veterans began long before the current election cycle. On the Howard Stern show back in 1997, sandwiched in between a bunch of embarrassing comments about women, Trump compared his sex life in the 1980s to a war experience.

    […]

    Trump has no way to know if dating has anything in common with combat, because he was a draft dodger. As Tim Mak wrote in the Daily Beast: “When Trump had the chance to join the military and fight in Vietnam, he did not take it. Instead, the rich kid got multiple student deferments from the draft and a medical deferment.”

    Trump continued to inappropriately compare his civilian experiences to military ones since the Howard Stern appearance. Last year Trump told a biographer that he always felt like I had been in the military because of his time at the New York Military Academy, an expensive military-themed boarding school where Trump’s parents sent him because of behavioral problems.

    […]

    A telltale sign that Trump does not actually know what it feels like to be in the military is his denigration of POWs. Last July at the Family Leadership Summit in Ames, Iowa, Trump said of Arizona senator and former Vietnam POW John McCain: He’s not a war hero. He’s not a war hero because he was captured. I don’t like people who were captured. Who would want to go to war for a President Trump knowing that if you were captured in the heat of battle your commander-in-chief wouldn’t “like” you?

    When Trump does gesture at supporting the troops, it rings hollow. He offers six figures to buy veterans groups as props to use during campaign rallies, as if risking life and limb for your country can be monetized. And his ads that are meant to show respect to veterans probably shouldn’t feature images of Soviet and Nazi soldiers rather than American troops. To lift one of Trump’s own favorite words: it’s pathetic.

    Hayden was quick to point out on Friday that the armed forces wouldn’t foment a rebellion against Trump; they’d just refuse to obey unlawful orders. […]

    I myself have openly wondered several times now if the military, faced with teh trum-prat, would “rebel” (a sort-of Seven Days in May–ish situation). Whilst I have very little confidence in Mr Hayden (I have more confidence it that pasta than I do in Mr Hayden), he’s not necessarily completely wrong here, albeit almost certainly significantly overstating.

    […] For all his talk about leadership, something that Trump fails to understand is that real leadership is predicated upon respecting the people that you want to follow you. So far, Trump has only insulted, abused and patronized service members and veterans. […]

    Some readers’s comments:

    ● “It would be nice if American forces refused to carry out illegal orders now, why wait for Trump […]”

    ● “Lots of hot air. Obama has already illegally killed american citizens with drone strikes and you didn’t refuse to follow orders.” [Numerous people have been extrajudicially executed, not just “american citizens” –blf]

    ● “Trump is a disaster waiting to happen. I am shocked that Americans want to follow this Pied Piper to hell. […]”

    ● “We’ve already seen the Bush torture program implemented – and while Hayden held public office. And President Obama routinely orders drone strikes that kill civilians in order to kill a single terrorist.
      “Hayden’s claim that the military would refuse orders WRT these things is simply ridiculous.”

    ● “I don’t support our troops either. I’m glad I’m not running for office. I might get shit for it.”

    ● “If this idiot is elected, he should lead the ground troops in any war he starts.”

    ● “What is sad is that actual veterans are treated so badly, the veteran’s administration so underfunded and overworked, and the absolutely batshit crazy establishment ‘war is peace’ mentality of republicans and far too many democrats. […]”

    ● “former head of the CIA and NSA Michael Hayden — You forgot to add the words ‘disgraced supporter of torture’ and ‘apologist for war crimes’, which is telling, isn’t it?
      “[…] troops are required to refuse unlawful orders — Go ahead, show us where and when that’s happened and the soldiers came out OK, and not in prison. How about 5 examples? Got any? Yeah, I didn’t think so.
      “This is all fantasy talk, if Trump is elected, no matter what he does, the military will cooperate, period, end of story.”

  28. says

    President Obama hosted a meeting in the Oval Office earlier today. V.P. Joe Biden attended, as well as Senate leaders from both parties (Reid and McConnell); and the top two members of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

    Obama invited everyone there to put forward Supreme Court nominees. The Republicans simply refused. They didn’t put forward their own choices for nominees, they just said that there shouldn’t be a nominee. If Obama puts forward a nominee, the Republicans plan to ignore the nomination as if it never happened. In other words, they Republicans plan to ignore the constitution.

    Link.

  29. says

    No more dog whistles. No more subtlety. Some Republicans are going all out to shout that racism, bigotry, and white supremacy are okay.

    […] South Dakota Sen. Mike Rounds,[…] says that even if Donald Trump meant it when he said he would not disavow David Duke (and didn’t try to walk that comment back later), he’d still be a better choice than a Democrat. […]

  30. says

    Donald Trump proves once again that his self-regard knows no bounds. In commenting on the Rubio jests about his hands, Trump said:

    I call him ‘Little Marco. He said I have small hands. I’ve always heard people say, “Donald, you have the most beautiful hands.” It hasn’t worked. He’s gone down.

  31. says

    Disabled voters are taking things into their own hands. They are pushing for presidential candidates to notice them, and to take their needs into account:

    […] Candidates don’t realize that disability issues are embedded in all of the major issues they’re currently talking about,” said disability rights activist Alice Wong. “They don’t realize that employment, health care, gun control, entitlements, impact people with disabilities in unique ways.”

    Wong and other advocates say the only pointed focus on disabilities during this election cycle has been negative, seen in candidates blaming mental illness for gun violence and mocking disabled election reporters.

    This neglect is why Wong, along with two other disability activists, created #cripthevote — an online movement to engage and empower disabled voters who feel largely forgotten by their next president.

    So far, the nonpartisan group has gained momentum through organizedTwitter discussions scheduled an hour before major candidate debates. […]

    Think Progress link.

  32. says

    More bigotry on the Republican side; this time, it is from Ted Cruz’s supporters.

    The Houston area “Redneck County Club” will host the Super Tuesday watch party tonight of Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz. The venue was founded by the Texas radio host Michael Berry, whose history of bigoted rhetoric and programming has not prevented the senator from welcoming his longtime friendship and support. […]

    Cruz’s decision to use Berry’s club as his election watch party venue comes as no surprise as Cruz and Berry have been friends for “over twenty years.” […] The host has referred to black people as “jungle animals” and often mocks black victims of Chicago’s gun violence. He regularly rejects civil rights advocacy and once said in response to the Black Lives Matter movement, “the dirty little secret is black people don’t believe that black lives matter.” The host also often hosts a blackface comedian, whose stage name is “Shirley Q. Liquor,” to portray racist stereotypes of African-American women.

    Berry also uses social media to share images that often portray black people as criminals and promote white people as more law abiding.

    […] One of the attractions of the bar is a full-size replica of the General Lee car, which boasts a Confederate battle flag spanning the roof. […] The host criticized those calling for the removal of the flag, asking if the shooter in South Carolina had been Muslim would society “outlaw the Koran? Outlaw the mosque? Would we outlaw the prayer rug?”

    Media Matters link.

  33. says

    Hilary Clinton has won in Georgia and Virginia. Sanders won in Vermont. More Super Tuesday results later.

    So far, Rubio is giving Trump some competition in Virginia.

  34. says

    Clinton wins in Alabama and Tennessee. Massachusetts is too early to call.

    Trump wins in Alabama, Massachusetts and Tennessee. Oklahoma is to early to call, looks likely for Cruz getting second place in OK.

  35. says

    Cruz won in Oklahoma. Bernie Sanders won in Oklahoma.

    As expected, Cruz won in Texas. Hillary Clinton won in Texas

    Trump won in Virginia.

    Clinton won in Arkansas.

    Hillary Clinton won in America Samoa.

  36. Tethys says

    MN is only at 53 % of precincts reporting. Rubio 37.3 Cruz 28.0 Trumpf 21.1 Carson 7.1 Kasich 6.3 On the Dem side it is Sanders 59.3, and Clinton 40.6.

  37. Tethys says

    Darn, I meant to add that the Dem side is only at 15% reporting. I can’t imagine that they were able to get everyone’s ballot cast by 8:00. Yay democracy!

  38. says

    Melissa McEwan has a great post up about Super Tuesday which I recommend for its discourse on why the best progressive position is to follow the lead of disenfranchised and marginalised people. The argument is that Black women can be relied on to recognise their own best interests, and that this will inevitably trickle up (my words) to lead to good progressive outcomes for everyone. Expecting the reverse – following the lead of the more privileged – to lead to better outcomes hasn’t worked very well yet, has it? Personally, I’m happy when I know my party appeals to people of colour and PWD and TBLG people.

    Thanks for keeping this rolling, Lynna.

  39. says

    CaitieCat @41, thanks for that comment: “Black women can be relied on to recognize their own best interests.” True. And I like the “trickle up” idea.

    Looking at election results in terms of delegates:
    Trump, 316
    Cruz, 226
    Rubio, 106
    Kasich, 25
    Carson, 8

    Clinton, 1001
    Sanders, 371

    Looking at the results in terms of states won:
    Trump, 7 states: Massachusetts, Virginia, Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, Arkansas, Vermont
    Cruz, 3 states: Alaska, Oklahoma, Texas
    Rubio, 1 state: Minnesota

    Clinton, 8 states:Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Massachusetts, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia
    Sanders, 4 states: Colorado, Minnesota, Oklahoma, Vermont

  40. says

    From CaitieCat’s link in comment 42:

    […] the number of black women who turn out to vote is higher than any other demographic group – 70% in 2012. That number has been rising since 1996, so it is more than a response to the candidacy of Barack Obama. And no group votes more consistently Democratic than black women. Here are the figures since 1992:

    1992 Bill Clinton – 87%
    1996 Bill Clinton – 89%
    2000 Al Gore – 94%
    2004 John Kerry – 90%
    2008 Barack Obama – 96%
    2012 Barack Obama – 96%

    As a comparison, in the above elections no Democratic candidate got more than 48% of the vote from white women. […]

    Now that’s power. and it says something about enthusiasm too.

  41. says

    Louisiana is the state with the most delegates to award in the voting that takes place next Saturday. Clinton leads Sanders 77-23 percent there.

    In other news, Trevor Noah covered the Iowa bill that eliminates the age requirement for children to use firearms under parental supervision. Talking Points Memo link. Scroll down for video.

  42. says

    Senator Orrin Hatch excused Trump for failing to disavow the KKK forthrightly, or until he was asked repeatedly:

    “I think it’s up to us to make it clear that we don’t tolerate those types of racist organizations and I don’t know many people who would believe that we do,” Hatch said on Tuesday when discussing how Republican lawmakers should approach Trump’s comments, like those he made regarding the KKK, according to CNN. “I think deep down, I don’t think Donald Trump tolerates it either. I think he is just inexperienced in expressing himself at things like that.”

    Oh, yeah, that’s it. Trump is inexperienced at expressing himself.

  43. says

    When Ted Cruz gave his version of a victory speech last night, he reminded us that he is going to eliminate the IRS.
    Vice link.

    […] Has anybody ever thought seriously about getting rid of the IRS? No. Other than people running for president. Steve Forbes I think was the first—in the 1990s he ran for president—and he said he was going to eliminate the IRS, and it would be “RIP.” People who run for president on the Republican side have, from time to time, said they were going to get rid of the IRS, but you can’t collect taxes without a tax collector. You can call it what you want, and you can change the name of it. And you can revise the tax system in a way that reduces what it is that the IRS is doing. Ted Cruz isn’t fooling himself. He knows that somebody’s got to collect the taxes. […]

    In other news, what Harry Reid had to say about the Republican candidates:

    The Republican Party has spent years railing against Latinos and immigrants, trying to incite fear. Congressman Steve King called undocumented immigrants drug dealers. He described their bodies in a very negative, ugly way. Now Donald Trump is saying the same thing. Donald Trump is the ultimate fulfillment of the Republican Party’s legacy of obstruction and resentment.

    It’s not only Trump. Senator Cruz, Senator Rubio and Ben Carson are saying basically the same thing. Maybe a little more subtle, but they’re saying the same thing. After all, this is the same party.

    The quote is from a speech Reid gave on the floor of the Senate.

  44. says

    Whoops. I made a mistake in comment 43. I listed Oklahoma twice, as a win for both Clinton and Sanders. Sanders won in Oklahoma, not Clinton.

    Oh, FFS. A CNN news “contributor,” Jeffrey Lord defended Trump by saying that the KKK had a “progressive agenda.” Think Progress link.

  45. says

    Whenever news hosts ask prominent Republicans if they will support Donald Trump if he is the nominee, almost all of them say, “I will support the Republican nominee.” They can’t bear to say Trump’s name.

    Some conservative organizations are trying to disinvite Trump:

    […] RedState, the prominent conservative site, calls on the Conservative Political Action Conference, the annual gathering of right-wing activists, to disinvite Trump from speaking at the confab this week; the outfit protested that CPAC and the American Conservative Union, which organizes the event, “are destroying their own reputations, that of the entire conservative movement, and indeed the Republican Party” by giving Trump a platform. […]

    Mother Jones link.

    Trump continues to say that he gets along with everyone, that everyone loves him. Not Representative Scott Rigell of Virginia:

    Trump is a bully, unworthy of our nomination. My love for our country eclipses my loyalty to our party, and to live with a clear conscience I will not support a nominee so lacking in the judgment, temperament and character needed to be our nation’s commander-in-chief.

  46. says

    More white nationalist news for the Trump camp:

    Donald Trump’s presidential campaign gave press credentials to the white nationalist radio program The Political Cesspool, which says it will soon air an interview with Donald Trump Jr.

    National civil rights groups have criticized the program for supporting anti-Semites, Holocaust deniers, and white supremacists like David Duke. The show openly states on its website that it’s a “pro-White” program that wishes “to revive the White birthrate above replacement level fertility.”

    It is hosted by white nationalist James Edwards, who has claimed that Martin Luther King Jr.’s “dream is our nightmare,” “interracial sex is white genocide,” and “slavery is the greatest thing that ever happened to” African-Americans. […]

    Media Matters link.

    The Political Cesspool received press credentials from the Trump campaign.

  47. says

    Here’s a good example of how Trump “gets along great with everyone”:

    I’m going to get along great with Congress. Paul Ryan, I don’t know him well, but I’m sure I’m going to get along great with him. And if I don’t, he’s going to have to pay a big price.

    Daily Kos link.

  48. says

    More violence against black people from Trump supporters at a rally:

    This video should make the hair on the back of your neck stand up. At a Donald Trump rally in Louisville, Kentucky, last night, Trump supporters acted as an angry mob, violently shoving young black people out of the rally. The young lady in the video below was clearly assaulted by numerous people, but especially the older white man in a veterans hat, who followed her through the crowd and could be seen shouting in her ear before physically assaulting her. There is no doubt he should be identified and charged with assault.

    Watch the despicable and increasingly violent behavior of Trump supporters as they screamed, pointed their fingers in the face of the young woman, dragged her by the arm and shoved her in all directions. All of it happening at the request of Donald Trump who repeatedly yelled “Incredible! Go on, get them out of here! Get out! Get out!” He lamented the “old days” when people “weren’t so nice” saying protests like this would never have happened back then. […]

    Link.

  49. says

    Just since Chris Christie endorsed Donald Trump, Christie’s approval rating in New Jersey has dropped 6 points. It is now 27%. It is even lower among New Jersey independents: 18%.

    News not related Christie, but related to Trump: this is what Ryan said that prompted Trump’s threat (see comment 52):

    Ryan (R-Wis.) said, “This party does not prey on people’s prejudices.” McConnell (R-Ky.) said, “Let me make it clear: Senate Republicans condemn David Duke, the KKK and racism. That is not the view of Republicans that have been elected to the United States Senate.”

  50. says

    Ted Cruz is so obnoxious:

    For the candidates who have not yet won a state, who have not racked up significant delegates I ask you to prayerfully consider uniting. For those who have supported other candidates, we welcome you on our team standing as one.

    According to Cruz, if you pray to God he will tell you to get out of Cruz’s way.

  51. says

    Delegate math: Trump won 46% of the delegates that have been awarded so far. That’s what he got for winning 10 of the first 15 state primaries.

    In future contests, Trump would have to win 52% of the delegates to win the nomination. That’s possible, but with Cruz, Rubio and Kasich staying in the race, it is less likely.

    In other words, the Republicans may be heading for a contested convention. Also, I don’t think it is a good idea for God to tell other candidates to drop out now, as Ted Cruz advises.

  52. blf says

    Norway rejects Anders Breivik ‘inhuman’ prison conditions claim: “Attorney general defends jail conditions of mass murderer who has access to three cells for living, studying and exercise”.

    I assume that if a person this fruitcake — the facist who shot dead 77 people five years ago — considers “subhuman” were to make a similar complaint, as ridiculous or perhaps not so absurd, he’d be ranting, raving, and going on another shooting spree.

  53. se habla espol says

    The LDS radio station in Salt Lake City, KSL, is reporting that a local resident, Mitt Romney, has scheduled a “major announcement” for 9:30 AM Mountain time (GMT-7) tomorrow. They conjecture that it is either an endorsement or that Romney is planning to try it again.

  54. says

    se habla espol @58, the Romney PR people say it is not an announcement that he is running for president again. Scuttlebutt has it that Romney wants to play elder statesman, and that he wants to lecture Republican candidates on how they should behave. We know one thing for sure, he is not going to endorse Donald Trump.

  55. says

    Senator Al Franken gave a speech on the floor of the Senate. He addressed Republican obstruction to a SCOTUS nominee to replace Scalia, and Republican obstruction in general.

    It’s a good speech. Scroll down at the link to watch the video.

    Excerpt:

    If we were to truly subscribe to the Majority Leader’s logic and extend it to the legislative branch, it would yield an absurd result.

    Senators would become ineffective in the last year of their term.

    The 28 senators who are now in the midst of their reelection campaigns and the 6 senators who are stepping down should be precluded from casting votes in committee or on the Senate floor.

    Ten committee chairs and 19 subcommittee chairs should pass the gavel to a colleague who is not currently running for reelection or preparing for retirement.

    Bill introduction, and indeed the cosponsorship of bills, should be limited to those senators who are not yet serving in the sixth year of their terms.

  56. blf says

    Romney wants to play elder statesman, and that he wants to lecture Republican candidates on how they should behave.

    Is it even possible to tell lies faster?

    “Bigger” lies are certainly possible — for instance, I don’t think any of the krazy klown kandidates have yet claimed gravity is myth invented by scientists to pocket billion$ & billion$…

  57. says

    Ben Carson is dropping out … sort of:

    I have decided not to attend the Fox News GOP Presidential Debate tomorrow night. Even though I will not be in my hometown of Detroit on Thursday, I remain deeply committed to my home nation, America. I do not see a political path forward in light of last evening’s Super Tuesday primary results. However, this grassroots movement on behalf of “We the People” will continue. […]

    Twitter link.

    Carson is going to speak on Friday at CPAC [Conservative Political Action Conference, a hive of über rightwing nonsense]. Presumably, he will explain why people should continue to send him money even though he is no longer running for president.

  58. blf says

    Presumably, [Carson] will explain why people should continue to send him money even though he is no longer running for president.

    Well, you see, there’s all these currently-empty storage pyramids in Egypt…

  59. What a Maroon, living up to the 'nym says

    God told most of these candidates to run, right? So is he the one that tells them when to drop out?

  60. says

    Classy as ever. Republican operatives in Texas gave Robert Morrow the job of Travis County GOP chairman. Robert Morrow posted the following drivel on his Twitter account:

    Bill says Hillary has “eaten more pussy than he has.
    ………….
    Is Hillary Clinton really an angry bull dyke? Bill says so!!
    ———–
    Heartless Hillary told druggie Bill Clinton to abandon a son he had with a black street hooker.
    ————
    Would Hillary Clinton swallow all of your cum or would it be more of a Lorena Bobbitt situation?
    ————
    Pretty sure George W. Bush can suck a dick better than Hillary Clinton.

    After the drivel was noticed by the press, and other Republicans threatened to remove Morrow from his job as Travis County GOP chair, Morrow defended himself by telling reporters:

    Tell them they can go fuck themselves. My friends and neighbors and political supporters, they wanted Robert Morrow. It’s derogatory toward Hillary Clinton because I hate Hillary Clinton. But I’m not sexist. Why would you ask that? I’m not sexist. I like beautiful women, I celebrate feminine beauty. I’m like Donald Trump — I love women.

    Texas Tribune link.

  61. says

    More white nationalist news associated with Trump.

    White nationalist anti-Semites David Duke and Kevin MacDonald used Duke’s Super Tuesday radio show to urge listeners to “get out and vote” for Trump and praised Trump’s handling of media questions about his white nationalist support.

    Numerous white nationalist figures have been supporting Trump’s campaign. His candidacy has been a fundraising engine for white nationalist media groups, which have praised Trump for spurring “unprecedented interest in” their ideology and putting their ideas “firmly in the mainstream.” The Trump campaign has come under fire after white nationalist radio host James Edwards said he was given press credentials to attend a Trump rally and announced plans to air a “previously taped 20-minute interview with Donald Trump, Jr.”

    Duke is one of the most infamous white nationalist figures, having been a Ku Klux Klan leader and far-right politician. He now devotes his time to a radio program and website, which regularly post anti-Semitic screeds. He became a campaign issue after Trump repeatedly refused to disavow Duke’s support during a February 28 CNN appearance. (Trump later implausibly claimed that a faulty earpiece was responsible for the incident.)

    MacDonald, a retired professor of psychology at California State University, Long Beach, is the editor of the white nationalist publication Occidental Observer. Its mission statement says it is dedicated to “white identity, white interests, and the culture of the West.” […]

    Media Matters link.

  62. quotetheunquote says

    Lynna #66 (and others)

    Trump T. Trump really is like (former Toronto Mayor) Rob Ford* – he lies like a little child; he just automatically lies to cover up having done something “bad”; he says “I wasn’t taking a cookie!” while standing there on a stool with his arm right in the jar; he lies, whether the lie has even the slightest chance of being believed, or not. (You really “know nothing about white supremacist groups”? Isn’t that a little hard to do, living your whole life in the US?)

    And if he gets caught out, he’ll just move on and tell another lie to try to cover the previous one.

    And, like Ford, he has a “nation” of followers who don’t care, they are with him no matter what. Yay, celebrity culture!

    *But of course, much scarier and in a position to do a lot more damage.

  63. says

    The United Farm Workers union endorsed Hillary Clinton.
    http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/united-farm-workers-endorse-hillary-clinton-37361566

    In other news, this is a followup to comment 53 which discusses the video of a young black woman being pushed around, and then escorted out of a Trump rally. The guy in the video that is wearing a red cap is Matthew Heimbach. The Southern Poverty Law Center describes him as “the face of a new generation of white nationalists.”

    After the incident, the young woman was interviewed. She said she was called a “n*g*er” and a “c**t” among other things.

    Matthew Heimbach has showed up at conservative rallies in the past, including CPAC in 2013. Talking Points Memo link.

    Right Wing Watch link.

    […] Heimbach first made waves when he founded the White Student Union at Towson University and he is now a leader of the Traditionalist Worker Party. An Al Jazeera profile of Heimbach last year was titled “The Little Führer.”

    Now Heimbach has turned up in another story that exemplifies why so many people are afraid of the forces being unleashed by the bigotry and bullying of Trump’s campaign.

    “White supremacists hurled racist and sexist slurs Tuesday afternoon as they pushed a black protester out of a Donald Trump rally in Kentucky,” reports Raw Story. Video shows Trump supporters violently shoving a black protester, including a screaming man wearing a “Make America Great Again” hat.

    In the New York Daily News, Shaun King reported that the man seen shoving and cursing at the Louisville rally appeared to be Heimbach. For him and others wearing the same Traditionalist Worker Party t-shirts, writes King, “a Trump rally is a white power rally.” […]

  64. blf says

    Islamophobia in action, Man removed from UK flight over ‘prayer’ message on phone:

    Laolu Opebiyi says fellow passenger on EasyJet plane at Luton saw his conversation on ‘ISI men’ WhatsApp group and reported him

    A British man was removed from a plane by armed police at Luton airport after a fellow passenger read a message on his mobile phone about “prayer” and reported him as a security threat.

    Laolu Opebiyi […] said he was forced to hand over his phone and supply his password in order to establish his innocence after he tried to arrange a conference call prayer with friends using WhatsApp.

    A detective subsequently questioned and cleared Opebiyi but the pilot refused to allow him back on to the easyJet flight to Amsterdam last Thursday and he was forced to wait more than three hours for the next scheduled departure.

    [… Opebiyi] believes the passenger next to him […] jumped to the conclusion that he may be a terrorist.

    “That guy doesn’t know me and within two minutes he’s judging me,” he told the Guardian. “[… I]t was pretty unfair the way I was treated. I don’t think anyone, irrespective of their religion should be treated in such a way.

    “If we keep on giving into this kind of bigotry and irrational fear, I dare say that the terrorists will have achieved their aim.”

  65. blf says

    Nestlé admits slave labour risk on Brazil coffee plantations:

    Nestlé and Jacobs Douwe Egberts say beans from Brazilian plantations using slave labour may have ended up in their coffee

    Two of the world’s biggest coffee companies, Nestlé and Jacobs Douwe Egberts, admit that beans from Brazilian plantations using slave labour may have ended up in their coffee because they do not know the names of all the plantations that supply them.

    People trafficked to work for little or no pay, and forced to live on rubbish heaps and drink water alongside animals, may have worked on plantations that supply the two companies, according to the media and research centre DanWatch.

    The Denmark-based group claims that human rights abuses are rampant across Brazil’s lucrative coffee industry, with hundreds of workers rescued from slavery-like conditions every year.

    [… W]orkers often face debt bondage, non-existent work contracts, exposure to deadly pesticides, lack of protective equipment, and accommodation without doors, mattresses or drinking water […]. Such working conditions contravene Brazilian and international law, as well as the ethical codes Nestlé and Jacobs Douwe Egberts require from their suppliers.

  66. says

    I listened to Mitt Romney excoriate Donald Trump. Romney provided details to prove his main point that Trump is a phony and a fraud, “as worthless as a degree from Trump University.”

    I think the end result will be that a few mormons in Utah will decide not to vote for Trump. But in the main, Romney just boosted Trump’s stock among Trump supporters.

    http://bigstory.ap.org/article/999a7f499006448a9068f19130050428/gop-sees-options-stopping-trump-not-good-ones

  67. says

    There is Republican debate scheduled for tonight. Katich, Rubio, Cruz, and Trump.
    The debate airs on Fox News, Fox News Radio, and FoxNews.com at 9 PM ET.

    In other news, Trump will have more to say about the Romney speech, but here is Trump’s general whine about “the establishment.” It includes yet another threat to run as a third party candidate:

    “I am watching television and I am seeing ad after ad after ad put in by the establishment knocking the hell out of me, and it’s really unfair,” Trump said on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.” “But if I leave, if I go, regardless of independent, which I may do — I mean, may or may not. But if I go, I will tell you, these millions of people that joined, they’re all coming with me.”

    Politico link.

  68. blf says

    More possible slavery in Brazil, Brazil: loss of ‘dirty list’ sparks fears of worker exploitation as Olympics near:

    International Labour Organisation criticises suspension of list of firms using slave labour just as Brazil faces migrant worker influx for Olympic Games

    The loss of one of Brazil’s most fundamental tools against slave labour amid the country’s worst recession in more than 100 years presents a serious risk of worker exploitation before the Olympic Games, according to labour activists.

    Luiz Machado, national coordinator of Brazil’s anti-slavery programme at the International Labour Organisation (ILO), warns that the suspension of the so-called dirty list of companies caught using slave labour, combined with an extremely conservative congress and rising unemployment, creates the possibility for a rise in modern-day slavery.

    “We have recently seen an increase in child labour, and this is usually linked to an increase in slave labour,” he said. “While the increase in child labour shows up in government household surveys, slave labour is a much more invisible crime.”

    Machado is also concerned that the Olympics could provide an opportunity for further exploitation. “Whenever you have one of these mega-events, there is always an increase in migration,” he said. “Migrants are particularly vulnerable to slave labour.”

    […]

    [… I]n late 2014, the supreme court ordered the labour ministry to suspend publication of the [dirty] list, following a lawsuit filed by the Associação Brasileira de Incorporadoras Imobiliárias (Abrainc), the real estate developer’s association , which represented many of the organisations on the list. Abrainc argued the list was “manifestly unconstitutional” due to its “disrespecting of the fundamental right to a defence”.

    “The ‘dirty list’ was one of the strongest tools against slave labour in the country,” said Leonardo Sakamoto, president of the NGO Repórter Brasil. “It allowed us to bring the private sector and banks into the fight against slave labour. Previously, they had said they wanted to help but they didn’t know how.”

    […]

    Ilan Fonseca, a prosecutor from the [labour] ministry in the north-eastern state of Bahia, described the conditions he found in a raid carried out last week in a remote farmstead. “When we checked the area where the workers were living, we found there was no electricity, no fridge, no TV, no running water, no toilet of any kind,” he said. “They went to the toilet in the woods, their meat was preserved in salt and hung on a clothesline, and the tub they used for drinking water was full of mould and insects.”

    During the raid, Fonseca and his colleagues were accompanied by a unit from the federal police because, he said, “in recent years, we have had many more death threats from farmers”.

    I’ve redacted a discussion of attempts to redefine what “slavery” is, the excuses used by the companies caught using (directly or indirectly) slave labour. Also, apparently Repórter Brasil is attempting to keep a useful list going, but not too surprisingly is find it difficult.

  69. blf says

    Not really a surprise, other than perhaps the scale / timeframe, Oil and gas industry has pumped millions into Republican campaigns:

    Fossil fuel barons have invested more than $100m in Republican presidential Super Pacs — raising concerns over special interests if GOP takes White House

    Secretary Clinton is arguably just as much a tool of these and other “special interests” as well…

    Fossil fuel millionaires collectively pumped more than $100m into Republican presidential contenders’ efforts last year — in an unprecedented investment by the oil and gas industry in the party’s future.

    About one in three dollars donated to Republican hopefuls from mega-rich individuals came from people who owe their fortunes to fossil fuels — and who stand to lose the most in the fight against climate change.

    […]

    Ted Cruz […] was among the biggest beneficiaries of fossil fuel support to his Super Pac.

    Cruz, who more than any other Republican candidate openly rejects mainstream science on climate change, banked some 57% of the funds to his Super Pac, or about $25m, from fossil fuel interests, according to campaign filings compiled by Greenpeace and reviewed by the Guardian.

    The scale of investment by fossil fuel interests in presidential Super Pacs reached about $107m last year — before any votes were cast in the Republican primary season.

    [… chart showing klowns and bribes — Clinton took in “only” c.$7m …]

    The Cruz campaign disavowed any knowledge of the Super Pac, but a spokeswoman reasserted the rejection of mainstream science about climate change. Regarding climate change, Cruz’s position is very simple. The data does not back up the theory, the spokeswoman said in an email, describing the global challenge as a politically driven cause that grows government and enriches entrenched Washington special interests.

    […]

    The donations — $107m through the course of 2015 — came from 124 billionaires or businesses that pumped a minimum of $100,000 each towards Republican presidential hopefuls through support groups or Super Pacs.

    […]

    The $107m from mega-rich donors forms a major chunk of the $524m that was given to presidential contenders from both parties last year.

    […] Hillary Clinton [has] made inroads into the ranks of the favoured. Mega-rich fossil fuel donors pumped about 7% of the funds into Clinton’s Super Pac last year, according to the filings. Clinton was criticised by Bernie Sanders and Martin O’Malley, her erstwhile rival, for taking funds from fossil fuel lobbyists.

    The findings revealed the largely unseen power players behind the Republicans’ presidential hopefuls — led by the Wilks family in Texas.

    The family, which made its fortune from making equipment used in fracking oil and gas wells, gave about $15m to a Cruz-supporting Super Pac in 2015.

    Next in line among the big fossil donors to Cruz was Toby Neugebauer, the son of Texas Republican congressman Randy Neugebauer and cofounder of an energy investment firm which has invested heavily in the Barnett Shale — ground zero of oil and gas fracking in Texas. The younger Neugebauer donated about $10m to Cruz’s Super Pac last year.

    Cruz also won big from groups associated with the Kochs, the oil billionaires who have emerged as major funders of ultra-conservative causes in the US. Cruz’s Super Pac took in $11.9m from donors who have supported Koch causes or its Freedom Partners organisation — compared to $7.8m for Rubio.

  70. says

    Hilary Clinton’s campaign raised $30 million in February. Bernie Sander’s campaign raised $42 million. Ted Cruz raised $12 million.

    Clinton is leading in Louisiana polls ahead of that state’s Saturday primary: 61% to 14%.

    Unconfirmed reports claim that the Koch brothers are not going to put their money behind the effort to undermine Donald Trump.

  71. says

    Excerpts from Romney’s speech:

    His bankruptcies have crushed small businesses and the men and women who worked for them. He inherited his business, he didn’t create it. And what ever happened to Trump Airlines? How about Trump University? And then there’s Trump Magazine and Trump Vodka and Trump Steaks, and Trump Mortgage? A business genius he is not.

    Donald Trump tells us that he is very, very smart. I’m afraid that when it comes to foreign policy he is very, very not smart.

    Then he said Trump’s mentally unstable.

    Dishonesty is Trump’s hallmark: He claimed that he had spoken clearly and boldly against going into Iraq. Wrong, he spoke in favor of invading Iraq. He said he saw thousands of Muslims in New Jersey celebrating 9/11. Wrong, he saw no such thing. He imagined it. His is not the temperament of a stable, thoughtful leader.” […]

  72. says

    A Trump supporter was arrested in connection with the Bundy Ranch standoff in 2014:

    FBI agents arrested Jerry DeLemus, co-chair of Veterans for Trump in New Hampshire […]

    Federal charges against DeLemus included “conspiracy to commit an offense against the United States, threatening a federal law enforcement officer, attempting to impede or injure a federal law enforcement officer and several firearms charges,” […]

    Susan DeLemus, a state representative and fellow supporter of Donald Trump’s presidential campaign, confirmed her husband’s arrest […]

    The event resurfaced in headlines this year when Bundy’s sons, Ammon and Ryan Bundy, organized a standoff of their own at a federal wildlife refuge in rural Oregon. DeLemus traveled to Oregon to visit their occupation and called their cause “peaceful” and “constitutionally just.”

    DeLemus told Reuters at the time that he wanted to tell Trump “the whole story” of the Oregon occupation, adding that he expected the story would “arouse” the real estate mogul and inspire him to head West. […] Trump never visited the refuge […]

    Susan DeLemus also spent time in the media spotlight recently for defending Trump against Pope Francis, whom she called the “anti-Christ.” […]

    Talking Points Memo link

  73. says

    John McCain issued a statement backing up Mitt Romney’s speech:

    I share the concerns about Donald Trump that my friend and former Republican nominee, Mitt Romney, described in his speech today. I would also echo the many concerns about Mr. Trump’s uninformed and indeed dangerous statements on national security issues that have been raised by 65 Republican defense and foreign policy leaders.

    At a time when our world has never been more complex or more in danger, as we watch the threatening actions of a neo-imperial Russia, an assertive China, an expansionist Iran, an insane North Korean ruler, and terrorist movements that are metastasizing across the Middle East and Africa, I want Republican voters to pay close attention to what our party’s most respected and knowledgeable leaders and national security experts are saying about Mr. Trump, and to think long and hard about who they want to be our next Commander-in-Chief and leader of the free world.

    Quoted text is from McCain’s website, mccain.senate.gov.

  74. says

    Fox News anchors Megyn Kelly, Bret Baier, and Chris Wallace will moderate tonight’s Republican debate. The moderators claim that they intend to guide the debate to a more “presidential” atmosphere, but I doubt they will be successful.

    On Saturday Republicans will vote in the following primaries: Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, and Kentucky. On Tuesday, primaries will be held in Hawaii, Idaho, Michigan, and Mississippi. And there is the primary in Puerto Rico on Sunday.

  75. What a Maroon, living up to the 'nym says

    Full transcript of Romney’s speech.

    He seems to be calling for a brokered convention:

    If the other candidates can find some common ground, I believe we can nominate a person who can win the general election and who will represent the values and policies of conservatism. Given the current delegate selection process, that means that I’d vote for Marco Rubio in Florida and for John Kasich in Ohio and for Ted Cruz or whichever one of the other two contenders has the best chance of beating Mr. Trump in a given state.

    It would certainly be entertaining to see the civil war that would erupt in the gop if that came to pass.

    Until of course they start exercising their Second Amendment rights.

  76. says

    More partisan promotion of anti-abortion tactics in the House of Representatives:

    […] members of the House held the first congressional hearing on Planned Parenthood’s involvement with the sale of fetal tissue. This hearing, dubbed the “Select Investigative Panel on Infant Lives” by the conservative representatives behind it, was a wide-ranging discussion of the morality of abortion that Democratic lawmakers protested was more like a witch hunt than an objective discussion. […]

    Four of the six people called to testify at Wednesday’s hearing were openly anti-abortion, and the discussion often veered into territory that left lawmakers at a loss for words.

    “In our society, have we reached a point where there is an Amazon.com for baby parts, including entire babies?” Rep. Diane Black (R) asked at one point. […]

    According to chair Rep. Marsha Blackburn, the Tennessee Republican who led the recent congressional fight to defund Planned Parenthood, the purpose of the hearing was to discuss “ethical issues that surround procuring and selling baby body parts” — an illegal act that Planned Parenthood never participated in, according to each of the nearly 30 states that have investigated the health organization.

    Although these videos have now been discredited due to their highly edited content, and two of the videographers involved have been indicted in Texas for tampering with government evidence and other crimes, GOP representatives were still eager to pursue the issue. […] the hearing mostly focused on the ethics of simply donating fetal tissue from aborted fetuses for scientific research, an act that’s been legal since the 1970s. […]

    Gerard Donovan, the director of the Pellegrino Center for Clinical Bioethics, was quick to compare research done on fetal tissue to the world’s most unethical studies, including Auschwitz physician Joeseph Mengele and the Tuskegee syphilis experiment. […]

    “I feel like I’m a time traveler to the Salem Witch Trials,” said Rep. Jackie Speier (D). “Unfortunately, this time, those being burned at the stake are our scientists, who hold future medical breakthroughs in their hands. They are joined by brave women’s healthcare workers who are simply trying to care for their patients.”[…]

    R. Alta Charo, a professor at University of Wisconsin’s Law School and the School of Medicine & Public Health, addressed the elephant in the room, stressing that banning fetal tissue research has little to do with a woman’s choice to end a pregnancy. “Federal review has repeatedly found that the option to donate tissue has no effect on whether a woman will choose to have an abortion,” Charo said.

    She went on to note the Center for Disease Control’s recent request for fetal tissue donations to accelerate the study of Zika, the virus that’s linked to severe brain defects in thousands of newborns. […]
    […]

    Think Progress link

  77. says

    opus @83, what may be happening in Georgia has happened in other states when legislators try to pass “religious liberty” bills, people begin to realize that the passage of such bills actually depresses the economy. Sometimes corporations even move out of the state in response.

    Not to mention the fact that discriminating against non-christians, gay people, and other population groups puts a damper on tourism as well.

    It was nice to see a self-identified christian object to the religious liberty bill.

    I think enforcement of “religious liberty” legislation will cause all kinds of problems.

  78. says

    Legislators in Mexico want their president to ban Donald Trump from entering their country.

    Legislators in Mexico City are asking the federal government to ban Donald Trump from entering the country, citing the GOP presidential hopeful’s repeated anti-Mexican comments.

    The proposal passed unanimously on Wednesday, according to Deputy José Manuel Delgadillo of the conservative National Action Party. He described the document, known as a “point of agreement,” as a largely symbolic recommendation to the federal government that the local legislature lacked the ability to enforce.

    Deputy Víctor Hugo Romo of the leftwing Revolutionary Democratic Party, which introduced the point of agreement, referred to Trump as “primeval, egocentric and primitive,” before going on to compare Trump to Hitler in public remarks Wednesday, according to MSV Noticias.

    “Hitler was very popular,” Romo said. “He generated a lot of sympathy by adopting nationalist politics that vindicated the Germans’ sense of self-worth. [Trump] is practically a copy. I consider Donald Trump a chauvinist, a misogynist who fosters and leans towards toward repression. … He doesn’t respect diversity.”

    Huff Po link

    Some journalists have suggested that Mexico might end up building wall … to keep Trump out.

  79. says

    An excerpt from Trump’s long response to Mitt Romney’s speech:

    […] “I could’ve said, ‘Mitt drop to your knees’ and he would’ve dropped to his knees,” Trump said. “He was begging. He was begging me.”

    Trump added that Romney “did a big choke” in the election against President Barack Obama.

    “Mitt is a failed candidate. He failed horribly. He failed badly,” Trump said. “That was a race that should have been won and I don’t know what happened to him. He disappeared.”

    Trump continued talking about how he supported Romney in that election, telling the crowd that he raised money for Romney against the advice of others who feared he wouldn’t be able to win the election. Trump said there were so many people at the fundraiser that the carpet was “ruined.”

    “This carpet was wiped out and nobody thanked me for the carpet,” Trump said. “Hey, maybe I could send Mitt a bill for carpet ruined?” […]

    Okay, that is what we expected from Trump.

  80. says

    What a Maroon @80, I agree. Romney is plainly calling for a brokered convention.

    From Josh Voorhees’ column:

    […] In reality, though, it’s likely to be too little, too late—and is more than a little hypocritical to boot. As Trump doesn’t hesitate to remind everyone, Romney went out of his way to seek his endorsement in 2012, well after the reality television star was beating the Birther drum. Romney was fine with Trump’s demagogy when the former Massachusetts governor thought it would help put him in the White House. It’s only now that the Donald is using it for his own political purposes that Romney is taking a stand.

    Undercutting Mitt’s anti-Trump pitch further is the fact that he still hasn’t endorsed anyone, a nondecision that my colleague Isaac Chotiner points out suggests Romney is leaving the door open to play white knight at a contested convention. In that way, he’s not unlike Trump’s 2016 rivals who have refused to sacrifice their own slim presidential prospects for the greater good of their party. […]

    Stopping Trump in Florida is the first step in a multistep plan to force a contested convention […]“Given the current delegate selection process, that means that I’d vote for Marco Rubio in Florida and for John Kasich in Ohio, and for Ted Cruz or whoever has the best chance to beating Mr. Trump in a given state,” he said.

    Romney isn’t acting alone. House Speaker Paul Ryan and Republican National Chairman Reince Priebus have pledged to stay neutral, but a growing number of GOP financiers and party strategists are working to stop Trump before the March 15 primary in Florida, where a Trump victory would be a humiliating defeat for Marco Rubio and the GOP establishment. […]

    Romney’s an imperfect messenger, but he’s not a horrible one. CNN, MSNBC, and Fox News all carried portions of his speech live—something they do far more frequently with Trump’s campaign events than they do with those of his rivals. […]

  81. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    AP Fact Check on last nights debate. Some low lights:

    DONALD TRUMP: Families of the 9/11 hijackers were allowed to leave the U.S. around the time of the attacks, even though “they knew what was happening. The wife knew exactly what was happening. They left two days early … and they watched their husband on television flying into the World Trade Center, flying into the Pentagon.”
    THE FACTS: No relatives of the hijackers were known to be in the U.S. before or after the attacks.

    TED CRUZ on his proposal to abolish the IRS: “Now, at the end of that there will still be an office in the Treasury Department to receive the postcards but it will be dramatically simpler.”
    THE FACTS: Cruz dodged the question of how the tax system will be enforced if he abolishes the IRS and has people pay taxes on simple postcard-like forms. No matter how simple taxes might become, the government still has to make sure people are paying their share, and that takes a large workforce. It’s not just a matter of receiving postcards.
    Cruz’s flat tax would consolidate seven tax brackets into one at 10 percent. It’s almost certain that this level would give the wealthy huge tax breaks and cause budget deficits to soar.

    TRUMP: “Because of the fact that the pharmaceutical companies are not mandated to bid properly, they have hundreds of billions of dollars in waste.”
    THE FACTS: This relates to Trump’s unachievable promise to save $300 billion by allowing Medicare to negotiate prescription drug prices. That’s impossible because the entire country — Medicare, private insurance, individuals and other government programs — spends about $300 billion on drugs ($297.7 billion in 2014).

    TRUMP: Repeating his advocacy of harsh interrogation of terrorism suspects, “We should go for waterboarding and we should go tougher than waterboarding. That’s my opinion.” Asked what he’d do if the military refuses to go along with the order because it’s against U.S. law, “They don’t refuse. They’re not going to refuse me. Believe me.”
    THE FACTS: Members of the military are obligated to refuse to follow an order that is illegal under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. If they follow unlawful ones, they risk punishment.

    CRUZ: Obamacare is “the biggest job killer in America.”
    THE FACTS: That evergreen assertion flies in the face of an unemployment rate that has fallen to 4.9 percent from 9.9 percent in March 2010, when President Barack Obama signed the health care law.
    The economy has added more than 13.4 million jobs during that period.

    Looks like Drumpf and Cruz make up facts.

  82. says

    If Drumpf and Cruz make up facts, we can also assume that Trump was lying when he reassured us concerning his penis size. Really. That happened during the Republican debate. What a farce.

    “I have to say this, I have to say this. [Rubio] hit my hands. Nobody has ever hit my hands. I have never heard of this. Look at those hands. Are they small hands?

    “And he referred to my hands, if they are small, something else must be small. I guarantee you there is no problem. I guarantee.”

    The Trump penis reference came in the first 10 minutes. That established the tone.

    You may have noticed that during the debate audience members in the line of sight behind the moderators were giving thumbs ups, making faces or just aping for the cameras like you’d expect to see at a football game or a wrestling match. We’ve never seen anything like that. The pro-wrestling mania of the Trump rallies is seeping into debates, like a virus spreading through a host body. And I tend to doubt that those people were all Trump supporters. It doesn’t matter. Creeping Trumpism is taking over his opponents from within.

    Link.

  83. says

    The Affordable Care Act now provides health insurance to 20 million people. President Obama made this point in Milwaukee:

    Today, I can announce that thanks to the law, 20 million more Americans now know the security of health insurance. Twenty million. Twenty million people. Twenty million folks like Brent. That includes 6 million young people, who were less likely to be insured before the Affordable Care Act.

    As many as 129 million Americans with preexisting conditions can no longer be charged more or denied coverage just because they’ve been sick. Almost 140 million Americans who already have private insurance, so they didn’t need to sign up for Obamacare – they’re now guaranteed free preventive care as well, and checkups. Mammograms. You’re getting more for what you’re paying for.

    Who is Brent? A Republican who saw the light and sent President Obama a letter.

    To My President,

    I sincerely hope that this reaches you, as far too often praise is hard to come by. Apologies to people who deserve it perhaps even less so.

    I did not vote for you. Either time. I have voted Republican for the entirety of my life.

    I proudly wore pins and planted banners displaying my Republican loyalty. I was very vocal in my opposition to you–particularly the ACA.

    Before I briefly explain my story allow me to first say this: I am so very sorry. I understand written content cannot convey emotions very well – but my level of conviction has me in tears as I write this. I was so very wrong. So very very wrong.

    You saved my life. I want that to sink into your ears and mind. My President, you saved my life, and I am eternally grateful.

    I have a ‘pre-existing condition’ and so could never purchase health insurance. Only after the ACA came into being could I be covered. Put simply to not take up too much of your time if you are in fact taking the time to read this: I would not be alive without access to care I received due to your law.

    So thank you from a dumb young man who thought he knew it all and who said things about you that he now regrets. Thank you for serving me even when I didn’t vote for you.

    Thank you for being my President.

    Honored to have lived under your leadership and guidance,
    Brent Nathan Brown

    Link.

    In Nerd’s comment 88, we see Ted Cruz attacking Obamacare as a “job killer.” All lies.

  84. says

    The audience at the Republican debate hooted and cheered loudly when Donald Trump said he would support torturing the families of terrorists.

    In fairly good news, 242,000 new jobs were created in February. The jobless rate stayed at 4.9%.

  85. says

    An excerpt from the Republican debate that shows Trump caught in a lie about Trump University:

    Megyn Kelly grills Trump over Trump University.

    At one point, Rubio and Trump got into a shouting match over Trump University, the now-defunct real estate seminar that Trump is being sued over by some former students. Trump claimed the Better Business Bureau gave his “university” an A rating.

    Rubio, who has lately been unleashing the fruits of his campaign’s copious opposition research on his rival, countered, that it was a D-.

    Finally, host Megyn Kelly stepped in. “With respect, we went back and looked at this,” she interjected. “The rating from the Better Business Bureau was a D-.

    Kelly, who was a lawyer before her career at Fox News, went on to lay out the case against Trump University and challenge many of Trump’s assertions about the lawsuits.

    http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/03/best-moments-gop-debate-detroit-trump-cruz-rubio-kasich

  86. blf says

    Previous posts have also discussed that independent analsys of teh crud’s flat rat tax “plan” shows federal agencies, departments, etc., will be also be paying tax, and that it that tax on the federal government that will generate most of the revenue for the federal government.

    See, e.g, Ted Cruz’s ‘crazy’ tax plan would cost US at least $16tn, thinktank says: According to Bob McIntyre, director of Citizens for Tax Justice, “[…] Cruz’s math has a gigantic hole in it. He wouldn’t just make consumers pay his VAT, he would also make the government pay the tax (to itself) on all of its purchases, from warplanes to paper clips and the wages it pays to its employees. Cruz’s claim that the government can raise money by taxing itself accounts for a third of the alleged yield from his VAT. Without this sleight of hand, Cruz’s overall plan would cost more than $16tn over a decade and reduce total federal revenues by well over a third.”

  87. blf says

    Of course, I mean flat rate tax “plan”, but flattened rat tax, or even fat rat tax, is just as much in UnReality La-La-Land…

  88. says

    blf, Ted Cruz’s tax plan is, like most of the Republican tax plans, a boon to wealthy people. If, by some miracle, that tax plan could even be implemented, it would eventually hurt wealthy USians by destroying the country in which they live. The plan immediately hurts everyone else, except perhaps the military:

    Cruz’s promise to greatly increase spending on the military would add another $2.4 trillion to the debt. That estimate doesn’t change much over the various estimates, because unlike some other proposals, this one is fairly specific.

    The CRFB analysis found that just paying for Cruz’s proposals would require spending cuts amounting to between 28 percent and 52 percent under the group’s central estimate.

    Cruz has also suggested that a surge in economic growth brought about by his policies would cause economic growth to spike, paying for much of it through increased tax revenues. The CRFB takes issue with that, too, noting that it would “require unprecedented levels of sustained economic growth.”

    Specifically, “it would require 6.8 percent real annual growth to simply pay for our central cost estimate of the initiatives on Sen. Cruz’s website, and 9.1 percent real annual growth to balance the budget.”

    Fiscal Times link.

    For the most part, the Cruz tax plan is not just bad, it is also can’t be implemented. It’s Republican shit pie in the sky. Not doable.

    So what do we hear in Republican debates? Penis jokes.

  89. says

    Watch a Cornered Donald Trump Reveal Himself for What He Really Is: A Deceptive Sleazebag

    Yes, Trump lied when questioned about Trump University. Did he think no one would notice?

    Trump University had a 98 percent approval rating. The Washington Post has reported that the 98 percent number is “generally” based on surveys that were given after a free initial seminar. “They were not anonymous,” the Post wrote, “and people were encouraged to give positive ratings in hopes of receiving program discounts or a certificate of completion. [The 98 percent number] is not a credible figure.” […]

  90. says

    During the debate, Rubio attacked Trump for praising Putin. Trump said that he didn’t praise Putin, that instead Putin had praised him. Lies.

    What Trump said on a TV morning show in December 2015:

    I’ve always felt fine about Putin. He’s a strong leader, he’s a powerful leader. … He’s actually got popularity within his country. He’s running his country, and at least he’s a leader, unlike what we have in this country.

    How does Trump get away with branding everyone else a liar?

  91. says

    Here’s some of what’s coming up this weekend in terms of primary and caucus voting:
    Kansas – caucuses for both parties (Cruz is favored over Trump)
    Maine – Republican caucus on Saturday, Democratic on Sunday
    Nebraska – Democratic caucus
    Louisiana – Republican and Democratic primary, (Trump is favored, Clinton is favored)
    Kentucky – Republican caucus (Trump is favored)
    Puerto Rico – Republican primary on Sunday

  92. says

    Both Sanders and Clinton have called for an end to “tipped minimum wage.”

    While the country’s minimum wage requires most workers to be paid at least $7.25 an hour, that’s not true for those who earn tips. Their minimum wage is $2.13, a figure that hasn’t increased in more than two decades. Employers are supposed to make sure that their wages, combined with tips, equal at least the full minimum wage, but many don’t.

    Calling this inequity “shameful,” Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton pushed to end the tipped minimum wage altogether at a rally in New York City. “It is time we end the so-called tipped minimum wage,” she said. “We are the only industrialized country in the world that requires tipped workers to take their income in tips instead of wages.”

    Clinton has supported raising the federal minimum wage to $12 an hour, below rival Bernie Sanders’ call for $15 an hour. She supports state and local efforts to go further, however, and supported New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s (D) current push to raise the state’s minimum wage to $15.

    Sanders had already advocated for an end to the gap between the minimum wages for regular and tipped employees. In the bill he co-sponsored that would raise the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour, the tipped minimum wage would also be scrapped.

    The lower minimum wage for tipped workers leaves them in an economically vulnerable position. They are twice as likely to experience poverty; restaurant servers, some of the most common tipped employees, experience a poverty rate nearly three times higher than the average. The differences have gender and racial impacts, as women make up two-thirds of the country’s tipped workers, while people of color make up about 40 percent despite being about 30 percent of the workforce. […]

    Think Progress link.

    Eight states have already repealed distinctions between tipped and regular employees.

  93. says

    Alex Jones of InfoWars is now pushing the theory that Marco Rubio has a secret “gay past” and is obsessed with Donald Trump’s package. Jones and Trump have expressed admiration for each other.

    In other, strange, Republican news, Alex Jones and Phyllis Schlafly agreed that Donald Trump smells like Ronald Reagan.

  94. says

    This is a followup to comment 51.

    It looks like some of the Trump campaign’s distance from white supremacist groups may be erased by facts:

    The syndicator for a white nationalist radio program is threatening to release emails proving Donald Trump’s campaign is lying about having “nothing to do with” Donald Trump Jr. fielding questions from a white nationalist during an interview.

    James Edwards is the host of the Liberty News Radio-syndicated The Political Cesspool, which describes itself as representing “a philosophy that is pro-White” and states that it has supported “pro-Confederate” causes against “black malcontents.”

    The Trump campaign gave Edwards and his Political Cesspool radio program press credentials for its February 27 rally in Memphis, TN. Edwards then wrote on his website that an upcoming show “will feature a previously taped 20-minute interview with Donald Trump, Jr.” […]

    The Trump campaign disavowed the association with James Edwards:

    “Donald Trump Jr. was not in attendance and although he served as a surrogate for his father on several radio programs over the past week, to his knowledge and that of the campaign, did not participate in an interview with this individual.” […]

    Trump Jr. said Wednesday that he was speaking to another radio host for a previously scheduled interview via telephone when, unbeknownst to him, Edwards chimed in with questions. “He was brought into the interview without my knowledge,” the 38-year-old executive vice president for the Trump Organization said in an interview with Bloomberg Politics. “Had I known, I would have obviously never done an interview with him.”

    The Sam Bushman and James Edwards side of the story:

    On his March 3 show, Bushman claimed that in his email reply to Trump’s booking agency, he wrote “this is Sam Bushman, I own Liberty News Radio, that’s the nationally syndicated radio network, James has a show on my network called The Political Cesspool, he went to your rally, was credentialed at your rally, you reached out to James with your email, and I’m responding back and saying that James can’t do the interview because he has a weekend show, but I would love to do the interview.”

    Bushman then added: “The Trump campaign reached out through their booking agency, though. Remember that fact. The Trump campaign reached out to James to do a radio interview via their booking agency.” […]

    He continued, “I called James and said ‘James, do you want to be on with us?’ And the reason I did is because this all came through James. It was James’ media credentials that they had approved. James was the one that attended the rally. They were the ones that reached out — meaning the Trump campaign through their booking agency — and absolutely invited James to do the interview.”

    Media Matters link.

    I guess the Trumps could disavow their booking agency.

  95. says

    Michigan Governor Rick Synder (R) has retained outside counsel to defend him over the poisoning of Flint’s water supply. Another Republican, Senator Mike Lee of Utah is blocking federal funding for Flint. Mike Lee stands alone in this action.

    The bill in question would send $250 million to Flint, with that money earmarked for infrastructure repair (mostly pipe replacement). The same bill proposes to send $50 million the CDC’s Department of Human Services to fund monitoring for lead contamination.

    Mike Lee put a “hold” on the bill (along with other Senators, including Ted Cruz). Everyone but Lee has come to realize that the problem was caused by Michigan’s Republican politicians, and that the problem needs to be solved immediately. Cruz quietly abandoned the stalling effort, and so did other obstructionists.

    Hey, Mike Lee, what does your mormon religion say about poisoning children, and then refusing to remove the source(s) of the poison?

  96. says

    The Mexican government has formally responded to Donald Trump’s demand that it pay for his proposed wall, and the answer is an emphatic “‘No.”

    “Mexico will under no circumstance pay for the wall that Mr. Trump is proposing,” Mexican Treasury Secretary Luis Videgaray said Wednesday, according to The Associated Press. […]

    Politico link.

  97. blf says

    Follow-up to @103, Why Mike Lee is stopping federal aid to fix Flint’s poisoned water:

    Sen. Mike Lee is defending his decision to block a vote on a $220 million package to help Flint, Mich., respond to its lead-poisoned drinking water.

    Initially, Lee, R-Utah, was part of a group of senators to place a procedural “hold” on the vote, but that group has shrunk and Lee is the only objecting senator to be identified. At first, he declined to comment, but he decided to break his silence Friday.

    Federal aid is not needed at this time, Lee said in a statement, noting that Michigan has a budget surplus and a “rainy day fund” that it could tap before turning to Congress. The people and policymakers of Michigan right now have all the government resources they need to fix the problem. And those public resources are being augmented every day by the generosity of individuals, businesses, labor unions and civic organizations of every stripe from across the country. The only thing Congress is contributing to the Flint recovery is political grandstanding.

    If that’s the case, then it is bipartisan grandstanding.

    Michigan’s two senators, Democrats Debbie Stabenow and Gary Peters, are sponsoring this proposal with Republican Sens. Jim Inhofe of Oklahoma and Rob Portman of Ohio.

    Their proposal, funded by redirecting money from a 2007 stimulus program for automakers, would create $100 million in subsidized loans for any state with a federal emergency due to lead contaminants in its water. Flint is the only community that would fit that description. […]

    […]

    “I am extremely surprised that Senator Lee would be holding up a bipartisan bill that would help communities across the country including in his home state of Utah,” Stabenow said in a statement Friday. “If Sen. Lee opposes this bipartisan bill, that is fully paid for, he should vote against it, but he should not block it from even getting a vote.”

    […]

    What’s really happening here is that Washington politicians are using the crisis in Flint as an excuse to funnel taxpayer money to their own home states, and trying to sneak it through the Senate without proper debate and amendment, [Lee blithered …].

    Some readers’s comments:

    ● “The bulk of the article could be replaced with ‘Because he’s a jerk’.”

    ● “Make that an arrogant jerk.”

    ● “Mike Lee, killing black people.”

    ● “Mike Lee sold his home on a short sale and the Federal Government paid the bank their losses — Sen. Mike Lee got hundreds of thousands in personal wealth from these programs.
      “But kids should drink lead because he’s a conservative.”

  98. blf says

    Considering both the source (the Wall Street Journal, a Moardoofus propaganda sheet), and the wazzock (teh trum-prat) involved, I am highly skeptical, Donald Trump reverses position on torture, saying he would abide by law:

    Donald Trump has reportedly reversed his position on ordering the military to use torture against America’s enemies and to target family members of suspected terrorists, policies he has advocated while on the campaign trail.

    The switch, indicated in a statement to the Wall Street Journal on Friday in which Trump said he understood that the US “is bound by laws and treaties”, came two days after prominent Republican national security and military figures published an open letter on the subject.

    The letter stated “we are united in our opposition to a Donald Trump presidency” and adding that the authors were “obligated to state our core objections clearly”.

    Those core objections included the statement that “[Trump’s] embrace of the expansive use of torture is inexcusable”.

    The open letter also pointed to the question of whether the military would or could follow potential extra-legal orders made by a hypothetical President Trump without going through the secret process they use now to deem such actions legal.

    […]

    [… Teh trum-prat’s] statement continued: “I do, however, understand that the United States is bound by laws and treaties and I will not order our military or other officials to violate those laws and will seek their advice on such matters.

    “I will not order a military officer to disobey the law. It is clear that as president I will be bound by laws just like all Americans and I will meet those responsibilities.”

    I’m tempted to highlight trum-prat’s quoted text, not in this case because the text is Not Even Wrong, but because nothing that wazzock says should ever be believed without confirming evidence: In this case, as one example, that he actually knows what both “law” is, and what the law is.

  99. says

    blf @106, After he made the somewhat moderate statement to the Wall Street Journal, Trump reverted back to his “worse than waterboarding” proposals at the rally.

    Rachel Maddow covered the violence and vulgarity at Trump rallies.

    As a followup to blf @105, Rachel Maddow presented a “special report” on the many failures of the Republican government in Michigan, failures which include but go beyond the poisoning of children in Flint.

    Governor Rick Snyder pushed privatizing the care of elderly veterans with sickening results: terrible healthcare and elder abuse. Rick Snyder put an emergency manager in charge of public schools: now the schools have black mold problems, rat infestations, buckled floors, mushrooms growing out of the walls, ceilings falling in, etc. There’s more. The video is 13:55 long.

  100. says

    Mormon Moments of Madness that reveal the attitudes behind LDS treatment of LBGT people:

    […] During a Feb. 23 meeting, the member of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles took a question from a church member in Chile who asked, “How can homosexual members of the church live and remain steadfast in the gospel?”

    “First, I want to change the question,” Bednar [Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS) Elder David A. Bednar] replied. “There are no homosexual members of the church. We are not defined by sexual attraction. We are not defined by sexual behavior. We are sons and daughters of God. And all of us have different challenges in the flesh.” […]

    “Simply being attracted to someone of the same gender is not a sin,” he explained. “There are many members of the church who may have some manifestation of that attraction. They honor their covenants, the keep the commandments, they are worthy, they can receive the blessings of the temple and they can serve in the church.”

    “It is when we act on the inclination or the attraction, that’s when it becomes a sin,” the elder continued. “We do not discriminate and we are not bigots. We extend Christ-like love to all sons and daughters of God.”

    Bednar’s sentiments resemble 2007 remarks by then-Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

    “In Iran we don’t have homosexuals like in your country,” Ahmadinejad told a group at Columbia University, prompting laughter from the audience. “In Iran we do not have this phenomenon,” he continued. “I do not know who has told you we have it.”

    In 2015, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints announced a new policy that same-sex couples would be considered apostates, and that their children would be denied communion until their marriages were dissolved. […]

    Raw Story link.

    That’s a lot of tap dancing around the subject. That’s a lot of spin.

  101. says

    Here’s some good news from the Supreme Court: some clinics that had been closed by an anti-abortion law will reopen.

    The Supreme Court handed down a brief order Friday allowing four Louisiana abortion clinics to reopen after they were closed due to a recent decision by a conservative federal appeals court.

    Last week, an especially conservative panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit handed down an “emergency” decision permitting an anti-abortion Louisiana law to go into effect. Under this law, physicians cannot perform abortions unless they have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital — an increasingly common requirement masterminded by an anti-abortion group that drafts model bills for state legislatures. A challenge to a similar Texas law is currently pending before the justices.

    The Supreme Court’s order temporarily suspends the Louisiana law, effectively preventing the Fifth Circuit’s Wednesday decision from taking effect. Only Justice Clarence Thomas explicitly dissented from the Court’s order.

    Monday’s order from the Supreme Court is not surprising — indeed, the most surprising thing is that the Fifth Circuit permitted the Louisiana law to briefly take effect despite clear signals from the Supreme Court that they should not do so.

    The justices twice stayed Fifth Circuit decisions permitting Texas’ similar, if more comprehensive, anti-abortion law from taking effect. […]

    Think Progress link.

  102. says

    In my earlier comment, I should have provided a link and text to show that Donald Trump doubled down on torture after his staff sent that quote to the Wall Street Journal renouncing torture.

    At a rally today in Warren, Michigan, Donald Trump once again said that he would use torture even worse than waterboarding, a stance that contradicts a statement his campaign released earlier today.

    “As far as I’m concerned, waterboarding is absolutely fine but we should go much further,” he said. […]

    Right Wing Watch link.

  103. blf says

    This is a test, please ignore…

    (Odd, for some reason, two very recent comments of mine (not in this thread) have been put in Moderation. Neither contained anything which should trigger the filter, leaving me very surprised.)

  104. says

    blf @111, both of my recent comments also ended up in moderation. Neither comment contained links or text that would trigger the filter. I sent an email to PZ to inquire about this.

  105. says

    This is a telling excerpt from Benjamin Wallace-Wells’ article in The New Yorker:

    […] “We are here in Detroit,” Fox’s Bret Baier said, coming back from commercial last night, and, directing his question to Rubio, he described the horror unfolding in Flint, Michigan, which was forced to source its drinking water from a river filled with contaminated lead. The Floridian—the most empathic of all the Republican candidates, the one whose campaign has been organized around the collapse of the American Dream—seemed not to have considered the situation at all. Feeling his way toward an answer, he turned to politics: Rubio said that the Democrats should not be “politicizing” the situation, presumably by assigning blame to the Republican Governor Rick Snyder. Cruz, for his part, claimed that Detroit “has been utterly decimated by sixty years of failed left-wing policy.” (If this were a less frantic and florid moment, this morning we would be scrutinizing the racial context of that history.) The actual human suffering in Flint went unacknowledged. […]

    Democrats are not ignoring the situation in Flint.

  106. blf says

    Following up to @114, there is an article I just tried to read in the Washington Post about the thugs’s stalling on Flint, and blaming it on the dummies. Unfortunately, their site is currently causing my browser to freeze up, making it all-but-unreadable, so I could, literally, only see snippets of the article. From what little I could read, it was the usual story of lies, invented “facts”, denial, everyone-else-is-to-blame, and practically nothing at all said about the poisoned people in Flint.

  107. says

    The people in Flint are African American for the most part. Therefore, Republicans ignore them.

    The “special report” that Rachel Maddow produced is the best overview I’ve seen of Republican malfeasance in Michigan. See comment 107.

    When he was asked about the poisoning of Flint’s water, Ted Cruz said that all of Michigan’s problems were a result of decades of mismanagement by Democratic politicians.

    When Rubio was asked about it, he flailed around so much that you could tell he didn’t really know what was going on. Rubio finally skipped around the issue by saying that it was a shame that Democrats were politicizing the issue.

    The Detroit Free Press posted a timeline of events.

    Here’s a collation of links to articles in the press that discuss the Flint water crisis:
    http://flintwaterstudy.org/articles-in-the-press/
    Unfortunately, the list is focused on 2015 and is not up to date for 2016. Still, there’s a lot there. If you search for 2016 on that site, you will find more current resources.

  108. says

    With 33% of the precincts reporting, Ted Cruz is leading in Kansas with 49.9% of the vote. Donald Trump has 25.0%. Rubio is at 13.5%; Kasich at 9.9%.

    You can see live election results in the right hand column of the talkingpointsmemo.com home page.

    Results for Democrats have not shown up yet.

    In Maine, 4.55% reporting, Ted Cruz is leading Donald Trump.

  109. slithey tove (twas brillig (stevem)) says

    speaking of FauxNoise: Faux’s favorite son Glenn Beck is being held (questioned) by the Secret Service, for claiming to want to stab, stab, stab, Trump. Beck brushes it off as “just a joke”. ha-ha-ha.

  110. says

    The Kansas race has been called: Ted Cruz is the winner, with a double-digit lead over Trump. In his victory speech, Cruz reminded us that he is going to “abolish the IRS.” He is also going to remove EPA regulations, repeal Obamacare, etc.. Bad ideas from top to bottom.

    Ted Cruz also won the CPAC straw poll. CPAC is a meeting of the most conservative of the conservatives. They’re known for combining fundamentalist religion with far rightwing political.

  111. says

    Summary of voting information, (some repetition of info already presented):

    Kansas
    – Democrats: Sanders 67.7%, Clinton 32.3%
    – Republicans: Cruz 48.2%, Trump 23.3%, Rubio 16.7%, Kasich 10.7%

    Kentucky
    – Republicans: Trump 35.1%, Cruz 31.2%, Rubio 17.1%, Kasich 14.9%

    Louisiana
    – Democrats: Clinton 69.7%, Sanders 23.7%
    – Republicans: Trump 42.1%, Cruz 37.3%, Rubio 11.3%, Kasich 6.1%

    Maine
    – Republicans: Cruz 45.9%, Trump 32.6%, Kasich 12.2%, Rubio 8.0%

    Nebraska
    – Democrats: Sanders 55.1%, Clinton 44.9%

    I’ll get revised figures tomorrow. Louisiana was the only primary state, all of the other states are caucus states.

  112. says

    Nancy Reagan died. She was 94 years old.

    In voting news, here is the revised delegate count:
    Trump, 382
    Cruz, 300
    Rubio, 128
    Kasich, 35

    Clinton, 1,121
    Sanders, 481

  113. says

    Revised voting percentages for Kentucky:
    Trump, 35.9%
    Cruz, 31.6%
    Rubio, 16.4%
    Kasich, 14.4%

    Revised voting percentages for Louisiana:
    Clinton, 71.1%
    Sanders 23.2%

    Trump, 41.4%
    Cruz, 37.8%
    Rubio, 11.2%
    Kasich, 6.4%

    Revised voting percentages for Nebraska:
    Sanders, 57.1%
    Clinton 42.9%

    The rest of states are the same as was posted earlier.

  114. says

    Donald Trump came out in favor of torture again today:

    Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump said Sunday that the country needed to be able to torture; to “beat ISIS” and “beat the savages.”

    Trump said on CBS’ “Face the Nation” that ISIS isn’t playing by the rules.

    “We’re not playing by — we are playing by rules, but they have no rules. It’s very hard to win when that’s the case,” Trump said.

    “Isn’t that what separates us from the savages?” CBS host John Dickerson asked Trump.

    “No, we have to beat the savages,” Trump replied.

    “Obviously, all you have to do is take a look at what’s going on. And they’re getting worse,” Trump continued. “They’re chopping, chopping, chopping, and we’re worried about waterboarding. I just think it’s – I think our priorities are mixed up.”

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/trump-advocates-torture-beat-savages

    I think he has, by now, completely obliterated the Wall Street Journal report that Trump would not order military personnel to commit war crimes.

  115. says

    Trump is now pushing hard for Marco Rubio to get out of the race. It’s true that Marco did very poorly in yesterday’s votes, but when Trump wants something, look for the underlying reason. I think Trump is afraid of a brokered convention (or contested convention), and if Marco stays in the race that result is more likely.

    On another subject, here is Trump’s response to questions about outbreaks of violence at his rallies:

    ACOSTA: Rallies, don’t you have some responsibility to keep the peace at these rallies?

    TRUMP: Well, I have nothing to do with it. When you have 25,000 people in a building — you know, today we had to send away so many thousands of people, we couldn’t get them in. If you have that many people, if you have four or five people or ten people stand up out of 22,000 that are in this building that I’m speaking to, a very great entertainer said, Donald, you’re the biggest draw in the world without a guitar, which is sort of an interesting —

    ACOSTA: But sir, can I ask a follow-up?

    TRUMP: I won’t tell you that was great Elton John. I will not tell you that. But somebody did make that statement. When you have that many people — you understand — in a room, and you’ll have a couple of, not skirmishes, just a couple of protests. Really not skirmishes. And we treat them very gently. You know, ten years ago, they would have been treated differently, not by me, but by — that’s the way life is. We treat them very, very gently. And yeah, we had a few protesters today, but very few. I mean, if a look at it as a percentage, we had what, 0.01% of the people in the room.

    ACOSTA: You don’t think it’s something that cotinues to happen at your events?

    TRUMP: No, look, I watched Bernie sanders have a protest. He was up at the microphone and two young ladies came up and took the microphone away from him. That will never happen with me. He walked meekly to the back of the room. And I said, isn’t that pathetic? Isn’t that sad?

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/trump-on-the-crowd-melees

  116. says

    Southern California, including the greater Los Angeles area, is home to some of the worst air pollution in the USA. And it looks likely to get worse, thanks to the Republican-dominated Southern California’s Air Quality Management District Board.

    On Friday, Southern California’s air quality board voted during a closed-door meeting to forcefully roll back pollution regulations in favor of regulations backed by oil refineries and other polluters. At the same time, the board also voted to dismiss their executive officer Barry Wallerstein, who had presided over the board since 1997. […]

    Republicans took control of the air quality board in February, and new members have not been shy about their intentions to bring a more industry-friendly approach to pollution control. All seven of the board’s Republicans voted to dismiss Wallerstein, narrowly beating out opposition from the board’s five Democrats and one independent.

    “With every rule-making and regulation we need to be looking at the economic impact as well as the environmental impacts,” Dwight Robinson, a Republican councilman […]

    The plan would delay installation of pollution controls at the region’s six major oil refineries, something that environmental and public health groups worry will slow progress toward meaningful pollution reductions in the area. The regulations are backed by Western States Petroleum Association and other industry groups. […]

    Think Progress link.

  117. says

    Trump tried again to explain his need to torture people, and what he would do if he were president:

    “You know, it’s very tough to beat enemies that don’t have any, that don’t have any restrictions, all right? We have these massive restrictions. Now, I will always abide by the law, but I would like to have the law expanded,” Trump said.

    “I happen to think that when you’re fighting an enemy that chops off heads, I happen to think that we should use something that’s stronger than we have right now,” he continued. “Right now, basically, waterboarding is essentially not allowed, as I understand it. … I would certainly like it to be, at a minimum, at a minimum to allow that.”

    http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2016/03/06/3757028/trump-torture-world-leaders-react/

  118. says

    Godwin’s law officially suspended for photos of Trump rallies.
    Daily Kos link.

    At a rally, Trump asked people to swear they would vote for him. As a result, we have a Hitler-ish salute from the mostly white audience. Photo at the link.

  119. says

    Ted Cruz sneaked onto the bandwagon coverage of the discussion of Trump’s genitals:

    “I’m not going to engage in the insults. I’m not going to throw the mud,” Cruz said on CBS’ “Face the Nation.” “I don’t really have any views on the size of any parts of Donald Trump’s anatomy. And I’m not interested in talking about that.”

    Talking Points Memo link.

    Without being asked, you just engaged in a discussion of Trump’s anatomy.

  120. says

    Uh-oh, bad news for gun control. The governor of West Virginia vetoed a bill that the NRA loved … then the West Virginia legislators rounded up enough votes to override the veto.

    Gun owners in West Virginia will no longer need to get a permit to have a concealed weapon, putting it among the most far-reaching states for gun rights. The House voted on the measure Friday and officially overrode a gubernatorial veto on Saturday.

    The law, which does away with the permit and training program for people 21 and older who want to carry a concealed weapon, was supported by the National Rifle Association, but opposed by law enforcement across the state.

    “West Virginia’s law enforcement officers have dedicated their lives to keeping us safe and helping us in times of need, and it’s disheartening that the members of the Legislature have chosen not to stand with these brave men and women – putting their safety and the safety of West Virginians at risk,” Democratic Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin said in a statement Saturday.

    Allowing just anyone to carry a concealed weapon means that law enforcement officers have no way of knowing whether someone might be armed. It also means there’s no way to know how much training or expertise a gun carrier has with the weapon. The permitting process also included a background check and a gun safety class, both meant to reduce gun violence.

    But gun-rights advocates were quick to applaud the legislature’s move, which can be seen as part of a broader trend across the country towards allowing concealed carry. […]

    Think Progress link.

    The West Virginia legislature is dominated by Republicans. In the state house there 64 Republicans to 36 Democrats. In the state senate, there are 18 Republicans to 16 Democrats.

  121. says

    There’s a Democratic Party debate tonight that is being held in Flint, Michigan. Should be interesting, if only because the Flint water crisis has been in the news … and because it has been largely ignored by Republican candidates.

    In other news, Ronald Reagan’s son Michael Reagan endorsed John Kasich for president.

    Marco Rubio won the GOP primary in Puerto Rico by a large margin.

  122. says

    More details regarding tonight’s Democratic Part debate:
    – Location: University of Michigan’s Flint campus
    – Time: 8 p.m. Eastern
    – Moderators: Anderson Cooper, Don Lemon, Dana Bash
    – Host: CNN

    The next primary votes will be held in Michigan, Mississippi, Hawaii, and Idaho on March 8. Hawaii is a caucus state. On March 15, votes will be held in Florida, Illinois, Missouri, North Carolina, Northern Mariana Islands, and Ohio. After March 15, it may all be over but the shouting.

  123. blf says

    The following is based on a real article about N.Korea’s latest tempter tantrum, but I could not resists some creative editting… –blf

    Wazzock threatens to reduce US and the reset of the world to ‘flames and ash’:

    Teh trum-prat has issued his latest belligerent threat, warning of an indiscriminate pre-emptive nuclear strike of justice

    Wazzock has threatened to turn Washington and everywhere else into flames and ashes, warning of an indiscriminate pre-emptive nuclear strike of justice in reaction to his alleged inadequate penis.

    Such threats have been a staple of the Wazzock since he before he started his insurgency. But they tend to increase whenever he does not perceive himself as the absolute winner.

    Wazzock says the penis size discussion is a rehearsal for not nominating him.

    Wazzock’s looney campaign issued threats of strikes against targets in the US and elsewhere, saying his enemies are working with bloodshot eyes to infringe upon his dignity, sovereignty and vital dimensions.

    If he pushes the buttons to annihilate the enemies even right now, all bases of provocations will be reduced to seas in flames and ashes in a moment, the statement said.

    A per-emptive, large-scale military strike that would end the authoritarian threat of the Trum-prat dynasty is highly unlikely.

    There is also considerable outside debate about whether Wazzock is even capable of finding a button to push. The Trum-prat goes crazier with each new threat, with many experts saying Wazzock’s still-crude bombast is frothing stupidity.

    There is uncertainty as to whether he has mastered the concepts of evidence or facts needed to govern, and widespread doubt over whether he has a reliable grasp on even his own fantasies.

    But Wazzock’s bellicose rhetoric raises unease in the world including the US, not least because of the huge number of threats and lies issued by a candidate for a very powerful position with control over the most powerful military on the planet.

    Teh Trum-prat’s animosity to reality occasionally erupts in violent incidents by his supporters. Blacks, Muslins, and other minorities have been roughed-up and ejected from his rallies, and there are always concerns about an escalation of violence.

    Relations between Wazzock and reality have worsened since Wazzock’s caucus and primary wins, which outsiders said was a test of how far down the rabbit-hole teh thugs have gone.

    The UK Parliament recently debated banning Wazzock from the country, and the idea has been floated in other countries.

    Similar threats by Wazzock have been made for years, anytime he is not on the front page.

    Analysts said this year’s threats are the most grandiose yet issued, involving a complete suspension of logic. Analysts say one element of Wazzock’s traditional anger is his ego and many bankruptcies.

    Responding to Wazzock’s threat, sane people say he must refrain from all “rash acts”.

    One or two paragraphs had to be extensively reworked, but otherwise it was (mostly) an exercise in replacing “North Korea” with “Wazzock”, and similar simple-ish substitutions.

  124. blf says

    This could be interesting, perhaps largely, I suspect, in How they (probably) “cook” the numbers; The (presumably) dubious methodologies used; and The (extremely likely) failure to address (or simply lie about) the extrajudical nature of the murders, White House to reveal death toll of US drone strikes for first time (my added boldfacing):

    Senior aide says US will disclose the number of terrorism suspects and civilians killed since 2009 in bid to bolster public support for controversial operations

    A senior White House aide has pledged to release how many terrorism suspects and civilian casualties the US has killed in its drone strikes since 2009, the first-ever disclosure surrounding the US’s most controversial lethal operations.

    […]

    The long-desired disclosure will cover strikes in undeclared US battlefields, such as Pakistan, Yemen, Libya, Somalia and elsewhere, rather than the active war theaters of Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria. There was no specific date set for release, White House officials said, though [Lisa] Monaco [Barack Obama’s counter-terrorism and homeland security adviser], said it will occur in the “coming weeks”.

    “Not only is greater transparency the right thing to do, it is the best way to maintain the legitimacy of our counter-terrorism actions and the broad support of our allies,” Monaco told the Council on Foreign Relations on Monday.

    […]

    Monaco said the administration intends the disclosure to occur annually, though she and her colleagues have less than a year remaining in office and it is unclear if their successors will institutionalize the disclosure of what Obama aides have for years suggested was a highly classified assessment. A key congressional leader argued on Monday for codifying the disclosure in law.

    Cori Crider, an attorney for drone strike victims at Reprieve, said that though this was a step in the right direction, “it doesn’t go nearly far enough”.

    “In every region where we have pursued an aggressive, secret drone policy, militancy has gotten stronger. It’s not enough to tally up the drones’ body count — we need a thorough reassessment of the program itself.”

    Human rights groups have for years called upon the administration to release hard data about its lethal counter-terrorism strikes and interpreted the administration’s reluctance as an indication that the strikes kill vastly more people than US officials — who rarely speak for the record — acknowledge.

    In February 2013, Senator Lindsey Graham […], stated that drone strikes had killed approximately 4,700 people. Administration officials have over the years obfuscated whether the CIA and the US military have compiled data on how many people — including civilians — their overlapping strikes have killed, particularly considering that the CIA’s so-called “signature strikes” kill people without prior knowledge of their identities if they fit presumed terrorist behavioral criteria.

    A senior senator on the intelligence committee, Democrat Dianne Feinstein of California, said in 2013 that the CIA’s drone strikes were killing single digits of civilians each year, a claim made earlier by the CIA director, John Brennan. [I assume what they meant to say is that after blowing people up, only an occasional finger could be found in the rubble –blf] That figure has come into question, as Feinstein has accused the CIA of lying to her on an unrelated inquiry, and documents published by the Intercept last year indicated that the US military retroactively defines people killed in drone strikes as combatants.

    […]

    While the administration claims its drone strikes are the state of the art in precision, some of those outside accounts call the unverified claims into question. An analysis by the group Reprieve in 2014 found that the US killed 1,147 people in Pakistan and Yemen in the course of targeting only 41 men.

    […]

    Monaco’s address came days after the Justice Department agreed to disclose additional information about how the administration conducts lethal drone strikes.

    Late on Friday, in response to a transparency lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union, US attorney Preet Bharara and a senior department official, Benjamin Mizer, agreed to release “a much more detailed explanation of the standards and procedures employed in both capture and lethal targeting counter-terrorism operations”, according to a letter the officials sent to US federal judge Colleen McMahon.

    […]

    Representative Adam Schiff, the ranking Democrat on the House intelligence committee, praised the forthcoming casualty assessment as a method to combat propaganda about drones and indicated that Congress ought to require the disclosure by law.

    “There is still value in considering a statutory requirement to make this executive action permanent, ensuring that our commitment to transparency extends beyond the term of the current administration,” Schiff said.

  125. blf says

    As previously noted, Mexico’s president has basically told teh trum-prat to go feck himself, Mexican president compares Trump rhetoric to Hitler and Mussolini (the Grauniad’s edits in {curly braces}):

    ● Peña Nieto warns that ‘strident’ words have led to ‘very ominous situations’
    ● President says Mexico will not pay for proposed border wall

    Mexico’s President Enrique Peña Nieto has said that comments by US presidential candidate Donald Trump have damaged relationships between the two countries, and compared Trump’s “strident” tone to those of fascist leaders Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini.

    In his most outspoken comments so far on the GOP frontrunner, Peña Nieto also denied that Mexico would cover the cost of Trump’s proposed border wall.

    “There have been episodes in human history, unfortunately, where these expressions of strident rhetoric have led to very ominous situations,” Peña Nieto told the Mexican newspaper Excélsior in an interview published on Monday. “That’s how Mussolini got in, that’s how Hitler got in: they took advantage of a situation, a problem perhaps, which humanity was going through at the time, after an economic crisis.”

    Peña Nieto’s pronouncements are the most forceful so far against Trump, whose rise to the top of the Republican primary races has spooked Mexicans of all social strata.

    […]

    When asked is there was a scenario in which Mexico would pay for a border wall, he responded: “There is no scenario.”

    […]

    Mexicans have taken to mocking Trump with memes on social media sites and beating piñatas resembling the real estate mogul-turned-politician. Politicians are speaking out, too, most notably ex-president Vicente Fox, who told Fusion, “I’m not going to pay for that fucking wall.”

    But analysts say Peña Nieto […] is in a tough spot with any Trump response, which will probably end up as fodder for another campaign attack and make Mexico appear to be supporting the Democratic party.

    “Why would you egg him on? Anything Mexico says is bound to play in his favour,” said Federico Estévez, political science professor at the Autonomous Technological Institute of Mexico. “If you punch back{…} there you are aligned with the Democrats and you get nothing {in the bilateral relationship} as a result.”

    Some readers’s comments:

    ● “Like the Mexicans sticking it to Trump. No people should accept that kind of abuse.”

    ● “Good for him. Anytime Trump tries to abuse Mexico or Mexicans they should tell that orange faced baboon to fuck right off. And it’ll be cheaper building a wall around Trump. Maybe with a reflecting pool.”

  126. blf says

    Whilst there is nothing obviously “wrong” with either the programme or teh trum-prat’s use of it, his use of the programme seems rather hypocritical (i.e., usual operating procedure for the wazzock), Trump hammers China while using its immigrants’ money to build tower:

    The Republican frontrunner has said China has taken US jobs, but a report finds his project in Jersey City leans heavily on funds from visa program

    In his run for the Republican presidential nomination, Donald Trump has been relentlessly negative about Chinese people.

    They have cost America jobs, he tells supporters. They have displaced American investment and driven ingenuity overseas. They ought to be issued fewer skilled-worker visas.

    But when it comes to investment in his own projects, the Las Vegas hotelier-cum-Republican frontrunner has taken a softer line.

    Trump is building a new tower, Trump Bay Street, in Jersey City. To do so, he has turned to an increasingly popular source of financing: wealthy Chinese people who need green cards.

    The EB-5 visa program essentially allows foreign nationals to purchase a green card by investing $1m — or $500,000 in economically depressed or rural areas — in a project that will result in 10 or more full-time jobs.

    Trump Bay Street cost $194m. According to Bloomberg News, $50m of that has come from investors using the EB-5 program, nearly all of them Chinese.

    [… long background about EB-5, including some scandals, snipped …]

    Trump’s Jersey City tower began construction [in 2014]. Its history has been a checkered one: late last year, a concrete block plummeted from its facade and on to a police officer. In December, a campaign to have Trump’s name removed from the building’s marquee arose, in response to the candidate’s statements about Jersey City residents celebrating the 9/11 attacks.

    The city awarded the project a five-year tax abatement that reduced the developer’s tax rate for the first year to zero. With the abatement, Trump’s 2016 taxes on the building will be 40% of the going rate.

  127. MassMomentumEnergy says

    Wonder why one youtube link came out as a hyperlink while the other was embedded.

  128. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    The Kansas legislature doesn’t like that the Kansas Supreme Court is holding them to the Kansas State Constitution. They want to be able to impeach Justices who don’t bow to their fascist wishes.

    Republican lawmakers in Kansas, weary of conflicts with a judiciary that has been pushing for more school spending, are beginning to act on a measure to expand the legal grounds for impeaching judges.
    The move is part of an intensified effort in red states to reshape courts still dominated by moderate judges from earlier administrations.
    A committee in the GOP-controlled Senate plans to vote Tuesday on a bill that would make “attempting to usurp the power” of the Legislature or the executive branch grounds for impeachment.
    Impeachment has “been a little-used tool” to challenge judges who strike down new legislation, said Republican Sen. Dennis Pyle, a sponsor of the measure. “Maybe it needs to be oiled up a little bit or sharpened a little bit.”
    The proposal has considerable support in a Legislature in which Republicans outnumber Democrats more than 3 to 1. Nearly half the Senate’s members have signed on as sponsors. It’s unclear whether its novelty could complicate passage.
    The serious consideration of the measure, though, signals the exceedingly bitter political climate in the state.
    Since Gov. Sam Brownback and GOP supermajorities won control of the statehouse in 2010, conservatives have passed a steady stream of bills cutting income taxes and spending, expanding gun rights and restricting abortion.
    The state Supreme Court has issued rulings to force increased spending on public schools, citing a constitutional requirement that schools be adequately funded, and threatened last month to shut the schools this fall if lawmakers don’t comply. The court also has overturned death sentences in capital murder cases and is reviewing a case that could toss out abortion restrictions.
    “I believe the court has a tremendous problem with overreach,” said Republican Sen. Mitch Holmes, one of the impeachment bill’s sponsors.
    Callie Denton, executive director of the state trial lawyers’ association, said Kansas is “really ground zero” for conservative antagonism toward the courts. Legal groups like hers fear Republicans will be motivated to initiate impeachment proceedings if the bill passes.

  129. nahuati says

    MassMomentumEnergy @ 138 & 139:

    Good clips. I didn’t know Bernie and Hillary were different on the pro-choice issue until I viewed those videos.

    With regard to a video link embedding or being a hyperlink, I think you get a hyperlink if you do a return and some text after the video link. I can’t find the comment now, but someone else originally shared that information on a thread.

  130. MassMomentumEnergy says

    Planned Parenthood’s official position supports Bernie. Pity their money doesn’t follow their values.

    http://www.plannedparenthoodaction.org/issues/abortion/20-week-bans/

    20-Week Bans Are Part of an Agenda to Ban All Abortion: The introduction of these bans doesn’t come in isolation. They’re part of a dangerous, out-of-touch, and coordinated effort to chip away at abortion access. Anti-abortion politicians in Congress and state legislatures are pushing their agenda, bit by bit, to ultimately outlaw abortion completely.

  131. chigau (違う) says

    re: embedding videos
    nahuati is correct.
    If the naked url is the last thing in a comment, the video embeds.
    Put anything after it, it doesn’t embed.
    Because reasons.

  132. says

    Bloomberg is not going to run for president. He said he is staying out of the race because he feels his campaign would likely hand the win to Trump or Cruz. It is probably true that Bloomberg would take more votes away from a Democratic candidate than from, say, Trump.

    Michael Bloomberg, the billionaire former three-term mayor of New York, said he’s decided against entering the 2016 presidential race, removing one of the remaining uncertainties in what already has been an unusual and unpredictable election year.

    Bloomberg Politics link.

  133. says

    Claiming ignorance, Scott Walker tried to absolve himself for appointing a Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice who had expressed openly anti-gay sentiments:

    Newly appointed [Wisconsin] Supreme Court Justice Rebecca Bradley in a student newspaper 24 years ago said she had no sympathy for AIDS patients because they had effectively chosen to kill themselves, called gays ‘queers’ and said Americans were ‘either totally stupid or entirely evil’ for electing President Bill Clinton…. GOP Gov. Scott Walker acknowledged he was not aware of her writings while at Marquette University before he appointed her three times to judicial positions.

    Milwaukee Journal Sentinel link.

  134. says

    Trump has his own 47% attitudes. He continues to criticize Mitt Romney for the “47%” speech, but I don’t see how that is different from what Trump says. In June 2015, Trump said:

    I would create incentives for people to work. People don’t have an incentive. They make more money by sitting there doing nothing than they make if they have a job. We have to create incentives that they actually do much better by working. Right now they have a disincentive. They have an incentive not to work. […]

    The problem we have right now—we have a society that sits back and says we don’t have to do anything. Eventually, the 50 percent cannot carry—and it’s unfair to them—but cannot carry the other 50 percent.

    Mother Jones link.

    The quoted text is from a Fox News interview.

  135. says

    A summary of news bulletins:

    The latest PPP survey shows Hillary Clinton leading Bernie Sanders 56% to 35% in Ohio.

    The Seattle Times endorsed Bernie Sanders.

    More conservative groups are launching attack ads against Donald Trump. In some states, like Florida, people have been sending in absentee votes for a month or more. Trump banked votes before his stock began to sink thanks to negative ads and reports. The anti-Trump campaign is late, and in some cases amateurish (focusing on how much he swears rather than his crazy policies).

    The Club for Growth spend $2 million in Illinois on ads attacking Trump. So far, Trump leads in Illinois polling; he has 32%, a slight drop from earlier, but still a double digit lead over his Republican competitors.

    Trump is attacking Rubio more than Cruz in Florida. The Sun Sentinel newspaper refuses to endorse a Republican candidate, saying that none of them deserve an endorsement.

    Bernie Sanders made a mistake in the last debate when he said, “when you are white, you don’t know what it’s like to be living in a ghetto, you don’t know what it’s like to be poor.” Sanders has been trying for a day and a half now to clarify his statement.

    “What I meant to say,” Sanders said, according to an NBC News reporter, “is when you talk about ghettos, traditionally what you’re talking about is African-American communities.”
    —————–
    “What I meant by that is, I think that many white people are not aware of the kinds of pressures and the kind of police oppression that sometimes takes place within the African-American community,” Sanders said.

    “In the African-American communities, you have police officers abusing people, and that is the point that I tried to make.”

    Sanders said no other presidential candidate has talked about poverty more than he has, nor proposed as specific ideas as his to address the issue of poverty.

    “I don’t want to be lectured about talking about poverty, whether it’s white, black, Latino,” he said.

    Link

  136. says

    Democrats in the Missouri Senate have been filibustering since 4:00 PM on Monday afternoon. They are trying to block Republican legislation that would codify anti-discrimination, trying to block a constitutional amendment that would make it okay to discriminate according to Missouri state laws.

    […] What they’ve been fighting all night is Senate Joint Resolution 39, which would advance a constitutional amendment that would protect religious organizations and individuals who oppose same-sex marriage. […]the amendment would protect those who wish to discriminate from any government “penalty.”

    […] For example, the state would be prohibited from altering the tax treatment of an organization or denying it any accreditation, license, or certification. One section specifically refers to withholding any benefit, custody award, foster home placement, or adoption, indicating protections specifically for child placement agencies that would refuse to serve same-sex families.

    There are also specific protections for student organizations, who could not be denied meeting space or channels of communication, even if they violate a university’s nondiscrimination policy. One other definition of “penalty” includes recognizing or allowing “an administrative charge or civil claim against a religious organization or individual.” In other words, if any municipality tried to enforce a nondiscrimination law, it would be prohibited under this amendment. […]

    Think Progress link.

    License to discriminate. The Republican way.

  137. says

    In Ohio, a Planned Parenthood clinic was vandalized. Someone painted, in huge red all-caps: “SATAN DEN OF BABYKILLERS GOD SEE ALLLL Mark 9:14.” Link.

    That should make support of Planned Parenthood even more of an issue during the upcoming presidential primary voting on March 15th.

    According to public policy polling (PPP), Trump leads (35%), with Kasich close behind (35%).

    The Democratic candidates have been clear that they support Planned Parenthood, while the Republican candidates have almost uniformly demonized PP. Trump has praised PP’s non-abortion healthcare for women, but that doesn’t really make sense.

  138. says

    Trump’s racist past rears it’s ugly head … again.

    Another day, another story about Donald Trump being involved in something abhorrent. This one’s from Yahoo News investigative reporter Michael Isikoff, who’s gotten documentation that the Trump Plaza casino in Atlantic City was fined $200,000 in 1991 for preventing black employees from working near Robert LiButti, a Mob-linked high roller who was known for racist tirades. From Yahoo:

    Investigators found that LiButti had, on multiple occasions, berated blacks and women using what one state official described as the “vilest” language — including racist slurs and references to women in obscene terms — and that the Trump Plaza, in order not to lose his substantial business, sought to accommodate him by keeping the employees away from his betting tables, according to commission documents recently obtained by Yahoo News under the New Jersey Open Public Records Act. […]

    Slate link.
    Yahoo link.

    As is his habit, Trump tried to deflect criticism by claiming that he did not know LiButti:

    […] Trump told Yahoo in a statement that he does not remember who LiButti is, but LiButti’s daughter says she and her father knew Trump well and that he often flew to Atlantic City in Trump’s helicopter—a claim bolstered by a 1990 police recording on which LiButti discusses a conversation he had with Trump in a helicopter. (A former Trump Casino manager also wrote in a 1991 book that Trump and LiButti had negotiated extensively over the sale of a racehorse.) […]

  139. says

    This falls into our “the company they keep” category. Trump says he is honored to be endorsed by a Sandy Hook Truther:

    Donald Trump’s campaign has been relying on the support of Carl Gallups, a Florida-based pastor and radio host, ahead of the state’s March 15 Republican primary; the campaign invited Gallups to speak at a rally and touted his endorsement as a “great honor” from a “prominent” leader. Gallups is a fringe conspiracy host who believes the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Newtown, CT, was a “staged” “hoax” and that the father of one of the victims was an “actor employed by the Obama administration to take away your guns.” […]

    Media Matters link.

    It’s one thing to say that Trump can’t control who endorses him, and it is another thing entirely to invite the Truther doofus to speak at a rally.

  140. says

    The Better Business Bureau confirmed that Trump has been lying about Trump University for some time.

    […] a spokesperson for the Better Business Bureau Serving Metropolitan New York issued a joint statement with the Council of Better Business Bureaus addressing “several misconceptions that have been reported publicly and repeated regarding Trump Entrepreneur Initiative (formerly Trump University).”

    Claire Rosenzweig, the president and CEO of the BBB Serving Metropolitan New York, the affiliate group responsible for maintaining records on Trump University, reiterated that the business’s rating had “fluctuated between a D-minus and an A-plus” and explained that the low ratings of Trump University stemmed from “multiple consumer complaints about the business.”

    Rosenzweig asserted, “At no point did BBB change the rating of Trump University based upon a demand from anyone.” She explained that BBB policy automatically discounts ratings more than three years old, leading to a gradual upgrade in Trump University’s rating over time as the business winded down and no new complaints were reported. Rosenzwieg also clarified that “Trump University has never been a BBB-accredited business.” […]

    Media Matters link.

  141. says

    Trump has always been Trumpish. In 1987 he took out full-page ads in the NY Times, the Washington Post, and the Boston Globe to declare, “There’s nothing wrong with America’s Foreign Policy that a little backbone can’t cure.” That headline was above an essay of sorts that claimed the USA was being cheated by other countries.

    In 1984, Trump told the Washington Post, “Some people have an ability to negotiate. It’s an art you’re basically born with. You either have it, or you don’t.” Trump was offering to negotiate nuclear disarmament with the Soviet Union. He knew next to nothing about the subject. That little fact didnt bother him in the least. “It would take an hour-and-a-half to learn everything there is to learn about missiles,” he said. “I think I know most of it anyway.”

    The examples above are summarized from an an article in The New Yorker by Jill Lepore.

    The article goes into even more detail about Trump’s wazzock qualities. In 1999, for example, Trump said on Fox News:

    Our trading partners would have to negotiate across the table with Donald Trump, and I guarantee you, the rip-off of the United States would end. I do a deal a minute.

  142. says

    Ken Cuccinelli is a lawyer, a former Virginia state senator, and an obnoxious doofus. This is the guy that, when he was a senator, did not want to vote with his colleagues to eliminate Virginia’s bans on oral and anal sex. Cuccinelli said, “My view is that homosexual acts, not homosexuality, but homosexual acts are wrong. They’re intrinsically wrong. And I think in a natural law based country it’s appropriate to have policies that reflect that. […] They don’t comport with natural law.”

    So, now, who are the Republican ‘s pushing for a seat on the Virginia State Supreme Court? Ken Cuccinelli of course. In Virginia, the legislature appoints judges.

    Here is some of the not-a-good-lawyer story:

    […] As attorney general, Cuccinelli famously challenged the Affordable Care Act. He lost. He challenged the EPA’s determination that greenhouse emissions contribute to climate change. He lost. He fought a years long battle to force a prominent climate scientist to release documents related to his research. And lost. He fought to preserve the same anti-sodomy law that he refused to fix in 2004. And lost. And he filed briefs defending the anti-gay Defense of Marriage Act. And lost. […]

    Link.

  143. says

    Yearn For Bern is strong among young Muslims:

    In Bernie Sanders’ home state of Vermont, only 2 percent of the population practice Judaism, and not even a tenth of 1 percent practice Islam, according to the state’s most recent Pew poll.
    That hasn’t stopped Sanders from healing historic tensions between the communities by landing the endorsements of the first Muslim congressman, the largest Arab-American newspaper and a prominent Palestinian-American activist.
    Sanders’ message has resonated among young Muslims in particular, as shown by the poll touted last week by the Council for American-Islamic Relations.
    After polling nearly 2,000 Muslim voters, CAIR found that 78 percent of Muslims between the ages of 18 and 24 favored Sanders, more than three and a half times the number favoring former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
    Though Clinton led among Muslim voters of all ages – 47 percent to Sanders’ 25 percent – CAIR said “support for Sanders may actually be higher because its poll surveyed more voters over the age of 45.”
    Discussing the results in a phone interview, CAIR’s government affairs director Robert McCaw said Clinton has an advantage among immigrant voters, who have known her name since the 1990s.
    As with young voters around the country of other faiths, including no faith, who have rallied around the senator’s platform of loan forgiveness, universal health care and free college tuition, McCaw said young Muslims share the Sanders campaign’s “more idealistic approach to the social safety net.”

  144. says

    Election results from today’s primaries:

    With 94% of the vote in Michigan counted, Bernie Sanders is the projected winner. Looks like we’ll end up with Sanders taking about 50% of the vote to Clinton’s 48%.

    The Republicans in Michigan line up like this, approximately:
    Trump 37%
    Cruz 25%
    Kasich 24%
    Rubio 9%

    In Mississippi, Clinton won in a landslide with about 83% of the vote; and Sanders got about 16.5% of the vote (that’s with 99% of the vote counted).

    For the Republicans:
    Trump 47.4%
    Cruz 36.3%
    Kasich 8.8%
    Rubio 5.1%

    In Idaho, only Republicans voted:
    Cruz 43.3%
    Trump 27.8%
    Rubio 18.2%
    Kasich 7.2%

    In Hawaii, only Republicans caucused, and those results are not yet in.

  145. says

    Trump turned his victory speech (he won in Mississippi and Michigan) into a sort of QVC show for Trump Winery, Trump steaks, Trump magazines and Trump water.

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/trump-romney-successful-companies–2

    Trump set up a booth backed by American flags. It was surreal.

    Seemingly wounded by Mitt Romney’s critiques of his business acumen, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump put some of his Trump products on display for a national TV audience in what was supposed to be a victory press conference. […]

    “I have very successful companies,” Trump said, knocking Romney’s critiques. “He really shouldn’t have done it. It wasn’t becoming.”

    He brought Trump magazines — one of which he tossed to the crowd, “Here take one,” he said.

    He brought Trump steaks: “And if you want to take one we’ll charge 50 bucks a steak,” he said.

    He also brought wine which came from “the largest winery on the East Coast.”

  146. says

    Michigan awards delegates on a proportional basis, so Sanders and Clinton will share those delegates almost evenly. Sanders celebrated his win:

    […] Frankly, we believe that our strongest areas are yet to happen. […] This has been a fantastic night in Michigan. We are very grateful for all of the support that we have gotten from this state. We look forward to going to Illinois, Ohio, Missouri and the other states that we will be competing in next week.

    The Sanders win in Michigan was an upset. Polls showed Clinton with a narrow lead.

    I’ve been watching pro-Cruz ads in Idaho, ads that claimed Cruz is going to give back to the state of Idaho all the federal lands. Bonkers. I guess that message worked, that along with Romney’s strong anti-Trump message (lots of mormons live in Idaho). Cruz won in Idaho.

  147. says

    Carly Fiorina endorsed Ted Cruz.

    Good news from Kentucky: Democrats in the Kentucky General Assembly won three of the four seats that were contested in Tuesday’s special election. Governor Bevin (major Republican doofus) is disappointed. Before the election, he said, “I will do everything in my power to make sure that the people who I think embody the values that I was elected to represent are elected. I do think they’ll be Republicans.”

    Thank goodness the people of Kentucky disagreed with Bevin. The Dems even flipped one seat that was held previously by a Republican. The state House has 53 Democrats to 47 Republicans. That will put a wrench in Bevin’s plan to take Kentucky down the same road as Michigan and Kansas.

  148. says

    Updating the election results posted in comment 159:

    Donald Trump won in Hawaii with 42.4% of the vote.

    Delegate counts:
    Trump 458
    Cruz 359
    Rubio 151
    Kasich 54

    Clinton 1221
    Sanders 571

  149. says

    While Donald Trump was touting his wine, steaks, water etc. in a deranged version of a QVC show in lieu of a victory speech last night, all of the cable news networks covered him. Clinton’s speech (she won in Louisiana) got zero seconds of live coverage. Sanders pulled off an upset in Michigan and that news was preempted by Trump’s QVC fest.

    Trump is bonkers, and he is entertaining, but enough is enough. Dropping all other news to cover all of what some journalists have called “drunk uncle nonsense” is malpractice.

  150. says

    Move coverage of the totally bonkers Trump coverage:

    CNN, MSNBC, and Fox News networks all aired GOP presidential front-runner Donald Trump’s March 8 press conference live without interruption, while completely ignoring Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s speech which occurred at the same time.

    Following the projected victories for Trump in the March 8 Mississippi and Michigan primaries, Trump held a press conference which […] was merely an extended “infomercial” for his line of products.

    Although Clinton held a speech simultaneously to celebrate her victory in Mississippi, all three major cable news networks aired the Trump press conference without interruption. […]

    In February alone, Trump received more than six hours of airtime on Fox News, the most airtime any candidate has received in any month since Media Matters began tracking appearances in May 2015. […]

    After over forty minutes of covering Trump’s press conference, MSNBC subsequently aired Clinton’s victory speech. CNN and Fox News, however have yet to air Clinton’s speech.

    Media Matters link.

    Not to mention the fact that they relegated the mounting support for Sanders in Michigan to a little sidebar.

  151. says

    More stupidity from Fox News host Greg Gutfeld:

    She [Hillary Clinton] doesn’t care about men’s concerns and it’s a sin of omission. And I think that’s actually hurting her more than anything.

    Link.

  152. says

    On this coming Tuesday, March 15, Florida and Ohio will hold presidential primaries.

    In other news, a bunch of West Virginia lawmakers legalized the sale of raw milk. To celebrate, they all drank some raw milk. Then they got sick.

    Some facts they ignored:

    […] According to an analysis by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), between 1993 and 2006 more than 1500 people in the United States became sick from drinking raw milk or eating cheese made from raw milk. In addition, CDC reported that unpasteurized milk is 150 times more likely to cause foodborne illness and results in 13 times more hospitalizations than illnesses involving pasteurized dairy products.

    Raw milk is milk from cows, sheep, or goats that has not been pasteurized to kill harmful bacteria. This raw, unpasteurized milk can carry dangerous bacteria such as Salmonella, E. coli, and Listeria, which are responsible for causing numerous foodborne illnesses. […]

    http://www.fda.gov/Food/ResourcesForYou/Consumers/ucm079516.htm

    WSAZ News Channel 3 link.

    Some of the West Virginia lawmakers are denying that it was the raw milk that made them sick. The percentage of raw-milk-imbibers who got ill tells a different story.

  153. blf says

    Another glimpse into a wazzockpratian future, as currently practiced (prat-ed?) in Poland, Poland’s legal reforms do not comply with constitution, court rules:

    Law and Justice government declared it would not recognise ruling over law passed last December concerning country’s judges

    Poland’s constitutional court has struck down a set of government reforms concerning its judges that have paralysed the country’s top court.

    The populist Law and Justice (PiS) government […] said in advance that it would not recognise the ruling.

    The move appears to have set the government on a collision course with the European Union, which launched an unprecedented investigation in January into the reforms, which could result in punitive measures.

    The chief justice, Andrzej Rzepliński, said the court found that many sections of a law passed in December were “non-compliant with the Polish constitution”.

    The law “prevents the honest and proper functioning of the{…} constitutional court, by interfering in its independence and separation from other powers, thus violating the principles of the rule of law,” Rzepliński said.

    Legal and opposition figures have criticised the law for paralysing the court and removing important checks on the government’s power.

    In a leaked draft report, legal experts from the Council of Europe rights watchdog warned that the reforms undermined democracy, human rights and the rule of law in Poland.

    […]

    The new law raised the bar for constitutional court rulings from a simple majority to a two-thirds majority, while requiring 13 judges to be present for the most contentious cases, instead of nine previously.

    […]

    The statement that will be delivered by some of the judges of the constitutional court will not be a verdict in the legal sense of the term, the Polish prime minister, Beata Szydło, had said on Tuesday.

    We don’t like your ruling so we will ignore it (Polish government); We don’t like you so we will ignore your nomination (USAian Senate).

  154. says

    blf @169, I see the European Union playing a good role here. The investigation, and the possible “punitive measures,” should put the wazzocks in Poland back on the reality track (I hope).

  155. blf says

    This is amusing, but also brings back something of a bad memory for me: At the time, I was living in California and still attending school, and had nightmares about being targeted by this loon. (Never mind that the killings were many hundreds of kilometres away.) Ted Cruz is the Zodiac killer: the anatomy of a meme gone rogue:

    A recent poll revealed that 38% of Floridian voters believed that Ted Cruz might actually be the Zodiac killer. Enough said

    [… history of the origin of the meme …]

    People all over the country are slyly linking the Republican presidential candidate’s name with that of the serial killer who terrorized California for several years in the late 60s and early 70s, and who was never definitively identified.

    [… various examples of the meme …]

    [… I]n your daily rounds of several respectable news outlets — among them the Washington Post and Vox Media — you found serious journalists who took it upon themselves to “debunk” the notion that Cruz is in fact a serial killer.

    Last week, for extra fun and mouseclicks, the respected polling outfit Public Policy Polling found that 38% of voters in Florida believed that Ted Cruz might be the Zodiac killer. […]

    […]

    These things might lead you to believe that there really is a constituency in America who have been fooled by this meme into thinking that the Zodiac is several hundred delegates away from the presidency. Perhaps there is. More likely, however, is that these people are kidding. In fact, the first rule of the “Ted Cruz is the Zodiac” meme club is this: you don’t actually believe Ted Cruz is the Zodiac.

    […]

    [… T]he meme works on a higher level. It satirizes the fact that political discourse in America has sunk so low that this kind of spurious accusation can actually get traction. Ted-Cruz-is-the-Zodiac types often say they’re only doing what birther Republicans did to Obama in 2008. They repeatedly insisted that Obama’s birth certificate was faked, and that he was born in Kenya. Gradually, certain members of the public began to believe it. So claiming that Ted Cruz is the Zodiac simply mimics the mass-panic technique Republican have already perfected, several meme proponents argued.

    The point has landed pretty sharply. Now that so many people have posted about Cruz and the Zodiac, angry Cruz supporters often appear in comments sections, on Facebook pages and elsewhere, to defend their man. […]

    [Tim] Faust, a data scientist, has played a particularly altruistic role in all this. He came across the meme on Twitter. Faust is, to say the least, not a Cruz fan. “The man is deplorable, contemptible,” he wrote to me. “This election is resplendent with abuses of integrity for political gain, and yet Cruz is still the worst of the bunch. How?! This would be some dark-ass comedy, if tens of millions of lives weren’t at stake.”

    Faust promptly enlisted an artist friend, Rory Blank, to design a T-shirt. A fundraising project was born. Faust is a longtime pro-choice activist, so he decided sales of the shirt would benefit the West Fund, which helps women pay for abortions in Texas.

    Initially, Faust says, he expected to make perhaps 20 T-shirts. But the project caught on, and he told me when he ended the sale on 2 March he had sold about 7,500 T-shirts. That comes out to an estimated donation of about $69,000.

    […]

    [… S]ome people are beginning to wonder if Cruz, faced with the internet ubiquity of the accusation, will somehow be forced to deny it. A favorite offshoot of the joke is to point out that Cruz has never denied that he’s a serial killer, so the possibility remains.

    I can see it. A serial killer before he was born, and now a putative carpet bomber still lacking any understanding of the wrongness.

  156. blf says

    Nuts, I hit Post instead of Preview for teh crud-is-the-zodiac-killer meme (@171). There are some great readers’s comments:

    ● “Think the Guardian is utterly contemptible for treating the accusation that Ted Cruz is the Zodiac Killer as an amusing internet meme, rather than the simple, uncontroversial truth.
      “I mean, if he is innocent, why hasn’t he denied it? Silence speaks louder than words.”

    ● “Ted Cruz has never denied that he’s a serial killer, so the possibility remains — If he denied it, you would immediately know it’s true.”

    ● In reply to “It’s the salem witch trials all over again!”: “Does he float or does he sink? […]”

    ● “I think you could easily make the case that Cruz is a sociopath.”
    In reply: “I’m not sure you need to make a case, I think pointing in his general direction probably suffices.”

    ● “The reason this myth is impossible to take seriously is because one cannot imagine a slimy milquetoast like Cruz being able to do anything that might get his hands dirty. He’s more the sort who would pay a killer to do the job for him, lure him to a pre-arranged spot to collect his bounty, and then shop him to the police so as to protect his money and make himself look like the good guy.
      “Mind you, it’s also impossible to imagine Cruz being that intelligent, so it’s swings and roundabouts.”

    ● “I have no problem believing Cruz is capable of mass murder.”
    In reply: “Let’s face it, Cruz is more terrifying than the Zodiac ever was.”

  157. says

    Cruz does seem more like the type that would hire someone else to do his serial killing for him.

    In other, equally disturbing news, Florida Republican voters think Donald Trump is honest and trustworthy.

  158. says

    A woman who is a guns-rights activist was shot by her 4-year-old son.

    Jamie Gilt, 31, of Jacksonville, Florida, was spotted by police “behaving frantically” in a pulled over four-door pickup truck, according to media reports. When an officer asked her what happened, Gilt said her son had accidentally shot her through the torso from the backseat. […]

    Gilt, who’s a Ted Cruz supporter, is the apparent proprietor of “Jamie Gilt for Gun Sense,” a Facebook page devoted to Second Amendment activism, which is, of course, being trolled following the incident.

    And on Monday night, Gilt proudly said in a comment thread on her personal Facebook page, “(A)ll of (our kids) know how to shoot too. Even my 4 year old gets jacked up to target shoot with the .22.”

    Salon link.

    Uh, maybe it would be a good idea to NOT get a 4-year-old child “jacked up” about firing a weapon.

    Police found a .45 caliber handgun on the floor in the backseat. So, a loaded gun, a child … I would not call this an accident. It sounds more like a setup for getting shot.

  159. says

    Ten years ago, Senator John Cornyn (a Republican doofus from Texas) said this about Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito: “[Democrats] “will need to come to terms with our confirmation process.”

    He went on to add that Democrats treating nominees “more like pinatas than human beings” is “something none of us should be willing to tolerate.”

    Now that President Obama is interviewing potential nominees to replace Scalia, Senator Cornyn has a different viewpoint:

    Even though Senate Republicans have no intention of holding hearings on President Barack Obama’s Supreme Court nominee, that doesn’t mean he or she won’t be dragged through the mud.

    And the chamber’s No. 2 Republican made that clear to a small cluster of reporters Monday, saying he believed the nominee, “will bear some resemblance to a piñata.”

    http://blogs.rollcall.com/news/scotus-nominee-will-resemble-pinata-cornyn-says/

  160. says

    The steaks that Trump touted as Trump Steaks during the infomercial he tried to pass off as a press conference (see comments 165 and 166) were not as advertised. Those steaks said “Bush Brothers” on the label.

    Trump Steaks have not been sold since 2007, but Trump wanted to push back against what Mitt Romney had said about Trump’s failed businesses, so he lied.

    The water Trump displayed was bottled by another company, and a Trump label was added before the water was served at Trump hotels and golf clubs.

    Major news outlets let Trump tout his fake wares in an hour-long infomercial.

    http://mashable.com/2016/03/09/donald-trump-infomercial/#_Sl8nMrL.Zql

  161. says

    This is a followup to comment 154.

    How is it that Trump and his campaign staff are always unaware of the obnoxious views held by their supporters? When they invited Carl Gallups to give the invocation during a January 13 rally in Florida, why didn’t they vet the guy? How could they have missed the fact that Gallups is a Sandy Hook Truther?

    After someone else pointed out the despicable side of Gallups, and made a big deal of it on social media, (and the story was picked up by national media) … then Trump or his campaign disavowed Gallups.

    Trump gets the attention and support of the conspiracy wingnuts, then he waits a while before he disavows them. (David Duke, for example. Fake veterans group, for example.) The conspiracy wingnuts all nod sagely and talk among themselves. They know that Trump has to disavow them for political correctness reasons.

    Bullshit. Trump has it both ways. He gets to associate with the worst of the worst, and then he gets a pass for having done so.

    Trump’s disavowal of Gallups came one day after the family of Victoria Soto, a teacher who was killed shielding her students from the flurry of gunfire in the December 2012 massacre, posted on open letter on Facebook condemning the real estate mogul.

    Connecticut Post link.

  162. Saad says

    American white supremacist Donald Trump chimes in on 1.2 billion human beings again

    Donald Trump said Wednesday that he thinks “Islam hates us,” drawing little distinction between the religion and radical Islamic terrorism.

    “I think Islam hates us,” Trump told CNN’s Anderson Cooper, deploring the “tremendous hatred” that he said partly defined the religion. He maintained the war was against radical Islam, but said, “it’s very hard to define. It’s very hard to separate. Because you don’t know who’s who.”

    And in a shocking turn of events, it turns out he doesn’t actually have anything substantial to say or has the ability to address questions about his fascist positions:

    Asked if the hate was “in Islam itself,” Trump would only say that was for the media to figure out.
    Clinton: Shameful the way Trump speaks about Muslims

    Clinton: Shameful the way Trump speaks about Muslims 02:36

    “You’re gonna have to figure that out, OK?” he told Cooper. “We have to be very vigilant. We have to be very careful. And we can’t allow people coming into this country who have this hatred of the United States.”

  163. says

    This is going to be a somewhat disjointed comment, with a quick listing of unrelated news.

    The Office and Professional Employees International Union (OPEIU) endorsed Hillary Clinton yesterday.

    The four remaining Republican presidential candidates will participate in their 12th debate in Miami tonight. Prior to the debate, Jeb Bush will meet with all of them but Trump. It will make big news if Bush decides to endorse Kasich, Rubio or Cruz.

    Now that Kasich has beaten Marco Rubio in a couple of states and positioned well to win in Ohio, other Republican campaigns have started to run adds against him. It sounds ironic to us, but probably not to right-wingers, that the attack ads slam Kasich for implementing the Medicaid expansion in Ohio, which provided health care to hundreds of thousands of low-income Ohioans.

    Trump blasted Kasich for being absent from Ohio while running for president. That seems kind of a silly insult — not up to Trump’s usual level of slime.

    Marco Rubio has decided to back off of the “small hands” insults:

    Marco Rubio said Wednesday he’s “not entirely proud” of his personal attacks on Donald Trump and wouldn’t have launched them if he could do things over again.

    “In terms of things that have to do with personal stuff, yeah, at the end of the day it’s not something I’m entirely proud of. My kids were embarrassed by it, and if I had to do it again I wouldn’t,” he said during an MSNBC town hall.

    MSNBC link.

  164. says

    Sanders and Clinton debated each other last night in Miami. Univision’s Maria Elena Salinas was one of the moderators.

    Most of the debate included repetition of policies we’ve heard Clinton and Sanders describe before, but there were a few new points related to immigration.

    […] [Salinas said] In South Florida, there are still open wounds among some exiles regarding socialism and communism. So please explain what is the difference between the socialism that you profess and the socialism in Nicaragua, Cuba and Venezuela.” Sanders responded that his comments were intended as criticism of regime-change policies in Latin America.

    SALINAS: In retrospect, have you ever regretted the characterizations of Daniel Ortega and Fidel Castro that you made in 1985?

    SANDERS: The key issue here was whether the United States should go around overthrowing small Latin American countries. I think that that was a mistake…

    SALINAS: You didn’t answer the question.

    […] in South Florida, it’s likely this exchange raised some eyebrows. Sanders’ controversial attitudes towards figures like Castro and Ortega have gone largely unexplored in the campaign thus far […]

    Clinton added soon after, in reference to Sanders’ 1985 comments, “I think in that same interview, he praised what he called ‘the revolution of values’ in Cuba and talked about how people were working for the common good, not for themselves. I just couldn’t disagree more. You know, if the values are that you oppress people, you disappear people, you imprison people or even kill people for expressing their opinions, for expressing freedom of speech, that is not the kind of ‘revolution of values’ that I ever want to see anywhere.” […]

    Facing questions in English and Spanish at the debate, hosted by Univision and The Washington Post, Clinton and Sanders drew a sharp line in the sand on deportation policies, which could haunt them down the road: Both pledged they would not deport children nor undocumented adults without criminal records. […]

    Link.

    It looks to me like Sanders has pulled Clinton to the left on immigration. They are both sounding compassionate and committed.

  165. says

    Saad @178, Thanks for posting that. Trump sounded so ignorant, so much like a schoolboy trying to answer a question for which he was unprepared.

    In other news, at some point the Republican obstructionist stance to a new Supreme Court nominee has got to cost them votes. This morning, yet another rightwing senator told the truth about the inexcusable tactics. Senator Ron Johnson said, basically, that the Senate would happily confirm an appointee if the President were a Republican like Mitt Romney:

    […] “It’s a different situation,” Johnson said. “Generally, and this is the way it works out politically, if you’re replacing — if a conservative president’s replacing a conservative justice, there’s a little more accommodation to it.”

    “But when you’re talking about a conservative justice now being replaced by a liberal president who would literally flip the court — you know, let’s face it, I don’t think anybody’s under any illusion — President Obama’s nominee would flip the court from a 5-4 conservative to a 5-4 liberal controlled court,” the senator continued. “And that’s the concern, is that our Second Amendment rights to keep and bear arms, our First Amendment rights to free speech and religious liberty, will be threatened. And so it’s an incredibly serious moment in terms of what’s the composition of the court going to be.”

    Johnson said that confirmation for a Supreme Court justice should wait until after the election.[…]

    Talking Points Memo link.

    The quoted text is from a Wisconsin radio show, “Morning Mess.”

  166. says

    President Obama held a press conference with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau this morning. The two leaders discussed their joint efforts to comply with agreements made in Paris concerning climate change, joint efforts to stop terrorism, excellent trade associations between Canada and the USA, Syrian refugees, etc. Looked like a bromance of sorts to me. Their wives also seem to get along well and have joined forces to work on the health of children.

    At one point, a reporter asked President Obama about the Republican claim that he is responsible for the rise of Trump. Here’s part of Obama’s reply:

    […] “Objectively, it’s fair to say that the Republican political elites and many of the information outlets, social media, news outlets, talk radio, television stations have been feeding the Republican base for the last seven years a notion that everything I do is to be opposed. That cooperation or compromise somehow is a betrayal,” Obama said.

    “The tone of that politics, I certainly have not contributed to. I don’t think that I was the one to prompt questions about my birth certificate, for example,” he continued. “Those aren’t things that were prompted by any actions of mine.”

    The President went on to credit the Republicans for “creating an environment where someone like a Donald Trump can thrive.”

    “He’s just doing more of what has been done for the last seven-and-a-half years,” Obama said.

    He went on to say while he owns the responsibility to keep building bridges as President, the Republicans’ primary brawl isn’t a result of his actions.

    “I’m not going to validate some notion that the Republican crackup that’s been taking place is the consequence of actions I’ve taken,” Obama said.

    “Thoughtful conservatives” are troubled by Trump’s rise and what it means for the party, he said, suggesting those party members take time to reflect on “what it is about the politics they’ve engaged in” that allowed “the circus we’ve been seeing to transpire.” […]

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/obama-trump-republicans-circus-trudeau

  167. says

    On “Morning Joe” today, Joe Scarborough asked Governor Rick Scott of Florida,

    Would you tell your friend Donald Trump that he should walk back his statements that Muslims, that Islam, hates America? Do you think Muslims in the state of Florida hate America”

    Scott skipped and dodged and danced, basically refusing to answer the question. His performance reminded me of Trump trying to claim that he didn’t know David Duke and had no clue about white supremacists. Scarborough tried to get an answer out of Scott several times:

    “I want you to answer the question!” Scarborough said. “Do you personally think that Islam is a religion that hates America?”

    When Scott once again refused to answer, Scarborough audibly sighed before going silent. Co-host Mika Brzezinski can then be heard telling producers “wrap it!” before abruptly ending the segment, calling the exchange “kind of awkward.”

    Link.

    A significant population of Muslims live in south Florida. In Florida there have been several hate crimes against Muslims. Since November of 2015, we’ve seen attacks on mosques, shots fired at the private homes of Muslims, threats to burn down Islamic places of worship, and threats to kill Muslim children.

  168. says

    One of Donald Trump’s supporters punched a black man in the face at a rally in North Carolina yesterday.

    The black man was escorted out of the rally by sheriffs, and the white guy who punched him was allowed to stay.

    Scroll down for video here.

  169. says

    In the USA, nine of the ten largest detention centers for immigrants are run by people who also run private prisons. Corrections Corporation of America has a contract with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to run Hutto in rural Texas. 26 women at the facility have resorted to a hunger strike to protest the unjust, dangerous conditions at Hutto.

    Maribel Zelaya ended up in Hutto after fleeing violence, gangs, and domestic abuse in Honduras.

    […] The asylum seeker fled harrowing abuse at the hands of her ex-husband, who was rumored to be a sicario, or hitman, for a dangerous gang. “Everyday I discovered a [bad] secret about him; he was a monster disguised as a person,” she recalled in a detailed declaration to her attorney. “He would snort cocaine, and also he would invite his colleagues and friends to drink; they would go to the club and get women and when he was drugged, he would kill them.” Sometimes, he would lock Zelaya up and refuse to feed her.

    Zelaya eventually left her husband and moved in with another man, but her situation didn’t improve. After she refused to carry drugs into the city jail for his gang, her home was broken into and she was brutally raped. A few days later, gang members stormed into her house with M16s and AK47s, warning her to leave or face death. Zelaya escaped Honduras, but was arrested by Customs and Border Protection and sent to Hutto after arriving in the U.S. […]

    Although ICE outsources to CCA, the for-profit corporation is not subject to federal public records law, making it difficult to know what happens to detainees who enter centers like Hutto through ICE’s tangled bureaucracy. But Freedom of Information Act request (FOIA) requests to ICE give us a peek behind the curtain of this secretive world. […]

    More than 60 detainees launched hunger strikes at other detention centers in Texas. The inmates (calling them “inmates” because they are treated like prisoners or worse) are desperate. As numbers of detained immigrants increase, a subset of the private prison system is raking in the cash: $195,000,000 for CCA in 2014, for example. The prison companies keep their cost low, and they treat the detainees badly.

    I was put in a room alone with so much cold, cold. I cried because my bones hurt from so much cold. [Maribel Zelaya wrote]

    Children are also in these detention centers:

    […] The lawsuit alleged that children were required to wear prison jumpsuits, held in small cells, and limited to an hour of outdoor playtime per day. […] After the settlement, conditions for detainees at Hutto reportedly improved, and the scorned family detention center was converted into an all-women’s detention center two years later.

    […] Bethany Carson, immigration policy researcher and organizer at Grassroots Leadership, said. “They tout their programs inside, and it’s the facility for asylum-seeking women. If there are reports that at that type of facility that there’s a hunger strike, that women are resisting eating, that would do a lot of damage to their image.” […]

    Link.

  170. says

    This is a followup to comment 186.

    The man who punched a black man at a Trump rally has been arrested. Finally.

    John McGraw, 78, of Linden, has been charged with assault and battery and disorderly conduct after authorities say he assaulted a protester who was removed from Wednesday night’s Donald Trump rally at Crown Coliseum in Fayetteville.

    The young man who was punched was being escorted out by at least four police officers, but the police threw him to the ground and did nothing to the older white guy who threw the punch. The young black man gave the bird to Trump and to the audience when Trump started saying into the microphone that the young man was “going to mommy,” “Go home to your mom!” etc. (The young man’s mother had passed away.)

    An Insider Edition interview with John McGraw makes him look even worse. He made some claim about he young black man perhaps being a member of ISIS. McGraw went on to say that next time they might have to kill the Rakeem, the young black man.

    Link.
    Link 2.

    Interview with the young man who was punched, and with his friend who took the video.

  171. says

    Elizabeth Warren lambasted the Republican Party members who are obstructing the Supreme Court nominee. She gave a great speech. YouTube link.

    Excerpts from the speech:

    […] There’s a vacancy on the most important court in America and the message from Senate Republicans is crystal-clear: Forget the Constitution. It doesn’t matter who President Obama nominates, because the Republicans will allow no votes on that nominee.

    They will hold no hearings on that nominee. Their response to one of the most solemn and consequential tasks that our government performs, the confirmation of a Supreme Court justice, will be to pretend that that nominee and President Obama himself simply do not exist — cannot see them, cannot hear them. […]

    If Republican senators want to stand up to extremists running for president, they can start […] by standing up to extremists in the Senate. They can start by doing what they were elected to do right here in the Senate. They can start by doing their jobs. […]

    ​But are Republican extremists voting against individuals based on the good faith judgment about a specific person? No, they are blocking votes wholesale in order to keep those jobs vacant and undermine the government itself.

    For years Republicans have executed a strategy to delay a vote on confirming government officials across the board. In 2013, only one year into President Obama’s second-term, Republican leaders flatly rejected his authority to confirm any judges, to fill any of the three open seats on the second highest court in the country. And Democrats had to change the filibuster rules in order to move those nominees forward. […]

    For months after the president won re-election, Republicans held up his nominees to run the Department of Labor and the Environmental Protection Agency largely on the suspicion that those highly qualified individuals might actually help those agencies do their work.

    For years Republicans held up nominees to the National Labor Relations Board, even Republican nominees, in order to cripple the ability of that 80-year-old agency to resolve disputes between workers and their bosses.

    For years Republicans held up the president’s choice to run the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, refusing to confirm anyone unless the president would agree to gut the agency. Republicans regularly hold up the confirmation of dozens of ambassadors, undermining our national security and our relationships with other nations.

    Last year Republicans blocked confirmation of the attorney general, the highest law enforcement official in this country, blocked her for 166 days. […]

    For more than a year, the Republican chairman of the banking committee hasn’t held a single vote on any of the 16 presidential nominees sitting on his desk — not even nominees who are critical to maintaining the financial stability of this country or the ones who are responsible for choking off the flow of money to ISIS. […]

    Barack Obama won the presidency in 2008 by nine million votes. He won re-election in 2012 by five million votes.

    President Obama was elected the legitimate president seven years ago and he is the legitimate president right now. […]

  172. says

    This is a followup to comments 186 and 188.

    The Trump campaign issued a statement about the incident in which Rakeem Jones was punched: “We are not involved.” I would just like to point out that in another of his rallies, Trump said about a protestor being escorted out, “I’d like to punch him the face.” Trump also said at a previous rally that he would pay the legal bills of any of his supporters who did punch a protestor. And finally, while Rakeem was being escorted out by officers, Trump was making insulting remarks about going home to mommy, etc. in order to rile up the crowd. Trump and his campaign are involved.

  173. says

    Hillary Clinton’s response to the punching of a black man at a Trump rally in North Carolina:

    […] Count me among those who are truly distraught and appalled by a lot of what I see going on, what I hear being said. […]

    You don’t make America great by dumping on everything that made America great, like freedom of speech and assembly. […]

    Clearly, I know that everybody in public life gets protested against and sometimes people do have to be removed. But it should be done in an appropriate manner. Other people in the audience should not be joining in. Mr. Trump should not be urging people on. This is deeply distressing. I think as the campaign goes further, more and more Americans are going to be disturbed by the kind of campaign he’s running. […]

    You can see the entire interview on the Rachel Maddow show tonight.

    Clinton also responded to a tweet from MSNBC’s Chris Hayes:

    This kind of behavior is repugnant. We set the tone for our campaigns—we should encourage respect, not violence.

  174. says

    Senator Mike Lee of Utah (a rightwing mormon doofus who is semi-famous for withholding funds to address the water crisis in Flint, Michigan) has endorsed Ted Cruz.

    In other news, Trump’s campaign manager Corey Lewandowski roughed up a female reporter. Lewandowski’s version of events is that the reporter is an “attention seeker.”
    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/conservatives-want-corey-lewandowski-fired-breitbart

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/corey-lewandowski-michelle-fields-attention-seeker

  175. microraptor says

    So if that guy was being escorted out of the room by police when he was attacked, isn’t that negligence on the part of the police?

  176. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    Cliven Bundy refuses to recognize the authority of the Federal Government.

    After several minutes of confusion about whether Bundy had a lawyer, U.S. Magistrate Judge Carl Hoffman entered a not guilty plea on Bundy’s behalf and scheduled a detention hearing March 17…
    Joel Hansen, a Nevada attorney who has represented property rights advocates in a number of cases in the state, served as Bundy’s attorney. But Hansen told the judge that Bundy plans to get another lawyer for trial.
    Hansen said Bundy’s refusal to enter a plea was a statement that he couldn’t have done anything wrong because federal law doesn’t apply.
    Bundy has consistently denied U.S. government authority over rangeland around his 160-acre cattle ranch and melon farm in Bunkerville, about 80 miles northeast of Las Vegas.
    Federal BLM officials said in 2014 that he owed more than $1.1 million in fees and penalties for grazing hundreds of cows illegally for about 20 years.

    Here’s a proposal. Two days added to the sentence as contempt of court for each day Bundy claim’s the government has no jurisdiction. His arrogant stupidity can give him a life sentence….

  177. says

    micro raptor @193. Yes, sure looks like it. There’s an internal investigation going on. Already, police officers (sheriffs) are saying they didn’t see the punch. Even if that were true, why did they throw Rakeem Jones to the floor as soon as they had him up the stairs?

    Nerd @194, the entire Bundy clan buys into the rightwing, libertarian (and in this case, also mormon), that the federal government is beast that has no legitimate authority. Father and sons, all the same. And yet, one of the sons used/abused the small business loan department of the federal government.

    In other news, here is the interview with Elizabeth Warren.

    Apparently, Trump played nice in the Republican debate tonight. I can’t bear to discuss it right now. I’ll post some highlights/lowlights tomorrow.

  178. says

    Here’s some news from the Republican debate last night: none of the candidates were willing to condemn violence at Trump rallies. One example:

    Tapper told Cruz, Rubio and Kasich that Trump has repeatedly encouraged violence against protesters. On Feb. 23, Tapper noted, Trump said he’d “like to punch” a protester “in the face.” On Feb. 27, Tapper added, Trump said that “In the good ol’ days, they’d have knocked him out of seat so fast,” referring to a protester, adding, “Knock the crap out of them. Knock the hell. I promise you I will pay for the legal fees, I promise, I promise.”

    “Are you concerned at all that these kind of scenes potentially hurt the Republican party for the general election?” Tapper asked Cruz.

    Cruz deflected the question, instead blaming President Barack Obama. “You know, we’ve seen for seven years a president who believes he’s above the law, who behaves as an emperor, and he forgot he’s working for the American people,” Cruz said. “Turn the camera around here. How many of y’all feel disrespected by Washington?” Then he criticized Trump—not for the violence, but for asking people at his rallies to raise their hands and promise to vote.

    Huff Po link.

  179. says

    Warmongers. That’s another conclusion from the Republican debate last night. every candidate wants to put boots on the ground in Syria and Iraq.

    Trump said he would send 20,000 to 30,000 troops. The other candidates were less specific, but just as hungry for all-out war:

    […] Many foreign policy experts have cautioned against the use of ground troops to fight ISIS, as it could exacerbate conflicts in the region. […]

    “We need to do whatever is necessary to utterly defeat ISIS,” said Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX). “And that needs to be driven not by politicians but by military expertise and judgment. Right now we’re not using a fraction of the tools that we have. We’re not using our overwhelming air power. We’re not arming the Kurds. Those need to be the first steps. And then we need to put whatever ground power is needed to carry it out.”

    Ohio Gov. John Kasich similarly called for U.S. troops on the ground to fight the militant group and stressed the need for a coalition. “Arabs have to be with us. The Europeans have to understand that this threat is closer to them than even is closer — is as close as it is to us. And in addition to that, you have to be in the air and you have to be on the ground,” said Kasich. “And you bring all the force you need. It has got to be ‘shock and awe’ in the military-speak. Then once it gets done, and we will wipe them out, once it gets done, it settles down, we come home and let the regional powers redraw the map if that’s what it takes.” […]

    Former FBI Supervisory special agent Ali Soufan, a leading expert on Islamic terrorism, previously told the Huffington Post UK that the militant group is trying “to suck the west” into a new war in Iraq. “Then they’ll be not only the regional bad boy, but also the bad boy for the global jihadi movement. They can then claim they are in an international war – a modern day Crusade – against all the countries coming to fight them,” said Soufan, who led the FBI’s investigation of Al Qaeda’s bombing of the USS Cole in 2000 and now works on finding counterterrorism strategies.

    […] “The solution is a regional solution that [is about] defeating the ideology that promotes extremist groups like ISIS, defeating the incubating factors that promote extremism, and [making] countries in the region.. understand they cannot use extremism in their proxy wars against one other.” […]

    Think Progress link.

  180. says

    Trump’s campaign manager did not condemn violence at Trump rallies:

    One day after a Donald Trump supporter was indicted for punching a black protester at a campaign rally, Trump’s campaign manager did not immediately condemn the violence, saying Friday that the Republican front-runner’s supporters are “passionate” and “express it in different ways.”

    “I think Mr. Trump’s people are very, very passionate and they’re angry because of the way that this country has been taken advantage of from so many other countries,” Corey Lewandowski said. “That’s a frustration level I think a lot of people in this country feel and people express it in different ways.” […]

    Link.

  181. says

    Yes, Marco Rubio did better in last night’s Republican debate than he has done in past debates. But that’s not saying much. Rubio offered a moment of stupidity when questioned about climate change:

    […] CNN moderator Jake Tapper asked Rubio to respond to the words of Miami Republican Mayor Tomás Regalado, who acknowledges the human-made threat to his city and wants to hear his state’s senator acknowledge it, too: “Will you, as president, acknowledge the reality of the scientific consensus about climate change and, as president, will you pledge to do something about it?”

    Rubio responded: “Well, sure, the climate is changing, and one of the reasons why the climate is changing is the climate has always been changing,” he said, interrupted by applause. “There’s never been a time when the climate has not changed. I think the fundamental question for a policymaker is, is the climate changing because of something we are doing, and if so, is there a law you can pass to fix it?”

    Rubio blamed Miami flooding on the city’s low-lying land and listed a convoluted second reason:”higher sea levels or whatever may be happening.” He continued his fact-free musings by dismissing the Environmental Protection Agency’s efforts to cut our greenhouse gas emissions. “But as far as a law that we can pass in Washington to change the weather, there’s no such thing.” The audience laughed.

    Most of the time, reporters and debate moderators will leave it at that and move on to another topic. But Tapper followed up with the key detail Rubio wanted to skip over. “So just to clarify, Senator Rubio,” Tapper said, “Mayor Regalado, when he talks about the reality of the scientific consensus about climate change…he’s saying the scientific consensus is that man does contribute to climate change.” Tapper asked if Rubio would tell the man he’s wrong.

    In fewer words, Rubio said, yes he would. “If we pass—if you took the gift list of all of these groups that are asking us to pass these laws and did every single one of them, there would be no change in our environment. […]

    Mother Jones link.

  182. says

    Trump quadruples down on Islamophobia:

    Following last night’s debate, Chris Cuomo of CNN asked Donald Trump about his nonsensical claim that “Islam hates us.”

    When pressed by Cuomo if he believes that all Muslims are “part of the hatred,” a characteristically vague Trump said that “if you look at the mosques and you go to various places and you look at what’s going on there and it’s virtually 100 percent. Certainly you can say radical Islam is a disaster right now, it’s causing tremendous problems worldwide, not just here. But the question was asked about Islam and there’s a great hatred, there’s no question about it.”

    Trump, who wants to ban the world’s 1.6 billion Muslims from entering America, added that Americans must “run our own place” rather than worry that such comments would alienate Muslims across the globe, noting that many people in the audience seemed to like his idea.

    “There is animosity like I’ve never seen before and hopefully we can straighten it out,” Trump said.

    Right Wing Watch link.

  183. says

    Sometimes the rightwing radio jocks go so far off the rails that I have to take a break from reading what they have to say. (Listening to them is worse. I gave that up long ago. I still check summaries of whatever bile they spew.) Expect me to be absent from this thread for a little while.

    Earlier this week on “The Savage Nation,” conservative radio host Michael Savage asked listeners what they think would happen to the country after three years of a Clinton presidency.

    Savage predicted that President Clinton will “seize guns” in order to stop an “armed rebellion.”

    “She is an absolute dictator,” he said. “She will seize guns and make them illegal in any way necessary.” (We can’t help but point out that Savage has frequently predicted that President Obama will seize guns, and he only has less than a year to do it.)

    Savage also claimed that Clinton will usher in a societal “meltdown” and “a social nightmare”: “There will be a transgender in your soup.”

    Link.

    It was the “transgender in your soup” that maxed out my tolerance level.

  184. says

    Ah, good. Someone has a sense of humor about this. Chicago’s “Wiener’s Circle” hot dog stand is offering “Trump Footlongs,” which are 3 inches long. Link.

    In other Trump news, a second video of a violent assault on protesters at the North Carolina rally has emerged. Link. Text and video at the link.

    Excerpt:

    […] These are a presidential candidate rallies. I’m not at a KKK rally. The fact that I experienced hate at a candidate rally tells you everything you need to know about him and the people that support him. People will act more hateful and racist in environments that they feel not only encourage it but accept it as normal. Donald Trump rallies are that environment.

  185. says

    Here is an article about violence narrowly avoided outside Trump rallies. Video, text and photos at the link.

    In good news, a Muslim man handed out free donuts to Trump supporters standing in line: “There you go, now you have a Muslim friend.”

  186. says

    Omarosa Manigault, a Trump spokesperson, said that protestors at rallies “get what’s coming to them.”

    Not all the people harassed, punched, or escorted out of Trump rallies are protestors. Some are innocent bystanders who happen to be black. That said, even protestors should not be punched or roughed up.

    Omarosa said:

    Donald can’t be responsible for every single person that comes to his rally. Listen, you have a right to go into a closed, private event and you get what is coming to you. I do not condone violence. If you go into an environment where you’re interrupting 13, 14 times, do you expect a hug or ‘Kumbaya’?

    That sounds to me like, “I don’t condone violence, but, yes, I do condone and expect violence.”

    When asked about Trump provoking the crowds and encouraging violence, Omarosa said:

    He’s a New Yorker, what do you want him to say? He’s not gonna be pushed around.

  187. says

    Phyllis Schlafly, far rightwing whacko and founder of Eagle Forum, has endorsed Donald Trump.

    Scholarly is a piece work. She covers all the rightwing bases: anti-vaccine, anti-immigration, etc. She wants Major League Baseball to ban foreign players, was an activist against the Equal Rights Amendment, praises the gender pay gap, thinks feminists are responsible for sexual assaults on college campuses, claims married women cannot be raped … and supports Donald Trump.

  188. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    It’s now obvious that The Drumpf is afraid of any real confrontation with political opponents. A “pep rally” was cancelled at UIC after protesters got in due to “security concerns”. The only concern is that the cameras would catch Drumpf being booed rather than universally cheered.

    CHICAGO (AP) — Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump canceled one of his signature rallies on Friday, calling off the event in Chicago due to safety concerns after protesters packed into the arena where it was to take place.

    Somebody from NYC scared of crownd from the Third City??? How does one say Bawk, Bawk, Bawk…..
    A coward, like most bullies.

  189. says

    Trump made several statements today that show how he will continue to use the outbreaks of violence at the Chicago rally to paint himself as a victim. Trump said that “thugs shut down our First Amendment rights.”

    Fox News was glad to back Trump up on this. Megyn Kelly said, “his First Amendment free speech rights have been shut down.” Sean Hannity said, “violent agitators hijacked what was to be a peaceful campaign rally.”

    The problem with this tale of victimhood is that the First Amendment protects the right of free speech, but it does not protect Trump or his supporters from criticism. The First Amendment does not protect political candidates from protesters. Trump has not been silenced, as the free coverage he gets on all the major and minor news outlets attests. His supporters have not been silenced.

    The idea that the rallies of a presidential candidate are private, and therefore only supporters of the candidate can attend, is likewise bonkers.

    And what about the fact that Trump has spent months encouraging violence? He is still calling the assault of protestors “very, very appropriate” today. He is still advising the crowds at his rallies to “knock the crap out of” protestors. When he says stuff like that, his supporters go wild. They love it.

    Trump does not want free speech for protestors. He wants “consequences” for protesting.

  190. blf says

    Oh for fecks sake, Georgia lawmakers poised to pour $2m into ‘fake abortion clinics’:

    Bill, which specifies abortion care should not be mentioned when discussing healthcare options for pregnant women, is now awaiting governor’s approval

    Georgia lawmakers have approved state funding of up to $2m for unlicensed crisis pregnancy centers, dubbed “fake abortion clinics” by some advocates.

    The bill, which specifies that abortion care should not be mentioned when discussing healthcare options for pregnant women, will now go before Governor Nathan Deal for his signature.

    Crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs) are non-medical facilities that seek to counsel women out of having abortions. Many of these clinics have confusing names and advertising that suggest they provide abortion services, and others provide misleading medical information to discourage women from having abortions.

    Often, counselors will tell women that condoms are ineffective, that they will be unable to get pregnant again if they have an abortion, and that abortion and birth control cause cancer. There are more than 4,000 CPCs in the US and at least 12 states fund CPCs directly.

    State senator Renee Unterman, the bill’s sponsor and the chair of the state senate’s health and human services committee, told her colleagues before their vote on Thursday that crisis pregnancy centers do a fabulous job because they offer alternative services other than abortion and that it’s a better thing for people to have better decisions. […]

    In one sense Unterman is correct-ish, abortion is not an easy decision. However, completely lying about it or denying the possibility is not in any sense useful consoling. And tends (very probably) to ignore born children and their needs.

    During debates on the bill, only female representatives spoke in opposition to its passage.

    “If you want to decrease abortion, then let’s invest $2m in sex ed,” state representative Stacy Evans said on the statehouse floor on Friday.

    We’re going to give $2m out to organizations not even licensed by the state of Georgia to provide medical care in any way?” said Staci Fox, the CEO of Planned Parenthood Southeast. “If this is really about providing access to women, shouldn’t we be concerned about who it is that is giving that access?”

    Fox also notes that the bill seems particularly misplaced in the midst of an epidemic of rural hospitals closing throughout the state of Georgia. A 2014 USA Today report found that five rural hospitals in Georgia had shuttered in a two-year period. At that time, an additional six rural hospitals faced precarious financial circumstances.

    “This bill prohibits counseling on abortion,” Fox added. “And the last time I looked, abortion is legal in the US — and our job is to make {abortion} safe and legal and not restrict women from accessing a critical part of healthcare. This isn’t about helping organizations provide healthcare for women. This is about restricting abortions.”

    […]

    When it comes to states providing funding directly to CPCs, historically “there is no requirement to ensure that the information women receive from the centers is medically accurate,” said Elizabeth Nash of the Guttmacher Institute. […]

    “The main crux of the problem is that CPCs project themselves to be comprehensive women’s healthcare centers, and course they’re not,” said Dr Serina Floyd, an OB-GYN and fellow of Physicians for Reproductive Health.

    “Women calling wanting to know their options and researching abortion need to have unbiased and medically accurate information. When this is not provided, it puts them in a very dangerous situation. And when it comes to crisis pregnancy centers, not giving women the information they need can cause delays in receiving care — and for something like abortion care, that’s a huge concern.”

    Floyd also cautioned that CPC staff may not tell — or have the training to tell — a woman if there is a maternal health indication or a fetal health indication that might lead to her needing or wanting to terminate a pregnancy. “They’re compromising patients’ health by furthering a pregnancy and endangering her,” Floyd says.

    Dr Floyd, at least as quoted in the article, does not mention the quality-of-life (and similar) issues for the child or family with forcing the mother to give birth.

    Georgia is one of the 28 states that allow production of “Choose Life” license plates; in Georgia, a portion of the proceeds from the sale of these license plates are donated to agencies or organizations that provide adoption assistance, counseling, training or advertising. At this time, proceeds do not go to specific antichoice organizations or CPCs.

  191. says

    Donald Trump is threatening Bernie Sanders:

    Bernie Sanders is lying when he says his disruptors aren’t told to go to my events. Be careful Bernie, or my supporters will go to yours!

    The canard Trump is telling is that the Sanders campaign organizes the protests at Trump rallies. It is true that some Sanders’ supporters have joined in the protests. It is not true that the Sander’s campaign organized the protests. Sanders had nothing to do with the protests, and there’s no evidence that he or his staff had anything to do with them.

    Trump also told Chuck Todd on NBC’s Meet the Press this morning that he might pay the legal bills of the white man who punched a black man who was being escorted out of a Trump rally.

    In Kansas City last night police pepper-sprayed a group of protesters. The pepper-spraying incident was largely condemned as not necessary. Circumstances didn’t call for it.
    http://www.kansascity.com/news/local/article65749927.html

    News reporters have also been harassed by Trump supporters.

    I shouldn’t have to wash spit off of my clothes after covering a presidential campaign event…but that’s where we’re at now. [Ben Kesling @bkesling]
    —————
    A handful of Trump supporters closed in around my live shot to chant about Trump & jeer at me. In these moments, I appreciate the press pen. @SaraMurray

  192. says

    Trump made stuff up. He said on Fox News Sunday that “something like 27 percent” of Muslims are “really very militant.”

    Trump said stupid stuff about connecting a protester at one of his rallies to ISIS:

    USSS did an excellent job stopping the maniac running to the stage. He has ties to ISIS. Should be in jail! ?ssr=true

    That’s a Trump tweet that noted U.S. Secret Service agents stopped a guy trying to rush the stage.

    And here’s a summary of a conversation Trump had with Chuck Todd about Trump having used a bogus internet video as his source for the ISIS connection:

    Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump defended tying a protester to the Islamic State on Sunday, saying that his claim was supported by an Internet video.

    But, as “Meet the Press” host Chuck Todd noted to Trump, the video was a hoax.

    “Supposedly, there was chatter about ISIS. Now, I don’t know. What do I know about it? All I know is what’s on the Internet,” Trump said on NBC’ “Meet the Press.” “And I don’t like to see a man dragging the American flag along the ground in a mocking fashion.”

  193. says

    blf @211, I see rightwing state lawmakers using the “crisis pregnancy centers” excuse to shut down legitimate clinics more and more.

    This seems to be the favorite means of obscuring the issues and of dodging responsibility to provide reproductive healthcare that is real. Lot’s of religion at the base of these actions.

  194. says

    Here’s what Bernie Sanders had to say about violence at Trump rallies:

    […] “I very much hope that he understands that in a democracy, people should be allowed to go to anybody’s rally, peacefully demonstrate without fear of being beaten up,” Sanders said on CBS’ “Face the Nation.” “So I really hope he tones it down. This is not good for the country.”

    Trump has also recently accused Sanders’ supporters of protesting his events, which Sanders denied during his interview.

    “To suggest that our campaign is telling people to disrupt his campaign is a lie. We don’t,” Sanders said.

    Link.

  195. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    Experts (with evidence) don’t think much of The Donalds complaints against trade agreements. Some samples:

    Many economists call Trump’s arguments off-base. Trade deals usually have little overall effect on jobs — positive or negative — partly because the American economy is already open to foreign competition. Bigger forces such as huge wage gaps between the United States and developing countries, and automation that lets companies replace workers, play a much larger role in job losses….
    Economists at the Peterson Institute think the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a pending deal involving the United States and 11 Pacific Rim countries, would barely affect American employment. Jobs created by greater access to Asia-Pacific markets would likely be offset by jobs lost…
    Just behind inept negotiators on Trump’s list of those responsible for America’s trade problems are businesses that move operations abroad to capitalize on cheaper labor.
    Trump pledged to give up Oreos after Nabisco’s parent, Mondelez International, said it would replace nine production lines in Chicago with four in Mexico.
    He also said he would demand that United Technologies reverse a decision to move two Indiana plants to Mexico, eliminating 2,100 jobs. If it refused, he said he would impose a tax on anything the company built in Mexico and exported to the United States.
    Trump also said he would tax auto imports from Mexico to stop U.S. automakers from moving production there.
    Levying those tariffs would probably require congressional approval. It would violate commitments the United States made when it joined the North American Free Trade Agreement in 1994, and the tariffs would trigger retaliation from Mexico.
    No problem, Trump says.
    He’d rip up NAFTA. He could exit the agreement provided he gave Mexico and Canada six months’ notice. Experts differ on whether Congress would have to authorize this.
    Regardless, leaving NAFTA would cause chaos for businesses that have arranged their operations around its rules.

    Fact checking appears to the bane of the Donald and his advisors.

  196. blf says

    Fact checking appears to the bane of the Donald and his advisors. Facts are alien to teh wazzock trum-prat and anyone whose breathing he hears.

    Fixed.

  197. blf says

    The macabre truth of gun control in the US is that toddlers kill more people than terrorists do:

    Last week, a Florida gun rights activist [sic] was shot in the back by her four-year-old son. How much longer will we keep participating in the collective lie that deadly weapons keep us safe?
    […]
    What do you say about the outspoken Florida “gun rights” advocate who left a loaded .45 calibre handgun in the back seat of her car and was promptly shot and wounded by her four-year-old child? [“Irresponsible child-endangering idiot” –blf …] I’m not happy that Jamie Gilt […] — who has built a thriving web presence on the argument that guns are not only perfectly safe around kids, but necessary for their protection — left a loaded handgun in reach of her four-year-old son, who then picked it up, aimed it at his mother, and pulled the trigger. […]

    But I have no interest in letting Gilt off the hook. Her child could just as easily have shot himself, or a passerby, or someone else’s child. With just a few tweaks of location and circumstance, he could have shot my child. Someone else still could, accidentally or with intention — it’s a possibility you have to consider in a country with so many guns and so few laws regulating them. That’s the macabre truth of parenting in 21st-century America.

    […]

    In the US in 2015, more people were shot and killed by toddlers than by terrorists. In 2013, the New York Times reported on children shot by other children: “Children shot accidentally — usually by other children — are collateral casualties of the accessibility of guns in America, their deaths all the more devastating for being eminently preventable.”

    And I’m supposed to believe that frightened Syrian refugees — or whomever becomes the next rightwing scapegoat du jour — are the real threat to my children? I’m supposed to be afraid of sharks? Heavy metal music? Violent video games? Horse meat in my hamburger patties? Teenagers pouring vodka up their butts?

    […]

    Videos of heavy sharks riding metal horses pouring teenaged vodka on hamburger peatties.

  198. says

    Nerd @216, making some adjustments to NAFTA seems to be the best way to go. The Trump-Prat is only interested in destruction of existing agreements, and in saying things that make him sound like the Bully King.

    You are right that fact-checking is simply off his radar. Look at the way he used a bogus video to claim an ISIS-supporting protestor charged the stage at one of his rallies.

    On NAFTA and TPP, I’d like to see even more debate on those issues between Sanders and Clinton. I don’t think enough time has been given to the subject. We have campaign slogans, talking points, and some accusations, but not enough detail on the plans for going forward. I do think it is likely that we can amend some of the agreements that benefit corporations and pharmaceutical companies too much.

    Japan has a problem with its agricultural interests being opposed to opening their ports to more trade.

    NAFTA is not the only reason that the USA lost manufacturing jobs.

  199. blf says

    Whilst the SPLC — the go-to organization / site for information on hate groups and similar in the USA — has pointed out wazzock trum-prat is a problem (Southern Poverty Law Center affixes Trump as face of ‘year in hate’ report: “The annual report focuses on how hate speech, mostly from Donald Trump, has pervaded mainstream politics, as well as the 14% increase in US hate groups”), I got to wondering what would happen if they classified him as a hate-monger (my term, I’m not sure what their terms / classifications are). A president who is also… Could get very interesting…

    The SPLC has been issuing statements. A very recent report one is Donald Trump has a hate group problem (dated 28-Feb-2016, quoted in full):

    This morning during an interview on CNN’s “State of the Union” businessman Donald Trump repeatedly dodged questions about the Ku Klux Klan and notorious white nationalist David Duke, who announced recently his support for Trump’s campaign.

    The Southern Poverty Law Center’s Heidi Beirich released the following statement:

    “Donald Trump’s statements this morning are just the latest in a string of incidents where he has used his massive media presence, especially his Twitter account with over 6 million followers, to elevate extremist ideas and individuals. Despite being called out by journalists and organizations like the Southern Poverty Law Center, these incidents continue. Condemning David Duke and the Ku Klux Klan at every opportunity should be the easiest thing anyone can do. The hatefulness of their ideas and actions are well-established and should be denounced forcefully by all responsible political leaders.”

    In response to the news the SPLC has sent each campaign a recently updated list of hate groups currently active in the United States, which can be found here: https://www.splcenter.org/hate-map

  200. blf says

    This seems brilliant, The ugly truth about Muslims: they have great frittata recipes:

    Comedians Negin Farsad and Dean Obeidallah are advertising their comic documentary while fighting bigotry, with a ‘delightful’ poster campaign on the New York subway that mocks Islamophobia

    The Muslims have come for New York City’s subway system in a coordinated attack affecting 144 stations across the borough. Authorities were alerted to the plans of Muslim-Americans Negin Farsad and Dean Obeidallah months ago, but failed to prevent the pair of comedians from implementing a campaign that is inciting laughter among millions of New Yorkers.

    The subway adverts, which mock anti-Muslim stereotypes, are promoting Farsad and Obeidallah’s comic documentary, The Muslims Are Coming! “We’re chipping away at an iceberg of misconception,” says Obeidallah.

    [… details of getting the poster campaign running — including a lawsuit …]

    It shouldn’t, perhaps, have taken a lawsuit to get a few lighthearted jokes in the New York subway, but the delay has had its benefits. “I’m glad they’re up now in the heart of the 2016 election,” says Obeidallah. “Trump was on CNN saying Islam hates us and We can’t tell the difference between a good and a bad Muslim. We’ve seen hate crimes against Muslims spike.” When it comes to battling Islamophobia, Obeidallah says: “The stakes are — no exaggeration — life or death.”

    So far, reactions to the posters have been overwhelmingly positive. “I’ve had the opportunity to see people read the ads, and then laugh,” says Farsad. “When you’re laughing, you enter into a state of openness and, in that state of openness, you can change the world.”

    There are images of some of the posters at the link.

  201. blf says

    First Dog on the Moon, What are these so-called minor technical issues with this extremely cool-looking F-35 jet? (cartoon): “Australia is handing over $18bn or so for 72 dud F-35 jets we may or may not get and if we do they may or may not work. Surely there is a better way to spend this money!”

    The F-35 — also known as the JSF (Joint Services Fighter) — is an extremely expensive “stealth” “multirole” fighter jet, supposedly capable of doing everything except making espresso and engaging in military missions.

  202. says

    blf @220, the phrase “has pervaded mainstream politics” struck me as really important. Trump has created a mainstream product out of concepts and slogans that used to be restricted to the fringes of rightwing politics. To me, Trump’s politics look more like an over-hyped and deceptively-advertised product than like a political ideology.

    That’s the scariest part of the trumpification of politics in the USA. He brings previously unacceptable ideas into the mainstream. Trump often says that he is creating a movement, and he is right.

    In other news, here’s a followup to the incident where a man rushed the stage at a Trump rally in Ohio and was taken down by Secret Service agents. Trump later claimed (falsely) that the man was associated with ISIS.

    A man arrested Saturday after he tried to get on the stage at a Donald Trump campaign rally in Ohio reportedly told police he planned to grab the microphone and yell that Trump is a racist but didn’t intend to hurt anyone.

    The Dayton Daily News reported that it obtained a report from Dayton police that included comments 22-year-old Thomas DiMassimo of Fairborn made to officers after his arrest. The newspaper said DiMassimo told officers he gave his car keys to his girlfriend before he rushed the stage because he anticipated being arrested.

    The newspaper said DiMassimo vaulted over waist-high metal railings, muscled past security guards and nearly got on the stage at the end of Trump’s rally before Secret Service agents tackled and handcuffed him. Video shows Trump, the front-runner in the Republican presidential campaign, turning around after hearing the commotion followed by agents surrounding him protectively. […]

    DiMassimo was released on bail Saturday after being charged with inducing panic and disorderly conduct.

    DiMassimo, an acting major in the theater program at Wright State University, couldn’t be reached for comment Sunday. […]

    Talking Points memo link.

    DiMassimo has been involved in anti-racism protests before.

    Experts dismissed Trump’s claims of a tie-in with ISIS.

  203. says

    More Trump supporters have used violence to intimidate people who are not white.
    The Wichita Eagle link.

    Excerpt:

    He kept kicking the student who was laying on the ground. He was kicking him; it was a gut-wrenching scene. He saw that I was calling the police and got back on his motorcycle and circled around us and was saying “Trump, Trump, Trump, we will make America great again. You losers will be thrown out of the wall.”

  204. says

    We’ve talked before about the ways in which some state-level judicial systems raise money off the backs of the poor, and how a system of fines and fees function as a sort of debtors prison. The Department of Justice (DOJ) is warning courts to stop.

    The DOJ’s warning letter went out to chief justices and court administrators nationwide.

    […] The letter reiterates that courts shouldn’t jail people who don’t pay fines and fees levied by the court without first determining whether they are able to pay. It says that courts should also consider options for those who can’t afford to pay the fines and fees that don’t include jail time.

    The letter mentions money bail schemes that result in poor people being jailed “solely because they cannot afford to pay for their release,” and condemns the use of arrest warrants or drivers license suspensions as a way to coerce people into paying. Those tactics make it more likely that the poor will be arrested, fined, and jailed simply because they couldn’t afford what they were charged with in the first place — while also making it likely they will miss work and fall further behind on payments.

    In some places, the letter notes, defendants can’t even start a judicial hearing until their debts are cleared, an “unconstitutional practice” that is “often framed as a routine administrative matter.” The letter also warns against the practice of using private companies to enforce debt collection or probation, allowing them to profit from discretionary fines tacked on top of what defendants owe courts.

    “Individuals may confront escalating debt; face repeated, unnecessary incarceration for nonpayment despite posing no danger to the community; lose their jobs; and become trapped in cycles of poverty that can be nearly impossible to escape,” the letter says. “Furthermore, in addition to being unlawful, to the extent that these practices are geared not toward addressing public safety, but rather toward raising revenue, they can cast doubt on the impartiality of the tribunal and erode trust between local governments and their constituents.”

    Beyond sending the letter, the DOJ announced that it will offer $2.5 million in grants to courts that seek to change their policies and “test strategies to restructure the assessment and enforcement of fines and fees.” […]

    Link.

  205. blf says

    “Brexit” (the campaign by racist loons for the UK to leave the EU) has just collided with the thugs’s kooks’s klown kampaign (racist loons who want to be the next president of the States), Ted Cruz: Obama anti-Brexit campaign will see ‘England pull out of EU’:

    […]
    Barack Obama’s reportedly impending visit to the United Kingdom will make the country’s exit from the European Union more likely, Ted Cruz told reporters on Sunday.

    President Obama, if anything his campaigning against {Britain leaving} will make it more likely that England will pull out of the EU, [teh crud said].

    […]

    Declining to say if he thought the UK leaving the EU would harm US national security, Cruz pegged his argument on a critique of US foreign policy that he gives when out on the stump.

    He argued that Obama had hurt our alliances and harmed our friendships around the world, and that our enemies have learned this president is not a credible threat for anything.

    There are numerous readers’s comments, a small collection of some I liked:

    ● “Ted Cruz — the one man who makes Donald Trump look like a thinking man’s candidate”.

    ● “Funny how Cruz doesn’t even know whether this country is called Britain, England or the UK […]”.

    ● “I see Mr Cruz doesn’t have a clue about the UK, its politics or people then. What a moron.”

    ● “Ted Cruz is Richard Nixon without the charm. I am as fearful of him as I am of Trump. And his quote only refers to England — huh?”

    ● “A loathsome man — with zero friends a real oddball — donest [sic] accept climate change — pro NRA, anti abortion, anti gay, thinks the 10 commandments should be the law, anti mexico, hates obama, hates er everything aside from the worse aspects of jesus worshipping.
      “Further down the repulsive food chain than trump — actually can’t recall a worse candidate for president ever.”

    ● “Surprised they even know where Europe is”.

    ● “It’s getting harder and harder to separate the cretins from the idiots in the US Republican suite of pillocks posing as statesmen and failing miserably.”

    ● “Obama has more integrity in his big toe than Cameron and his Tory cabal could muster collectively, as for Cruz he is just another lunatic tea party zombie.”

  206. says

    blf @226, Thanks for that info. It prompted a few bitter laughs on my part.

    I liked the dry humor of “Richard Nixon without the charm,” since Nixon was notably charm-deficient.

    Also, “suite of pillocks” is a good description for the Republican candidates.

    Cruz should cruise over to “England” and get his clock cleaned by the journalists there.

    In other news, Ben Carson came out in support of violence at Trump rallies. Carson encouraged Trump supporters to fight: “They can submit and do whatever those protesters want them to do, or they can fight back.”

    Both Carson and Trump base some of their most egregious comments on the false story that protestors are starting fights .

    Excerpt from Think Progress article:

    [Carson continued], “The problem is that there are those who are being taught that if someone disagrees with you, you have the right to interfere with their First Amendment rights, their ability to express themselves, their freedom of speech” he said. “Now when people do things wrong, such as that, it causes people to react in a way that is negative.”

    Not only does Carson’s defense misunderstand the First Amendment — which protects the right to free speech for everyone, including the protesters, and does not guarantee the right to speak without protest or criticism — he shifts attention from the role Trump’s incendiary rhetoric has played in encouraging the violence. […]

  207. says

    A longer excerpt from the comments President Obama gave in reply to a question asked at a White House press conference (bolding is mine):

    What is happening in this primary is just a distillation of what’s been happening inside their party for more than a decade. I mean, the reason that many of their voters are responding is because this is what’s been fed through the messages they’ve been sending for a long time — that you just make flat assertions that don’t comport with the facts. That you just deny the evidence of science. That compromise is a betrayal. That the other side isn’t simply wrong, or we just disagree, we want to take a different approach, but the other side is destroying the country, or treasonous. I mean, that’s — look it up. That’s what they’ve been saying.

    So they can’t be surprised when somebody suddenly looks and says, ‘You know what, I can do that even better. I can make stuff up better than that. I can be more outrageous than that. I can insult people even better than that. I can be even more uncivil.” I mean, conservative outlets have been feeding their base constantly the notion that everything is a disaster, that everybody else is to blame, that Obamacare is destroying the country. And it doesn’t matter whether it’s true or not. It’s not, ‘We disagree with this program,’ ‘We think we can do it better,’ it’s, ‘Oh, this is a crisis!’

    So if you don’t care about the facts, or the evidence, or civility, in general in making your arguments, you will end up with candidates who will say just about anything and do just about anything. And when your answer to every proposal that I make, or Democrats make is no, it means that you’ve got to become more and more unreasonable because that’s the only way you can say no to some pretty reasonable stuff. And then you shouldn’t be surprised when your party ultimately has no ideas to offer at all.

  208. says

    Without actually endorsing him, Mitt Romney is campaigning with John Kasich in Ohio today. That’s weird. Polls indicate that Kasich may beat Trump in Ohio. I hope so.

    Polls show Trump doing well in Illinois, but apparently the ground game is so weak there that Trump fired its Illinois campaign director.

    Cruz finally came out and said that there is one thing Trump could do to keep Cruz from voting for Trump if he is the Republican nominee: if Trump shoots someone on 5th Avenue, Cruz will not vote for him. Yay, high standards! /sarcasm

    The editors of the National Review endorsed Ted Cruz.

    One report claimed that North Carolina investigators were considering filing a charge of inciting a riot against Donald Trump. Not quite true, or not wholly true, unfortunately:

    According to Sgt. Sean Swain, a department spokesman, Sheriff Kevin J. Joyce appeared on a local radio show earlier Monday and was asked whether the department had looked into applying the state’s riot laws against Trump—it was something “they had looked at,” Joyce reportedly said. However, Swain told The Daily Beast, Trump’s actions did not fit the statute. “We would have made the charges by now” if that were the case, the spokesman added.

    http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2016/03/14/nc-sheriff-might-charge-trump-for-inciting-riot.html

  209. says

    Here’s a different flavor of nastiness from the Trump campaign, and it’s aimed at Bernie Sanders:

    A Donald Trump surrogate said during a campaign event Monday morning that Bernie Sanders needs to find Jesus. Sanders, of course, is Jewish. Many of his Polish relatives on his father’s side were killed during the Holocaust.

    […] Pastor Mark Burns, who has spoken at previous Trump events, told the audience that in order to be taken seriously as a presidential candidate, Sanders needs to accept Christianity.

    “Bernie Sanders, who doesn’t believe in God,” Burns said. “How in the world are we going to let Bernie—I mean really? Listen, Bernie gotta get saved, he gotta meet Jesus. I don’t know, he gotta have a coming to Jesus meeting.”

    Mother Jones link.

  210. says

    Ann Coulter, a Trump supporter, and former Fox News darling, demonstrated the split that is widening among rightwing voters. On her Twitter feed, Coulter wrote:

    Fox News & Cruz are American traitors, in league with the liberal establishment. Silent majority must face fire from a unified oligarchy.

    “Silent majority” is a phrase Trump uses in his speeches.

    The rightwing is ripping itself apart.

    I don’t understand the claim that the “liberal establishment” is in league with Fox News and Cruz. Say what now?

  211. blf says

    The UK’s own wannabe-wazzocks (they are too useless to qualify for wazzockianhood; they are mostly pillocks), that is, the current government, seems to taking a lesson from Steve Harper, the former-pillock, I mean former-PM, of Canada, and is planning on censoring scientists, The government’s lobbying ban will have a chilling impact on scientists (the authour is Dr David Nutt, who, as he explains in this opinion piece, has previously had a run-in with the pillocks ignoring inconvenient evidence):

    New regulations on the use of grants represent an appalling insult to freedom of thought and will censor scientific debate. […]

    […]

    The British government now seems to be moving in the same direction [as Stalin], trying to limit scientific outputs to those that support its policies. Hard to believe? That’s the effect of a recent, largely misunderstood move by the Cabinet Office. When it announced plans to prevent any person or institution in receipt of government money from using those funds to argue (“lobby”, if you prefer) against official policy, this was widely interpreted as an attempt to silence unruly charities. As the minister Matthew Hancock put it, a clause to be inserted in new and renewed grant agreements would mean that taxpayers won’t be made to foot the bill for political campaigning and political lobbying.

    But the move has wider and even more worrying ramifications — it could significantly censor scientific debate. Almost all scientists in the UK get some form of funding from the government […].

    Even more chilling is the potential impact on our leading scientific institutions, the Royal Society and the Academy of Medical Sciences, both of which receive very significant amount of their funding from government. Will they no longer be able to review health and science policy if their findings might challenge government policy?

    And who will decide what constitutes “lobbying” and is therefore banned and what is simply scientists talking about the implications of their research findings? Censorship would irreparably damage scientific enquiry and debate in the UK […]. It would also lead to the growth of US-style anti-science “thinktanks”, as described in Naomi Oreskes and Erik Conway’s recent book Merchants of Doubt.

    […]

    I have direct experience of how ministers dislike having to deal with scientific evidence that contradicts their policy. I was threatened with dismissal by two Home Office ministers and then sacked after publicising the findings of my peer-reviewed research into the relative harms of drugs in 2009. Rather than hearing that evidence, assessing it and honestly rejecting it on the grounds that it clashed with party policy, ministers instead sacked me from my role as independent adviser on drugs.

    The message to other scientists with inconvenient evidence was clear, and it saddens me greatly that this is the same message being sent by this new missive: the awkward squad should stay out of the debate. It’s likely that a secret blacklist of “dissident” scientists will be kept.

    […]

  212. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    Interesting analysis. The Donald’s supporters make up their minds early.

    EARLY VOTING
    In Florida, the biggest prize up for grabs Tuesday, more than 1 million people voted early in the GOP primary. That’s about one-fourth of the projected electorate that can’t be persuaded in the final days of campaigning.
    Giving Trump’s showing in other states with early voting, the numbers in Florida could bode well for the billionaire.
    In Georgia, where Trump won handily, 44 percent of early voters sided with the real estate mogul. In Arkansas, Trump won about 34 percent of early voters, more than any other candidate, and also went on to win the state.
    Early voting was designed to make it easier for more people to vote. It’s become particularly popular in Florida, where 10 days of early voting were held in the lead-up to Tuesday’s contest.
    Jean Vasiliades of New Port Richey, Fla., is among those whose support has been cemented at the ballot box. While she attended a Rubio rally near her hometown Saturday, there was nothing he could say to win her vote — because she’d already cast it for Trump.
    “I like Rubio very much and will vote for him if he runs again for Senate,” she said.

    But Trump doesn’t fare will with late deciders.

    But there are indications that Trump struggled in some states to close the deal with voters who held off on making a decision.
    In those same 15 states, just 23 percent of people who made up their minds in the last seven days of campaigning sided with the billionaire. That’s according to Edison Research, which conducts exit polls for The Associated Press and television networks…
    Here’s the problem for Trump’s rivals: No single candidate has emerged as the clear beneficiary of the billionaire’s inability to close the deal with late-deciding voters.
    It’s another consequence of a crowded primary field that’s left voters with plenty of anti-Trump options.
    In South Carolina, one of Trump’s rivals may have been able to top the real estate mogul if they could have carried the majority of late deciders. Instead, 28 percent went to Rubio, 26 percent went to Cruz and 12 percent to Kasich. The breakdown was similar in Arkansas, with Rubio winning 35 percent of late deciders and Cruz carrying 31 percent in their losses to Trump.
    Kasich, who desperately needs to stop Trump in his home state of Ohio, has been a non-entity in most of the primaries up until this point. But in Michigan, a state his campaign views as similar to Ohio, Kasich had a late surge, winning 43 percent of those who decided on a candidate within a week of the primary, compared to a paltry 13 percent of voters who made up their minds earlier.

    Interesting if applied to the November election. The now undecideds would likely vote anti-Trump.

  213. says

    blf @232, thanks for that link. Here’s a longer version of the quote you posted:

    “His identity is wrapped around being a winner. If you challenge him, or if he’s put into a losing position, now you begin to take Donald out of his comfort zone.”

    So telling. Yes, that’s exactly how Trump comes across.

    “I don’t think it’s possible to quantify the size of his ego,” said Barbara Res, a former Trump Organization executive vice-president throughout the 1980s. “It’s too big.”

  214. says

    Sarah Palin spoke at a Trump rally in Florida:

    What we don’t have time for is all that petty punk ass little thuggery stuff that’s been going on with these quote-unquote protesters who are doing nothing but wasting your time. And trying to take away your First Amendment rights, your rights to assemble peacefully, and the media being on the thug side. […]

    Talking Points Memo link.

  215. says

    An unsavory backstory sullies Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi’s endorsement of Donald Trump. Yes, there are unsavory details in addition to the general nastiness of associating with Trump.

    […] Bondi’s Monday endorsement comes more than two years after she decided not to follow the New York attorney general’s lead and sue Trump over accusations Trump University seminars swindled people.

    The timeline of that fall 2013 episode raised eyebrows. Three days after a Bondi spokeswoman said the attorney general was studying New York’s lawsuit to see whether she wanted to take similar action in Florida, Trump cut a $25,000 check to a committee associated with Bondi’s campaign. That seeming conflict of interest was criticized in the Florida press at the time, but a Bondi spokesperson justified her decision by suggesting no action was necessary because the affected Florida consumers would be compensated if New York won that case.

    […] The “university,” which allowed students to purchase expensive CDs and DVDs that they were told would help them get rich via real estate investments, was not actually accredited. The New York lawsuit charges that Trump University “repeatedly deceived students into thinking that they were attending a legally chartered ‘university’” and misled students into believing the so-called experts on investing in real estate would be hand-picked by Trump, according to the New York Daily News. […]

    During Monday’s rally, Bondi, who previously endorsed Jeb Bush, gave a rather limp explanation for why she’s switching her allegiance to Trump, saying, “You are speaking loud and clear, and Americans are speaking loud and clear,” and, “I always listen to my mom, and my mom is with Donald Trump, and so am I.” […]

    Think Progress link.

  216. says

    Here’s a unique take on the people protesting at Trump rallies, Michael Savage says the protesters are racist against white people:

    Earlier today, Donald Trump spoke with right-wing radio host Michael Savage about the “horrible” and “wild” protests he’s been facing in his campaign, saying that the man who tried to storm the stage at his Dayton, Ohio, rally “should be in jail right now.”

    “This guy is a thug and now he’s becoming a big movie star, well he doesn’t have the face of the movie star, that I can tell you,” Trump said. “This guy’s a thug. He should be in jail. How they don’t press charges is just beyond me, it’s just beyond me.”

    CNN has reported that the man was in fact “charged with disorderly conduct and inducing panic.” [The man is out on bail.]

    Savage called the demonstrators “Brownshirts” who are “racist” and “violent,” adding: “There’s a high degree of racism towards white people coming out of these crowds.” […]

    Right Wing Watch link.

  217. blf says

    Sarah Palin (as quoted in @236 (my emboldening)), [T]hese quote-unquote protesters who are doing nothing but wasting your time [a]nd trying to take away your First Amendment rights, your rights to assemble peacefully […].

    Ironic. But more than that, the emboldened phrase seems a possible clew as to some of the “reasoning” behind the widely(?)-held misinterpretation of free speech / First Amendment (sometimes called freeze peach), including ideas such as what you say must be published, must be taken seriously, cannot be ridiculed, and so on. Which is rubbish, as both the above link, and quite famously XKCD, argue.

    To wit: Protesting, ridiculing, etc., nonsense is “not peaceful” and therefore violates the freeze peachers’s right to assemble peacefully. This is quite an elastic definition of “not peaceful”, in the sense it (probably) doesn’t apply to the freeze peachers’s own protesting, ridiculing, etc., of their protesters; and in the sense that (e.g.) telling teh trum-prat he is a wazzock (whether stated calmly or yelled as a heckle) is also “not peaceful” simply because the wazzock doesn’t want to hear that and much of his audience probably has no idea what a “wazzock” is. (That they then probably beat the heckler with teh trum-prat egging them on certainly is not peaceful, but is also a reaction to the heckler’s exercise of free speech.)

    Or in short: If a freeze peacher hears something s/he disagrees with, s/he gets upset, and that is not peaceful, so whoever said the something is “denying” the freeze peacher’s right to assemble peacefully, i.e., denying their free speech.

    (Probably over-analyzed, I was just struck by eejit’s inclusion of the right to assemble peacefully in her attack on free speech…)

  218. blf says

    Teh cult of EW, like the child raping cult, also has a rape-then-coverup problem, Damning report reveals Church of England’s failure to act on abuse:

    Review into priest’s assault against boy in 1976 criticises Justin Welby’s office and expresses disbelief that senior figures cannot recall being told of attack
    […]
    The first independent review commissioned by the [Church of England] into its handling of a sex abuse case highlights the “deeply disturbing” failure of those in senior positions to record or take action on the survivor’s disclosures over a period of almost four decades. […]

    The Guardian understands that among those told of the abuse were three bishops and a senior clergyman later ordained as a bishop. None of them are named in the report.

    The review also criticises the office of Justin Welby, the archbishop of Canterbury, for failing to respond meaningfully to repeated efforts by the survivor throughout 2015 to bring his case to the church leader’s attention. […] Welby has said that abuse by church figures and within other institutions has been “rampant”.

    The full 21-page report by safeguarding expert Ian Elliott has been seen by the Guardian, although the C of E published only its conclusions and recommendations. Chief among them was the need for training for those who may receive abuse disclosures on keeping records and taking action. This was particularly important for those in senior positions, the report said.

    It also recommended that the church prioritises its pastoral responsibilities above financial and reputational considerations, and that “every effort should be made to avoid an adversarial approach” in dealing with survivors of abuse.

    […]

    Elliott examined the case of “Joe” — described in the report as “B”, and whose identity is known to the Guardian — who as a 15-year-old was subjected to a “sadistic” assault in 1976 by Garth Moore, a leading figure in the church, the chancellor of three dioceses and vicar of St Mary’s Abchurch in the City of London. Moore, who died in 1990, is described in the report as “A”.

    […]

    Over a period of almost 40 years, Joe made disclosures about the abuse to dozens of people in the C of E, including senior members of the hierarchy. While some of those Joe spoke to had clear recollections of his disclosures, none of the senior figures had any memory of such conversations. Elliott describes this as “a deeply disturbing feature of this case”.

    The report says: “What is surprising about this is that {Joe} would be speaking about a serious and sadistic sexual assault allegedly perpetrated by a senior member of the hierarchy. The fact that these conversations could be forgotten about is hard to accept.”

    Despite the seriousness of the disclosure, no records were kept by those Joe spoke to and no further action was taken. “Practice of this nature is simply not acceptable,” the report says.

    Joe also repeatedly sought to bring his case to Welby’s attention. “His persistence in doing this is a product of the deep sense of frustration and anger that he feels about the lack of responsiveness from the church,” says the report. However, the archbishop’s office failed to provide “meaningful replies”.

    Joe formally reported the abuse to the church’s safeguarding officers in July 2014, and later lodged a claim for compensation. On receipt of the claim, the church cut off contact with Joe on the advice of its insurers, who wanted to avoid liability.

    The report is highly critical of the church’s actions, saying the withdrawal of support “can create risk of self-harm and should be avoided at all costs”. It added: “The pastoral needs of the survivor were set aside to avoid incurring legal liability for financial compensation.”

  219. says

    Republican obstructionists in the Senate have come up with a new reason to ignore any Obama nominee for the Supreme Court. They’re just trying to protect the nominee from abuse. Yeah, right.

    After all, the whole point of deferring the nomination and confirmation process [until 2017] is to limit the mistreatment of any nominee, as Senator Cornyn suggested in his remarks. This unfounded accusation is also deeply ironic, coming from the party that stooped to the character assassination of Robert Bork and Clarence Thomas.

    If there is anyone who has been treated like a pinata in this debate, it has been Senator Grassley.

    That’s Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah saying something utterly ridiculous.

    Other Republican senators have already admitted that they simply do not want to confirm an Obama nominee — doesn’t matter who that nominee is. Also, as Steve Benen of the Maddow blog noted, Republicans must have really changed a lot if they now have such a huge capacity for empathy towards White House nominees. I’m not buying Hatch’s load of swill.

    As for Bork and Thomas, they were both questioned at confirmation hearings and they both received floor votes. Those are the Senate duties that President Obama expects for his nominee.

    The Republicans have no logical reason to refuse confirmation hearings and floor votes for an Obama nominee, so they are throwing all kinds of ridiculous flak into the air. I think they hope to confuse voters and the media. I see you Orrin Hatch.

  220. says

    The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a nonpartisan committee, assessed the impact of Trump’s plan to “repeal and replace” the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) “with something terrific.”

    The Trump campaign posted a sort of outline for a healthcare plan. The Trump plan would cost more and do less than the Affordable Care Act. You can read the entire CRFB report at http://fiscalfactcheck.crfb.org/measuring-trumps-healthcare-plan/

    Jonathan Cohn summarized Trump’s plan. Excerpt:

    The number of people without health insurance would rise by something like 21 million people if Trump had his way. That would mean more financial hardship, less access to health care, and — according to a large, if occasionally contested, body of research — higher mortality. Trump’s plan could also increase the deficit by somewhere between $270 billion and $490 billion over 10 years — depending in part on how the repeal affected the rest of the economy.

  221. says

    Voting is taking place today in Florida, Illinois, Missouri, North Carolina, and Ohio.

    On the Republican side, Trump leads in every poll except Ohio, where Kasich has a significant lead. Take all polls with a grain (or a ton) of salt. They’ve been wrong before. On the Democratic side, Clinton leads in every state, with the smallest gap between her and Sanders in Illinois and Ohio.

  222. says

    Trump says over and over and over again that he likes it when protestors disrupt his speeches. This amazing collation of “I love it. Isn’t is exciting!” etc. Trump comments was presented on a Rachel Maddow segment last night.

    Trump’s enjoyment of the chaos is disturbing: “It is fun, right?! It’s exciting!” Donald Trump likes it. He really likes it. “Nobody else has this!”

  223. says

    The Daily Kos posted a funny (bitter, black comedy) article in which journalist Hunter provides the details of Breitbart News’ implosion.

    The article is too long and too tightly written to excerpt, but I recommend it. Breitbart is sinking under the fuckton of ridiculous conspiracy theories it has promulgated in the past and is struggling to nurture today.

  224. says

    Today is Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s birthday. To celebrate, let’s enjoy a few quotes from Notorious RGB:

    If there was one decision I would overrule, it would be Citizens United. I think the notion that we have all the democracy that money can buy strays so far from what our democracy is supposed to be.
    —————–
    The sad irony of today’s decision lies in its utter failure to grasp why the [Voting Rights Act] has proven effective … Throwing out preclearance when it has worked and is continuing to work to stop discriminatory changes is like throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet.
    —————-
    People who think you could wave a magic wand and the legacy of the past will be over are blind. Think of neighborhood living patterns. We still have many neighborhoods that are racially identified. We still have many schools that even though the days of state enforced segregation are gone, segregation because of geographical boundaries remains.

    There have been experiments, tests that I have referred to, where the tester goes to a used car buyer and wants to buy a car. So the testers can be white male, African American male, white women, African American women. And the one who gets the highest price is always the African American woman. So there’s that kind of bias. That is still prevalent. You can see it with people trying to get loans to buy homes. That same pattern. So again, we’ve come a long way from the days where there was state enforced segregation. But we still have a way to go.

  225. blf says

    Koch donors divided over failure to stop Donald Trump (this is a long article, I’ve only excerpted a few bits I found amusing):

    The conservative network that pledged to spend nearly $900m on the 2016 election cycle has sat on the sidelines despite fears of a Trump nomination

    […]

    [Randy] Kendrick, a top fundraiser for Rubio’s campaign, said that she tried to encourage efforts against Trump by the Koch network, which plans to spend an astonishing $900m this election cycle on political and issue advocacy efforts, the vast majority of which will be spent by not-for-profit groups that don’t have to disclose their donors. But donors in late January learned of a network decision against launching Trump attacks at a Koch policy and fundraising retreat in Indian Wells, California, which drew a few hundred donors who back the network’s many free-market [sic], small-government [sic] projects.

    “They’re my main peer group and they’re not involved,” Kendrick said about the Koch network. “[…] I’m disappointed with the Kochs, but I’m more disappointed with the national news media, including Fox and Drudge.”

    Kudos for thinking teh trum-prat is terrible, but, um, Ms Kendrick, so is teh robot, teh kochroach brothers, and faux; And da-uggh is so not even on the same planet it’s probably in a completely different reality.

    [… S]ome conservatives familiar with the Koch network believe [Marc] Short’s sudden departure leaves a gap in the political operation at a time when spending and political plans for 2016 are being hashed out.

    Marc Short was the kochroach network’s “top political operative”. He left that group of loons, perhaps because they aren’t obviously opposing teh trum-prat, but given that he is now reported to be advising multiple other loons (including teh robot), I would not rule out an axiom of thuggery: “Follow the money”.

    “The Koch political machine has more money than muscle and Marc Short’s separation will leave donors wondering who will run the political strategy,” said one GOP operative familiar with Koch world. “Marc’s departure leaves a significant void. The leadership of Freedom Partners [an anti–trum-prat super pac –blf] has very limited political experience,” added another conservative source.

    I’m not quite sure what metric is used to compare cash and “political muscle” (using “follow the money” — total amount of bribes paid?), but the kochroach swamp and environs has a considerable amount of “muscle”, albeit it seems to be infected with political-rabies (batshite lunacy).

  226. says

    So, yeah, we all saw Trump say on a news program that he would consider paying the legal fees of the man who sucker punched a protester at one of his rallies. Trump followed that up by saying that he already had his team looking into paying the man’s legal fees.

    Today Trump is denying all that.

    […] George Stephanopoulos asked Trump on ABC’s “Good Morning America” if he was condoning violence by saying that he was open to paying the legal fees.

    “No, because I don’t condone violence. And I didn’t say I was going to pay for his fees,” Trump said. “No, I didn’t say that. I haven’t looked at it yet and nobody has asked me to pay for fees and somebody asked me the question and I haven’t even seen it so I never said I was going to pay for fees.”

    Talking Points Memo link.

  227. tomh says

    @ #246 on RBG
    One of my favorites is from a speech she gave at Georgetown University.
    “People ask me sometimes, when — when do you think it will it be enough? When will there be enough women on the court? And my answer is when there are nine.”

  228. says

    Fun at the White House:

    Lin-Manuel Miranda, the creator of the hit Broadway musical “Hamilton,” freestyle rapped in the Rose Garden with a little help from President Barack Obama in a video posted by the White House on Monday.

    Miranda, along with the Hamilton cast, went to the White House to perform for the Obamas and local students in a day devoted to the arts.

    Obama told Miranda his freestyle was “serious business” and joked that he hoped he didn’t “drop these cards.”

    “Drop the beat,” Obama told the drummer in the background before Miranda did his thing.

    Obama wondered at the end, “Do you think that’s going viral? That’s going viral!”

    Link

  229. says

    toms @249, I love that quote.

    Here’s a quote where RBG is being practical and inspirational: “I’m dejected, but only momentarily, when I can’t get the fifth vote for something I think is very important. But then you go on to the next challenge and you give it your all. You know that these important issues are not going to go away. They are going to come back again and again. There’ll be another time, another day.”

  230. says

    Ben Carson seems to have mixed feelings about endorsing Donald Trump:

    Carson told the conservative online site NewsMax TV on Monday that he backed Trump based on a practical calculus.

    “I didn’t see a path for [John] Kasich, who I like, or for [Marco] Rubio, who I like. As far as [Ted] Cruz is concerned, I don’t think he’s gonna be able to draw independents and Democrats unless he has some kind of miraculous change… Is there another scenario that I would have preferred? Yes. But that scenario isn’t available.” Pressed to clarify, Carson said he meant he’d prefer to have backed one of the other candidates.

    Carson then said that Trump had promised him a role in his administration, “certainly in an advisory capacity.” Asked by NewsMax’s Steve Malzberg whether this meant a cabinet position, Carson declined to “reveal any details about it right now, because all of this is still very liquid.”

    Federal law expressly prohibits candidates from directly or indirectly promising “the appointment of any person to any public or private position or employment, for the purpose of procuring support in his candidacy.” The penalty for violations could include fines or a year in jail — two years if the violation was willful. […]

    Link

  231. says

    Trump is backed by a bunch of well-known pastors and other christian conservative stars. What they all have in common is that they’re rich. Trump is not doing as well with the not-rich christians.

    […] Although he now boasts the endorsement of Liberty University president and influential conservative Christian Jerry Falwell Jr., several prominent members of the Religious Right have repeatedly disavowed his candidacy, such as when Southern Baptist leader Russell Moore said Trump represents “everything” evangelicals should stand against. Meanwhile, Trump has racked up an ever-growing list of rejections from non-evangelical religious groups: Pope Francis implied in February that the real estate mogul is “not Christian”; his own claimed Presbyterian denomination openly discussed revoking his membership last year; […]

    But in the midst of this whirlwind of divine dismissals, there is one group of faithful that has consistently called Trump a friend, and vice-versa: preachers of the so-called “prosperity gospel.” […]

    Lakewood Church, the congregation of megapastor and New York Times bestseller Joel Osteen, is now the largest church in the United States, filling seats in the retrofitted former home of the Houston Astros with as many as 40,000 worshippers every Sunday, all eager to hear the ostensibly lucrative message of the prosperity gospel.

    […] Trump met with 40 prosperity gospel preachers and televangelists […] in September 2015. […]

    Other prosperity preachers have heaped praise on Trump over the past few months. Mike Murdock, known for being skewered by HBO talk show host Jon Oliver for exploiting his parishioners with shady money-making schemes, endorsed Trump […] saying he “has a warrior spirit for restoring America in the eyes of the world and he has a warrior’s heart.” […]

    [Joel Osteen said], “Mr. Trump is an incredible communicator and brander […]. He’s been a friend to our ministry. He’s a good man.” […]

    http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2016/03/15/3760287/donald-trump-prosperity-preaching/

  232. says

    North Carolina’s voter ID laws are causing problems for students who want to vote in the primary. And they are not the only ones.

    […] About 218,000 North Carolinians, roughly five percent of registered voters, do not have an acceptable form of government-issued ID that is now required under state law to cast a ballot

    […] during the past ten days of early voting, many college students were blocked from the polls. North Carolina’s WRAL reported that 864 people across the state had cast provisional early ballots because they did not have acceptable forms of ID, and four of the five counties with the highest concentrations of provisional ballots from voters without ID were in places with college campuses. […]
    Bob Hall, the executive director of Democracy North Carolina, told ThinkProgress that the voter protection hotline is receiving many calls, “disproportionately from young people and students,” […] Those ballots run the risk of being challenged and not being counted. […]

    […] Rosanell Eaton, a 94-year-old voter, had to recite the Preamble to Constitution to vote in North Carolina in the 1940s. Last year, she had to make 11 trips to state agencies to comply with the voter ID law.

    ”We had 100 years of pushing away people from the polls,” Hall said about North Carolina. “It was really only in the early 21st century, after 2000, that our participation started to come up, and now we’re going right back to this message of ‘elections are not for you.’” […]

    Link

  233. says

    Donald Trump as America’s King David? Sheesh.

    In an interview with Liberty University’s student newspaper last week, the school’s president Jerry Falwell, Jr., defended his endorsement of Donald Trump.

    Falwell, who has compared Trump to Jesus Christ and Martin Luther King Jr., said that conservative Christians who oppose the candidate should remember that “God called King David a man after God’s own heart even though he was an adulterer and a murderer.” […]

    Link

  234. says

    China is using Trump to foster an anti-democracy agenda:

    Mussolini and Hitler came to power through elections, China’s Global Times reminded readers Monday. Now an “abusively racist and extremist” candidate is on the rise in the United States, it says. Maybe democracy isn’t such a good idea after all.

    In an editorial Monday, China’s state-owned Global Times newspaper used Donald Trump’s rise to gloat about the fault lines in U.S. society and to argue that democracy was both a waste of time — and downright scary.

    From the rise of a “narcissistic and inflammatory candidate” to the violence that surrounded his planned rally in Chicago, the paper said it was shocking this could happen in a country that “boasts one of the most developed and mature democratic election systems” in the world.

  235. says

    The Amalgamated transit Union (190,000 employees) endorsed Bernie Sanders.

    In other news, there’s going to another Republican debate next Monday. On one subject I agree with Donald Trump, we don’t need more stinking Republican debates. Those candidates don’t tell us anything new, and sometimes they fail entirely to answer the questions of moderators.

    Fox News is hosting the Republican debate in Salt Lake City on March 29. The moderators are Bret Baier, Megyn Kelly and Chris Wallace.

    Trump already said he won’t participate, but his campaign has not confirmed that. Kasich says he’ll drop out if he doesn’t win in Ohio today; and Rubio may drop out if he doesn’t win in Florida (which looks likely). So, what the heck is up with this debate? A town-hall type interview with each remaining candidate might make more sense.

  236. blf says

    A town-hall type interview with each remaining candidate might make more sense.

    So might a practical, personalized demonstration of various policies advocated, such as being waterboarded and worse, carpet-bombed, shot for not putting their hands up, shot even if they do put their hands up, and so on. There are some obvious practical, moral, ethical, legal, etc., problems here, however, so we’d probably have to settle for making them eat peas whilst explaining just what any one of those many problems actually is.

    Ejector seats optional. The audience, however, should wear helmets and other protective gear to reduce the number of injuries from desk-head collisions.

  237. says

    blf @259, helmets for all of us! We all need protection to get us through the campaign season.

    This could be bad, bad, bad or it could be good … definitely head-desk worthy. MSNBC reporters across Ohio are reporting an exceptionally high rate of Democratic voters crossing over to vote in the Republican Party. Video link. 5:42 minute video. The educated guess is that a high unemployment rate in some areas may drive some white working class Democrats to crossover in order vote for Trump (the angry-at-everyone-vote) — but, and this is important, some Democrats are crossing over to place an anti-Trump vote in the Republican primary. Some of the crossover is voting for Kasich.

  238. says

    The St. Patrick’s Day luncheon is usually a lighthearted event during which the President, Senators, and Representatives get together, tell jokes, drink and eat.

    Today was different. President Obama delivered a very serious address about the “vicious” political environment.

    […] For it is a cycle that is not an accurate reflection of America, and it has to stop. I say that not because it’s a matter of political correctness. It’s about the way the corrosive behavior can undermine our democracy and our society and even our economy. In America there aren’t laws that say we have to be nice to each other or treat each other with respect, but there are norms. There are customs. […]

    We have heard vulgar and divisive rhetoric aimed at women and minorities and Americans who don’t look like us or pray like us or vote like we do. We’ve seen misguided attempts to shut down that speech. However offensive it may be, we live in a country where free speech is one of the most important rights that we hold. In response to those attempts we’ve seen actual violence and we’ve heard silence from too many of our leaders […]

    The longer that we allow the political rhetoric of late to continue and the longer that we tacitly accept it, we create a permission structure that allows the animosity in one corner of our politics to infect our broader society, and animosity breeds animosity […]

    http://theobamadiary.com/2016/03/15/president-delivers-remarks-at-a-reception-for-st-patricks-day/

  239. says

    Politics in Ohio = too many guns. And at a polling place!

    Police arrested an armed worker Tuesday at a Cleveland polling station.

    Cleveland police spokeswoman Sgt. Jennifer Ciaccia said that police took a man into custody about noon at the Louisa May Alcott School in the 10000 block of Baltic Road.

    The man got into an argument with a fellow poll worker and pulled a .380 pistol out of his backpack, Ciaccia said. He didn’t point the gun at anyone, but verbally threatened people, she added.

    Cleveland Plain Dealer link.

  240. says

    Oh, good. President Obama delivered some good news. He is eliminating “abstinence-only” funding for sex education (sometimes called “Abstinence Only Until Marriage”), and he added to the budget $4 million for teen pregnancy prevention.

    Lots of people are happy about this budget proposal, including the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States.

    Now we’ll have to wait to see how much of the President’s budget proposal is actually implemented.

  241. says

    So Mitch MConnell is advising Trump? I wish I had a transcript of that phone call.

    Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said Tuesday he advised Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump to discourage the violence erupting at his rallies after the billionaire contacted him this week.

    “He called me,” McConnell said in an afternoon press conference Tuesday. “I mentioned to him that I thought it would be a good idea for him, no matter who starts these violent episodes, to condemn it and discourage it.”

    McConnell would not tell reporters how Trump responded.

    “I believe that the candidates ought to be discouraging, no matter who starts the fight,” McConnell said.

    When asked what it said about Trump that he had to be reminded to condemn violence, McConnell said “one thing I thought you guys had learned was I am pretty good about not answering questions I don’t want to answer.”

    Talking Points Memo link.

  242. says

    Trump won in Florida. Rubio lost. Rubio suspended his campaign for president. We now have only three Republican presidential candidates left: Trump, Cruz, and Kasich. Trump added 99 delegates from Florida to his count. Rubio credited God with deciding Rubio should not be president.

    The projected Democratic Party winner in Florida is Hillary Clinton. With 72% of the vote in, Clinton has 64.5% to Sanders’ 33.2%.

    Hillary Clinton won in North Carolina for the Democrats.

    The other races are too close to call, or too early to call.

  243. says

    Hillary Clinton won in Ohio. No matter how the rest of today’s vote goes (Illinois and Missouri), Clinton will have added to her delegate lead.

    On the Republican side, John Kasich won in Ohio.

  244. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    Quick update on the Illinois vote. It’s close on the democratic side, with 1.8 million votes cast (92% reporting), Clinton 51%, Sanders 49%. On the Rethug side, Trump now has less than 40% of the popular vote. Not quite a mandate.
    The US senate race has an interesting feature, with both Kirk (stroke) and Duckworth (RPG to her Blackhawk helicopter in Iraq) campaigning from wheelchairs.

  245. Saad says

    Lynna, #265

    Rubio credited God with deciding Rubio should not be president.

    God’s decisions about candidates not being president seem to always come after the votes are counted.

  246. says

    Saad @268, Ha! Yes. God is not good with predictions?

    Here’s a summary of yesterday’s voting.

    In the delegate count:

    Trump 646
    Cruz 397
    Kasich 142

    Clinton 1599
    Sanders 844

    A roundup from states where voting took place yesterday:

    Florida for Democrats – Clinton 64.4% and Sanders 33.3%
    Florida for Republicans – Trump 45.8%, Rubio 27%, Cruz 17.1%, Kasich 6.8%

    Illinois for Democrats – Clinton 50.5% and Sanders 48.7%
    Illinois for Republicans – Trump 38.8%, Cruz 30.3%, Kasich 19.7%, Rubio 8.7%

    Missouri, with 99% of the vote in, this state is too close to call on both sides. So far, Clinton and Trump have tiny, tiny leads (0.2% for both).

    North Carolina for Democrats – Clinton 54.6% and Sanders 40.8%
    North Carolina for Republicans – Trump 40.2%, Cruz 36.8%, Kasich 12.7%, Rubio 7.7%

    Ohio for Democrats – Clinton 56.5% and Sanders 42.7%
    Ohio for Republicans – Kasich 46.8%, Trump 35.6%, Cruz 13.1%, Rubio 2.9%

  247. What a Maroon, living up to the 'nym says

    Obama nominates Merrick Garland to fill Scalia’s seat. Older white man, well-regarded by both sides, went to Harvard Law, Jewish–should fit right in.

    Not that it matters–the Senate won’t confirm even him. I’m of two minds about this–on the one hand, if you know it’s going to be futile anyway, why not make a statement with the nomination? Find the anti-Scalia–someone who’s brilliant and radical, from a neglected demographic. On the other hand, if the goppers won’t consider even him, it underscores just how unreasonable they are.

  248. says

    President Obama introduced his Supreme Court nominee today, federal judge Merrick Garland. Garland is a 63-year-old white man who is a qualified and respected jurist. Some pundits are calling the nomination “generic,” while there is both high praise and disrespect coming from other quarters. Garland is also Jewish.

    Senator Orrin Hatch (Republican doofus) said last week: “[Obama] could easily name Merrick Garland, who is a fine man … [but] he probably won’t do that because this appointment is about the election. So I’m pretty sure he’ll name someone the [liberal Democratic base] wants.”

    More details from Think Progress.

  249. says

    What Republicans said about Merrick Garland in 2007, when Garland was confirmed for a seat on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia:

    Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT)
    “Merrick B. Garland is highly qualified to sit on the D.C. circuit. His intelligence and his scholarship cannot be questioned… His legal experience is equally impressive… Accordingly, I believe Mr. Garland is a fine nominee. I know him personally, I know of his integrity, I know of his legal ability, I know of his honesty, I know of his acumen, and he belongs on the court. I believe he is not only a fine nominee, but is as good as Republicans can expect from this administration. In fact, I would place him at the top of the list.”

    Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA)
    “I have nothing against the nominee. Mr. Garland seems to be well qualified and would probably make a good judge — in some other court.”

    Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL)
    “He has a high position with the Department of Justice and, by all accounts, does a good job there. There will be a number of judgeship vacancies in the D.C. trial judges. He has been a trial lawyer. He would be a good person to fill one of those. I would feel comfortable supporting him for another judgeship.”

    Then-Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ)
    “I believe Mr. Garland is well qualified for the court of appeals. He earned degrees from Harvard College and Harvard Law School and clerked for Judge Friendly on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and for Justice Brennan on the Supreme Court and, since 1993, he has worked for the Department of Justice. So there is no question, he is qualified to serve on the court.”

    Then-Sen. Strom Thurmond (R-SC)
    “I have no reservations about Mr. Garland’s qualifications or character to serve in this capacity. He had an excellent academic record at both Harvard College and Harvard Law School before serving as a law clerk on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and the U.S. Supreme Court. Also, he has served in distinguished positions in private law practice and with the Department of Justice. Moreover, I have no doubt that Mr. Garland is a man of character and integrity.”

    Then-Sen. Conrad Burns (R-MT)
    “[T]he nominee has the character and is highly qualified for the position.”

    http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2016/03/16/3760775/republicans-backed-merrick-garland-1997/

  250. says

    Hillary Clinton’s victory speech, transcript. And for those that prefer it, here is the Video.

    Donald Trump’s victory speech, video during which Trump blasted “disgusting reporters” and otherwise repeated a lot of his usual schtick, including emphasis on poll numbers.

    John Kasich’s victory speech, video.

    Marco Rubio’s concession speech, YouTube video link.

    Ted Cruz’s primary night speech. Cruz repeated his pledge to get rid of the IRS, to institute a 10% flat tax, to repeal every word of Obamacare, and to get rid of EPA regulations. He made a big deal out of the fact that he is the only one who can beat Donald Trump. Cruz was smarmy.

  251. says

    With 100% of the Missouri primary votes in, here are the results:
    Clinton, 49.6%
    Sanders, 49.4%

    Trump 40.8%
    Cruz 40.6%
    Kasich 10.1%
    Rubio 6.1%

    In other news, we already knew that Trump said he will not attend the next Republican debate, to be hosted by Fox News in Salt Lake City. Now Kasich has declared that he won’t attend that debate if Trump skips it.

    Now that Rubio is out of the picture, Trump is focused on threatening Hillary Clinton and the RNC. Specifically, Trump repeated several times that is we does not get the nomination automatically at the convention “you’d have riots.” Yes, Trump is pushing for riots at the Republican convention.
    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/trump-riots-if-i-do-not-win

  252. says

    What a Maroon @270, Sorry I didn’t see your comment before I posted mine.

    Republican senators are desperately looking for a way out of their obstructionism when it comes to the new Supreme Court nominee:

    Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) […] signaled Wednesday [today], that he was open to moving Garland’s nomination in a lame duck session after the election in November, presumably only if a Democrat wins the White House.

    “I’d probably be open to resolving this in the lame duck,” Hatch said according to a tweet from a reporter closer to Hatch in the scrum.

    “He is a good man, but he shouldn’t be brought up tin this toxic environment,” Hatch told reporters Wednesday. “I am tired of the Supreme Court being used as a battering ball back and forth on both sides. That is why I’d put it off till next year.”

    Hatch said that while he once supported Garland “there is a difference between being on a circuit court and being on the Supreme Court.”

    “I think highly of him, but I haven’t read his cases and all I can say is I think the same argument stands that we should not be doing this in this toxic environment,” Hatch told reporters on the hill Wednesday. “It demeans the Supreme Court. Man, I gave a speech yesterday, and it was interrupted by people sponsored by the White House yelling and screaming.”

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/hatch-open-to-garland-in-lame-duck

  253. says

    Mitch McConnell has already rejected the nomination of Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court.

    […] saying there was no point in the Senate “endlessly debating an issue where we don’t agree.”

    “The American people are perfectly capable of having their say—their say—on this issue,” McConnell said from the Senate floor shortly after Obama’s announcement. “So let’s give them a voice. Let’s let the American people decide.”

    “The American people may well elect an American president who decides to nominate Judge Garland for Senate consideration,” McConnell continued. “The next president may also nominate someone very different. Either way our view is this: give the people a voice in filling this vacancy.” […]

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/mcconnell-rejects-garland-nomination-scotus

  254. says

    Remember that über conservative Catholic archbishop that snuck Kim Davis in to see the Pope during that visit to D.C.? Well that guy has been fired. The Vatican is replacing Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano with a clergyman that is an advocate for immigration. I hope the new guy, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, does not join Kim Davis in hating LGBT people.
    Link.

  255. says

    Stupidity from Idaho: a sheriff objects to mandatory rape kit testing because a “majority of cases are consensual sex.”
    http://www.localnews8.com/news/local-sheriff-reacts-to-rape-kit-legislation/38515374

    BINGHAM COUNTY, Idaho –
    Not every rape kit in Idaho is sent to a lab and tested, and state lawmakers are looking to change that.

    There’s a bill that would create a statewide system of collecting and tracking the physical evidence in sexual assault investigations. Part of that bill would give clinics the responsibility of sending rape kits for DNA testing (unless the victim requests otherwise).

    Currently, law enforcement is in charge of deciding if a kit should be tested.

    “I really believe the Legislature needs to take a strong look at allowing law enforcement to do their job and not try to dictate what we need to do. I think they’re trying to help, I really do,” Bingham County Sheriff Craig Rowland said. “They need to let us decide if we’re going to send the kit and when we send the kits in. Because the majority of our rapes, not to say that we don’t have rapes, we do, but the majority of our rapes that are called in, are actually consensual sex. ”

    This bill has already passed the House, now it’s going to the Senate.

    Sheriff Craig Rowland is, in addition to being a dunderhead, is a mormon.

  256. says

    House Speaker Paul Ryan is backing Senator McConnell (see comment 277):

    This has never been about who the nominee is. It is about a basic principle. Under our Constitution, the president has every right to make this nomination, and the Senate has every right not to confirm a nominee. I fully support Leader McConnell and Chairman Grassley’s decision not to move forward with the confirmation process. We should let the American people decide the direction of the court.

  257. says

    More head-desking news regarding Supreme Court nominee Judge Merrick Garland:

    […] The National Republican Senate Committee released a statement calling Garland “a liberal” and “an activist,” boilerplate that they had on tap for any nominee, but language that is jarringly off when it comes to this one. Sen. Orrin Hatch, who had previously named Garland as the kind of reasonable nominee he would like to see from President Obama, flatly refused to even meet with him. […]

    Link.

    Some senators have said they would be glad to consider Garland if he is nominated next year. WTF?

  258. says

    When Trump was asked about his foreign policy advisors, he said, “My primary consultant is myself.”

    Here’s what Trump said previously (March 8):

    Yes, there is a team. There’s not a team. I’m going to be forming a team. I have met with far more than three people.

    Here’s what he had to say today:

    I’m speaking with myself, number one, because I have a very good brain and I’ve said a lot of things. I know what I’m doing, and I listen to a lot of people, I talk to a lot of people, and at the appropriate time I’ll tell you who the people are. But my primary consultant is myself and I have, you know, a good instinct for this stuff.

    Link.

    If Trump becomes President Trump the USA is so fucked.

  259. blf says

    This could have been an interesting article, potentially touching on the “lamestream media” problem in some countries, probably including the States. Unfortunately, it’s mostly saying the obvious, that anonymous sources, and their quotes and information, must be handled with care. Would UK political coverage be possible if we adopted the NY Times’s rules?:

    New guidelines at New York’s main newspaper over the use of anonymous sources might prohibit the publication of controversial stories in Britain
    […]
    From now on, the [New York Times] will require any story that “hinges on a central fact” from an anonymous source to be approved by one of the NYT’s three senior editors.

    […]

    Anonymity is not specifically banned, because its use, said the memo, “is sometimes crucial to our journalistic mission.” But the new policy is aimed at significantly reducing an over-reliance on unnamed sources.

    […]

    Single, anonymous sources form the key part of so many contentious political stories. The Guardian’s readers’ editor, Chris Elliott, has tackled this topic many times.

    A couple of years ago he wrote: “The use of anonymous quotes is widespread within newspapers and is, I think, particularly insidious when used to snipe at public figures in profiles.”

    He was right, of course, but the practice has continued, not out of journalistic defiance, but pragmatism. No guarantee of anonymity for a source means no story.

    One very good readers’s comment (which reminds me of the Washington Post’s rule for Watergate, “Verify! Verify! Verify!”):

    This seems to be conflating two different issues; a single anonymous source and the story’s veracity.

    Surely a single anonymous source should only be the start of the investigation. Too often a paper will rush to print desperately wanting the source to be true. Perhaps all unverified stories should have this fact clearly shown in the sub heading — or kept where they belong in the opinion section.

  260. says

    Fox News is trying, desperately, to back up Mitch McConnell and other Republicans when it comes to the new Supreme Court nominee:

    Fox’s Andrew Napolitano and Stuart Varney accused Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland of publicly “lobbying for the job” by speaking during his nomination announcement, despite precedent of prior Supreme Court nominees chosen by presidents of both parties doing the same.

    During the March 16 edition of Fox Business’ Varney & Co., Varney said he was “surprised to hear Judge Merrick Garland say anything” during the nomination announcement, and accused Garland of sounding “like he was lobbying for the job” while speaking at the White House. Napolitano added that “It is highly unusual for the nominee, him or herself, to engage in any type of public lobbying and really should be reserved for behind the scenes with the members of the Senate.” Napolitano said that he could not imagine former President Ronald Reagan allowing a Supreme Court nominee to speak at his announcement, saying “A different era, a different president, different morals, different values.”

    But, there is strong precedent of presidents from both parties, including Reagan, allowing Supreme Court nominees to speak during nomination announcements. Justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor each spoke during their nominations, while former President George W. Bush’s nominees Justice Samuel Alito and Chief Justice John Roberts were allowed to do the same. Reagan, meanwhile, turned the microphone over to Justice Anthony Kennedy and allowed the late Justice Antonin Scalia to take questions from reporters. […]

    Media Matters link.

    Doesn’t pass the smell test, Fox News.

    See comments 270, 271, 272, 276, 277, and 282 for earlier conversation about the Supreme Court nominee.

  261. What a Maroon, living up to the 'nym says

    Lynna,

    What a Maroon @270, Sorry I didn’t see your comment before I posted mine.

    No worries–you added a lot more info. To be honest, I was surprised I beat you to the news.

  262. says

    Now that Rubio has dropped out, Governor Nikki Haley has endorsed Ted Cruz. Yuck.

    Maybe we should like Merrick Garland more. Ted Cruz hates him:

    […] Merrick Garland is exactly the type of Supreme Court nominee you get when you make deals in Washington D.C. A so-called ‘moderate’ Democrat nominee is precisely the kind of deal that Donald Trump has told us he would make – someone who would rule along with other liberals on the bench like Justices Ginsburg and Sotomayor.

    Make no mistake, if Garland were confirmed, he would side predictably with President Obama on critical issues such as undermining the Second Amendment, legalizing partial-birth abortion, and propping up overreaching bureaucratic agencies like the EPA and the IRS.

    We cannot afford to lose the Supreme Court for generations to come by nominating or confirming someone that a dealmaker like Donald Trump would support. Washington dealmakers cannot be trusted with such crucial lifetime appointments. […]

    Talking Points Memo link.

    On a daily basis, Cruz says something that adds to his dunderhead status.

  263. says

    Glenn Beck loves, loves, loves him some Ted Cruz. And he hates, hates, hates John Kasich. He hates Kasich so much that he abandoned his mormon-scrubbed vocabulary to call Kasich a “son of a bitch.”

    Welcome to more eye-brow-raising weirdness from the rightwing:

    On Monday, Glenn Beck was positively giddy over his realization that everything he has done for the last decade has been orchestrated by God for the purpose of preparing his audience to save this nation by electing Ted Cruz as president.

    God’s plan for saving America, Beck explained, hinged upon Donald Trump winning the Republican primaries in Florida and Ohio and thereby driving both Marco Rubio and John Kasich out of the race, setting up a showdown between Cruz and Trump, at which point “Cruz turbos and the republic is saved.”

    Unfortunately for Beck, last night didn’t quite turn out the way he had anticipated, with Kasich winning in his native Ohio and vowing to stay in the race until the Republican convention. So while Beck heaped praised upon Rubio for dropping out after losing to Trump in Florida, saying that he delivered a “landmark” concession speech that will go down in history, he declared that Kasich will conversely go down in history as the man who “possibly destroyed the republic.”

    After co-host Pat Gray mocked Kasich on the radio program today for being “delusional” for staying in the race when it is mathematically impossible for him to actually win enough delegates in the remaining primaries to secure the GOP nomination, Beck stated that “this guy is going to be remembered as a guy who possibly destroyed the republic.” […]

    “Excuse my language,” Beck said later in the broadcast, “but you son of a bitch, the republic is at stake. This is not like a normal race. The republic is at stake!” […]

    Link

  264. says

    The Economist Intelligence Unit has placed Donald Trump among its top ten global risk.

    […] The well-respected global economic and geopolitical analysis firm put a possible Trump presidency in its top 10 global risks this month, released Wednesday. Other risks include a sharp slowdown in the Chinese economy, a fracture of the Eurozone, and Britain’s possible departure from the European Union.

    Trump’s controversial remarks on Muslims would be a gift to “potential recruiters who have long been trying to paint the U.S. as an anti-Muslim country. His rhetoric will certainly help that recruiting effort,” said Robert Powell, global risk briefing manager at EIU.

    Until Trump, the firm had never rated a pending election of a candidate to be a geopolitical risk to the U.S. and the world. […]

    “It’s highly unusual, and I don’t think we ever have done it where we’ve had a single politician be the center of our risk items,” Powell said in an interview, but noted that the firm has once included the transition at the top of the Chinese Communist Party as a top-ten risk as well. […]

    Politico link.

  265. says

    Trump won in every state but Ohio last night. What does he tweet about? Mostly Megyn Kelly. He is prolonging his petty she-hurt-my-feelings fit and vendetta.

    Watching other networks and local news. Really good night! Crazy @megynkelly is unwatchable.
    ——————
    Can’t watch Crazy Megyn anymore. Talks about me at 43% but never mentions that there are four people in race. With two people, big & over!

    The quotes are from Trump’s Twitter feed. Kelly was slated to be one of the moderators of the Republican debate in Salt Lake City, the event that Trump said he would not attend.

  266. says

    This news about the Ted Cruz campaign belongs in our “the company they keep” category.

    Frank Gaffney is a notorious anti-Muslim activist. He’s the guy that thinks “creeping Sharia” is taking over the USA (shades of Michele Bachmann without the crazy eyes), and he’s the one who pushed the conspiracy theory that the Muslim Brotherhood had snuck into the Obama administration (or Obama had let them in).

    His “creeping Sharia” conspiracy theory included the idea that Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan was plotting to insert elements of Sharia law into the U.S. government. Most bonkers of all, Gaffney accused Grover Norquist of infiltrating the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) for the Muslim Brotherhood. Grover Norquist? Really?

    Goofy Gaffney held a National Security Action Summit in July. Cruz and other Republican candidates spoke there as if it were a legitimate conference. Now Cruz has added Frank Gaffney to his national security advisory team.

    Trump also has connections to Gaffney. He used bogus poll results from the Gaffney Center for Security Policy to back up his plan to ban all Muslims from entering the USA.

    It’s a rat’s nest of conspiracy theories and bigotry.

  267. says

    Anti-abortion foes have found a reason to oppose Merrick Garland as the Supreme Court nominee. They had to leap chasms, and then drown in guilt-by-association to do so, but Americans United for Life (“the nation’s premier pro-life legal team”) has identified Garland as “Obama’s pro-abortion pick.”

    This is how they played their abortion card:

    […] Garland once spoke at a gathering celebrating the 2005 release of a book on the late Justice Harry Blackmun by veteran New York Times Supreme Court reporter Linda Greenhouse. After Blackmun’s death, Greenhouse had drawn heavily on the release of a huge treasure trove of Blackmun’s papers—papers Garland called “a great gift to the country.” Blackmun was the author of Roe v. Wade. […]

    Yes, that’s right. Garland went to a party to celebrate the publication of a book by Justice Harry Blackmun. That’s the full extent of Garland’s supposed connection to court decisions that affect access to abortion.

  268. says

    Donald Trump refused to go to Salt Lake City, but other presidential candidates are campaigning in Utah.

    Kasich will be there tomorrow, Friday; Cruz arrives on Saturday; Bernie Sanders will campaign in Utah on Friday. For the Clinton campaign, Chelsea Clinton was in Utah on Tuesday and Michelle Kwan will speak for Clinton today.

  269. says

    The Wall Street Journal published an article that discussed the primary votes so far, the Republican candidates, and the possibility of a brokered convention. The article included this sentence: “By the way, Hillary Clinton’s primary vote total so far is 8,646,551, according to the RealClearPolitics count. Mr. Trump’s is 7,533,692.”

    Of course, the facts, and the real world sometimes make Trump really angry (angry with a side of hurt feelings), so he took to Twitter for revenge.

    @WSJ Editorial says “Clinton primary vote total is 8,646,551.Trump’s is 7,533,692”-a knock. But she had only 3 opponents-I had 16. Apologize.
    —————–
    @WSJ is bad at math. The good news is, nobody cares what they say in their editorials anymore, especially me!
    ——————–
    Please explain to the dummies at the @WSJ Editorial Board that I love to debate and have won, according to Drudge etc., all 11 of them!

    The Wall Street Journal has not responded.

  270. says

    The five deputies involved in escorting a black protester out of a Trump rally have been disciplined for failing to take action when John McGraw sucker punched the protestor. The deputies face up to a year of probation. WRAL link.

    The Cumberland County Sheriff’s Office said that five deputies have been disciplined in connection with the assault of Rakeem Jones at a Donald Trump rally in Fayetteville on March 9.

    The sheriff’s office said the deputies witnessed the assault and did not take action. Three of the deputies were demoted and were also suspended without pay for five days. The other two were suspended without pay for three days. All five deputies face one year of probation.

    “I applaud the sheriff’s department for their work and finding the deputies responsible,” said Jones.

    In a statement, Sheriff Earl “Moose” Butler said the deputies faced disciplinary action for “unsatisfactory performance and failing to discharge the duties and policies of the office of the sheriff.”

  271. says

    Amazing. Marco Rubio actually returned to the Senate to work for a day. After that, he is going on spring vacation for two weeks with the rest of the Senators.

  272. says

    Rachel Maddow interviewed Bernie Sanders last night. Excerpt:

    MADDOW: I’m just going to push you and ask you one more time. I’ll actually ask you from the other direction. If one of you — presumably, there won’t be a tie — one of you presumably will be behind in pledged delegates heading into that convention. Should the person who is behind in pledged delegates concede to the person who is ahead in pledged delegates in Philadelphia?

    SANDERS: Well, I — you know, I don’t want to speculate about the future and I think there are other factors involved. I think it is probably the case that the candidate who has the most pledged delegates is going to be the candidate, but there are other factors.

    Segment in which Sanders talked about Garland as the Supreme Court nominee.

    Segment in which Sanders talks about super delegates and his path forward to the nomination. Part 1.

    Continuation of Part 1 as noted above, plus a discussion of trade policy, and Sanders’ denouncing violence at Trump’s rallies.

  273. says

    Ah, yes, it is budget time again. President Obama submitted a budget proposal. Republicans control the House Budget Committee and that committee submitted a proposal.

    This [Republican] spending blueprint would eliminate the subsidies people enrolling through Obamacare get for their health insurance. It would slash Medicaid, add work requirements for benefits like food stamps, raise the eligibility age for Medicare to 67, cut student loan subsidies, end a program that helps states fund various programs for the poor (the Social Services Block Grant), and make federal workers pay more into their pension funds. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities calculates that the programs for the poor that make up only 28 percent of domestic spending would suffer 60 percent of the cuts in this budget.

    Link.

    The Hill link.

    Yeah, the official Republican proposal is really bad, but guess what? It is not bad enough. Extreme rightwing Republicans in the House will not vote for it because it does not go far enough when it comes to decimating many federal programs.

  274. says

    The Governor of Michigan, Rick Snyder, and EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy testified for two days before a congressional committee.

    I was struck by the way that Snyder bemoaned his own fate (“I will have to live with this the rest of my life”) without putting enough emphasis on the lives of the children his administration poisoned with lead-tainted water.

    Snyder’s main tactic was to blame the feds. His secondary tactic was to claim an implausible innocence, along with an exaggeration of his response once he was forced to acknowledge the problem.

    While in DC, Snyder refused to meet with families from Flint who had traveled to the Capitol.

    […] Democrats repeatedly berated Snyder about what he did or did not know during the time of the crisis. “I’m not buying you didn’t know about this until October 2015,” Rep. Matt Cartwright (D-PA) said. “You were not in a medically induced coma.” They also repeatedly called for him to resign.

    The first step in the crisis was that when Flint switched its water source from Detroit to the Flint River, corrosion control chemicals weren’t added to keep the water from leaching lead from pipes. In his testimony, Snyder confirmed that officials in the state Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) did not instruct the city of Flint to use those chemicals. “They failed in what I would deem common sense to say they should have,” he said.

    Snyder maintains he only found out about the lead contamination issues late last year. Emails between Snyder’s top aides and legal advisers in late 2014 showed that they described the water situation as an “urgent matter to fix” and “downright scary,” with many arguing that the city’s source should be switched back to Detroit. Snyder testified that he wasn’t looped in or made aware of the contents of those emails. “I recall in that time period we discussed issues… the color and odor of the water, including E. coli,” he said. “Several issues, but never related to lead.”

    He said that he didn’t become aware of the dangerous lead levels in Flint’s water until October 1, 2015, at which point he took “immediate action” by reconnecting to the city to Detroit water, distributing water filters, conducting blood tests, and sending $67 million in state funding.

    Snyder was asked about the Legionnaires outbreak, which has killed ten people and infected scores more, although state and federal officials have still not tested the water to determine whether it was the cause. On Thursday, Snyder said he didn’t learn of the outbreak until 2016 and that the MDEQ “should have done more to escalate the issue.” He added that given the timing with the change in the water source, “It’s a concern” that it was the cause.

    Snyder also testified that the emergency manager system, in which governor-picked officials take control of financially stressed towns like Flint, failed. “In respect to the water issue, that would be a fair conclusion,” he said. […]

    Think Progress link.

    Rachel Maddow’s updated coverage of the U.S. House Oversight Committee hearings on the mass lead poisoning in the city of Flint.

  275. says

    Uh … yeah, that’s weird. Michael Savage, popular conservative talk show host, claims that the successes of President Obama and Hillary Clinton have made him doubt that God exists.

    “I go in and out of it lately,” Savage said. “When I see what Obama gets away with and what Hillary gets away with, I lose my faith.”

    Right Wing Watch link.

  276. says

    This is a followup to comment 292. Chris Hayes covered Ted Cruz’s foreign policy advisors, including the odious and illogical Frank Gaffney. Media Matters link.

    Video from “All In with Chris Hayes” and a partial transcript are both at the link. Excerpt:

    […] Today Trump’s most serious remaining challenger Ted Cruz released his list of foreign policy advisers. And it’s a — well, it’s a real rogue’s gallery of warmongers and bigots, including Elliott Abrams, who pleaded guilty to keeping information from Congress about his role in the Iran-Contra scandal, and Michael Ledeen, another Iran-Contra figure and namesake of the so-called Ladeen Doctrine, and I’m quoting directly here: “Every ten years or so, the United States needs to pick up some small crappy little country and throw it against the wall, just to show the world we mean business.”

    But by far the worse of the bunch, a guy who has no business anywhere near the corridors of power ever is anti-Muslim conspiracy theorist Frank Gaffney. The man who the Southern Poverty Law Center described as “one of America’s most notorious Islamophobes.” Gaffney believes the Obama administration and large parts of the U.S. government are fronts for the Muslim Brotherhood. Accusing such figures as Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan, Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin, and Republican anti-tax fanatic Grover Norquist of promoting Sharia law.

    Gaffney’s organization, The Center for Security Policy, is responsible for the bogus poll cited by Donald Trump himself in justifying his proposal to ban Muslims from entering the U.S., an idea that now appears to have gone mainstream in the Republican electorate.

    According to exit polls around two thirds of the voters in this past Tuesday’s Republican primaries said they support banning Muslims from the country. As Gaffney sees it, Islam is less a religion protected by the First Amendment than a militant political plot to take over the U.S. […]

  277. says

    President Obama is making history again by appointing a woman to a post previously held by men.

    President Barack Obama plans to nominate Air Force Gen. Lori Robinson to be the head of U.S. Northern Command — which would make her the first woman to be named combatant commander, Defense Secretary Ash Carter announced Friday.

    Robinson is now the head of Pacific Air Forces. If confirmed by the Senate, she would replace Adm. Bill Gortney, who’s been in the post since 2014. […]

    Politico link.

  278. says

    The administrators of a high school in Georgia decided to move the site of its prom because a white supremacist group was holding a rally nearby.

    A Gwinnett County high school is moving its prom from Stone Mountain Park, citing concerns about a “pro-white” rally scheduled there earlier the same day.

    Peachtree Ridge High School announced Wednesday it has moved its prom from the Atlanta Evergreen Marriott Resort in Stone Mountain Park to the Westin Buckhead Atlanta, school district officials said. The prom will be on the same date and time, Saturday, April 23, from 8 p.m. to 11 p.m. The Evergreen Marriott released the school from its contract, officials said.

    Gwinnett school district spokeswoman Sloan Roach said some parents were worried about student safety upon learning a “pro-white” group, Rock Stone Mountain, planned a rally at the park the same day. Two other groups announced plans to protest the Rock Stone Mountain rally. […]

    Atlanta Journal link.

  279. says

    This is a followup to comment 296. Trump is continuing his feud with the Wall Street Journal. This round goes to the editors of the WSJ.

    The Wall Street Journal editorial board declined Donald Trump’s demand for an apology after it cast doubt on his chances of winning the Republican presidential nomination, instead writing another editorial late Thursday calling him “a sure loser in November.”

    “The truth hurts,” the editorial read, “though Mr. Trump would rather walk down Fifth Avenue shooting the messenger.” […]

    “Actually his rise has been cleared by the large and fractured GOP field,” the WSJ editorial board fired back. “Of the 20.35 million GOP primary votes cast so far, he has received 7.54 million, or a mere 37%. Despite the media desire to call him unstoppable, Mr. Trump is the weakest Republican front-runner since Gerald Ford in 1976.”

    The editorial board pointed out that though Trump may have diehard followers, his unfavorables are also remarkably high: “The Real Clear Politics polling average shows twice as many adults have negative views (61%) than positive views (32.5%) of Mr. Trump.”

    As for Trump’s remark that the newspaper’s editorials don’t matter because “nobody cares” what the Wall Street Journal writes anymore, the board thanked him for being “such a loyal reader.”

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/wall-street-journal-tells-trump-truth-hurts

    Ha. That’s snark on The Guardian level. I like it.

  280. says

    Editors at Wikipedia are struggling mightily to keep facts posted on the Wiki page describing Judge Merrick Garland.

    […] Prior to the announcement, Judge Garland’s page noted that he was recognized as a “judicial moderate.” After the announcement, however, an editor struck that description in favor of “extreme liberal.” A minute later, to stop potential “vandalism,” in Wiki-speak, the article was closed to open editing, meaning only confirmed editors would be allowed to change the post. A minute after that, the “judicial moderate” description was restored. […]

    If you keep scrolling, you’ll see how some editors sought again and again to update the article before the official announcement was made. Over and over again, another editor took it down—a back-and-forth that went through nine rounds in one ten-minute period. One editor who repeatedly deleted anything he marked as speculative said, “Let’s not claim that leaks and rumors are true. We aren’t CNN.” […]

    Something approaching objectivity may be the end result you typically see. But getting an entry to that point, especially where politics are involved, rarely happens without a fight.

    Wired link.

  281. says

    Bernie Sanders has picked up an interesting endorsement in Arizona:

    […] Russell Begaye was elected President of the Navajo Nation in a close election in 2015. He leads a nation which is semi-autonomous with the U.S., with it’s own governmental services and a land mass larger than West Virginia.

    On March 18th, Begaye endorsed Sanders at a campaign rally in Flagstaff, AZ, giving the Sanders campaign a powerful Native American leader and ally. […]

    Link.

  282. says

    Instead of saying he endorses Ted Cruz, Mitt Romney just tweeted that he plans to vote for Cruz in the Utah Republican primary. Two whacko religious conservatives on the same page, I guess.

    In other news, there are additional cracks in the Republican dam holding back consideration of President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee, Merrick Garland. Senator Mark Kirk, a Republican from Illinois, created the latest crack. Senator Kirk told his fellow Republican senators to “just man up and cast a vote.”

  283. says

    The governor of Alabama, Robert Bentley, recently signed a bill that bans cities in that state from raising the minimum wage. He stopped a proposed $2.85 raise for the lowest-paid workers in Birmingham, for example.

    But Bentley was generous with more well-to-do people in his cabinet. He gave four of them $73,405 raises, which increased their salary by 80%. The cabinet members were already making $91,000 per year.

    Bentley has also denied pay increases for teachers, other state employees, and retirees. He rather infamously closed 31 drivers license office, with most of those offices in majority black communities (a side effect will be that those residents find it harder to get a mandated ID in order to vote).

    A rich asshat is screwing the people of his state.

    […] Supporters of the legislation argue raising the minimum wage is bad for businesses — the evidence on that point is mixed — but opponents argue that with the 48th highest poverty rate in the country, it’s time for lawmakers to prioritize lifting Alabama workers out of poverty.

    This isn’t the first time in recent months that Bentley’s budgetary choices have come under fire. In December, he diverted funding from the 2010 BP oil spill recovery effort to finance the renovation of a second Governor’s mansion on the Gulf Coast.

    Think Progress link.

  284. says

    Tennessee lawmakers want to pay for shoutouts to god by stripping some funding from education.

    A bill that would strip the University of Tennessee of $100,000 a year in state funding for certain diversity and inclusion operations began advancing in a House subcommittee Tuesday — but on a separate track than a similar effort underway in the state Senate.

    House Bill 2248 as originally filed by Rep. Micah Van Huss, R-Johnson City, would strip all state funding from UT’s Office for Diversity and Inclusion. But Van Huss entered the House Education Subcommittee on Tuesday afternoon with an amendment that would take $100,000 a year for the next three years away from UT and use it instead to pay for decals bearing the national motto “In God We Trust” on law enforcement vehicles. […]

    Knoxville News Sentinel link.

    Not content with the shoutout to god on police vehicles, the lawmakers added some amendments to the bill, one of which would ban the University of Tennessee from using any state funds “to promote the use of gender-neutral pronouns, Sex Week or to promote or demote a religious holiday.”

  285. says

    There must be a lot of mormon leaders shaking their heads today. Bernie Sanders drew a crowd of more than 14,000 supporters yesterday at Brigham Young State Park. Nice.

    […] “On Tuesday there is going to be a very important caucus here in Utah. Let me give you a simple political truism. We will win that caucus if there is a large turnout. We will lose if there isn’t,” Sanders said.

    Across town, Republican front-runner Donald Trump drew a much smaller crowd in the same city on the same day. […]

    Trump consistently tells TV hosts that he gets the biggest crowds, “bigger than Bernie Sanders.” Wrong.

    Utah was the second stop on a three-state swing that took him earlier to Idaho Falls, another state [Idaho Falls is not a state. It is a city in southeastern Idaho] where Democrats will go to caucuses next Tuesday to choose a nominee for the Democratic Party nomination for president. Later Friday, Sanders was headed to Tucson to resume campaigning in Arizona where voters will go to the polls in a primary election on Tuesday. […]

    Sanders also called for bold action to reverse global warming caused by burning coal, oil, gas and other fossil fuels. Sanders would tax carbon to discourage burning fuels that emit the greenhouse gasses responsible for climate change.

    https://berniesanders.com/press-release/utah-feels-bern-14000-turnout-sanders-salt-lake-city/

  286. says

    Sheriff Joe Arpaio is speaking at a Trump rally in Maricopa County, Arizona. He and his deputies are also providing security for the event (deputies riding around on ATVs and horses, deputies in patrol cars blocking some access roads). Protestors are massing on the perimeter. Looks like another recipe for violence.

    In other Trump-related news, Trump asked his supporters to boycott Megyn Kelly’s show. This is getting really ridiculous. Even Fox News thinks Trump’s obsession with putting Megyn Kelly down has crossed a line.

    Fox News slammed Republican frontrunner Donald Trump Friday night for his “sick obsession” with host Megyn Kelly after the real estate mogul called on supporters to boycott her evening news show.

    A Fox News spokesperson said Trump’s “vitriolic attacks” on Kelly are undignified from a candidate running for the for the nation’s highest office.

    “Donald Trump’s vitriolic attacks against Megyn Kelly and his extreme, sick obsession with her is beneath the dignity of a presidential candidate who wants to occupy the highest office in the land,” the spokesperson said in a statement provided to TPM.

    Trump’s one-sided feud with Kelly dates back to the first Republican debate hosted by Fox News last summer, when the freshly minted presidential candidate took issue with Kelly’s line of questioning. […]

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/megyn-kelly-donald-trump-boycott

  287. says

    There are better photos of the protesters blocking access to a Trump rally at the New York Daily Mail.

    […] Anti-Donald Trump protesters blocked an Arizona highway and created a traffic nightmare in an attempt to keep the GOP frontrunner from attending his Saturday rally in Fountain Hills.

    The group parked two pickup trucks — one with a poster that read “Dump Trump” and another that said “Shut Down Trump” — lengthwise across the Phoenix area road ahead of the bombastic billionaire’s 2 p.m. EST appearance.

    “We don’t want Donald Trump in Arizona. We don’t want his hatred,” a protester told an NBC News reporter on the scene. […]

    Activists fortified their blockade by adding three layers of cars behind the pickups. They stood in the road chanting and beating drums, stopping anyone from passing on the three-lane highway.

    Video showed cars backed up for miles […]

    By 1 p.m., traffic cops began towing the layers of protesters’ cars, but the people stayed put in the middle of the road, keeping traffic at a stand still. […]

    My bet is that Trump will take this as a personal affront, and will be in feelings-hurt mode for weeks — but he will spin it as a criminal act preventing free speech, etc.

  288. says

    Donald Trump drew smaller-than-usual crowds in Salt Lake City. That didn’t stop his from adding a few new insults to his repertoire:

    Donald Trump questioned Mitt Romney’s faith at a Salt Lake City rally on Friday night, ripping the former GOP presidential nominee as a “choke artist” before wondering whether he was truly a member of the Mormon religion.

    “Are you sure he’s a Mormon? Are we sure?” he asked a supportive crowd. Romney, just hours earlier, had indicated he’d be casting a vote for Ted Cruz in Utah’s caucuses Tuesday.

    Trump’s broadside was the latest and most direct in a trend of questioning his opponents’ religion. He previously wondered about Ben Carson’s Seventh Day Adventist faith and suggested that Ted Cruz is unlikely to be a true evangelical because he hails from Cuba. And as he lavished praise on Utah’s Mormon population, he wondered whether Romney was fit to be counted among them.

    “And do I love the Mormons. OK? Do I love the Mormons?” he bellowed from a podium. […]

    Politico link.

  289. says

    Three of the protestors in Arizona (see comments 319 and 320) were arrested, but violence between protestors and those trying to drive to the Trump rally was avoided. Good.

    Protests against Trump were also held in New York City. There were few arrests and the protests seem to have been peaceful for the most part.

    Glenn Beck protested Trump by telling him to “leave Megyn Kelly alone.”

    Bernie Sanders talked about immigration policy when he held a rally near the border fence that separates Arizona from Mexico. The difference between the Democratic Party candidates, with their emphasis on policy, and the Republican Party candidates, with their posturing and bluster grows starker by the day.

  290. says

    This may turn out to be good news. We’ve talked before about the so-called “religious liberty” bills that some states have passed. These bills are licenses-to-discriminate. Lawmakers in the state of Georgia sent a “religious liberty” bill to Governor Nathan Deal for his signature.

    Deal is a Republican who wasn’t clear in the past about signing such a bill, and he asked for changes that would make it less discriminatory. He got some of those changes in the revised bill, but now he is getting powerful signals from the NFL and from Apple that he should not sign the bill. The good news is that the pushback from businesses as influential as the NFL may make Governor deal change his mind. For one thing, Deal could lose the chance to host a Super Bowl.

    […] On Friday, the NFL issued a statement on Georgia’s House Bill 757, which would allow faith-based groups, including churches and religious schools, to refuse service to people if that service violated the group’s religious beliefs.

    “NFL policies emphasize tolerance and inclusiveness, and prohibit discrimination based on age, gender, race, religion, sexual orientation, or any other improper standard,” NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy said in a statement. “Whether the laws and regulations of a state and local community are consistent with these policies would be one of many factors NFL owners may use to evaluate potential Super Bowl host sites.”

    Atlanta, whose new Falcons stadium is set to open in 2017, had hoped to host a Super Bowl in 2019 or 2020. […]

    More than 480 businesses — including Atlanta-based Delta, Coca-Cola, and Home Depot — have come out against the bill. On Friday, Apple added its voice to the protests, urging Gov. Deal to veto the legislation and “send a clear message that Georgia’s future is one of inclusion, diversity and continued prosperity.”

    […] the Metro Atlanta Chamber and the Atlanta Convention and Visitors Bureau have said that, if visitors begin boycotting Georgia over the bill, it would mean a $1 billion to $2 billion hit to the state’s economy.

    The fight against Georgia’s religious liberty bill echoes a fight over a similar bill in Indiana last year. That bill, which was signed into law last March, went further than Georgia’s, extending protection to businesses that choose to refuse service to customers in the name of religious rights. Arkansas’ governor also signed a religious liberty bill into law last April. […]

    Think Progress link.

  291. says

    Cruz has added another rightwing extremist to the long list of dunderheads with whom he is happy to be associated. The Cruz campaign posted a list of endorsements, and added John Zmirak to that list.

    John Zmirak is a conservative Catholic who pushes fear of “gay Sharia” on the rightwing website The Stream. Of course, Zmirak wants the Senate to block all Democratic Supreme Court nominees … forever. Cruz has voiced similar beliefs, backing obstructionist tactics, and even mentioning “gay jihad.”

    Here are a few more of Smirk’s greatest rightwing hits:
    – he warned us that Christians may face genocide in the USA
    – he wants us to boycott Apple and Walmart because those two companies spoke out against “religious liberty” laws (see comment 324 for an example of “religious liberty” laws)
    – he says gays are a greater threat to the U.S. than ISIS
    – he loved, loved, loved the Center for Medical Progress’ deceptively-edited videos against Planned Parenthood
    – he thinks President Obama is a Muslim

  292. microraptor says

    Glenn Beck protested Trump by telling him to “leave Megyn Kelly alone.”

    Anyone remember that “Leave Brittany Spears Alone” video that went viral years ago? I’m now hearing it in Glenn Beck’s voice.

  293. blf says

    There was a fascinating article in yesterday’s International New York Times (formerly IHT), hidden away in the “Business” section, about teh trum-prat and his apparent worldview, What Donald Trump Doesn’t Understand About ‘the Deal’ (my emboldening):

    […]
    I have spent much of the past few months trying to make sense of Trump’s policy proposals. His website lists his major priorities as, in order: health care reform, China-United States trade agreements, Veterans Affairs reform, tax reform, gun rights and immigration reform. There are no other issues addressed at length. It’s a puzzling mix. Any serious economic proposal to ‘‘make America great again’’ would surely mention education, fiscal policy, entrepreneurship and trade with the entire world, not just China — issues he makes little or no reference to. No doubt Trump’s list of priorities reflects the issues that he and his advisers perceive, probably correctly, to be red meat for Republican primary voters. But tellingly, it’s also a set of issues for which the ‘‘deal’’ — that is, Trump’s unique ability to make deals — can be presented as his crucial promise.

    The centrality of the ‘‘deal’’ to Trumponomics is especially strange when you consider how tangential that concept is, or at least should be, to a modern economy. In Microeconomics 101, deals are an afterthought: Transactions have the most socially optimal outcome when buyer and seller reach a mutually beneficial agreement. […]

    It’s easy to dismiss Trump as a loutish ignoramus who simply doesn’t understand how modern economies function. But I’ve come to see him as a canny spokesman for a different sort of economy, one that often goes by the technical name ‘‘rent seeking.’’ In economics, a ‘‘rent’’ is money you make because you control something scarce and desirable, whether it’s an oil field or a monopolistic position in a market. There is a bit of ‘‘rent’’ in nearly every transaction. When you pay rent on an apartment, some of the money is for the value the landlord has added to the property, by upgrading the kitchen, say. But much of the money your landlord makes comes from the fact that he or she controls property in a desirable location. If you think of the transactions that make people the most frustrated, they are, most likely, rent-seeking transactions in which some force is imposing a better ‘‘deal’’ for one party. […]

    [… a discussion of rent-seeking, or rentier economics, including the Manhattan real estate market …]

    In recent weeks, hearing Trump talk, I’ve realized that his economic worldview is entirely coherent. It makes sense. He is not just a rent-seeker himself; his whole worldview is based on a rent-seeking vision of the economy, in which there’s a fixed amount of wealth that can only be redistributed, never grow. It is a worldview that makes perfect sense for the son of a New York real estate tycoon who grew up to be one, too. Everything he has gotten — as he proudly brags — came from cutting deals. Accepting the notion of a zero-sum world, he set out to grab more than his share. And his policies would push the American economy to conform with that worldview.

    Many economists and political scientists now think that the United States economy has shifted, over the past few decades, toward one in which a higher proportion of the economy comes from so-called rents: Wall Street’s maneuvering through the regulatory process, ‘‘free-trade’’ deals whose thousands of pages of rules wind up proscribing winners and losers. The left, right and center of the economics profession all agree that reducing rent-seeking behavior, and improving overall growth, is essential if we want to ‘‘make America great again.’’

    […] In a rentier state, every ambitious person knows that the way to become rich and powerful is to grab the sources of wealth and hold onto them, by force if necessary. It’s no accident that, around the world, rentier states tend to be run by unelected dictators — the ultimate dealmakers in chief.

    There’s a brilliant illustration in the on-line version, http://static01.nyt.com/images/2016/03/20/magazine/20onmoney2/20mag-20onmoney-t_CA1-articleLarge.jpg

  294. blf says

    ‘A tipping point’: record number of Americans see global warming as threat:

    New polling data shows that public concern about climate change is at a new high, as the US emerges from its warmest-ever winter

    A record number of Americans believe global warming will pose a threat to their way of life, new polling data shows, amid strengthening public acceptance that rising temperatures are being driven by human activity.

    […] Gallup, which has been tracking public sentiment on the topic annually since 1997, found that 41% of US adults feel warming will pose a “serious threat” to them during their lifetimes. This is the highest level recorded by Gallup, a 4% increase on 2015.
    […]
    The results show a solidifying belief that changes in the climate are under way, with 59% of people thinking so. A record 65% of Americans said global warming was down to greenhouse gases released by human activity — a 10% leap on last year.

    […]

    Last year was the warmest year on record globally; scientists forecast this record to fall again in 2016. Despite this, climate change has barely featured in the Republican presidential debates. Frontrunner Donald Trump has derided the science as bullshit and called climate change a hoax invented by the Chinese.

    “Sadly, I think that the current Republican party including their likely presidential nominee are entrenched in their climate change denialism,” [Michael] Mann [at Pennsylvania State University] said. “Only a major political shakeup and realignment is likely to change that. But we might very well see that realignment in this election.”

  295. says

    blf @327, It occurs to me that in Donald trump’s rent-seeking world, one of the commodities he controls is his name. He makes millions from loaning the Trump name to hotels in Dubai, etc. That’s one way to control a market.

    The idea that Trump is always out to grab more than his share rings true. That’s what he does.

  296. says

    More details concerning the mistreatment of protesters in Tucson (see comment 330):

    […] As you’ll note, in something of change of pace, the attacker appears to be African-American. He was later identified as 32 year old Tony Pettway. He’s now been charged with misdemeanor assault. 67 year old Linda Rothman was also arrested on suspicion of misdemeanor assault.

    In a second incident, Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski appears to get into an altercation with another protestor. I want to be clear what we know in this case and do not know. The video below was posted by CBS News reporter Jacqueline Alemany. She identifies the man with close cropped hair, to the protestors left, as Lewandowski. That appears correct to me but I can’t independently confirm that. The man identified as Lewandowski appears to grab the protestors collar and yank him back. […]

  297. blf says

    Pay-to-pray scam finds families caught between faith and desperation:

    A Washington judge has ordered the Christian Prayer Center to pay $7m in restitution as attorney general calls for more victims to come forward

    The first complaints about the Christian Prayer Center were short and cryptic — but not enough for the Washington state attorney general’s office to investigate. “These people bilked me.”

    But then, a lengthy letter landed, from a family whose members were both heartbroken and furious.

    “They had a child with a rare terminal illness,” said assistant attorney general Daniel Davies. “They were looking for hope anywhere they could get it. One of the places they turned to was the Christian Prayer Center.

    “When they are going through incredibly difficult situations, often times people turn to prayer,” Davies continued. “They see a website touting that thousands of people will pray for you. They have a pastor, testimonials on the website of people whose prayers were answered.

    “The pastor was a sham,” he said. “The testimonials were fictitious as well.”

    The child is still dying.

    And the family paid and paid. The first $35 they gave to the Christian Prayer Center to help their ailing daughter was one kind of fraud. No one was praying. There was no one there to help.

    The second and third times the family were charged constituted yet another kind of fraud, because the center continued to charge the family’s credit card without consent. When the girl’s father spotted the unapproved charges, he investigated and then contacted Davies’s office.

    As a result, the owner of christianprayercenter.com and its Spanish-language counterpart, oracioncristiana.org, have been ordered to pay up to $7m in restitution to an estimated 125,000 desperate consumers who reached out for prayers in their times of need.

    Sounds promising. But:

    […] As part of the consent decree, the [Seattle businessman [sic] Benjamin] Rogovy does not admit to having violated the law.

    [… this slimeball had other scams going as well …]

    If he does not stop engaging in what the state officials described as “unfair and deceptive business practices” and repay his victims, he will be subject to an additional $1m in civil penalties.

    In other words, this is being treated as a civil matter, not a criminal matter. There may be some logic to this, albeit I am very uncomfortable with the stated reasoning:

    One of the difficulties in the investigation was that it involved both faith and desperation. The attorney general’s office wants as many of Rogovy’s victims to come forward as possible and file claims for reimbursement online.

    But “when you’re dealing with people who pay for prayer”, Davies said, “you don’t want to be in a position where someone might think you rescinded their prayer through a lawsuit. That’s why we’re doing a claims process{…} If people did feel they had consolation, we don’t want to take that away from them.”

    The young girl’s parents who made the investigation possible have requested anonymity and do not want their 2014 letter released. “It explains that they felt terribly misled,” said Davies, who handled the case, “and that this is a horrible practice.”

    At least some of the readers are also bothered:

    ● “This is the same deal the Wall Street malefactors get. If they plead guilty, they become felons and are prohibited from engaging in such ventures in the future — to speak nothing of jail time. This reduces the entire affair to the level of a parking violation with a larger civil fine.”

    ● “Conservatives are a weird bunch. They claim to be Christians, have no problem getting upset with gays, which Christ never mentions once in The Bible, they love their guns, despite being told to turn the other cheek. The ONE thing Jesus made it very clear he was no fan of was money, he mentions it several times, get furious with the moneychangers, pissed in fact. Yet money is seen as some divine gift from god,and it’s collection at the cost of everything else is seen by evangelicals as perfectly acceptable. I’ll be honest, it seems pretty hypocritical to me, and I know I’m not alone. I feel bad for those taken by this scam, but praying for money? What did you expect? As soon as you saw the dollar sign, god is nowhere around.”

  298. blf says

    By rejecting $1 billion for a pipeline, a First Nation has put Justin Trudeau’s climate plan on trial:

    Canada’s Lax Kw’alaams show us how we can be saved: by loving the natural world and local living economies more than mere money and profit

    […] To export [LNG] overseas via tankers, Malaysian-owned Petronas must first win approval for a multi-billion dollar terminal on [Canada’s north-west] coast.

    That happens to be at the mouth of Canada’s second-largest salmon river, on the traditional territory of the Lax Kw’alaams First Nation. One of the world’s longest un-dammed rivers, the Skeena abounds in the fish relied on by surrounding wildlife — and by First Nations and an entire regional economy.

    Last year […] Petronas offered the First Nation an offer they imagined couldn’t be refused: in exchange for their support, a whopping $1.15 billion in cash. But put to a vote, the Lax Kw’alaams resoundingly said “no” — every single community member.

    […]

    They knew something even a billion dollars couldn’t persuade them to ignore: that you couldn’t pick a worse place to transform into an industrial landscape. The proposed site for the LNG plant is smack in the middle of a unique estuary, a coastal Mecca for fish: where every year hundreds of millions of young salmon, having travelled down the river after birth, feed and nurture as part of their journey to adulthood.

    When the British Columbia government gave Petronas a green-light anyway [the Lax Kw’alaams community] sprung into action. In the summer of 2015 they set up camp on Lelu island, right in the path of Petronas at the mouth of the river. Monitoring the area on boats, they peacefully turned away workers from sensitive sites.

    […] The federal government has said they’ll give the same tax breaks to the LNG industry that Harper was prepared to. [… T]he government is feeling the heat of opposition: after tens of thousands of public comments criticizing the Petronas project, a decision that was to come down March 22 was delayed by Canada’s Environment Minister and referred to cabinet.

    The British Columbia government’s response to date has been worse. I’m not sure what science the forces of no bring together up there except that it’s not really about the science, Premier Christy Clark declared. It’s not really about the fish. It’s just about trying to say no. It’s about fear of change. It’s about a fear of the future.

    It must have been a complete fluke for the “forces of no” that the results of a study assessing the project were published in Science, one of the world’s premier academic journals. Its conclusion? The LNG plant could lead to the collapse of BC’s wild salmon run.

    It must be another coincidence that the government’s own scientific studies showed, already 40 years ago, that any development in this region could “completely destroy” the river’s complex ecosystem.

    And still yet another coincidence that the government’s current studies continue to point out the problems with an LNG industry: its emissions, in a worse case scenario, “would be comparable to those from Alberta’s oilsands.”

    […]

    These Indigenous “forces of no,” derided by Christy Clark, ignored by Justin Trudeau, have taken to calling themselves by another name: the Forces of Know.

  299. says

    blf @332 Can you rescind a prayer? Can the scam pastor who never prayed to begin with, rescind a non-prayer? I don’t understand the fear that prayers Christians paid for could be rescinded if a lawsuit was filed? Anyway, the whole scam looks like criminal fraud to me.

  300. says

    Mitch McConnell has come up with a new reason to refuse to consider Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland: the NRA didn’t approve him.

    Supreme Court justices are nominated by the president and appointed with the advice and consent of the National Rifle Association, according to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY).

    […] In response to a question from host Chris Wallace, who asked if Senate Republicans would consider the nomination of Judge Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court after the election if Hillary Clinton prevails, McConnell responded that he “can’t imagine that a Republican majority in the United States Senate would want to confirm, in a lame duck session, a nominee opposed by the National Rifle Association [and] the National Federation of Independent Businesses.” […]

    But it’s also worth examining exactly who McConnell would give a veto power over nominees. The NFIB, of course, was a plaintiff in NFIB v. Sebelius, the first Supreme Court case seeking to repeal the Affordable Care Act. That lawsuit called upon the justices to impose limits on federal power that even the late Justice Antonin Scalia refused to impose in previous cases […] When the NFIB isn’t fighting to take health care away from millions of Americans, it fights equally hard against raising the minimum wage.

    […] Though Garland’s record on guns is fairly thin, the NRA opposes Garland’s nomination based on two cases he considered as a judge.

    In the first of these two cases, Parker v. District of Columbia, Garland played a very limited role. In Parker, two conservative members of a three judge panel struck down the District of Columbia’s strict handgun laws, over the dissent of another conservative, George H.W. Bush appointee Judge Karen Henderson. The District then asked the full appeals court to reconsider this decision in a process known as en banc review. Garland was one of four judges who voted to rehear the case, as was Judge A. Raymond Randolph, an extraordinarily conservative H.W. Bush appointee. […]

    The second case cited by the NRA is National Rifle Association v. Reno, where Garland joined a decision by Judge David Tatel upholding a database the FBI uses to audit the background check system used to screen potential firearm buyers. […]

    After six months, information in this database was destroyed. Nevertheless, the NRA claimed that the FBI was required to destroy this information much sooner.

    […] NRA v. Reno is a classic case of gun groups seeking to win a victory in the courts that they repeatedly lost in Congress.

    […] As Judge Tatel notes in the opinion joined by Garland, members of Congress attempted multiple times to change this law to require the government to “immediately” destroy records produced by the background check system, and these efforts repeatedly failed. Thus, having failed to write the word “immediately” into the statute, the NRA asked the courts to do it for them. Tatel and Garland refused to take up this invitation.

    So McConnell isn’t simply delegating his duty to evaluate potential Supreme Court nominees to the NRA, he’s deferring to the NRA despite the fact that the gun lobby group’s case against Garland is very thin. It consists of Garland’s single vote to rehear a case that one of his court’s most conservative members also voted to rehear, along with a decision to allow the FBI to continue to perform audits on the background check system after lawmakers sympathetic to the NRA tried and failed to shut those audits down.

    Think Progress link.

  301. says

    micro raptor @326. I remember that. The viral video was famously tearful and overwrought. I get the comparison to Glenn Beck, who is also famous for crying and for whining.

    In other news, Mitch MConnell says there will be no lame-duck (after November) vote on Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland. This leaves Republican senators split three ways: those that want to hold confirmation hearings and a vote; those that do not want to hold hearings and a vote for an Obama nominee ever; and those that want to delay a vote until after the November election. What a mess.

  302. says

    This is a followup to comment 335.

    NPR’s Nina Totenberg rebutted conservative and NRA claims that Judge Garland in anti-gun:

    BRIAN STELTER (HOST): First to this issue about the Second Amendment. What is the truth about Garland’s stand on the famous Heller case?

    NINA TOTENBERG: Well you really can’t tell. You can tell what his view was before Heller, and then you have to wait and see what his view would be if he were confirmed to a Supreme Court seat after Heller.

    STELTER: So when conservative media outlets say that he’s anti-gun, are they stretching the truth?

    TOTENBERG: I think that perhaps that’s stretching the truth. But the point is that lower court judges — and that’s what he is — are bound to follow what the Supreme Court says, and prior to Heller, the Supreme Court had basically said there is no individual right to own a gun. After Heller, there is an individual right to own a gun. And then the question is how much of a right? I mean, how much can the state regulate it? And, you’d have to ask him questions actually in a confirmation hearing.

    Media Matters link.

  303. microraptor says

    blf @332:

    Is it just me, or does that article really make it sound like there was greater concern about the dial-a-prayer not having the people praying for the family it claimed it did vs the fraudulent continual charges to their credit card?

    Lynna @336:

    The difference is that that video was made by someone who was IIRC 16 or so at the time while Glenn Beck has no such excuse.

  304. Ichthyic says

    Lynna… I so wish you kept your blog up to date with all the news and information you post here!

    a single source of fact checking like none other, that would be.

    I just have to say how much I have relied on your informative posts over the years here at Pharyngula.

    seriously… maybe you can just copy/paste the things you post in the comments to your own blog? no need to organize or make any other commentary even!

    I would link the HELL out of that.

  305. says

    Ichthyic @340, thanks so much. I’ll think about adding the posts to my personal blog. My hesitation to do that is based on the fact that I usually keep my personal stuff completely separate from political commentary. I see your point, though. (I don’t keep my personal blog up to date. Posting here, in addition to working for a living, is about all I can manage.)

    microraptor @339, Glenn Beck’s excuse is that he uses his fake sentimentality to make money. The “leave Brittany alone!” video was at least real on the level of 16-year-old-emotionalism. Beck is fake at all levels. Beck makes big bucks though, even after Fox News kicked him to the curb.

    In other Glenn Beck news: he has resurrected the “White Horse prophecy” that made a brief appearance during Romney’s campaign. A few mormons said it out loud then, and a few are saying it out loud now. Beck’s dog-whistle version is that God is going to use mormons to save the republic by electing Ted Cruz. [head-desk]

    Back in 1843, Joseph Smith, the founder of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, supposedly delivered a message known as “The White Horse Prophecy” that declared that one day, when the U.S. Constitution was hanging by a thread, the Mormon people would rise up and save this nation.

    This is how Brigham Young reportedly explained it in 1854:

    Will the Constitution be destroyed? No; it will be held inviolate by this people; and, as Joseph Smith said, “The time will come when the destiny of the nation will hang upon a single thread. At that critical juncture, this people will step forth and save it from the threatened destruction.”

    […] Beck spent all last week declaring that God has spent the last 10 years preparing and sanctifying his audience to rise up at this very moment and save the republic by electing Ted Cruz as president. But when he went to Utah, Beck made it unmistakably clear to his fellow Mormons that God is using them to save America because evangelical Christians “are not listening to their God,” a reference to southern evangelical Republicans who have voted for Donald Trump. […]

    “It’s something that Utah needs to hear,” he said. “The body of the Priesthood is known to stand up when the Constitution hangs by a thread. I am a convert to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints in 2000. What attracted me was not only the truth of the message, but also the people like President [Harold] Lee and President [Ezra Taft] Benson, who knew exactly who we were, knew who we were as a country. Many times, what held me through was the prophecy that the Constitution will hang by a thread and this people would remember what our founders did. It is our responsibility to stand for the Constitution!” […]

    Right Wing Watch link.

  306. says

    We have news of yet another rightwing extremist backing Ted Cruz white uttering totally bonkers nonsense.

    Clare Lopez is on Cruz’s national security advisory team. Lopez is all-in when it comes to the conspiracy theory that the Muslim Brotherhood has infiltrated the Obama Administration. Her additional, and unique contribution to the rat’s nest of wildly inaccurate claims is that Senator Joseph McCarthy was “spot-on” when he was investigating the infiltration of the federal government by communists.

    Way to go Ted Cruz, you added another rung on the ladder to exceptional dunderheadedness.

    Here’s a quote from Lopez:

    We can go all the way back, of course, to the time of the Cold War and back to the 1920s, ‘30s, ‘40s when communists, you know, the KGB, infiltrated our government at the very highest levels. And then, like now, we were unprepared and in large measure unaware of what was going on, at least until the House Un-American Activities got rolling in the 1950s with Sen. Joseph McCarthy, who absolutely was spot-on in just about everything he said about the levels of infiltration. So we have precedent for this where we were not fully aware of the infiltration occurring at the time. […]

    Link.

    Clare Lopez works for Frank Gaffney at the Center for Security Policy. (See comment 293 for details concerning Gaffney’s flavor of doofusness.)

  307. says

    Trump’s team just increased his problem with mormons by continuing to hang out with Robert Jeffress.

    Fox News contributor and leading Donald Trump surrogate Robert Jeffress wrote in his new book that Joseph Smith, the founder of Mormonism, is one of the “servants of Satan.” Jeffress also wrote that Jews, Catholics and members of other faiths have embraced “lies” on a “highway to hell.”

    The Dallas Morning News recently described Jeffress, a Dallas pastor, as “the lead, unofficial religious supporter of” Trump. Jeffress “said Trump sought him out in August and began to cultivate a relationship.” A spokesperson for the Trump campaign said that “Jeffress has attended many campaign events and is a great person and supporter.” After Jeffress introduced Trump at a September rally, the business magnate said, “What a good guy. … I love this guy.” […]

    Jeffress has continued his attacks on Mormonism this campaign season. In his new book Not All Roads Lead to Heaven, Jeffress writes that Mormon church founder Joseph Smith and the prophet Muhammad are servants of Satan because they offer people an alternate path to God […]

    Media Matters link.

    Right about now Trump is probably head-desking over how difficult it is to pander to religious extremists. He needs them, but what a hassle!

  308. says

    Trump gets way more media coverage, including on-air time on major TV new programs, than any other candidate. He grabs some of that coverage by calling in to various programs. On the phone, Trump talks over the hosts or other guests, makes his points, and doesn’t even have to show up in the studio.

    For a few weeks now, there’s been a movement afoot to deny this phone-it-in access for Trump. At least one host has taken the bull by the horns: Chuck Todd (host of NBC’s “Meet the Press”) says that he will no longer allow Trump to call in to his show.

  309. blf says

    microraptor@339 and Lynna@335, Yes, you both have pointed out reasons to be uncomfortable with the DA’s approach to the pay-to-pray scam: It is not at all clear the credit card fraud side of the scam is being taken (much) into account; I think, albeit I may be mistaken, that tends to lead to prison time. And the DA seems to be pandering to the predominate religious beliefs, and also, perhaps in doing so, (in effect) allowing the conman to keep the money if it isn’t claimed-back; I may also be mistaken here, but I think a government-run (or at least -approved) special fund is the usual solution (along the lines of the conman pays in an agreed amount, and the fund pays out to valid claimants, albeit I’m not sure what happens to unclaimed funds or in the case of an oversubscription).

    (I sortof, kindof, wonder what would have happened if the victims were, say, Muslims — but have no actual basis to suppose it would have been handled differently…)

    Then there is the point he had other scams going as well (which I redacted from my excerpts), and a mention of a partner-in-con (also redacted since the article didn’t go into that at all). This leaves an impression that the punishment — which, I think, isn’t necessarily the full $7m — doesn’t quite “fit” the multiple crimes.

    Mano Singham also has a post on this, but doesn’t really go into this angle other than a comment at the end, “[P]eople who are dying or are caregivers of the dying are often not thinking rationally. They will grasp at any thing that offers hope and they are to be pitied while the people who take advantage of such desperation are scum and should be prosecuted to the maximum.”

  310. blf says

    Right about now Trump is probably head-desking over how difficult it is to pander to religious extremists.

    Can’t imagine why. He’s very possibly unawares of this-or-that fruitcake’s anti-other-fruitcakes-isms — being aware would imply doing research and/or listening(actually, understanding, but with teh trum-prat, just hearing what others say is a necessary first step) — and it very much looks like he doesn’t do research, doesn’t understand, and doesn’t even listen. And should he happen to imagine something he doesn’t like at that moment in time, he throws out insults, threats, and absurdities. And, he also seems to be entirely happy to make things up, so I can easily imagine him burbling something like Robert Jeffress is passionate about his faith. As a good christian he’d never insult or opposite other faiths. Those who claim he does are liars, trained by teh evil moolsin deash in Mexico!

  311. says

    Just a taste of President Obama’s visit to Cuba:

    Shouts of “U.S.A.!” and “Obama!” echoed over the stone plazas as President Obama and his family made their way around rain-slicked courtyards in Old Havana on Sunday evening, savoring the adulation of Cubans welcoming him warmly despite a driving rain as he began a history-making visit.

    “Welcome to Cuba! We like you!” a man shouted as Mr. Obama’s entourage passed. Above, a woman applauded and hooted from her wrought-iron balcony.

    Later, a motorcade including the presidential limousine, adorned for the first time with Cuban and American flags, snaked through narrow streets where elated residents, their clothing soaked from waiting in the rain, hoisted cellphones and cheered the first sitting American leader to set foot on Cuban soil in 88 years.

    The excerpted text above is from The New York Times.

    Two Cuba-related bills are pending in Congress, one bill to lift the travel ban instead of just amending it piecemeal, and one bill to end the trade embargo. Both bills are sponsored by Republicans, so they have at least a chance of passing.

    During the joint press conference held by Raoul Castro and President Obama, Castro commented on the inequities in the USA, and on the USA’s failure to take care of poor or low-income people.

  312. says

    Elizabeth Warren employed some Facebook posts to roast Donald Trump:

    Let’s be honest – Donald Trump is a loser. Count all his failed businesses. See how he kept his father’s empire afloat by cheating people with scams like TrumpUniversity and by using strategic corporate bankruptcy (excuse me, bankruptcies) to skip out on debt. Listen to the experts who’ve concluded he’s so bad at business that he might have more money today if he’d put his entire inheritance into an index fund and just left it alone.

    Trump seems to know he’s a loser. His embarrassing insecurities are on parade: petty bullying, attacks on women, cheap racism, and flagrant narcissism. But just because Trump is a loser everywhere else doesn’t mean he’ll lose this election. People have been underestimating his campaign for nearly a year – and it’s time to wake up.

    People talk about how “this is the most important election” in our lifetime every four years, and it gets stale. But consider what hangs in the balance. Affordable college. Accountability for Wall Street. Healthcare for millions of Americans. The Supreme Court. Big corporations and billionaires paying their fair share of taxes. Expanded Social Security. Investments in infrastructure and medical research and jobs right here in America. The chance to turn our back on the ugliness of hatred, sexism, racism and xenophobia. The chance to be a better people.

    More than anyone we’ve seen before come within reach of the presidency, Donald Trump stands ready to tear apart an America that was built on values like decency, community, and concern for our neighbors. Many of history’s worst authoritarians started out as losers – and Trump is a serious threat. The way I see it, it’s our job to make sure he ends this campaign every bit the loser that he started it.

    https://www.facebook.com/ElizabethWarren/posts/10153621490203687

  313. raven says

    The man identified as Lewandowski appears to grab the protestors collar and yank him back. […]

    Lewandowski has a long history of antisocial behavior and assaults. He was the one who attacked a Breitbart reporter who has since quit.

    He is also one of Trump’s campaign managers.

  314. says

    blf @346, Yes, I do keep making the same mistake. I assume Trump wants to make sense when he speaks, and when he panders to religious extremists. I assume Trump wants to have a coherent approach to religious minorities. I have a hard time thinking like Trump, or like the many doofuses he has working for his campaign.

  315. says

    raven @349, Yes, that was Lewandowski, though the Trump campaign continues to deny that. After the incident with the Breitbart reporter, Trump had Lewandowski stand next to him during a post-Tuesday victory speech. Trump gave Lewandowski a special shoutout, “Good job, Corey.” Lewandowski grinned from ear to ear the whole time.
    Washington Post link.

    […] After speaking for about 15 minutes, Trump threw some insults at the journalists sitting far away from him, beyond all of the well-dressed supporters who laughed at his jokes and applauded him again and again. […]</blockquote

    "Disgusting reporters," Trump said, as his guests laughed. "Horrible people. Some are nice. Some are nice. Some really disgusting people back there.

    Standing to Trump's right and grinning was Corey Lewandowski, Trump's campaign manager, who has been accused of roughly grabbing a reporter's arm after a news conference in Jupiter, Fla. Michelle Fields, then a reporter for Breitbart, has filed a police report accusing Lewandowski of assault. Lewandowski has denied touching Fields, and Trump has backed him up.

    And I just want to say: We're going to go forward, and we're going to win. But more importantly we're going to win for the country, we're going to win, win, win, and we're not stopping. We're going to have great victories for our country. Thank you very much, everybody." […]

  316. says

    A federal court has ruled that one of the voter-suppression tactics used by the Republican-dominated Florida legislature is unconstitutional: prison gerrymandering has to go.

    The Federal District Court for Florida’s Northern District ruled Monday that the prison gerrymandering in Florida’s Jefferson County unconstitutionally dilutes the voting power of its residents. By packing inmates who can’t vote into a district, but counting them when drawing electoral maps, District Judge Mark Walker said the county had violated the “one person, one vote” principle in the Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment.

    The American Civil Liberties Union’s attorney, Nancy Abudu, argued the case on behalf of Jefferson County residents who felt the prison gerrymandering watered down the strength of their political power by unfairly stacking the deck for residents who live in the same district as the non-voting prisoners. […]

    According to the ACLU, of the nearly 1,200 inmates in the correctional center, only nine were convicted in Jefferson County. Yet the inmates make up a whopping 43 percent of the voting age population in District 3. […]

    The county had argued before the court that the maps should remain the way they are, saying that because the county has a role in managing the prison, it should get to count the inmates as residents.

    But the judge, and Abudu, disagreed. […]

    “What we do know,” she continued, “is that the inmates service the county through free labor. They have formal and informal contracts with the county to have the inmates fix up parks, clean roads, and do other work that the county would otherwise have to pay someone to do.” […]

    Florida officials have also been accused of pushing a prison gerrymandering scheme on the federal level, and were caught by reporters this year discussing how such a tactic could be used to unseat African-American Congress member Corrine Brown (D-FL). The maps, which are also being challenged in court, put 18 prisons in Brown’s district, driving up the population count with inmates who can’t legally cast a ballot.

    http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2016/03/21/3761659/florida-prison-gerrymandering-case/

  317. says

    Well, this is even worse that having state lawmakers and governors claim that Crisis Pregnancy Centers can take up the slack when Planned Parenthood is defunded.

    In Florida, Governor Rick Scott is expected to sign a bill that defunds Planned Parenthood. On the list of alternatives sources for health care for women were:
    – 2 Salvation Army offices
    – 38 dental offices
    – 67 elementary and middle schools

    http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/mar/19/defund-planned-parenthood-florida-bill-dentist-reproductive-care-alternatives

  318. says

    Blame the media: RNC Committee chairman Reince Priebus said that violence at Trump rallies would not be as bad as it is if the media didn’t add “fuel to the fire.”

    Priebus also said that he likes what Trump is doing to cool things down. Say, what now?

    He’s certainly talking about it a lot more now and certainly calling for the temperature to be cooled more now. [Bull pucky.]

    But you know, look, we’re not a party that believes in violence. I think violence begets violence and you ought to leave some of the work in the crowd up to professionals,” Priebus told CNN’s Alisyn Camerota before pivoting some blame to the media.

    “But I also think, Alisyn, if we’re being fair here and it’s nothing against you or anyone, but when cable shows are on a constant loop — you know a couple knuckleheads pushing each other on a 24/7 loop — You know, I mean you create an environment, I think, that just adds fuel to the fire.” […]

    Politico link.

    At every Trump rally I’ve seen on TV in the past few weeks the voice-of-god announcer tells the audience not to touch protesters, and to shout protesters down with chants of “USA” or “Trump.” Then Trump comes on stage and invariably incites violence with his “Get ’em out!” shouts, his repetition of insults like “disgusting,” “these are not nice people” and worse.

    BTW, Trump does believe in violence: killing or injuring the families of terrorists, including their children; waterboarding “and worse” detainees, etc. Most of the Republicans seem to believe in violence. Priebus is delusional.

  319. says

    Past presidents have been photographed in front of Communist leaders, and that includes Republican presidents Nixon, Reagan, and both Bush 1 and Bush 2. Reagan posed in front of a Vladimir Lenin statue, for example. Mao Tse-tung and Ho Chi Minh appeared in the Bush photos. Nixon also posed in front of a Mao Tse-tung image. Nevertheless, rightwing media is totally flipping out over the fact that a photo taken of President Obama (and a large group of other dignitaries) in Cuba shows an image of Che Guevara on one of the buildings in the background.

    Mr. President, you’re a disgrace. [Ben Shapiro]
    —————
    Yeah, that’s a good photo to have as you close out your presidency. [T. Becket Adams]
    —————
    A fresh wave of fury. [Washington Examiner]
    —————–
    Barack Obama stands in front of the leftist, murderous hero Che Guevara in Cuba [Katie Pavlich]
    ——————–
    No time for Nancy Reagan’s funeral … too busy posing with murals of Fidel Castro’s racist, mass murdering, Communist executioner. [Steven Crowder]
    ——————-
    Obama proudly poses w/ Marxist murderer Che Guevara. Freedom advocates everywhere mournfully ask: Where is America? [Pete Hegseth]
    —————
    Today, in Cuba. To be fair, Obama’s probably been saluting images of the blood-soaked Che Guevara his whole life. [Mark Krikorian]
    —————
    Finally, our POTUS is able to honor the mural of a racist, terrorist, mass murderer who oversaw concentration camps. [Benny Johnson]

  320. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    An interesting happening, some NY millionaires are asking to have their taxes raised to pay for poverty relief, plus roads and other infrastructure.

    More than 40 millionaires, including members of the Rockefeller and Disney families, are asking to have their taxes raised to help address poverty and rebuild failing infrastructure.
    The millionaires wrote a letter to Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo and top New York lawmakers proposing new, higher tax rates for the top 1 percent of earners in the state. The letter, a copy of which was given to The Associated Press, says additional revenue is needed to address child poverty, homelessness and aging bridges, tunnels, water pipes and roads.
    “As New Yorkers who have contributed to and benefited from the economic vibrancy of our state, we have both the ability and the responsibility to pay our fair share,” the letter states. “We can well afford to pay our current taxes, and we can afford to pay even more.”
    Those signing the letter include Abigail Disney, Leo Hindery and Steven C. Rockefeller. The tax plan, known as the one-percent tax plan, was worked out in conjunction with the Fiscal Policy Institute, a left-leaning economic think tank.

    Now, if the Kochroaches would only see the light.

  321. says

    CaitieCat @356, good point. Both Trump and Cruz have been seen with a lot of criminals and bonkers bigots.

    In other news, all of the current presidential candidates except Sanders showed up at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) conference today to speak.

    From Trump’s speech:

    I love the people in this room. I love Israel. I love Israel. I’ve been with Israel so long in terms of — I’ve received some of my greatest honors from Israel. My father before me, incredible. My daughter, Ivanka, is about to have a beautiful, Jewish baby.

    Trump was using a teleprompter and he still talked like that.

    There were about 20,000 people in attendance. Trump didn’t pander to them at all (/sarcasm).

    I didn’t come here tonight to pander to you about Israel. That’s what politicians do: all talk, no action, believe me. […] There is no moral equivalency. Israel does not name public squares after terrorists. Israel does not pay its children to stab random Palestinians. […] Iran has seeded terror groups all over the world […]

    [About those missiles Iran tested] to intimidate not only Israel, which is only 600 miles away but also intended to frighten Europe, and, someday, the United States.

    Do you want to hear something really shocking? As many of the great people in this room know, painted on those missiles – in both Hebrew and Farsi – were the words “Israel must be wiped off the face of the earth.” What kind of demented minds write that in Hebrew? And here’s another twisted part – testing these missiles does not even violate the horrible deal that we made!

    The deal is silent on test missiles but those tests do violate UN Security Council Resolutions. The problem is, no one has done anything about it.

  322. says

    From Hillary Clinton’s AIPAC speech:

    […] The United States should provide Israel with the most sophisticated defense technology so it can deter and stop any threats. That includes bolstering Israeli missile defenses with new systems like the Arrow Three and David’s Sling. And we should work together to develop better tunnel detection, technology to prevent armed smuggling, kidnapping and terrorist attacks. […]

    Let’s also expand our collaboration beyond security. Together, we can build an even more vibrant culture of innovation that tightens the links between Silicon Valley and Israeli tech companies and entrepreneurs. […]

    http://time.com/4265947/hillary-clinton-aipac-speech-transcript/

  323. microraptor says

    Lynna @360:

    Given all the white supremacists that Trump’s been hanging out with, I’m surprised that he wasn’t booed right out of AIPAC.

  324. says

    micro raptor @363, the AIPAC audience did laugh at Trump once. They laughed at one of Trump’s claims that he knew more than anyone else about the Iran deal. YouTube link. So telling a moment. Trump looked so ridiculous.

    If Trump wanted to be honest he should have had his white supremacist supporters join him on the AIPAC stage. Barring that, the organizers could have displayed photos and quotes from white supremacists on the giant screens while Trump was talking.

  325. says

    I am not ignoring the two explosions in Brussels, just referring to the thread that PZ posted on the subject. ISIS has now claimed responsibility.

    In other news, I wanted to do a followup on President Obama’s visit to Cuba. Obama “set a trap” for Raul Castro. Well done. President Obama has set a press trap for dictators before.

    [Obama turned to the press to make a point about a repressive regime] in China in 2013 by giving a New York Times reporter a question to Xi Jinping right after the government in Beijing had kicked out a reporter from the newspaper. He did it in Ethiopia last year when he forced the journalist-jailing prime minister to stand next to him for a long press conference where Obama talked about the country’s record on human rights and held forth on American politics.

    Monday afternoon here in Havana, he did it to Raul Castro, right in the Revolutionary Palace, letting him be pressed with questions for the first time — ever — and joining in himself. And not just that: he had to answer for the political prisoners that the government rounds up almost daily, but denies exist at all. […]

    Politico link.

    Both President Obama’s speech, and the press conference mentioned above, were broadcast on Cuban TV. That’s a first. And it bears repeating that this is the first time that Cubans have seen one of the Castro brothers answering questions from the press —answering questions that had not been cleared beforehand. This was not a mock press conference.

  326. says

    An example of Trump pretending to be a serious candidate for president, and to know something about foreign policy … he fails.

    Post publisher Fred Ryan asked Trump if he would consider using a tactical nuclear strike against the forces of the Islamic State, were he president. Trump responded that he didn’t want to “start the process of nuclear,” then reminding the editors that he was “a counter-puncher.”

    “Remember, one thing that everybody has said, I’m a counter-puncher,” Trump said. “Rubio hit me. Bush hit me. When I said low energy, he’s a low-energy individual, he hit me first. He spent, by the way – he spent 18 million dollars’ worth of negative ads on me. That’s putting…”

    Ryan jumped in. “This is about ISIS,” he reminded Trump. “You would not use a tactical nuclear weapon against ISIS?”

    “I’ll tell you one thing,” Trump replied. “This is a very good looking group of people here. Could I just go around so I know who the hell I’m talking to?”

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/03/21/the-most-baffling-moments-from-donald-trumps-washington-post-ed-board-interview/

    Trump never answered the question about tactical nuclear strikes against ISIS. He deflected, he tap danced, he tried to charm the other humans present.

  327. says

    This is is a followup to comments 6 and 316.

    We saw that Alabama state government (dominated by Republicans) had passed a law banning progressive moves by some cities, like raising the minimum wage. Now Arizona is following suit.

    [Tempe City Council member Lauren Kuby] and her colleagues heard that Arizona’s Republican-controlled state legislature was considering punishing cities that tried to set their own codes for worker benefits. Arizona’s House passed a bill on March 1 specifying that cities aren’t allowed to require private employers to provide paid sick leave or vacation.

    The state Senate has passed companion legislation that would cut state funds, used to pay for services like police and firefighting, for cities that try to supersede state laws. “They actually decided to dissolve our study group because they were so chilled by the state threat,” says Kuby.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-03-15/help-workers-risk-losing-money-for-cops

  328. says

    Republicans have been vowing to repeal Obamacare for some time. Republicans in Congress voted more than 60 times to repeal the Affordable Care Act. Most of the Republican presidential candidates have repeated the “repeal every word of Obamacare” mantra. Within the last few days, Trump repeated the canard that Obamacare has raised the cost of healthcare premiums by “30, 40 or 50%.”

    Despite rightwing doom-and-gloom pronouncements, good news about Obamacare continues to flood in. More people covered, no job losses, etc. Now we have evidence to refute another lie, that it is the improving economy that is responsible for reducing the uninsured rate and not Obamacare. (At least that lie requires that right-wingers confirm that the economy has improved since the dire last days of the George W. Bush administration.)

    There’s growing evidence that most of the dramatic gain in the number of Americans with health care coverage is due to President Barack Obama’s law, and not the gradual recovery of the nation’s economy. […]

    “It’s very clear that the Affordable Care Act has done most of the work in decreasing the number of uninsured,” said economist Robert Kaestner of the University of Illinois at Chicago. […]

    “This kind of shift in insurance I don’t think can be explained by the economy,” economist Christine Eibner of the RAND Corporation said. “The increase (in coverage) is large enough that it can’t be driven by just economic recovery.”

    Associated Press link.

  329. says

    More detail on the AIPAC conference. (See comments 360, 361, 363, and 366.)

    The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) on Tuesday condemned Donald Trump’s Monday night comments criticizing President Obama during a speech at an AIPAC conference.

    “We say unequivocally that we do not countenance ad hominem attacks, and we take great offense to those that are levied against the United States of America from our stage,” AIPAC president Lillian Pinkus said on Tuesday, reading from a written statement at the conference, according to Politico. “While we may have policy differences, we deeply respect the office of the president of the United States and our president, Barack Obama.”

    During his Monday night speech, Trump said that Obama has treated Israel “very, very badly” and “may be the worst thing that ever happened to Israel.” […]

    “There are people in our AIPAC family who were deeply hurt last night, and for that, we are deeply sorry,” she said, according to Politico. “We are disappointed that so many people applauded a sentiment that we neither agree with or condone.”

    “Let us take this moment to pledge to each other that in this divisive and tension-filled political season, we will not allow those who wish to divide our movement from the left or from the right will not succeed in doing so,” Pinkus added.

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/aipac-trump-speech-obama

  330. says

    Mormons, especially those in Utah, have a personal connection to the attack in Brussels. Some of their missionaries were injured.

    The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints announced Tuesday morning that three of its missionaries, all Americans, were “seriously injured” in the explosion at the international airport in Brussels.

    The injured were identified as Elder Richard Norby, 66, of Lehi, Utah; Elder Joseph Empey, 20, of Santa Clara, Utah; and Elder Mason Wells, 19, of Sandy, Utah. They all have been hospitalized, according to the church’s statement.

    The church’s release said the three men had been escorting a female missionary, 20-year-old Sister Fanny Rachel Clain of Montélimar, France, on her way to Ohio. She had already gone through security, the release said. […]

    Link.

  331. says

    More fear mongering and blather that is not helpful from Donald Trump:

    […] “I’m a pretty good prognosticator. Just watch what happens over the years, it won’t be pretty,” Trump said. “We’re going to get worse and worse. At this point, we cannot allow these people to come into this country, I’m sorry.”

    “It’s at least a small part of the reason why I’m the number one frontrunner,” Trump said on Fox, referring to his status as the presumptive GOP presidential nominee. “People are very concerned about this, and they’re very concerned about the security of this country.”

    Asked during his Fox appearance about what else he’d do in response to the attacks in addition to closing the southern border and banning Muslims, Trump said he give the American people a “pep talk.”

    “I guess I would just talk to the people and give them, frankly, a pep talk,” Trump said. “We need spirit in our country, okay.”

    Think Progress link.

  332. says

    Donald Trump is outsourcing his list of future Supreme Court nominees to the Heritage Foundation.

    Like his retweets of white supremacist sources, like his recent list of foreign policy advisors, and like most of his sources for pseudo-facts, Trump has chosen a rightwing den of dunderheads to advise him.

    Let’s take a look at some of the ways in which the Heritage Foundation has embarrassed itself in the past:

    Heritage is a think tank known for its stridently conservative views and its unorthodox approach to mathematics. They oppose marriage equality, defend discrimination against LGBT Americans, and they have a surprisingly long history of reversing their own stances on health policy when doing so is useful to opponents of Obamacare. Their former chief “economist” is an ex-newspaper columnist and anti-tax activist with no doctorate in economics.

    In 2013, Heritage released a widely criticized report claiming that immigration reform would cost an eye-popping $6.3 trillion. One of the co-authors of that report resigned four days later after news broke that “his graduate dissertation on immigration was premised on the idea that Latinos were less intelligent than whites.” Heritage also released projections predicting that the Bush tax cuts would result in significant job growth. Their projections proved less than accurate: (See chart at the link.) […]

    Think Progress link.

    It’s a good thing for a president to seek advice from credible sources, and its a bad thing for Trump to be so ignorant that he cannot tell a good source from a discredited source.

  333. says

    Ted Cruz reiterated his intention to carpet bomb ISIS into oblivion.

    Is he is going to carpet bomb Brussels then? The attackers were, as far as we know, born in Belgium or France. They were European citizens. According to Cruz, we should be carpet bombing parts of Europe.

  334. says

    Ted Cruz has added another rightwing doofus to his already mind boggling array of dangerous and stupid advisors. Cruz’s new Senior Economic Adviser is former Texas Senator Phil Gramm.

    Yeah, that’s right. One of the guys that guaranteed a financial meltdown is going to give economic advise to Cruz. Gramm’s infamous past includes helping to pass bills connected directly to the financial crisis that started during George W. Bush’s administration. As a side dish of extra stupidity, Gramm is also against having a social safety net for anyone.

    […]Gramm [allegedly told] former Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chairman Arthur Levitt, “Unless waters are crimson with the blood of investors, I don’t want you embarking on any regulatory flights of fancy.”

    […] he oversaw and advocated for a number of measures that weakened the government’s oversight of the finance industry. He was an architect of a key measure bearing his name, the Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act, which repealed parts of the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933. […] Many also argue that bringing commercial and investment banking under one roof led to greater and greater risk taking, which eventually led to the financial crisis.

    The act also created a big regulatory gap for large investment banks for a period of time by failing to give the SEC or another agency authority to regulate them. Instead, they could submit to voluntary oversight, but many simply opted not to.

    […] He inserted a provision in the Commodity Futures Modernization Act in 2000 that exempted complex derivatives — such as credit-default swaps — from regulatory oversight by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. […] Credit-default swaps took down AIG, leading to its bailout.

    […] Acting as a presidential adviser to John McCain in July of 2008, three months after the failure of investment bank Bear Stearns, Gramm called the impending crisis a “mental recession,” saying the economy was doing much better than the naysayers claimed. He also said the U.S. has “become a nation of whiners” over the economy. He was asked to resign from McCain’s campaign shortly afterward. […]

    So, yeah, Gramm is also delusional. Facts like the failure of Bear Sterns are not allowed to make an impression on his closed mind.

    […] In 2003, he joined UBS to become vice chairman of its investment banking division and was there until 2012, coinciding with the time that the bank manipulated a key interest rate that enriched large banks at the expense of the public (for which it was later fined). […]

    In announcing Gramm’s endorsement, Cruz took great care to point out that Gramm was a staunch opponent of Bill and Hillary Clintons’ efforts during the 90s to pass health care reform. He was a leader of the Republican opposition to it, saying at the time it would only pass “over my cold, dead political body.” He’s since continued the theme, writing op-eds in opposition to the Affordable Care Act, saying it “has made many problems in health care worse.”

    Gramm was also the mastermind behind a particularly punitive part of the 1996 welfare reform bill, which automatically and permanently banned those who commit a drug crime from both food stamps and welfare benefits unless their states opt out of the measure. […] The bans have been linked to recidivism, as people who are released from prison and then cut off from the safety net have fewer options for financial stability, and taking other desperate measures like simply going hungry. […]

    Link.

  335. says

    Ted Cruz said some more stupid stuff about the terrorist attacks in Brussels:

    [He said] that the U.S. should “empower law enforcement to patrol and secure Muslim neighborhoods before they become radicalized,” a vague proposal with troubling civil liberties implications. […]

    One of Cruz’s new national security advisers, Family Research Council official Jerry Boykin, has said that “Islam is not a religion and does not deserve First Amendment protections” and has called for “no mosques in America” […]

    Link.

  336. says

    Donald Trump said some more stupid stuff: In a TV interview he said that Belgium’s capital is a “horrible city” that has been ruined by Muslim immigration. He tweeted: “Do you all remember how beautiful and safe a place Brussels was. Not anymore, it is from a different world! U.S. must be vigilant and smart!”

    More blather from Trump:

    Trump: I will tell you, I’ve been talking about this for a long time. And look at Brussels. Brussels was a beautiful city. A beautiful place with zero crime. And now it’s a disaster city. It’s a total disaster. And we have to be very—we have to be very careful in the United States. We have to be very, very vigilant as to who we allow into this country.

    Anchor: If you do become president and you were in a situation like this, what would you do to protect America?

    Trump: Well again, I think I said it. I would close up our borders to people until we figure out what is going on. Look at Brussels. Look at Paris. Look at so many cities that were great cities. Paris is almost, almost as bad. Paris is no longer the beautiful city of lights. Paris has got a lot of problems. All you have to do is speak to the people that live there. And you look at other places where the same thing has happened, and they’re in fear, they’re cities in fear. And we have to be smart in the United States. And when people come in—we’re taking in people without real documentation. We don’t know where they’re coming from. We don’t know where they’re from, who they are. You look at them, you look at it from any standpoint, they could be ISIS, they could be ISIS related. And you know, we just don’t learn. We don’t learn. Brussels is an amazing example. Brussels was an absolutely crime-free city. One of the most beautiful cities in the world. And now you look at it, it’s a disaster.

    The quoted text is from an interview on Fox and Friends.

    The Trump-Prat is making a fear-mongering tour of TV shows today.

  337. says

    On CBS, Trump said:

    If you would have known Brussels 20 years ago, you would have seen a place that was like one of the truly great places, one of the most magnificent cities in the world, with no crime. Today it’s an armed camp. You see soldiers walking all over the streets. And I’m not talking about today after the attack. I’m talking about before the attack. It’s an armed camp. They have areas in Brussels where the police can’t even go. The police are afraid to go there. The police don’t even go there. It’s a mess. And if you look at Paris, believe me it’s the same thing. It’s pretty close. It’ll be the same thing. It might be worse, if you want to know the truth. So you know, all of these cities that we think so much of, they’re from different planets right now, all because you allowed people into the cities that shouldn’t be in there, frankly.

    Trump’s claim that there are areas where “the police can’t even go” is false. He has made that claim in the past, and he has been called out as wrong. That doesn’t stop him, doesn’t even slow him down.

    During the CBS interview, Trump said “I would close up our borders.” A minute later, in the same interview, he said, “I didn’t say shut down the border. What I said is we have to be very, very strong and vigilant at the borders.”
    He added:

    We can be smart or we can be extremely dumb. But something has to change. And this is going to happen in the United States. And we’re allowing thousands of people to come into the United States from Syria—we think it’s from Syria, we don’t even know if it’s from Syria. But we think from the migration. We’re allowing thousands of people to come in. They have no documentation. We don’t know where they come from. We don’t know anything about them. And you watch what’s going to be happening.

  338. says

    One of Trump’s supporters, conservative radio host Alex Jones, is claiming the the attacks in Brussels are “the ultimate false flag.” To which I just have to say, “oh, FFS.” On the theory that is good know how deep the slime pit is, I’ll post what Jones had to say:

    So we got 34 dead, ISIS is taking responsibility. Donald Trump has shown his geopolitical foxiness in that he told AIPAC yesterday, just hours before this happened, that NATO has been basically backing ISIS, and is no friend of Israel.

    And that’s just true. How astute. Hollande, Merkel, France more than anybody, has been backing Al Qaeda and now Islamic State, it’s the elephant in the room. All over the Middle East, all over North Africa, especially Libya and Syria, and that’s what’s so frustrating about watching the communist Hollande, the communist Merkel, go, “We will stand strong against this terror. We will keep the emergency going and take all your rights and arrest anybody who’s right wing and criticizes Islam.”

    They bring ’em in, unvetted, they let ’em attack, and then they take your rights. This is the ultimate false flag. […]

    Brussels attacks are a false flag. I want to go with that, then all the enemies and detractors will come in and attack us, national news will say that I said it didn’t happen, and then everyone will find the truth and millions will watch it.

    It’s a real Islamic attack. But when you bring ’em in and you know they’re going to attack and you know a bunch of ’em are terror cells, then you are aiding and abetting, it is a false flag.

    […] “over 500 of a known Islamic Sunni terror group have come in just from Greece alone in the last year,” that was a few months ago in mainstream news.

    […] they know that terrorists are coming in with the refugees and they’re not vetting them by design, just like Obama won’t vet ’em and won’t even look at their ID cards when they come in. So Trump says, “We need to check their IDs and stop it until the IDs are checked.”

    And they call that outrageous and crazy, when it’s default common sense.

    Media Matters link.

  339. says

    Ted Cruz’s official written statement about the attacks in Brussels:

    We need to immediately halt the flow of refugees from countries with a significant al Qaida or ISIS presence. We need to empower law enforcement to patrol and secure Muslim neighborhoods before they become radicalized.

    “We need to secure the southern border to prevent terrorist infiltration. And we need to execute a coherent campaign to utterly destroy ISIS. The days of the United States voluntarily surrendering to the enemy to show how progressive and enlightened we are at an end. Our country is at stake.

    Where does he get that “United states voluntarily surrendering to the enemy…” bit? Sheesh. Some of the facts:

    As of 3:59 p.m. EST Mar. 15, the U.S. and coalition have conducted a total of 10,962 strikes (7,336 Iraq / 3,626 Syria).

    U.S. has conducted 8,386 strikes in Iraq and Syria (4,985 Iraq / 3,401 Syria)

    Rest of Coalition has conducted 2,576 strikes in Iraq and Syria (2,351 Iraq /225 Syria)

    The countries that have participated in the strikes include:
    – In Iraq: (1) Australia, (2) Belgium, (3) Canada, (4) Denmark, (5) France, (6) Jordan, (7) The Netherlands, and (8) UK
    – In Syria: (1) Australia, (2) Bahrain, (3) Canada, (4) France, (5) Jordan, (6) The Netherlands, (7) Saudi Arabia, (8) Turkey (9) UAE and (10) UK

    As of Mar. 14, U.S. and partner nation aircraft have flown an estimated 86,058 sorties in support of operations in Iraq and Syria.

    In 2015, ISIS lost 14% of the territory it held. In 2016, ISIS lost more territory. Mirror link. The ISIS loss of territory is now up to about 22%. In addition, we have reports of ISIS troops having their salaries cut in half, and we have reports of increasing defections from ISIS.

    As for Cruz’s suggestion that law enforcement patrol Muslim neighborhoods:
    – how do you define a “Muslim neighborhood”
    – how do you “patrol” neighborhoods in a way that does not violate civil rights
    – how does a patrol prevent radicalization

    It seems to me that patrolling so-called Muslim neighborhoods in such an invasive way that you can spot who is being radicalized is a sure fire way to increase radicalization of the people that live there.

  340. says

    We’re seeing more fallout from the two Bundy-related standoffs on public land. Dunderheaded Republicans in Congress have come up with a bill that blocks federal enforcement of laws on public lands.

    […] The bill, the Local Enforcement for Local Lands Act of 2016, was introduced last week by Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) along with the rest of Utah’s Republican delegation: Reps. Mia Love, Rob Bishop and Chris Stewart. It would strip officials in the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) of their authority to enforce laws regulating federal land. Rather, local and state authorities would be provided with a block grant to enforce the laws instead. […]

    Talking Points Memo link.

    The people sponsoring this bill have even worse, ulterior motives. They want to turn all public lands over to local control. In Utah, this would mean that a bunch of right-wingers who support extractive industries, (and who would like to cash in themselves by building housing developments, resorts, hunting lodges, etc.), would be managing previously protected public lands. What could possibly go wrong?

    […] Two of the bill’s sponsors, Bishop — who is also chair of the House Natural Resources Committee — and Stewart, launched the “Federal Land Action Group” last year to work on legislation that would turn public lands over to local control.

    Critics of the BLM bill argue that the lawmakers sponsoring it are in effect siding with anti-government extremists pushing the line of thought that the federal government should not be in charge of regulating public lands. […]

    Aside from the signal the bill’s opponents say it sends to extremists, they brought up the logistical concerns it poses. The legislation leaves the enforcement of federal law to local authorities who they say, at best, may not be qualified to implement it, lack the resources to take on the additional responsibilities, and even be sympathetic to those wishing to resist it.

    “It’s like telling IRS you can collect taxes but if someone doesn’t pay your taxes there’s nothing you can do about it,” […]

  341. Ichthyic says

    a bill that blocks federal enforcement of laws on public lands.

    if this were any other business, it would read:

    “CEO comes up with idea to block selling of own companies products at their own business.”

    …and everyone wold think that CEO had lost their fucking minds and should be immediately replaced.

  342. Ichthyic says

    The people sponsoring this bill have even worse, ulterior motives. They want to turn all public lands over to local control.

    um. AFAICT, that’s treason.

    how much longer do Americans plan to put up with this crap?

  343. Ichthyic says

    It seems to me that patrolling so-called Muslim neighborhoods in such an invasive way that you can spot who is being radicalized is a sure fire way to increase radicalization of the people that live there.

    I’ve often wondered if that isn’t the point.

  344. says

    In the state of Idaho, Democrats are holding caucuses today. (Ted Cruz won the Republican vote in Idaho on March 8.) Polls show Sanders with a narrow lead in the Democratic race. 47% to 45%.

    Both Republicans and Democrats are caucusing in Utah today. Cruz is likely to win for the Republicans in Utah (Cruz 53, Trump 12, Kasich 4%). I would like to see Kasich steal some of Trump’s small slice of pie. Sanders may win for the Democrats, but there is some uncertainty, with polls showing Sanders at 52% and Clinton at 44%.

    Both Republicans and Democrats face primary votes in Arizona (not a caucus state). Polls show Trump leading Cruz at 37 to 20%, with Kasich at 16%. For the Democrats, Arizona looks like a sure thing for Clinton, with polls having her at 50% and Sanders at 24%. However, Sanders is showing as a favorite among Native Americans. On the Democratic side, delegates are awarded proportionately at the statewide and district level. For Republicans, this is a very different story, the entire state is winner-take-all. That means Trump will likely add 58 delegates to his count.

    There’s also a Republican caucus in American Samoa, with six delegates up for grabs.

    We don’t have results from any of these races yet.

  345. tomh says

    @ #385

    I’ve often wondered if that isn’t the point.

    I think the point is to get votes. Saying out loud what the bigots are thinking seems like a good way to ensure their loyalty.

  346. says

    Donald Trump right now is validating the cartoonish view that they tell their operatives…that America is a racist nation, xenophobic, anti-Muslim, and that that’s why you must carry out terrorist attacks against them…It’s irresponsible and it needs to stop.

    That’s terrorism expert Malcolm Nance, the head of the Terrorism Asymmetrics Project and a veteran of Navy intelligence, speaking. Nance was reacting to what Trump had to say today about the terrorist attacks in Brussels.

  347. says

    The cab driver who took two of the terrorists to the airport recognized the guys on TV reports, and he contacted police. That’s how police were able to so quickly hone in on the residence where the bomb factory was.

    The cab driver said the two terrorists would not let him handle their luggage. He said the luggage was exceptionally heavy. The two terrorists put the bombs/luggage on carts to wheel it through the airport.

  348. says

    This is a followup to comments 6, 316 and 369.

    North Carolina has joined Alabama and Arizona in passing state-level laws to prevent cities from passing progressive ordinances. It was a minimum wage raise in Birmingham, Alabama; worker benefits in Tempe, Arizona; and now it is anti-discrimination ordinances in Charlotte, North Carolina.

    North Carolina lawmakers have called a special session of the state legislature for Wednesday to block a Charlotte anti-discrimination ordinance supported by gay and transgender groups.

    The ordinance, which was passed by the Charlotte City Council last month, expands the city’s civil rights statute to include protections on the basis of marital status, sexual orientation and gender identity and expression. It prohibits businesses and city contractors, among others, from discriminating against these and other groups.

    […] It would allow transgender people to use bathrooms and locker rooms that match their preferred gender. […]

    “We aim to repeal this ordinance before it goes into effect to provide for the privacy and protection of the women and children of our state,” [said state lawmakers]

    The decision provoked outrage, in part because of the cost to taxpayers of holding such a special session: $42,000 per day, according to the Charlotte Observer. […]

    Washington Post link.

  349. Pierce R. Butler says

    Lynna… @ # 380: … claiming the the attacks in Brussels are “the ultimate false flag.”

    A follow-up claim (involving video clips I have neither time nor bandwidth to study, though the stills provided look persuasive) has it that footage shown from the Brussels airport actually came from a different attack in Moscow’s Domodedovo airport on 1/24/11: http://www.globalresearch.ca/fake-video-used-in-news-coverage-of-brussels-terror-attacks/5515894

    NB: I relay this with no endorsement and much skepticism, in hopes those with better connections and more knowledge will offer analysis.

  350. says

    @391, I seriously doubt that fake video was used to cover the attacks in Brussels. I’ll investigate later. I’ve seen dozens of videos from the attacks. All of them looked genuine.

    In other news, we have some results from the voting tonight.

    Democrats: Clinton won in Arizona – delegates awarded not yet known, but it looks likely that Clinton will be awarded about 50+ delegates, and Sanders about 20+ (there are 75 total)

    Republicans: Trump won in Arizona, and he got all 58 Republican delegates

  351. says

    Shenanigans?

    Arizona’s primaries aren’t even done yet, and there’s already legal action being taken as a result of incompetence or possibly even intentional sabotage.

    Leaders from the Arizona branch of the Democratic Party have confirmed that its lawyers are officially making an inquiry after multiple Democratic voters showed up to the polls only to find that they were listed as independents, Republicans, or had no party affiliation at all.

    Many voters wound up having to wait in line under the hot Arizona sun only to find that they were ineligible to vote for the candidates of their choice. To add insult to injury, the polling locations have been so poorly planned that many voters had to wait in line up to four hours before finding out that their information had been improperly filed.

    “We’ve been getting calls all day from lifelong Democrats who have been registered as independents…One woman even said she’d been registered as a Libertarian.”

    U.S. Uncut link.

    Sounds like a real mess. We’ll be watching this to find out what went wrong.

  352. says

    Pierce @391, Globalresearch is, according to rationalwiki, a website

    […] that can’t distinguish between serious analysis and discreditable junk and so publishes both. The website is run by the Montreal-based non-profit The Centre for Research on Globalisation (CRG) founded by Michel Chossudovsky, a tenured professor at the University of Ottawa. Weep for the future.

    While many of Globalresearch’s articles discuss legitimate humanitarian or environmental concerns, its view of science, economics, and geopolitics is broadly conspiracist, with a strong anti-Western bent. It’s no surprise that the site has long been a crank magnet for moonbats of all stripes. If you disagree with mainstream sources on 9/11, or HAARP, or vaccines, or Gaddafi, or H1N1, or climate change, or anything published by mainstream “Western” media, then Globalresearch is guaranteed to have a page you can cite in support.

    Globalresearch may be best described as the moonbat equivalent to WorldNetDaily. Whenever someone makes a remarkable claim and cites Globalresearch, they are almost certainly wrong. […]

    Example:

    We’ve seen it with the treasonous US crime cabal government that engineered the murder of 3000 Americans on 9/11 to establish a fake war on terror with fake enemies acting as mercenary Islamic stooges that conveniently facilitated the dismantling of the US Constitution.
    —Joachim Hagopian promoting 9/11 conspiracy theories on Globalresearch

    This is not just an unreliable source, it is a batshit bonkers source. Throw that claim you mentioned about the attacks in Brussels in the trash.

  353. says

    Ted Cruz compared his proposal to have law enforcement patrol Muslim neighborhoods to the way that neighborhoods beset with gang violence are patrolled. This did not sit well with anyone but Donald Trump, who agreed with Cruz.

    For one thing, let’s not compare Muslims to gangs. For another, the police themselves disagree with Cruz:

    Sen. Ted Cruz’s controversial proposal that “patrols” should monitor “Muslim neighborhoods” in the United States the aftermath of terror attacks in Belgium has been condemned on both sides of the political aisle, and on Tuesday, New York Police Department commissioner William Bratton added his voice to the chorus.

    Bratton, flanked by New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio, who had previously called Cruz’s remarks “reprehensible” and example of “demagoguery,” told reporters that “the statements he made today is why he’s not going to become president of this country.”

    “We don’t need a president that doesn’t respect the values that form the foundation of this country,” Bratton added. “As the mayor mentioned, I have over 900 very dedicated officers in this department, many of whom do double duty, and they serve as active duty members of the U.S. Military in combat, something the senator has never seen,” referring to the fact that Cruz has no military experience.

    “So before he starts denigrating any population, he should take a close look at who he’s denigrating,” Bratton said. […]

    MSNBC link.

    Cruz was told by some interviewers about the misconceptions his proposal included, but Cruz just doubled down:

    The NYPD has attempted to procure intelligence by secretly monitoring Muslim enclaves in the past, a practice defended by then-New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg. But doing so yielded little success, according to the Associated Press. They report that in six years of broad surveillance, the so-called Demographics Unit “never generated a lead or triggered a terrorism investigation.” Meanwhile, when reports of the program surfaced, first revealed as part of a Pulitzer prize-winning investigation by the AP, it was met with strong rebuke from the Muslim community and led to a discrimination lawsuit against the city which was ultimately dismissed in 2014. Bratton, who was appointed by de Blasio, oversaw the decision to abandon the program.

    Later on Tuesday, Cruz doubled down on his earlier statements, arguing that it’s “standard” police procedure to infiltrate communities overrun with gang activity, and that the same tactics should be applied to areas where radicalization may be taking hold. “Political correctness costs lives,” he added. […]

    His 2016 rival Donald Trump, who spent much of Tuesday advocating for torture techniques to reinstated to combat threat of ISIS, called Cruz’s patrol plan a “good idea” which he “100 percent” supports. […]

  354. says

    Corrections to comment 389: the cab driver took all three terrorists to the airport, not just two of them.
    The cab driver actually took the police to the building where he had picked up the men going to the airport.

  355. says

    quotetheunquote @394, that sounds like confirmation of PZ’s comments in his “Chaos/Savagery and the elimination of Grey Zones” post. You may want to cross post your comments there.

  356. says

    Here are the election results from voting in three states yesterday:

    Arizona
    – Republicans: Trump won with 47.1% of the vote, Cruz got 24.9%, Kasich got 10.0%
    – Democrats: Clinton won with 57.6% of the vote, Sanders got 39.9%

    Utah
    – Republicans: Cruz won in a landslide with 69.2%, Kasich was second with 16.9%, and Trump came in third for the first time with 14.0%
    – Democrats: Sanders won in a landslide with 79.7%, Clinton 19.8%

    Idaho (Democrats only)
    Sanders won handily with 78.0% of the vote, Clinton 21.2%

  357. says

    Here are the delegate counts:
    Trump, 739
    Cruz, 465
    Katich, 143

    Clinton, 1,681
    Sanders, 937

    A Republican candidate needs 1,237 to get the nomination.

    A Democratic candidate needs 2,383 to get the nomination.

  358. says

    Oh, FFS. Jeb Bush endorsed Ted Cruz for president. The political arm of the Club for Growth also endorsed Cruz.

    Cruz and Trump are trading schoolyard taunts about their wives.

    [Trump tweeted] Lyin’ Ted Cruz just used a picture of Melania from a G.Q. shoot in his ad. Be careful, Lyin’ Ted, or I will spill the beans on your wife!
    ———–
    [Cruz tweeted] Pic of your wife not from us. Donald, if you try to attack Heidi, you’re more of a coward than I thought. #classless

    The ad showing Melania in G.Q. was run by the anti-Trump group Make America Awesome. It was run in Utah to prompt mormons to shy away from Trump.

  359. says

    Give me a break.

    One of Donald Trump’s foreign-policy advisers said the Republican front-runner is only talking about torturing terrorists because “we are in a political season” and doesn’t believe a Trump administration would resort to such techniques. […]

    “This is a reaction to a very complex and difficult and challenging situation,” Phares said. “I think Mr. Trump, because we are in a political season, he’s making those statements, but when he will come to the White House … then he’s gonna be tasking experts to answer that question, and I’m not sure that the experts are gonna recommend any form of torture.”

  360. says

    What President Obama had to say about Cruz’s proposal to surveil Muslim neighborhoods:

    As far as the notion of having surveillance of neighborhoods where Muslims are present, I just left a country that engages in that kind of neighborhood surveillance. Which, by the way, the father of Sen. Cruz escaped for America.

  361. says

    In an interview with ITV’s “Good Morning Britain,” Donald Trump said some more stupid stuff about Muslim communities:

    When they see trouble, they have to report it. They are not reporting it; they are absolutely not reporting it, and that’s a big problem. […]

    It’s like they’re protecting each other, but they’re really doing very bad damage, and they have to open up to society. They have to report the bad ones.

    British officials were quick to condemn Trump’s comments as false and potentially dangerous.

    “He said that Muslims were not coming forward in the United Kingdom to report matters of concern,” Interior Minister Theresa May told Parliament, according to a Reuters report. “This is absolutely not the case—he is just plain wrong,” she said.

    Neil Basu, Deputy Assistant Commissioner to the UK Counter Terrorism Policing Network, said Trump’s remarks could spark hate crimes.

    “If we demonize one section of the community, that is the worst thing we can do,” Basu said, as quoted by the Associated Press . “We are absolutely playing into the terrorists’ hands of making people feel hate.” […]

    Link

  362. says

    OMG, Paul Ryan actually apologized for demonizing poor people in the past. This is a Republican first. Oh, don’t worry, he is still pushing policies and budgets that punish poor people.

    […] “There was a time when I would talk about a difference between ‘makers’ and ‘takers’ in our country, referring to people who accepted government benefits,” he said. “But as I spent more time listening, and really learning the root causes of poverty, I realized I was wrong. ‘Takers’ wasn’t how to refer to a single mom stuck in a poverty trap, just trying to take care of her family. Most people don’t want to be dependent.”

    […] “I was callous and I oversimplified and castigated people with a broad brush. There is a lot of that happening in America today.”

    For several years — as he has pushed policies to slash Medicaid funding, food stamps, unemployment insurance, and other social programs — Ryan has repeatedly referred to poverty as a “culture problem” among people in “inner cities,” where “generations of men [are] not even thinking about working.”

    His most recent poverty plan takes a punitive stance, punishing people who can’t find a job by a certain mandated deadline by reducing their benefits. While Ryan did express a willingness in Wednesday’s speech to evolve on policies like criminal justice, he offered no changes to this economic model other than more respectful rhetoric regarding the poor.

    Ryan pulled the same say-nice-things-do-awful-things stunt when it came to denouncing bigotry and prejudice:

    […] While offering a mild denunciation of the anti-immigrant, anti-Muslim, anti-woman, and pro-white supremacist rhetoric in the 2016 race, Ryan failed to acknowledge that the Republican Party has for years pushed bills in Congress that advance similar views and helped create a space for the current election tenor.

    Republicans in the House, for instance, introduced legislation suggesting that President Obama wasn’t born in America. Prominent Republicans warned that the Muslim Brotherhood was infiltrating the Obama Administration.

    “The Republican establishment has allowed a decades old anti-Latino movement to fester within its ranks,” noted Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid in a speech in Washington last week. “Republican leaders looked on approvingly while extremists like Congressman Steve King used repugnant language against Latinos, such as likening DREAMers to drug mules. Republican leaders said nothing as Mitt Romney urged a policy of self-deportation, as Jeb Bush spoke of “anchor babies” and as Marco Rubio called for deporting all DREAMers.”

    Though he did not mention Trump once by name, Ryan did seem to refer to him Wednesday when he urged his party to adopt a more optimistic and forward-looking tone with voters. “Instead of playing to your anxieties, we can appeal to your aspirations,” he said. “We don’t just resort to scaring you. We dare to inspire you.”

    Link

    Inspire me with policies and budgets that actually address the issues.

  363. says

    tomh @405:

    In other words, he’s just saying it to get votes. What a shock.

    Yes, but we really don’t know what Trump would do or try to do as President.

  364. says

    Ted Cruz is all over the place when it comes to torture. We don’t know what, if he were president, he would approve.

    On Fox & Friends Wednesday morning, presidential candidate Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) claimed that the United States has “never engaged in torture.”

    [Well, that’s not true.]

    “America has never engaged in torture and we’re not about to,” Cruz responded after being asked whether he would engage in torture, enhanced interrogation, and waterboarding by the show’s three hosts.

    Cruz, whose father was tortured in Cuba, has changed his stance on torture several times in the past — so his comment on the show simply adds to the confusion regarding what the presidential candidate actually thinks of its use.

    In a Republican presidential debate last month, he claimed that “under the law, torture is excruciating pain equivalent to losing organs and systems” — a definition which surprisingly would not include his father’s experience of torture in a Cuban prison when he was a teenager. […]

    http://thinkprogress.org/world/2016/03/23/3762638/ted-cruz-torture/

  365. says

    Reaction to Donald Trump from Brussels:

    Brussels resident Lucien Culot thought it was unusual to see emergency vehicles racing past as he emerged from the metro Tuesday morning. […]

    As the dark day unfolded, Culot, a 28-year-old business analyst who has lived almost all of his life in Brussels, watched TV news with a Muslim colleague. Culot tells ThinkProgress they were mutually appalled to hear Donald Trump call their city “a hellhole,” citing the hate Trump believes the Muslim community there has for westerners.

    “It’s really dangerous if that kind of stuff can help Donald Trump,” Culot told ThinkProgress. “Brussels is a city were you have a high percentage of Muslim people. We work with Muslims, go to school with Muslims. When Donald Trump said the thing he said today, imagine what kind of effect it can do? It’s not the way we can solve the situation… to divide people, they want to get us afraid and stuff, and that’s not the way to react.” […]

    Link

  366. says

    Republicans in Congress are following the Trump/Cruz lead. They are trying to pass bills that would obstruct settlement of refugees in the USA.

    […] After the terrorist attacks in Paris last November, more than 30 states mounted efforts to ban the resettlement of Syrian refugees in their communities—issuing executive orders, proposing state-level legislation, and even filing lawsuits. These efforts failed because the Constitution mandates that immigration policy be set by the federal government. Now Congress is considering a bill that would tweak federal law to make this sort of refugee obstructionism a whole lot easier.

    […] the Refugee Program Integrity Restoration Act […] would give state and local governments the opportunity to reject the resettlement of refugees in their communities […] and it would shift the responsibility from the president to Congress of setting an annual ceiling on the number of refugees.

    […] Congress could set it as low as 60,000 refugees and block the president from raising it without congressional approval. […]

    The measure would also allow “recurrent background security checks” of US refugees, a provision that critics say amounts to “continual surveillance” of refugees. It would also delay how soon refugees can obtain their permanent green cards—changing it from one year after their arrival to three years. The bill also requires that the Department of Homeland Security prioritize claims from refugees who fear persecution based on their religion, as opposed to those who face persecution due to other circumstances, like their race, nationality, […]

    Link

  367. blf says

    Inspire me with policies and budgets that actually address the issues.

    He is! To wit:

    (1) Tax rate is 100%. No deductions. Only exemptions are for thug politicians and Faux and Kochroach Bros., Unlimited, who pay 0%.
    (2) Collected taxes are reimbursed to Faux and Kochroach Bros., Unltd.
    (3) Faux and Kochroach Bros., Unltd., pay the thug politicians.

    In a typical example of thug thoroughness, the plan does not specify how much the thug politicians are paid. Observers suspect the thugs “think” the pay will be connected to the elimination of civil society and the rule of law, and the imposition of theocracy staffed by the thugs and other Faux and Kochroach Bros., Unltd., disciples. With bonuses for nuking those pesky mooslins and other furriners.

  368. says

    Rush Limbaugh loves Ted Cruz, and despite all the stupid stuff Cruz has said about Muslims, Limbaugh touts Cruz’s intelligence:

    […] “Why do they hate Ted Cruz so much? Well yeah, partly it’s because he’s conservative. But why hate that?” said Limbaugh […]

    “And I’m just going to tell you in the case of Ted Cruz, every damned one of these people knows full well that they are not in his league in terms of IQ, in terms of intelligence, in terms of talent and ability. They can’t compete with him.” […]

    “They can’t keep up. They despise him. He’s a threat in that regard. You combine the kind of raw native intelligence Cruz has with his heartfelt conservatism and you have personified what the left fears the most, therefore what they hate, what they despise,” Limbaugh continued, adding, “They know they’ll never be able to corral Cruz, they’ll never be able to control him. They will never be able to impugn him intellectually.” […]

    Link

  369. says

    Hillary Clinton gave a counterterrorism address at Stanford University. She did not sound like Trump or Cruz. Quite the opposite.
    NBC Bay Area link.

    During a speech on counterterrorism at Stanford University Wednesday, Hillary Clinton said the U.S. needs every American community invested in the fight against terrorism.

    Clinton stressed that demonizing Muslims is wrong. […]

    “These terrorists seek to undermine the democratic values that are the foundation of our allegiance and our way of life, but they will never succeed,” Clinton said in a statement. “Today’s attacks will only strengthen our resolve to stand together as allies and defeat terrorism and radical jihadism around the world.”

    Clinton said that what Trump and Cruz are proposing is wrong and “dangerous.” […]

    More coverage from Politics USA.

    […] We can’t let fear stop us from doing what’s necessary to keep us safe. Nor can we let it push us into reckless actions that end up making us less safe. For example, it would be a serious mistake to stumble into another costly ground war in the Middle East. If we’ve learned anything from Iraq and Afghanistan, it’s that people in nations have to secure their own communities. We can, and I argue must support them, but we can’t substitute for them.

    It would also be a serious mistake to begin carpet bombing populated areas into oblivion. Proposing that doesn’t make you sound tough. It makes you sound like you are in over your head. Slogans aren’t a strategy. Loose cannons often misfire. What America needs is strong, smart, steady leadership to wage and win this struggle. To do that we need to strengthen America’s alliances in Europe, Asia, and around the world. […]

    You can view the entire speech on YouTube. It is about 27 minutes long. After a personal introduction, Clinton’s speech about the attacks in Brussels, and about how foreign policy should be used to diminish the threat of terrorism, begins at 1:38. This is a speech that is quite good. It is an intelligent approach and it shreds Trump and Cruz without using any shouting or personal insults.

    The actual steps needed to face the threat are laid out in the speech. Clinton gets specific.

    The presentation on YouTube is interrupted by ads, but you can skip them. I looked for a transcript but didn’t find one. If anyone finds a link to a transcript of this speech, please post it.

  370. says

    President Obama had more to say about Ted Cruz’s plan to “patrol and secure Muslim neighborhoods”:

    “We have an extraordinarily successful, patriotic, integrated Muslim-American community,” Obama said. “They do not feel ghettoized, they do not feel isolated.”

    “Any approach that would target them for discrimination is not only wrong and un-American, but counter-productive,” he said.

    The quotes are from a speech Obama gave at a press conference in Argentina.

  371. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    Let’s see if I can recap this. After the Brussels bombing, Drumpf and Cruz are being paranoid Islamophobes, while Clinton is showing real statesmanship and understanding of the issues. Sanders, please way in, preferably like Clinton…

  372. says

    Here’s a statement Sanders made about Trump’s response to the attacks in Brussels:

    At the end of the day, we cannot allow the Trumps of the world to use these incidents to attack all of the Muslim people in the world. That is unfair—to imply that because someone is a Muslim they are a terrorist, that is an outrageous statement, equally so when he talks about Mexicans coming over the border as rapists or criminals. That is not what this country is about.

    The Slot link.

  373. says

    Why did the Nixon administration launch the “war on drugs” in 1971? John Ehrlichman, a Watergate criminal and Richard Nixon’s former chief domestic advisor, put it this way: “We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.”

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/nixon-drug-war-racist_us_56f16a0ae4b03a640a6bbda1

  374. says

    Here’s another quote from Bernie Sanders:

    We are fighting a terrorist organization. A barbaric organization that is killing innocent people. We are not fighting a religion.

  375. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    Lynna#417, Thanks. Much as I expected.
    Democrats being States(wo)men and refuting ISIS, two. Rethugs being parnanoid Islamophobes, and therefore abetting ISIS, two.
    And there is no difference between the parties????

  376. says

    Michele Bachmann weighs in on terrorist attacks, and she concludes that God uses terrorists to humiliate President Obama.

    […] As Bachmann sees it, ISIS strikes whenever the president tries to downplay the group’s threat or change the subject to issues like U.S. relations with Cuba. This may be God’s way, she said, of humiliating Obama.

    Or maybe our president’s humiliation comes in a manner so devastating it makes one wonder whether the Creator of humankind isn’t reminding this world of the inferiority of foolishness in the face of wisdom.

    The president once again mocked his nemesis, the Jewish people and the nation of Israel, by cleverly turning the international press corps toward his brilliant work in Cuba, instead of covering ongoing Islamic attacks against the Jewish state as outlined that very same day at the annual pro-Israel AIPAC meeting in Washington, D.C. […]

    Link.

  377. says

    The people Donald Trump has working for him … what can I say? Trump spokesperson, Katrina Pierson, sent out this tweet:

    Cruz should denounce his SuperPAC for attack on @realDonaldTrump wife. Attacked her because she’s a beautiful & successful entanpanuer. Sick

  378. says

    Oh, sure, Trump-Prat, that will play well. Not.

    To his usual repetition of insults, (low-energy Jeb, lying’ Ted, and little Marco), Trump has added an insult for Hillary Clinton, she is “incompetent.”

    “I think people will see I’m much more competent than she is,” Trump told Bloomberg Politics’ “With All Due Respect” in an interview conducted Tuesday but broadcast Wednesday. “I think I’m much smarter than she is. I think I’m much more competent than she is.”

    Link.

  379. says

    Trump obviously thinks he has hit on a winning strategy against Hillary Clinton. He is repeating some form of the “incompetent” insult in other venues:

    Trump’s used the same phrase during his appearance on Fox News’ “Hannity”[…] “Incompetent Hillary doesn’t know what she’s talking about,” he told host Sean Hannity in a phone interview. “She doesn’t have a clue. She’s made such bad decisions.”

    Roughly 40 minutes later, Trump took to his favorite platform to re-up his new phrase.

    “Incompetent Hillary, despite the horrible attack in Brussels today, wants borders to be weak and open-and let the Muslims flow in,” he tweeted. “No way!”

  380. Pierce R. Butler says

    Lynna… @ # 395: …Globalresearch … can’t distinguish between serious analysis and discreditable junk and so publishes both.

    Which served to confuse me greatly, and led me to post my query here.

    Pls confirm (as I expect to discuss this with the conspiracist friend who sent me that link, and I never watch tv myself): Did any tv coverage you (Lynna or others here) saw include the Domodedovo footage that Globalresearch claims was proffered as news from Brussels? Just from clothing alone, one should have a good shot at distinguishing Moscow-in-January from Belgium-in-March.

    Thanks much, Lynna!

  381. says

    Pierce @425, I’m not going to spend any time looking for examples of the video on Globalresearch having been used elsewhere. What a waste of time. I haven’t seen it.

    The screen grabs from videos that are posted on Globalresearch are all fuzzy, poor quality examples of panic in an airport. They could be anywhere.

    The Globalresearch false-flag story reminds me of people trying to prove that Bigfoot or Sasquatch exists. Or people posting photoshopped examples of Obama’s birth certificate. It’s all fucking nonsense.

    Meanwhile, we have ample, full color, professional photos and video from the scenes in Brussels. All of those are fully vetted and obviously show what they purport to show. To back up the professional presentations of news from Brussels, we have amateur video and photos that match.

    One female photo journalist was on the scene. She narrowly escaped the first blast in the airport, and she started taking photos within minutes. Some of the most iconic photos are hers.
    http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2016/03/22/story-behind-brussels-photo-you-saw-everywhere-not-able-help-them/82134802/

  382. says

    The New York Times covered Hillary Clinton’s foreign policy speech at Stanford.

    In some respects, this NY Times coverage is disappointing. For example, the article claims that Clinton’s remarks “tilted heavily to pointed words for Mr. Trump and Mr. Cruz, rather than new policy solutions.” Bullshit. Clinton carefully delineated policy solutions. She focused on them. Yes, she compared policy solutions to the meaningless bluster from Cruz and Trump, but I don’t see how anyone who listened to the speech could have missed the emphasis on policy.

    Maybe the NY Times has a hate-on for Clinton?

  383. says

    Rolling Stone has been covering the Sanders campaign well. They featured Bernie Sanders on the cover twice. I expected the magazine to eventually endorse Sanders. Surprise. They have endorsed Hillary Clinton for president.

    http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/hillary-clinton-for-president-20160323

    Excerpts:

    t’s hard not to love Bernie Sanders. He has proved to be a gifted and eloquent politician. He has articulated the raw and deep anger about the damage the big banks did to the economy and to so many people’s lives. He’s spoken clearly for those who believe the system is rigged against them; he’s made plain how punishing and egregious income inequality has become in this country, and he refuses to let us forget that the villains have gotten away with it. […]

    Hillary Clinton has an impressive command of policy, the details, trade-offs and how it gets done. It’s easy to blame billionaires for everything, but quite another to know what to do about it. During his 25 years in Congress, Sanders has stuck to uncompromising ideals, but his outsider stance has not attracted supporters among the Democrats. […]

    Every time Sanders is challenged on how he plans to get his agenda through Congress and past the special interests, he responds that the “political revolution” that sweeps him into office will somehow be the magical instrument of the monumental changes he describes. This is a vague, deeply disingenuous idea that ignores the reality of modern America. With the narrow power base and limited political alliances that Sanders had built in his years as the democratic socialist senator from Vermont, how does he possibly have a chance of fighting such entrenched power?

    I have been to the revolution before. It ain’t happening.

    On the other hand, Hillary Clinton is one of the most qualified candidates for the presidency in modern times […]

    The debates between Clinton and Sanders have been inspirational; to see such intelligence, dignity and substance is a tribute to both of them. The contrast to the banality and stupidity of the GOP candidates has been stunning. It’s as if there are two separate universes, one where the Earth is flat and one where it is round; […]

    I keep hearing questions surface about her honesty and trustworthiness, but where is the basis in reality or in facts? This is the lingering haze of coordinated GOP smear campaigns against the Clintons — and President Obama — all of which have come up empty, including the Benghazi/e-mail whirlwind, which after seven GOP-led congressional investigations has turned up zilch. […]

    Sanders blaming Clinton’s support of “free trade” policies for the loss of jobs in Detroit is misleading. The region’s decline began as foreign automakers started making and exporting cars of clearly superior quality. The Big Three saw their market share slipping, and pressed the White House to enact import quotas on foreign cars instead of facing the competition head-on and improving their own products. This backfired when foreign companies built their own factories in the United States and directly took on Detroit.

    Politics is a rough game, and has been throughout American history. Idealism and honesty are crucial qualities for me, but I also want someone with experience who knows how to fight hard. It’s about social and economic justice and who gets the benefits and spoils of our society, and those who have them now are not about to let go of their share just because it’s the right thing to do. And Clinton is a tough, thoroughly tested fighter. […]

    More at the link, including more details regarding what Sanders has brought to the table.

  384. says

    Donald Trump and Ted Cruz are still fighting over their wives. Trump posted side-by-side photos of the two wives, Melania and Heidi. The implication was that Melania is more good looking than Heidi, and therefore, Trump wins.

    Really? Seriously? How childish.

    Cruz has been busy quadrupling down on his “patrol Muslim neighborhood” stupidity, but at least he did one thing right in the war-of-the-wives. He tweeted:

    Donald, real men don’t attack women. Your wife is lovely, and Heidi is the love of my life./blockquote>

    Hate-spewing bloviator Trump threatened to “spill the beans” about Heidi, which was, apparently, a reference to a period of time when she was so depressed that she sought help. Not a secret.

  385. says

    Another “family values” rightwing governor goes down in flames after a sex scandal. Moreover, the elderly but super-horny Governor Robert Bentley of Alabama, fired the head of the Alabama Law Enforcement Agency when the guy refused to cover up the governor’s affair.

    Alabama’s Sunday school-teaching governor was accused by his former top cop on Wednesday of breaking the Seventh Commandment — thou shalt not commit adultery.

    Spencer Collier claims he was fired from his post as head of the Alabama Law Enforcement Agency on Tuesday because he refused to cover up Gov. Robert Bentley’s alleged affair with top political adviser Rebekah Caldwell Mason.

    http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/alabama-top-cop-says-governor-fired-him-refusing-lie-about-affair

    Governor Bentley is one of those holier-than-thou family values conservatives that fights against gay rights, marriage equality, etc. He says he is not going to resign, but I think his political career is kaput. And his wife of 50 years divorced him.

    The Governor says he did not have a physical relationship with “Mrs. Mason.” The press has audio copies of his phone sex escapades. The phone sex conversation makes it sound very much like he did have a physical relationship with her.

    Nobody really cares if consenting adults have sex, but this guy based his whole political career on family values. Also, Mrs. Mason was paid some $400,000+ per year and no one seems to know where that money came from.

  386. says

    More stupidity with guns: a man in Georgia blew off part of his own leg when he was trying make some old lawn equipment “go boom.” He used “tannerite.”

    What is tannerite?

    Tannerite is the brand name of a binary explosive marketed primarily for making exploding targets for long range firearms practice. It is a patented combination of ammonium nitrate, which acts as an oxidizer, and aluminum powder for the fuel.

    When the two separate powders are mixed and shaken, it produces an explosive material. However, the explosion produced by the mixture is non-incendiary.

    The Walton County Sheriff’s office in Georgia posted this:

    Yes, it is legal and no, we can’t make people stop doing it. But why, folks, just why?

    The dangers of tannerite were more than words Saturday afternoon for a 32 year old resident of eastern Walton county. He was dangerously close to the object containing the tannerite when the final gun shot round caused it to explode sending a piece of shrapnel through his leg severing it below the knee. Yes, completely taking his leg.

    The quoted text is from the Sheriff’s Facebook page.

  387. tomh says

    @ #428

    Maybe the NY Times has a hate-on for Clinton?

    Very much so. Media Matters details the NYT’s biased Clinton coverage for the last twenty years, from Whitewater to their blunder of erroneously reporting that two inspectors general were seeking a criminal probe of Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email account while serving as secretary of state. A consistent pattern of misinformation.

  388. says

    toms @433, that’s just sad. What the hell? I used to depend on the NYT. I’m sure they still do some good work, but a pattern of prejudice is inexcusable. The lack of a fact check before printing the false “criminal probe” story is especially startling.

    In other news, the House committee “Select Investigative Panel on Infant Lives” is run by bonkers conservatives. We always knew it was a waste of time since they are using the long-since discredited video campaign against Planned Parenthood as the foundation of their so-called “investigation.” Now the committee has gone even further off track. They are going after medical researchers.

    […] A House committee led by anti-abortion Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) is on the verge of issuing 17 subpoenas to medical companies to gather the names of medical researchers, graduate students, laboratory technicians, and administrative staff who are in any way involved in fetal tissue research.

    According to Blackburn: “We are going to review the business practices of these procurement organizations and do some investigating of how they have constructed a for-profit business model from selling baby body parts.”

    The committee […] was originally created by former House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) to find out if Planned Parenthood has any involvement with the sale of fetal tissue, an idea sparked by a now-discredited undercover video campaign. Nearly 30 states that conducted similar investigations failed to turn up any evidence to support this claim.

    This new focus […] openly exhibits the GOP’s wild mission to find someone to hold accountable for a baseless accusation made in a few discredited attack videos. The attack has spiraled so far into broad areas of the medical industry, it’s almost hard to remember it’s solely rooted in lawmaker’s beliefs about abortion.

    The researchers and technicians in question fear this attack could effectively halt critical research that depends on fetal tissue samples — including researching cures for the Zika virus, Parkinson’s disease, HIV, and many other fatal conditions. Of course, many also fear that making the researchers’ names public could seriously endanger their lives. […]

    Think Progress link.

  389. says

    From the depths of the rightwing misinformation pit:

    – Wayne LaPierre (NRA honcho) told students at Liberty University that gun owners are smarter than everyone else.

    So many of those elites, they think they’re better than us. They somehow think they’re more sophisticated. They think they’re more intellectually evolved somehow than we are. Or they think they’re just somehow plain smarter than we are. Well, I’ve got news for the elites who look down their noses at all of us and our rights: we gun owners are a heck of a lot smarter than you’ll ever be. It’s true.

    […] Never have there been smarter, freer American citizens than America’s one hundred million gun owners. […]

    Link

    – Rick Wiles says that President Obama attended a baseball game in Cuba so that it would look like he was cheering a baseball game when he was really cheering for the terrorist attack in Brussels. The timeline is iffy since Obama’s attendance at the game was announced on March 1, but that does not deter Rick Wiles. He adjusted his thinking to include the pseudo-fact that Obama knew about the attack in Brussels ahead of time.

    I think the guy went to the ball game to chill out because he’s winning. It was his victory wave. Everybody else was stressed out, everybody else was upset about the terrorist attack; he wasn’t because he’s getting what he wants. […]

    Muslim warriors in Obama’s war, that’s why Obama was doing the wave yesterday in Havana. His army is winning, his ISIS army is winning. […]

    The man in the White House is the leader of the Islamic jihad of the whole world. He is an Antichrist. Not the Antichrist, but Obama is an Antichrist. […]

    Link

    Ah, so sad. Obama is just one of many Antichrists, and not The Antichrist. That’s a let down.

  390. tomh says

    @ #433
    This column from Quartz details the sexism that is so prevalent in American politics, and America in general, as a source of much of the antipathy towards Clinton. There is little that America hates more than a “tainted” woman, and Hillary is a woman with a past. In passing, it mentions the NYT columnist Maureen Dowd as one of Hillary’s most vicious critics over the past 20 years, (in 2008 she was “acting like a masculine woman,” according to Dowd.)

  391. says

    toms @436, disgusting and dispiriting — something to consciously fight.

    In evidence of another kind of bigotry, South Carolina lawmakers passed a bill that will create a state refugee registry, and more importantly, will require state law enforcement agencies to investigate all refugees. Those refugees were investigated before they entered the U.S. This bill looks like it will burden the refugees with endless investigations.

    […] [Federal] Government officials say Syrian refugees are strictly and lengthily vetted, enduring a degree of scrutiny higher than any other group of people trying to enter the US. But after the terrorist attacks in Paris last November, governors and state lawmakers around the country tried to bar refugees from their states or restrict aid money and cooperation for people being resettled there. […]

    Link.

    Lawmakers in New York are also considering a bill that would require registry and monitoring of refugees. Big Brother for refugees. That will cost the states some money.

  392. says

    Attorney General Loretta Lynch, along with other officials, indicted Iranian hackers for cyberattacks on banks, stock exchanges, and a dam in New York.

    The attackers are connected to the Iranian military. My bet is that Donald Trump and Ted Cruz will blame this on President Obama, and that they will bluster some more about bombing Iran.

    The hacking took place between 2011 and 2013.

    Seven hackers carried out a long series of attacks on major financial institutions including the New York Stock Exchange, Bank of America, and JPMorgan Chase, slowing down the companies’ operations and frequently cutting off customers from their accounts. “These attacks were relentless, they were systematic, and they were widespread,” Lynch said at a press conference on Thursday. “We believe they were conducted with the sole purpose of undermining the American free market.”

    The hackers, who the government says worked for Iranian companies tied to the country’s elite Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, also broke into the computer system that runs a flood-control dam in Rye, New York. While they were able to roam the dam’s systems looking for vulnerabilities, they could not do any damage because the dam’s sluice gate was disabled for maintenance. […]

    Link.

  393. says

    The whose-wife-is-more-of-a-babe war between Trump and Cruz continues. Cruz fired back at Trump again:

    It’s not easy to tick me off. I don’t get angry often, but you mess with my wife, you mess with my kids, that’ll do it every time.

    Donald, you’re a sniveling coward. Leave Heidi the hell alone.

  394. Chris J says

    Welp, time to stifle back the vomit induced by even typing the words “I think Ted Cruz has the moral high ground on this one” and check to see how many times Cruz has attacked Hillary on her looks.

    Bleagh.

    “Real men don’t attack women,” huh?

  395. tomh says

    @ #441
    Not exactly about looks, but I do recall that, before the Iowa caucus, speaking about the (widely debunked) meme that Clinton lied about Behghazi, ““You know I’ll tell you, in my house, if my daughter Catherine, the five-year-old, says something she knows to be false, she gets a spanking.” I wonder if he would have said that about a male opponent.

  396. says

    I don’t know how much of a victory it is to be able to claim the moral high ground over Donald Trump. Nevertheless, Cruz gets that prize this time.

  397. Pierce R. Butler says

    Lynna @ # 427: … I’m not going to spend any time looking for examples …

    Nonetheless, what you did provide will be of great help to me (though I doubt my friend will accept it) – so, thanks again!

  398. says

    Pierce @444. You’re welcome.

    In other news, we are seeing a few more cracks in the Republican wall of obstructionism when it comes to the Supreme Court nominee.

    Sen. Jerry Moran (R-KS) has joined a small group of Senate Republicans who say they want to hold a hearing on President Barack Obama’s Supreme Court nominee to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia.

    “I would rather have you complaining to me that I voted wrong on nominating somebody than saying I’m not doing my job,” Moran told constituents during a town hall meeting on Monday, according to The Garden City Telegram.

    President Barack Obama has nominated D.C. Circuit Court Judge Merrick Garland for the position. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) has said he won’t put Garland through the nomination process, but some Republican senators have said they would meet with him.

    Moran told the town hall attendees that he believes senators should interview Garland and hold a hearing on his nomination, according to the newspaper. […]

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/jerry-moran-scotus-vote-doing-my-job

  399. says

    Despite Cruz’s anger over Trump having insulted Heidi Cruz, Ted Cruz still says he will vote for Trump if he is the Republican nominee.

    A few other Republicans have not been cowardly when it comes to saying they won’t vote for Trump. Add to that small group Maryland Governor Larry Hogan.

    Larry Hogan will consider voting for someone else in November if Donald Trump is his party’s nominee, according to an Associated Press report.

    The Maryland Republican governor told the AP he is “not a Trump fan” and the billionaire should not represent the party in the general election — a stance that separates Hogan from his fellow governor and ally, Chris Christie.

    According to the AP, Hogan doesn’t know who he’d vote for, but he’s unhappy with the state of the race in general. Hogan said he doesn’t like watching the debates on TV and has no plans to go to the Republican National Convention. […]

    Politico link

  400. Pteryxx says

    If you care about abuse, you should care about who Ted Cruz wants on the Supreme Court

    Warning for descriptions of domestic violence and abuse at the link.

    Ted Cruz is displaying an increasingly disturbing record on child and survivor advocacy. He has a nearly non-existent legislative history of supporting survivors and victims of child abuse, sex abuse, and domestic violence. He voted against the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act in 2013. He was the only U.S. Senator who did not vote for S. 178, the Justice for Victims of Trafficking Act, in 2015. He considers it appropriate to joke about how he beats his wife and thinks Hillary Clinton should be spanked like he spanks his children. He shows little respect for his children’s physical boundaries.

    To make matters worse, last week Ted Cruz appointed Paige Patterson to his Religious Liberty Advisory Council. Patterson has publicly declared that the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (SNAP), one of the leading non-profit organizations advocating for survivors of clergy abuse, are “evil doers” who are “just as reprehensible as sex criminals.” SNAP’s vital role in exposing more than 250 child molesters in the Catholic Church was recently featured in the Oscar award-winning movie Spotlight. […]

    But perhaps the most troubling revelation about how Cruz values (or does not value) advocacy for abuse survivors is who he recently declared he would appoint to the Supreme Court if he was president. During the September 2015 Reagan Library Republican presidential debate, Cruz name-dropped Edith Jones on three occasions as who he would love to see on the Supreme Court. “Edith Jones, the rock ribbed conservative on the fifth circuit court of appeals,” he declared, “is who I would have appointed.”

    For anyone who cares about child and survivor advocacy, the possibility of such an appointment should be terrifying.

  401. says

    Pteryxx @447, thank you for that info. Ted Cruz has consistently aligned himself with evangelical christians who are activists on the fringes of anti-gay, anti-abortion, and anti-equal rights of all kinds. Being anti-child is a new low.

    Here’s more background on his entire Religious Liberty Advisory Council:

    […] the 15-point list is unsurprisingly dedicated to privileging Christian beliefs and enabling discrimination against the LGBT community and women.

    […] one of the recommendations is to “rescind Executive Order 13672″ […] This order, which Obama first issued back in 2014, requires companies that contract with the federal government to have a policy against discriminating against LGBT people. By vowing to rescind it, Cruz is blatantly endorsing such discrimination and promising to subsidize it with taxpayer funding.

    The council also recommends that Cruz “direct all federal agencies to stop interpreting ‘sex’ to include ‘sexual orientation’ and/or ‘gender identity.’” […]

    […] His “religious liberty” advisers would have him “direct the Department of Health and Human Services to eliminate its requirement that all employers include coverage for all FDA-approved contraceptive methods and sterilization procedures.” This would make it even harder for women to access birth control than the Hobby Lobby case has already made it.

    Other suggestions include protecting religious organizations from the IRS if they engage in political speech, expanding school prayer to the fullest extent possible, and ensuring that military chaplains can condemn homosexuality and women who have sex outside of marriage without consequence.

    […] His council’s chair is Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, an anti-LGBT hate group. […]

    Other members include:

    The Benham brothers, who have become celebrity victims since HGTV decided against giving them a house-flipping show because of their anti-gay beliefs.

    Ryan T. Anderson, the Heritage Foundation’s point man for espousing anti-LGBT positions.

    Bishop Harry Jackson, who was one of the loudest opponents of marriage equality fights in the District of Columbia and Maryland.

    Steve Riggle, a Houston pastor who helped lead the fight against the LGBT-inclusive Houston Equal Rights Ordinance (HERO).

    Kelly Shackelford, head of First Liberty (formerly the Liberty Institute), a legal organization that defends individuals and businesses when they discriminate against LGBT people.

    Jim Garlow, a California pastor and activist with a storied history of railing against the LGBT community.

    No one on the council represented any non-Christian religions nor any of the LGBT-inclusive or even more moderate Christian denominations. With Ted Cruz as president, it seems the only religion that will have any liberty is his particular conservative brand of evangelical Christianity

    http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2016/03/25/3763293/ted-cruz-religious-liberty/

  402. says

    David and Jason Benham, mentioned in comment 448, used their celebrity to fight against an LGBT nondiscrimination ordinance in North Carolina last year. PZ recently posted about the restrictive North Carolina anti-LGBT law passed this year that bars transgender people from using restrooms that match their identifying gender. The bill also barred cities from passing any separate progressive ordinances banning discrimination.

    Pretty ugly stuff. Ted Cruz is a dangerous man. He has become the presidential candidate of choice for a well-organized group of anti-LBGT individuals and organizations.

  403. says

    You can submit a question for a proposed presidential forum focused on science, “2016 Presidential Science, Tech, Health, and Environmental Forum”

    […] To come up with potential questions for the candidates, they are turning to the American public. You can submit a question by clicking here.

    ScienceDebate.org, a non-profit backed by Nobel Laureates and hundreds of other leaders in science, academics, business, and government, is running a campaign calling for at least one presidential debate that is exclusively focused on science, health, tech, and environmental issues. Now, in partnership with the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the American Geosciences Institute, the Union of Concerned Scientists, and others, the group is crowdsourcing the best science-related questions.

    Questions posed by ScienceDebate.org have helped shape the past two presidential elections; in 2008 and 2012, […]

    Media Matters link.

  404. says

    This is what happens if a Republican politician is reasonable enough to suggest that, yes, the Senate should hold hearings on Judge Merrick Garland’s Supreme Court nomination: the Tea Party Patriots Citizen Fund declares that it will support a challenger when that politician is up for reelection.

    Senator Jerry Moran of Kansas is up for reelection this year. Far rightwing Republicans may kick him out of the club for exhibiting reasonableness.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/09/us/politics/leading-republicans-move-to-stamp-out-challenges-from-right.html

  405. says

    The International Longshore and Warehouse Union endorsed Bernie Sanders yesterday.

    In other news, the combined fundraising efforts of both political parties in the USA has passed the $1 billion mark for the current presidential race. Republican groups have a significant lead in raising money for Senate races, and that is not good. Democrats have a good chance to retake the Senate, but that requires a lot of campaign funds.

    In other, other news, Republican candidates continue to claim that President Obama is doing nothing to defeat ISIS. Meanwhile, U.S. defense officials announced today that they killed Haji Imam, an ISIS finance minister who oversaw funding for all ISIS operation.

    The U.S. and its coalition partners are killing an average of one ISIS leader every three days. The Washington Post noted that on the battlefield in Iraq and Syria, ISIS is “a rapidly diminishing force.” This is not to say that the job is done, nor that ISIS won’t regroup, but it does mean that Republican candidates don’t know what they’re talking about.

    Defeats in Syria and Iraq may be part of the impetus driving ISIS to make a show of force in Europe. In Brussels, law enforcement personnel continue to roundup suspected terrorists.

    A new blast has been heard from a police operation in a Brussels neighborhood that once housed a hideout for the suicide bombers who targeted the city’s airport and subway system this week.

    Associated Press reporters at the scene described hearing a new detonation, though it was unclear whether it was a controlled police detonation or something else.

    Earlier, a witness speaking on Belgian state broadcaster RTBF described hearing two blasts and shots from heavy weapons during the police raid on the Schaerbeek neighborhood.

    About 50 officers appear to be involved in the operation. […]

  406. says

    Another one of Ted Cruz’s supporters who is a religious extremist said something stupid. Bryan Fischer (American Family Association honcho) said that we need to “de-Islamize” America.

    […] Fischer’s “de-Islamization” program has three planks […]:

    – Immediately suspend immigration by Muslims. Fischer says that “unvetted, untrammeled immigration of Muslims to the U.S. is a form of insanity.” Islam, he says, “is the Ebola virus of culture.” He says, “Preventing carriers of this cultural virus from entering America is simply common sense…”

    – No More Mosques. Fischer says there is no constitutional problem with state governments banning mosques “if we use the Constitution given to us by the Founders and not the one mangled by the courts.” Fischer argues that the First Amendment’s establishment clause does not apply to the states, which he says “have unilateral authority to regulate religious expression within their borders.” In other words, he would see no constitutional barrier to Texas, for example, allowing only Baptists to worship openly.

    – No more Muslims in the military. Fischer says Congress can and should bar Muslims from service in the armed forces. […]

    Link.

    I suppose Fischer would also like to see the more than 900 Muslim officers serving in the NYPD fired. What a doofus.

  407. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    Fischer says there is no constitutional problem with state governments banning mosques “if we use the Constitution given to us by the Founders and not the one mangled by the courts.” Fischer argues that the First Amendment’s establishment clause does not apply to the states, which he says “have unilateral authority to regulate religious expression within their borders.”

    Apparently Fischer can’t read the constitution. The Fourteenth Amendment applies all federal protections unto the states. But then, he would have to get his head out of the eighteenth century and learn something new, and that the original constitution set itself up to be modified, and it was. As the founders expected. What a doofus.

  408. blf says

    he would have to get his head out of the eighteenth century and learn something new

    His head is not only in the 18th centurt BCE, but also stuffed far up his arse. It is so far up his arse it has gone recursive; that is, it’s gone in so far its come out of his mouth… and then keeps on going, around again up the arse, out the mouth, and around again, up the arse, out the mouth, and around again. And again. And again. Again.

    He’s been doing this for about 38 centuries now, so he’s wound himself into a very tight knot, a superdooper dense knot, a black hole of stooopidity, that is so dense it attracts other black holes of stooopidity. Unfortunately, black holes of stoooopid don’t “eat” the stoopid, they just concentrate it. The ultimate “echo chamber”.

    Occasionally a black hole of stoooopidity “burps” and emits assorted loonyions, wazzocktrons, and other lumps of stupid. Sometimes the stupid lumps coalesce and you get weird disturbances to Reality, such as teh crud and, when cruds collide, trum-prats. Trum-prats are thought to be their own anti-“particle”, and are prone to blowing up.

  409. says

    It is amusing in a black-comedy way when so-called intellectuals who are conservatives try really hard to justify or to understand what is going on in rightwing politics. They go mad. David Brooks is a good example.

    […] After watching the institution he has dedicated his life to supporting fall into tatters with a speed no one imagined, Brooks is trying desperately to envision some way of saving at least a little of the material being ripped away from what is left of the outfit. At the same time, he is trying to convince himself that, at one point (the Reagan years), his creations were the height of fashion.

    […] Brooks writes that “Reaganism was very economic, built around tax policies, enterprise zones and the conception of the human being as a rational, utility-driven individual.” Even amid the myriad disasters spawned by those very policies, Brooks still wants to claim that they were expertly tailored by diligent craftspeople, that something more was going on than pandering to style.

    Of course, there was never any real conception of “the human being as a rational, utility-driven individual.” You can’t sell rational people the illusion that they are going to be rich. That’s a con […] That really is ‘the emperor’s new clothes.’

    Reaganism, if there ever really was such a thing, has failed. The crumbling infrastructure of Flint is just one of the first obvious holes in the fabric. […] There are going to be more bridge collapses, water and sewage problems, railroad accidents and airport incidents all because “we” decided we look better in the cheap suits the Reagan hucksters convinced us to buy […]

    Donald Trump promises to replace the Reagan tatters with a suit of armor, though armor stopped working centuries ago. The people Brooks helped fool are being fooled again. […]

    He doesn’t even know what it will look like, he says, but he’s excited about it. He’s going to make “Émile Durkheim neckties” to replace the “Adam Smith necktie” that, he claims was the emblem of Reaganism. He thinks his new neckties will “relate to binding a fragmenting society, reweaving family and social connections, relating across the diversity of a globalized world.”

    Salon link.

  410. says

    Donald Trump is either vague or contradictory when he talks about ideology or policy proposals, but, as journalist Franklin Foer notes: “[…] there’s one ideology that he does hold with sincerity and practices with unwavering fervor: misogyny.”

    […] On its face, Donald Trump’s hateful musings about women and his boastful claims of sexual dominance should be reason alone to drive him from polite society and certainly to blockade him from the West Wing. Yet somehow his misogyny has instead propelled his campaign to the brink of the Republican nomination. Each demonstration of his caveman views—about Megyn Kelly’s menstruation, about Carly Fiorina’s face, about the size of his member—produces a show of mock-horror before Trump resumes his march to the nomination. […]

    Trump wants us to know all about his sex life. He doesn’t regard sex as a private activity. It’s something he broadcasts to demonstrate his dominance, of both women and men. In his view, treating women like meat is a necessary precondition for winning, and winning is all that matters in his world. By winning, Trump means asserting superiority. And since life is a zero-sum game, superiority can only be achieved at someone else’s expense. […]

    Trump’s primary method for asserting dominance was sex. The school’s [New York Military Academy] yearbook—the perfectly named Shrapnel—anointed him the official “ladies man” of the class. […] Decades later, he’s still trumpeting his sexual exploits. When Tucker Carlson once mocked him on air, Trump called the pundit and left a voicemail: “It’s true you have better hair than I do. But I get more pussy than you do.” […]

    In 2001, he phoned into The Howard Stern Show to discuss his feats of cuckoldry. […] “I’ve been successful with your girlfriend, [the girlfriend of author and columnist A.J. Benza] I’ll tell you that,” Trump told Stern’s audience. “While you were getting onto the plane to go to California thinking that she was your girlfriend, she was some place that you wouldn’t have been very happy with.” […] As he wrote in The Art of the Comeback: “If I told the real stories of my experiences with women, often seemingly very happily married and important women, this book would be a guaranteed best-seller.” […]

    Trump considers himself such a virile example of masculinity that he’s qualified to serve as the ultimate arbiter of femininity. He relishes judging women on the basis of their looks, which he seems to believe amounts to the sum of their character. Walking out of his meeting with the Washington Post editorial board this week, he paused to pronounce editor Karen Attiah “beautiful.”

    When he owned the Miss USA and Miss Universe pageants, he would screen all the contestants. […] One of the contestants, Carrie Prejean, wrote about this in her book, Still Standing: “Some of the girls were sobbing backstage after [Trump] left, devastated to have failed even before the competition really began … even those of us who were among the chosen couldn’t feel very good about it—it was as though we had been stripped bare.”

    […] When the New York Times columnist Gail Collins described him as a “financially embittered thousandaire,” he sent her a copy of the column with her picture circled. “The Face of a Dog!” he scrawled over her visage.

    This is the tack he took with Carly Fiorina, when he described her facial appearance as essentially disqualifying her from the presidency. It’s the method he’s used to denounce Cher, Bette Midler, Angelina Jolie, and Rosie O’Donnell—“fat ass,” “slob, “extremely unattractive,” etc.—when they had the temerity to criticize him.

    The joy he takes in humiliating women is not something he even bothers to disguise. He told the journalist Timothy L. O’Brien, “My favorite part [of the movie Pulp Fiction] is when Sam has his gun out in the diner and he tells the guy to tell his girlfriend to shut up. Tell that bitch to be cool. Say: ‘Bitch be cool.’ I love those lines.” Or as he elegantly summed up his view to New York magazine in the early ’90s, “Women, you have to treat them like shit.” […]

    Working moms are particularly lacking in loyalty, he believes, and thus do not make for good employees. “She’s not giving me 100 percent. She’s giving me 84 percent, and 16 percent is going towards taking care of children,” […]

    This is one reason that evangelicals, both men and women, gravitate to Trump, despite his obvious lack of interest in religion and blatantly loose morals. He represents the possibility of a return to patriarchy, […] While he celebrates his own sexuality, he believes that female sexuality has spun out of control and needs to be contained. […]

    The former Newsweek reporter Harry Hurt III described Trump’s history of assault in his book, The Lost Tycoon: The Many Lives of Donald J. Trump. In 1989, Trump had returned home from a painful scalp-reduction surgery, intended to remove a bald spot. His ex-wife Ivana had suggested the doctor—and he blamed her for his suffering. He held her arms and began pulling hair from her scalp, then tore off her clothes. […] When Hurt was writing his book, Trump’s lawyers forced the author to include a statement from Ivana in the book, “A Note to Readers,” which softens the account but doesn’t disavow it: “As a woman, I felt violated, as the love and tenderness, which he normally exhibited towards me, was absent. I referred to this as a ‘rape,’ but I do not want my words to be interpreted in a literal or criminal sense.”[…]

    Misogyny isn’t an incidental part of Donald Trump. It’s who he is.

  411. says

    More organizations are objecting to Georgia’s “religious liberty” bill by threatening to take their business elsewhere:

    […] a fleet of major Hollywood players have joined the Walt Disney Co. and its Marvel Studios film unit in threatening to boycott Georgia should the bill be signed into law.

    As of Friday, all of the following companies have spoken out against the bill: Viacom, 21st Century Fox, Lionsgate, CBS, Starz, AMC Networks (megahit The Walking Dead is currently filmed in Georgia), Netflix, Time Warner, CBS, The Weinstein Company, Sony, Comcast/NBCUniversal, MGM, STX Entertainment, and Open Road Films.

    The legislation before Gov. Nathan Deal (R) is House Bill 757. It would prevent individuals from being forced to perform or attend same-sex weddings (if you’re curious, yes, that is a right already guaranteed by the First Amendment; no one can make you attend a wedding, be it gay, straight, or dog); allow faith-based groups, including churches and religious schools, to refuse employment and service to anyone who violates the group’s religious beliefs; and permit those groups to deny employment to anyone “whose religious beliefs or practices or lack of either are not in accord with the faith-based organization’s sincerely held religious belief.” […]

    Think Progress link.

    Yes, you read that correctly, The Walking Dead will walk out of Georgia if rightwing politicians there persist in passing anti-gay legislation.

  412. says

    Ted Nugent said some more stupid stuff: he compared women to guns and found that guns are better in many ways.

    […] Guns function normally every day of the month. […]

    A gun doesn’t mind if you go to sleep after you use it. […]

    You can buy a silencer for a gun. […]

    Media Matters link.

    “Use it”? Really? Nugget was trying to be funny, but instead he was horrifying. Some of the other “Top ten reasons men prefer guns over women” combine ageism with misogyny: “You can trade an old 44 for a new 22.”

  413. tomh says

    @ #458
    Major sports leagues have also spoken. the National Football League released a statement that suggests the legislation may impact whether or not Atlanta hosts a Super Bowl. It’s worth noting that in 1992 the NFL moved the Super Bowl from Arizona to Los Angeles because Arizona refused to recognize Martin Luther King Day. And the National Basketball Association weighed in on the new North Carolina law expressing “concern that this discriminatory law runs counter to our guiding principles of equality and mutual respect. [We] do not yet know what impact it will have on our ability to successfully host the 2017 All-Star Game in Charlotte,” the statement read.

  414. says

    The NRA is rewriting fairy tales to include guns.

    […] As part of its new family-oriented website, NRA Family, the organization reimagined popular fairy tales by arming the main characters with guns. The stories, which the NRA posted on its site and in the site’s newsletter, feature illustrations and stories by Amelia Hamilton, a conservative blogger and author.

    The first, published on March 17, is called Hansel and Gretel (Have Guns), a new spin on the classic Brothers Grimm story. Instead of being nearly eaten by the witch, the brother and sister duo rescue another boy with guns loaded. They then to return to their village and tell their parents, who storm back guns-a-blazing to capture the witch.

    Another story published Friday is a take on Little Red Riding Hood called—you guessed it—Little Red Riding Hood (Has a Gun). It follows a similar narrative, with both granny and Little Red packing heat and using their guns to scare the wolf so he can be tied up and carried away.

    “As they slowly began to feel calm, Red got her grandmother chicken soup and a cup of tea,” the NRA version of the tale reads. “They sat in companionable silence, happy in the security that comes with knowing they could defend themselves.” […]

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/nra-adds-guns-fairy-tales

  415. says

    The National Enquirer has published scurrilous headlines and articles about every presidential candidate but Donald Trump. Now, in the wake of the war-of-the-wives between Trump and Cruz, the National Enquirer published an article claiming that Ted Cruz was unfaithful to his wife multiple times.

    The story seems to have no basis in fact. So what does Trump do? The usual:

    I have no idea whether or not the cover story about Ted Cruz in this week’s issue of the National Enquirer is true or not, but I had absolutely nothing to do with it, did not know about it, and have not as yet, read it. I have nothing to do with the National Enquirer and unlike Lyin’ Ted Cruz I do not surround myself with political hacks and henchman and then pretend total innocence. Ted Cruz’s problem with the National Enquirer is his and his alone, and while they were right about O.J. Simpson, John Edwards and many others, I certainly hope they are not right about Lyin’ Ted Cruz. I look forward to spending the week in Wisconsin, winning the Republican nomination and ultimately the Presidency in order to Make America Great Again.

    What a sleazy way to respond.

    BTW, Trump does seem to have personal friends at the National Enquirer. He is reported to have been friends for years with CEO David Pecker.

    Examples of other hit pieces run by the National Enquirer:
    – “Bungling Surgeon Ben Carson Left Sponge in Patient’s Brain!” (Published when Carson was polling well and looked like he might overtake Trump.)
    – Jeb Bush was “involved in the drug trade in Florida”
    – “Homewrecker Carly Fiorina Lied About Druggie Daughter.” (That headline appeared after Fiorina bested Trump in a debate.)
    – Clinton is “engaging in a massive cover-up about her health.” (According to the Enquirer, Clinton is suffering from strokes, brain cancer, depression, alcoholism, multiple sclerosis, endometriosis, and paranoia.)

    For contrast here are Enquirer headlines about Trump:
    “Trump’s the One!”
    “The Man Behind the Legend!”

  416. says

    More voter-suppression tactics from the state of Wisconsin:

    A bill signed into law last week by Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker could make it much harder for the poor and minorities to register to vote in the pivotal swing state just as the 2016 election approaches.

    The Republican-backed measure allows Wisconsinites to register to vote online. But voting rights advocates say that step forward is massively outweighed by a provision in the bill whose effect will be to make it nearly impossible to conduct the kind of community voter registration drives that disproportionately help low-income and non-white Wisconsinites to register.

    http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/wisconsin-throws-major-voter-registration-hurdle

  417. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    At least one republican senator is showing some statesmanship (adult behavior in my book) and is meeting with Garland, and that is Senator Mark Kirk from Illinois.
    Kirk is in an uphill campaign against liberal democrat Tammy Duckworth. The tea-bag hatred will do nothing, as the IL primary was held 3/15, which Kirk won handily against a tea-bagger, and if they want to take their hatred to a write-in level for the general election, they give Duckworth the Senate seat for six years….

  418. says

    I can’t figure this one out. Why would Trump perpetuate a lie about his grandfather, claiming he was Swedish?

    […] One demonstrable lie Donald Trump tells in The Art of the Deal is that his immigrant grandfather “came here from Sweden as a child.”

    In truth, Frederich Trump arrived at Ellis Island from Germany, to be precise the small town of Kallstadt.
    Frederich worked for a brief time as a barber in New York and then headed to Canada for the Klondike Gold Rush. There he ran what has been variously described as a restaurant and a whorehouse. He then returned with his fortune to Kallstadt, where he married a young woman named Elizabeth Christ […]

    The bride in particular had no desire to leave their hometown. They might well have stayed there had German authorities not observed that Fredrick had departed the fatherland just before he was to have begun compulsory military service and returned just after he aged out.

    Frederich became that very rare person who is deported from his own country. […]

    Frederich died at the age of 49 in the great influenza pandemic of 1918. Elizabeth put what was left of his fortune toward founding a real estate firm, E. Trump & Sons. Her son, also Fred, married […]

    Fred joined his manifestly and proudly Germanic mother in the real estate business, constructing homes and apartment buildings. Many of the customers were Jewish and he began telling folks that he was Swedish. […]

    Fred’s mother, in the meantime, marked her 80th birthday by making a triumphal trip back to Kallstadt with a number of her grandchildren. […]

    Fred continued the fiction about Sweden. His son, Donald, then memorialized the lie in The Art the Deal. A reporter in Vanity Fair asked him in 1990 if he were not in fact of German origin. Donald responded as was his wont, with what was almost certainly more lying.

    “Actually, it was very difficult,” Donald replied. “My father was not German; my father’s parents were German… Swedish, and really sort of all over Europe… and I was even thinking in the second edition of putting more emphasis on other places because I was getting so many letters from Sweden: Would I come over and speak to Parliament? Would I come meet with the president?” […]

    The Daily Beast link.

    At one time, Trump said “I love Kallstadt!” He knew the truth, he just couldn’t tell it.

  419. says

    Nerd @466, I hope that is just one of many stories we hear about down-ballot Republicans either moderating their policy stances, or being defeated by Democrats thanks to the deleterious effects of the Trump campaign.

  420. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    Nerd @466, I hope that is just one of many stories we hear about down-ballot Republicans either moderating their policy stances, or being defeated by Democrats thanks to the deleterious effects of the Trump campaign.

    Actually, this had nothing to do with Drumpf. Kirk had said before the primary election that the Senate should interview and vote on the SCOUTUS nominee. He is what used to be known as a moderate republican running a state that twice voted overwhelmingly for Obama, so I don’t consider his actions out of line with his knowledge of Illinois politics.
    This is compared to McConnell, who is throwing a toddler temper tantrum, and not acting like a MATURE politician/statesman. He is no leader.
    Kirk’s actions won’t cause me vote for him. Prior to being elected Senator, he was the Representative for my congressional district. Didn’t vote for him then either.

  421. blf says

    Apparently, Ozland will be having an election. Sometime. Soon. Why? I dunno. Most Ozlanders probably don’t either.

    In any case, First Dog on the Moon is on the case, What the people of Australia need is — Continuity. And also — Change. But with Continuity (cartoon): “How did Malcolm Turnbull end up with a campaign motto that sitcom writers devised as ‘the most meaningless election slogan’? Introducing the Mottomatic 5000, with built-in teeny-tiny focus group”.

    Turnbull is the current PM, and his slogan is apparently Continuity and Change.

    (The NBN mentioned is a, as I understand it, mostly–non-existent Ozland-wide Intertubes infrastructure.)

  422. blf says

    The (fortunately not nuclear-armed) prototype trum-pratist “government” in Poland, having raided press freedom, judicial independence, and the rule of law, is now planning on raiding the land itself, Poland approves large-scale logging in Europe’s last primeval forest:

    Greenpeace accuses government of ignoring scientists over fate of Białowieża woodland, home to 20,000 animal species and Europe’s tallest trees

    Poland has approved large-scale logging in Europe’s last primeval woodland in a bid to combat a beetle infestation despite protests from scientists, ecologists and the European Union.

    The action in the Białowieża forest is intended to fight the spread of the spruce bark beetle. [or so claims the Polish trum-pratists… –blf]

    [… L]loggers will harvest more than 180,000 cubic metres (6.4m cubic feet) of wood from other areas of the forest over a decade, dwarfing previous plans to harvest 40,000 cubic metres over the same period.

    Vowing to protect the forest, Greenpeace accused [environment minister Jan] Szyszko of “ignoring the voices of citizens and scientists, the European Commission, Unesco and conservation organisations.”

    […]

    Sprawling across 150,000 hectares, the Białowieża forest reaches across the Polish border with Belarus, where it is entirely protected as a nature park.

    It is home to 20,000 animal species, including 250 types of bird and 62 species of mammals — among them Europe’s largest, the bison.

    Europe’s tallest trees, firs towering 50m high (164ft), and oaks and ashes of 40m, also flourish here, in an ecosystem unspoiled for more than 10 millennia.

    The article is, unfortunately, quite short, and does not go into what scientists and others recommend to do about the infestation, nor does it make it attempt to “follow the money” and explain who will be profiting.

  423. says

    Nerd @469, thanks for the correction and additional info.

    blf @471, Sounds like Poland hired the Bundy clan as consultants. I hope Poland gets a lot of pushback. Sounds like Greenpeace is on the case. Officials in Poland need to change their minds about destroying the last primeval woodland. I don’t doubt that they have a beetle infestation. Global warming is accelerating beetle infestations so much in the western USA that in my lifetime I have seen dramatic changes in the backcountry places I love.

  424. says

    Three states are holding Democratic caucuses today: Washington, Alaska and Hawaii. Republicans already held their caucuses in Alaska and Hawaii. Republicans in Washington state will vote in a primary on May 24.

    Polls show Clinton with a narrow lead in Alaska, 44% to 41%. Sixteen delegates are up for grabs.

    In Hawaii we have no polling. 25 delegates.

    In Washington we have no polling since May 2015. 101 delegates, with an expected 66-35 delegate split for the two candidates. Sanders is expected to win. Yesterday, Sanders filled a 54,000 stadium for a rally in Seattle.
    http://www.politicususa.com/2016/03/25/massive-crowd-size-forces-bernie-sanders-delay-start-safeco-field-rally-seattle.html

  425. says

    The real Republican primary is taking place behind closed doors. Political operatives are working hard to influence and to select the delegates who will go to the national convention. A candidate may have won in a state like Alaska, but may not have the majority of the delegates at the convention. Cruz supposedly has 12 delegates going to the convention for him (Trump has supposedly 11 delegates). Rubio had 5 Alaskan delegates who were reallocated because he dropped out. Miraculously, Cruz is no longer the delegate winner in Alaska. Trump and Cruz are tied with 14 delegates each.

    This kind of stuff is going on all over. Ted Cruz gained delegates in Louisiana even though he lost to Trump there. Campaigns are also using all kinds of pressure techniques to place their delegates on the rules, platform and credentials committees. People from Louisiana who are slated to participate in those committees are all Cruz supporters.

    Delegates are not robots, they are people, and they can be persuaded. Trump won in Georgia with 39% of the vote, but it is possible that Georgia’s delegates will not support Trump. Georgia delegates have been organized (reorganized?) by the Ted Cruz campaign. As delegate slates are put together at the state level, the ground beneath Trump is shifting.

    Voters have not voted yet in South Dakota, and yet we see a delegate slate dominated by Cruz supporters.

    Most of the above information is my summary of a segment presented by Rachel Maddow.

    On the Democratic side, what you see is, more or less, what you get. Not so on the Republican side.

  426. blf says

    With a few minor tweaks, Trum-prat releases propaganda film showing Washington under nuclear attack:

    The video, menacingly titled Last Chance, contains a visual history of relations between teh trum-prat and Reality and ends with the US flag in flames

    Teh trum-prat’s campagin released a new propaganda video menacingly titled Last Chance, showing a submarine-launched nuclear missile laying waste to Washington and concluding with the US flag in flames.

    The four-minute video, set to jaunty music, romps through the history of Reality–trump-prat relations and ends with a digitally manipulated sequence showing a missile surging through clouds, swerving back to the earth and slamming into the road in front of Washington’s Lincoln Memorial.

    The US Capitol building explodes in the impact and a message flashes up on the screen in trum-pratian: If Obama realityists budge an inch toward me, I will immediately hit them with nuclear {weapons}.

    The video was published on teh trum-prat’s website […].

    Teh trum-prat has increasingly upped the rhetorical ante in recent weeks, with near daily threats of nuclear and conventional strikes against Reality in response to completely imaginary threats and manipulated fearmongering.

    The threats have turned increasingly personal, and currently concern penis location and size. […]

    In is alarmingly easy to edit news about N.Korea’s antics into a report on teh trum-prat.

  427. says

    The Trum-Prat is scary all right. So are his supporters.

    A 55-year-old man from California was arrested after he threatened to kill Muslims. William Celli had expressed his admiration for Trump many times.

    […] [He] will spend 90 days in jail after being caught in possession of an explosive device and threatening to kill Muslims. […]

    Celli was arrested on Dec. 20, 2015 after yelling “I’m going to kill you all” outside the Islamic Society of West Contra Costa County in Richmond, California. Police later found and detonated an explosive device at Celli’s residence after receiving tips that he was constructing homemade explosives.

    […] “Donald trumps on again I’m happy leaders okay but this guys a great point man I’ll follow this MAN to the end of the world,” Celli wrote on Facebook […] radical rightwing activists are a greater threat to Americans than jihadists, according to recent studies. […]

    Celli’s sentence is lenient in comparison with that of the Duka brothers. Three brothers from this family of Albanian Muslim immigrants are currently serving life sentences (two of the brothers were sentenced to life sentences plus 30 years) for allegedly planning an attack on Fort Dix. The brothers were sentenced despite being caught on tape multiple times denying any intent to undertake such an attack. They were arrested while illegally buying firearms.

    Celli isn’t the first American to get a relatively lenient sentence [90 days in jail, three years probation, banned from posting on Facebook] for threatening Muslims […]

    Think Progress link.

  428. says

    This is a followup to comment 475.

    Both Cruz and Kasich have sent political operatives to South Carolina to try to strip Donald Trump of some of the delegates he won there (50 delegates).

    Those SC delegates are supposed to vote for Trump on the first ballot at the GOP convention, according to the rules. The trick is to persuade the prospective delegates to vote for Cruz or Katich on the second ballot. Well, the first trick is to lobby for the state’s party honchos to pick delegates in the first place that already lean toward Cruz or Kasich.

    Delegates, according to South Carolina’s Republican Party rules, must be chosen from the 925 party honchos who attended the state convention in 2015. The chairman of that convention has made no secret of his dislike of Trump.

    What do the prospective delegates say? Business as usual to their minds. First Congressional District delegate Duffy Lewis said:

    Some people think there’s something dishonest about trying to recruit support. But isn’t that what this is all about?” she wondered. “People who are new to the process, I’m a little concerned that they seem to think there’s some sort of nefarious scheme. I think the rumors are very unproductive. Everyone has to calm down and recognize it’s a normal process.”

  429. says

    We’ve been hearing about the potential for violence at the RNC convention that will be held in Cleveland, Ohio. Donald Trump has almost promised that there will be violence. What could be worse?

    There’s a petition to allow open carry firearms at the Quicken Loan Arena during the July convention. 14,989 people have already signed the petition.

  430. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    There’s a petition to allow open carry firearms at the Quicken Loan Arena during the July convention. 14,989 people have already signed the petition.

    I suspect the Secret Service will have a large say in the final decision.

  431. says

    According to polls, about 63% of Americans seriously dislike Donald Trump. That’s according to Huff Po polls. Other polls show even worse results for Trump:

    This week’s Bloomberg Politics poll was one of Trump’s worst — 29 percent favorable, 68 percent unfavorable — but it also broke out those numbers by its force: 53 percent of respondents said they had a “very unfavorable” view of Trump. […]

  432. says

    Nerd @482, I agree. I don’t expect the petition to succeed. It alarms me though that so many people would even suggest such a stupid course of action.

  433. says

    One of Trump’s son’s gave an interview to a Neo-Nazi. Trump himself has received endorsements from white supremacists like David Duke. Now, two more Trump supporters, and actual Trump surrogates, have promoted Trump on a Neo-Nazi show.

    […] Lynette “Diamond” Hardaway and Rochelle “Silk” Richardson (a.k.a., the “‘Stump for Trump’ girls”) gained national media attention as two YouTube stars who vivaciously expressed their love for Trump and his 2016 presidential campaign.

    They have subsequently been booked to appear on TV news programs to talk about the election and The Donald, in segments that sometimes fly completely off the rails. One such example is an interview on CNN during which they promoted the fringe conspiracy theory that Marco Rubio is a covert homosexuals.

    The two female, African-American, full-time Trump supporters have also become part-time surrogates, firing up crowds at some Trump campaign events […]

    One of their most recent media appearance was on a platform hosted by a Holocaust-denying, Hitler-praising, conspiracy-theory-mongering neo-Nazi.

    In an 18-minute “exclusive” audio interview with John Friend of American Free Press […], Hardaway and Richardson talked Trump, jobs, and immigration, among other topics. […]

    The problem here isn’t as much what the Diamond and Silk duo said. It’s pretty standard, anti-undocumented-immigrant, anti-GOP-elite stuff (perhaps more extreme) […]

    The problem is the interviewer […] You can easily Google for the far-right journalistic output of John Friend, […] a “vir­u­lent anti-Semite and Holo­caust denier.” Friend’s bit on how the “Jews did 9/11” speaks fascistic volumes for itself.

    But the clearest understanding of his worldview comes from the fact that he is an unabashed Hitler fan boy.
    “If you take an objective look at what [Adolf Hitler] did, what he was all about, the policies that he implemented and championed…you will recognize that this man and his movement were the greatest thing that’s happened to Western civilization,” […]

    Way to pander to white supremacists, Trum-Prat.

    The Daily Beast link.

  434. says

    73% of women voters have a negative view of Donald Trump. And, really, a lot of Trump’s dirty laundry has not yet come to these women’s attention.

    […] But Trump’s primary method for asserting dominance was sex. The school’s yearbook—the perfectly named Shrapnel—anointed him the official “ladies man” of the class. He began his lifelong practice of advertising his bedroom exploits as a means of demonstrating his authority over the rest of the locker room. Decades later, he’s still trumpeting his sexual exploits. When Tucker Carlson once mocked him on air, Trump called the pundit and left a voicemail: “It’s true you have better hair than I do. But I get more pussy than you do.” […]

    Slate link.

  435. says

    NBC has called the Alaska Democratic caucus for Bernie Sanders. The race was not as close as polls had predicted. All of the votes are not yet in, but it looks like Sanders will come away with almost 80% of the vote.

    Some media sources have also called the Washington State caucus for Sanders. Only 30% of the vote is in, so I’m not going to predict yet by how much Sanders will win.

    There are no results yet from the Hawaii caucus.

    Just for fun, here is a photo of Democrats voting in Anchorage, Alaska. So many of them showed up to caucus that the Fire Department made them move to the parking lot.

    And, also just for fun, here’s a quote from an voter in Alaska, 66-year-old Bill Heym: “Asked if Sanders could beat Republican front-runner Donald Trump in a general election, Heym said: “I think my mother could beat Donald Trump.”

  436. blf says

    ¡Viva México! Mexicans to burn Donald Trump effigy to celebrate Easter:

    Papier-mache ‘Judas’ figure to be set alight in public square is modelled on Republican presidential hopeful

    Around this time of year, Leonardo Linares likes to get hold of a contentious politician or venal public official, stuff him full of explosives and set him alight.

    This year, the honour will be granted to Donald Trump.

    Linares, like four generations of his family before him, is an artisan in Mexico City who specialises in making papier-mache “Judas” figures to be burned in an Easter weekend tradition enacting Jesus Christ’s victory over evil.

    Generally his effigies portray prominent Mexicans, but this year, Linares decided to look north: Donald Trump’s anti-Mexican comments made him “an ideal candidate” for Judas, he said.

    “With all of the stupid things he has said about Mexicans, I thought people would like to see him burning as Judas,” said Linares.

    […]

    Mexicans have mocked Trump with cartoons, memes and piñatas to be beaten at parties. But over the Easter weekend, his effigy will hang in a public square as a representation of Judas Iscariot […]

    [… T]he choice of Judas is widely seen as a good barometer of social discontent in Mexico and an indicator of the issues that most infuriate the country’s population. […]

    […]

    Linares is not not the only one planning to lampoon Trump. The western city of León has also announced it will burn Trump in effigy.

    The selection of a foreign figure is rare, though Linares says that figures resembling the former US president George W Bush and ex-Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein sold well in 2003. […]

    […]

    This year, Linares said he also planned to ignite a second polemic figure: a masked Isis fighter with devil horns — something he said was inspired by the attacks in Brussels.

    When asked how the group compared to Trump, he responded: “They’re the same.”

    As at least one of the readers comments, Olé!

    There’s actually quite a number of comments complaining this is “evil”, “un-xian”, will only increase the number of trum-prat supporters, or is a plot by the Mexican government, Democratic Party, or Bigfoot.

    Well, Ok, maybe not Bigfoot…

  437. blf says

    California reaches tentative deal to increase minimum wage to $15 an hour:

    Legislators and labor unions agree to take state’s minimum wage from $10 to $15, and if finalized would go to legislature, but some warn ‘this is not a done deal’

    California legislators and labor unions have reached a tentative agreement that will take the state’s minimum wage from $10 to $15 an hour, a state senator said, a move that would make for the largest statewide minimum in the nation by far.

    “This is not a done deal,” senator Mark Leno said on Saturday. “Everyone’s been operating in good faith and we hope to get it through the legislature.”

    Leno said if an agreement is finalized, it would go before the legislature as part of his minimum-wage bill that stalled last year.

    If the legislature approves a minimum-wage package, it would avoid taking the issue to the ballot. One union-backed initiative has already qualified for the ballot, and a second, competing measure is also trying to qualify.

    […]

    Leno did not confirm specifics of the agreement, but most proposals have the wage increasing about a dollar per year until it reaches $15 per hour.

    […]

    At $10 an hour, California already has one of the highest minimum wages in the nation along with Massachusetts. […]

  438. says

    With all three states reporting 100% of the votes, here are the Democratic caucus results.

    Washington State
    Sanders 72.7%
    Clinton 27.1%

    Hawaii
    Sanders 69.8%
    Clinton 30.0%

    Alaska
    Sanders 81.6%
    Clinton 18.4%

    Current delegate count:
    Clinton 1,712
    Sanders 1, 004

    Number of delegates needed for the nomination 2,383. Number of delegates still available, 2,049.

  439. says

    Alpha dog in the sleaze fest, Donald Trump, is still attacking Heidi Cruz.

    Well, there are things about Heidi that I don’t want to talk about, but I’m not going to talk about them. I mean, you know, you can look, but I wouldn’t talk about them.

    The quote is from an interview Trump gave to ABC News.

  440. says

    The stupidity of the Republican presidential candidates is making John Kerry’s job as Secretary of State harder.

    […] Asked on CBS’ “Face the Nation” about the impact of the campaign rhetoric overseas, [Kerry] said the talk “upsets people’s sense of equilibrium about our steadiness, about our reliability.”

    “Everywhere I go, every leader I meet, they ask about what is happening in America,” he said. “They cannot believe it. I think it is fair to say that they’re shocked. They don’t know where it’s taking the United States of America.”

    Kerry defended President Barack Obama’s decision to stick with a trip to Latin America after Tuesday’s deadly terrorist attacks in Brussels — a move that has drawn fire from Republican presidential candidates.

    “My response is to quote Charles Krauthammer: The president of the United States’ schedule is not set by terrorists,” Kerry said, […].

    Politico link.

  441. blf says

    That idiotic petition to have a gunfight at the thugs’s convention (see @480) now has over 24000 signatures (and probably many more by now), Petition to allow guns at Republican convention earns 24,000 signatures:

    Change.org post attacks irresponsible and hypocritical act of choosing gun-free site for party’s gathering, citing ‘direct affront’ to second amendment

    An online petition to allow guns into the Republican National Convention in Cleveland in July has received more than 24,000 signatures in favor of overturning the irresponsible and hypocritical act of selecting a ‘gun-free zone’ for the party’s quadrennial gathering.

    […]

    The petition, posted anonymously to Change.org last week, declares the Cleveland arena’s weapons ban a direct affront to the second amendment and puts all attendees at risk.

    By forcing attendees to leave their firearms at home, the petition continues, the RNC and Quicken Loans Arena are putting tens of thousands of people at risk both inside and outside of the convention site.

    […]

    Every American is endowed with a God-given constitutional right to carry a gun wherever and whenever they please, the author writes.

    […]

    Violence has increasingly plagued Trump’s campaign rallies: supporters have repeatedly assaulted protesters; his campaign manager has been accused of grabbing a reporter; and the candidate has himself said he would like to see protesters punched or roughed up.

    Some commenters on the petition alluded to such incidents, and claimed to have signed the petition because, as one Ohio man put it, “Republicans should face the same dangers that they have inflicted on the general public”.

    […]

    Republicans clashed over guns with local and federal security before the 2012 convention in Tampa, Florida, where secret service agents only allowed law enforcement officers to carry firearms.

    The city’s rules against gun control prohibited its police from enacting a proposal from Republicans to make Tampa a clean zone, prohibiting string and gas masks but not licensed firearms.

    And the readers’s are snarking:

    ● “Every American is endowed with a God-given constitutional right to carry a gun wherever and whenever they please — And God said to Moses “I am who I am, and I’m armed to the teeth. Tell thy people to arm themselves with a faithful caliber gun”.

    ● “What fun is a convention if you can’t get drunk and shoot somebody?”

    ● “Alright!!! Only thing missing is free Jack Daniels and Ted Nugent.”

    ● “I imagine Trump saying at the convention that it’s a great triumph for democracy that those attending won the freedom to carry their guns, at which point he invites the audience to take their guns out and hold them in the air, and thereafter quite a few get accidentally shot while others fire their guns into the air bringing the ceiling down. Those carrying assault weapons keep a watchful eye out for any protesters.”

    ● “[…] It’s up to 36,000 signatures now.
      “I doubt many of the signers really want to see the GOP convention turned into a Quentin Tarantino wet dream. But they do want to see the GOP live with the same risky rules they want to inflict on the rest of us.”

    ● “Isn’t Trump afraid that somebody might panic and shoot that thing that’s crawling around on his head?”

    ● “Why is it ‘open carry’ and not ‘openly carry’?”
    One reply: “home skooling”.
    Another reply: “Trump’s supporters can’t understand adverbs.”

    ● “Oh this is just too ludicrous. […] Carrying a gun is a GOD given right???? Seriously!!!”
    Reply: “Yes, obviously, since God herself packs a Smith & Wesson.”
    Reply: “[…] ever wondered how Jesus was able to turn over the tables of the moneylenders? Jesus & the Disciple Crew walked in with their Kalashnikovs. […]”
    Reply: “WRONG. The bible clearly states that Jesus only carried American made weapons.”

    ● “It would be of greater benefit to the Republican Party if their delegates took their brains to the convention and left their guns at home instead of the other way round.”
    Reply: “What brains?”
    Reply: “The ones they ate, from the victims who couldn’t outrun them.”
    Reply: “Trouble is, even the ones who possess a brain as well as a gun are out of practice using it.”

    ● “[…] I think every Republican is well aware that the Secret Service is Obama’s secret police. They should oppose those gun snatchers just like the brave heros in Oregon peacefully stood up against that tyrant wildlife sanctuary by bringing their God blessed AR15s to the convention.”

    ● “Strange priorities, but easier than solving real problems.”
    In reply: “Sounds like a solution to the one of America’s biggest current problems — live Republicans.”

    ● “Not a surprise since Republican’s are intent on shooting themselves in the foot”.

    ● “[…] In Wyatt Earp’s day, you had to ‘check’ your guns before entering town, but now carrying them is apparently compulsory. Advance America?”

    ● “Michael Mouse from Disney, Florida has signed. Is he a nominee?”

    ● “How much more juvenile can the American right get?”

    ● “someone just needs to yell ‘there’s a terrorist!’ and then duck.”

    ● “As any good creation scientist can tell you ‘Trial by Combat’ was employed in the Middle Ages and can be again today because God never ever lets the bad guy win.
      “This would also save a lot of money spent on primary campaigning. Cost of arming one’s partisans would be a fraction of the cost. And in the GOP many already are well-armed.
      “Once we’ve seen how it works at conventions, we can use it in the general election. If the ‘election’ were televised, it’s certain to be a ratings hit. The proceeds from the sale of commercials could be used to retire the national debt.
      “God-ordained government and a debt free America would be the result.”

    ● “Instead of demanding the right to bring guns, they should be demanding the right to debate and formulate policy — but evidently that’s not quite as important.”

    ● “Does the second amendment allow for firing the firearm in the air and shouting yea-haw due to excitement?”
    In reply: “Yosemite Sam is a good image for the republican party.”

    ● “Once you invoke a God-given constitutional right, sanity and reason magically evaporate.”
    In reply: “No, no, this is totally legit. An invisible superhero in the sky told me it’s my right. *pew, pew, pew!*”

    ● “Has America gone mad?”
    In reply “New to the planet huh?”

    ● “Yahoo Republicans!”
    In reply: “And conversely.”

    ● “Feel bored because there is no war in your country? Call the NRA –heehaw– to set up mass shootings at your political conventions with your favourite candidate!”

    As several of the readers point out, you should be very very cautious about signing that petition as a joke — the Secret Service obviously isn’t going to allow any such thing so there is a low-ish risk of actually contributing to a circular firing squad — because it will almost certainly be interpreted as mass support for carrying openly, yadda, yadda, yadda…

  442. blf says

    A bit of a follow-up to @492, John Kerry: presidential campaign descending into ’embarrassment’ for US (I’ve redacted most of the article, see @492):

    Secretary of state says world leaders are’ shocked’ as Republican candidates Ted Cruz and Donald Trump defend plans to combat terror and focus on Muslims
    […]
    The secretary of state also defended Barack Obama’s conduct in the immediate aftermath of the [Brussels] attacks, which occurred while he was on the first diplomatic visit to Cuba by a sitting president since 1928. Republicans heaped scorn on the president for attending a baseball game on the afternoon of the attacks, a long-planned event to celebrate new relations with Havana.

    “Life doesn’t stop because one terrible incident takes place in one place,” said Kerry, who was also in the stands that day. “The president of the United States’ schedule is not set by terrorists.”

    Some readers’s comments:

    ● “Cruz: We can’t be forced to live under Sharia law.
      “Trump: I don’t think America’s a safe place for Americans.
      “Sure — Sharia legislation almost passed by a whisker last week in Congress, right? As for safety in America, the biggest enemy is the NRA. Plenty of reasons for embarrassment when these two jokers are the best the GOP can offer.”

    ● “Republicans heaped scorn on the president for attending a baseball game on the afternoon of the attacks, a long-planned event to celebrate new relations with Havana — Because Republicans really care about what happens in Belgium. Arseholes.”

    ● “Between Cruz and Trump, it’s a like a choice between a toaster in the bath tub or the third rail.”
    In reply: “A tongue on the third rail.”

    ● “We live on planet earth with a population of 7 billion people. America has a population of about 320 million which makes up about 3% of the world’s population. Of that population about 90% of Americans could be on Mars, they know so little about this enormous culture of other humans on earth outside the US.”
    [As an aside, if my memory is correct, it has been estimated that only c.10% of the people born in the USA have ever traveled outside the USA; indeed, something like only c.16% of citizens have a passport (which is an improvement from c.12% of a decade-or-so ago) — so that “90% could be on Mars” jibe is, in a sense, not-inaccurate –blf]

    ● “America definitely is unsafe for Americans. The number of people killed and injured by firearms clearly demonstrates the lack of safety.”

    ● “[…] What’s happening with the GOP is possibly the most embarrassing episode in American politics in my lifetime. My American friends here can’t stop laughing. What would the response be, I wonder, if someone said that they wanted to carpet bomb the USA? Cruz is trying to out-Trump Trump, but you can’t out-parody parody itself.”

    ● “The more you hear from Cruz, the more you realise just how dangerous and unstable this guy is.
      “Forced to live under Sharia law???
      “This creep will press the button without a second thought”.

  443. says

    Democratic women running for office:

    Catherine Cortez Masto, former attorney general of Nevada. She is running for the Senate to replace Harry Reid, who is retiring. Representative Joe Heck and wing-nut extraordinaire Sharron Angle are her Republican opponents.

    Ann Kirkpatrick is opposing John McCain in Arizona. She is currently an Arizona Representative. She is running for the Senate.

    New Hampshire Governor Maggie Hassan is running for the Senate to replace Tea Party wing-nut Kelly Ayotte.

    Congresswoman Tammy Duckworth is running for an Illinois Senate seat. Her opponent if Senator Mrk Kirk, a guy who said, “the black community” is one “we drive faster through.” Kirk is also a Trump supporter. Duckworth is veteran of the Iraq war, and she is currently a Congressional Representative from Illinois.

    Deborah Ross is running for a Senate seat from North Carolina. She is an attorney who was also a member of the North Carolina General Assembly for 10 years. She is a strong advocate for civil rights and for women’s reproductive rights.

    Donna Edwards is running for a Senate seat from Maryland. Donna Edwards is black and progressive and a woman, a category not currently represented in the Senate since the election of Carol Moseley-Braun. She is running to replace Senator Mikulski who is retiring.

    Two women are vying to replace Senator Boxer who is retiring, Kamala Harris and Loretta Sanchez. Harris has Indian-American and African American heritage. Sanchez is Mexican-American.

    Katie McGinty is running in Pennsylvania.

    Patty Murray is running for re-election in Washington.

    Caroline Fayard is an oddity, a Democrat who is “pro-life and pro-business.” She is running in Louisiana.

    You can find more information here:
    http://www.emilyslist.org/candidates/gallery/senate

  444. says

    More bomb blasts, plus some disgusting rightwing reaction in Brussels:

    A spokesman for the Punjab government says that a bomb attack on a park in the Pakistani city of Lahore has killed 60 people and injured 300. […]

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/pakistan-lahore-bomb-blast

    A Brussels square that has been a memorial site turned agitated on Sunday when black-clad men started shouting slogans and carrying a banner with an expletive against the Islamic State group. […]

    Riot squads joined plainclothes policemen to move the protesters away from the square. A water cannon sprayed the protesters.

    The anti-IS rally came despite government appeals not to hold a march against fear Sunday in Brussels since the security forces were stretched too thinly to provide security.

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/brussels-memorial-site-protesters

    The rightwing protestors screamed insults at Muslims and at anyone they thought looked like a Muslim.

  445. says

    Well, this is new. Trump has finally ruled something out: internment camps for American Muslims.

    […] “Would you categorically rule out the idea of internment camps for American Muslims?” ABC News’ “This Week” host Jonathan Karl asked Trump.

    “I would rule it out, but we would have to be very vigilant. We’re going to have to be very smart,” Trump said. “We’re going to have to be very rigid, very vigilant. And if we’re not very, very strong and very, very smart, we have a big, big problem coming up. We’ve already had the problem. Check out the World Trade Center, OK.”

    “Check out the Pentagon,” he continued. “We’ve already had the problem.”

    Link.

  446. says

    President Obama’s administration issued a statement condemning the attack in Pakistan (see comment 496).

    This cowardly act in what has long been a scenic and placid park has killed dozens of innocent civilians and left scores injured. We send our deepest condolences to the loved ones of those killed, just as our thoughts and prayers are with the many injured in the explosion.

  447. says

    Donald Trump gave to interviews to editorial boards (Washington Post, and The New York Times). It did not go well. Here is Jeffrey Goldberg’s take:

    I gleaned that he has no understanding of the post-war international order that was created by the United States, that he has no understanding of why we maintain alliances with such treaty partners as Japan and South Korea, Britain, NATO, and the importance of maintaining those stable relationships with other democracies, shows that he has no idea of nuclear doctrine. […]. It was really remarkable to imagine that someone who shows so little interest in understanding why the world is organized the way it is organized is this close to the presidency of the world’s only superpower.

    The quote is from an interview on CBS’s Face the Nation. Goldberg is a writer for The Atlantic.

  448. says

    Andria Mitchell was, like Jeffrey Goldberg, not impressed with Trump’s bizarre interviews with the editorial board of The Washington Post and The New York Times:

    […] He cannot stick to a subject. It is remarkable. And when he doesn’t know something, he just changes the subject, makes it all about himself. […]

    And then The New York Times, David Sanger, Maggie Haberman, do an interview with him, a 90-minute interview and it’s in today’s paper and online. And the transcript, if you read the transcript online, he would cancel defense treaties with Japan and South Korea against North Korea. He doesn’t mind, he would be okay if Japan and South Korea go nuclear. American policy for decades since World War II has been trying to keep nukes out of that arena.

    He would stop importing oil from Saudi Arabia if they don’t pay more for their defense. We need oil. We are not energy independent. We rely on oil still for our daily needs.

    He is completely all over the lot on Iran. He believes — he complained that Iran isn’t buying our planes. It had to be pointed out to him that Iran is still under sanctions and cannot buy American planes.

    He thinks North Korea and Iran are the biggest trading partners when North Korea’s biggest trading partner is China. He is completely uneducated about any part of the world.

    Way to go Andrea, you told it like it is.

    The quoted text is from today’s “Meet the Press” show, with Chuck Todd hosting.