Look at this: no originality at all. The wanna-bes and poseurs all have to dress up in their idol’s fashions, even if it is cross-phylum dressing.
(via NatGeo)
(Also on Sb)
Frequently Read Threads
Commenting Rules
The Desert Tortoises With Boltcutters Civility Pledge
[Introductions]: Meet the other commenters
The [Lounge]: a safe space; friendly chat; moderated
The [Thunderdome]: no-holds-barred unmoderated chaos

PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
![]()
Chris Clarke is a science and natural history writer, editor, and
environmental protection activist in Joshua Tree, California.
• Coyote Crossing
• my writing
at KCET
• Desert Biodiversity
• Facebook
• Twitter
• Google
Plus
• Walking
With Zeke
• Walking
With Zeke (iBookstore)
© 2013 Pharyngula.


13 comments
Skip to comment form ↓
Glen Davidson
13 January 2012 at 12:35 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Just like Martin Luther (reportedly) thought that the devil shouldn’t have all of the good music, I can’t see why invertebrates ought to have all of the cool colors and stripes.
So that’s actually me mimicking a jawfish mimicking a mimic octopus mimicking a sea snake. They can’t sue if they can’t use language.
Glen Davidson
Brownian
13 January 2012 at 12:47 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
I was going to ask “Who mimics the mimics”, but now I see it’s Glen.
w00dview
13 January 2012 at 12:50 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Ah teleosts, by far my favourite group of vertebrates. Adaptable, varied, bizarre and can exploit whatever food source there is in an aquatic environment. Mix them with my favourite cephalopod and you get awesomeness.
The paper which describes this interaction says that this species of jawfish only mimics the octopus in areas where they coexist. While that is stating the obvious, the mimic octopus occurs in the Indo-Malay region, the black marbled jawfish has a distribution range from Japan to Australia. This suggest that this mimicry is opportunistic, cool stuff.
We Are Ing
13 January 2012 at 12:55 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Actually it isn’t obvious really. It would be possible for it to be an incidental mimicry if we saw it in non-overlaping areas. The fact that it is only in over-laping ones suggests that it is indeed the octopus that is being mimicked and not a third object!
Irene Delse
13 January 2012 at 1:27 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Strategies to reduce your attractivity to predators:
A) Be poisonous. (Doesn’t do much for your survival if the predator only comes to realise its error after eating you.)
B) Be poisonous and advertise it with brightly coloured patterns. (More efficient, but expensive in genetic and metabolic resources.)
C) Skip the poison, just use a similar pattern to that of a species not attractive to predators. (Sounds good, except that now you’re limited by the look you’re born with. What if you’re mimicking a species that’s not common in your environment because of genetic drift, or climate change, or overfishing, or whatever? The local predators won’t have a clue and you’ll risk getting eaten.)
D) Change patterns to model your appearance on the local species that predators tend to avoid, for some reason. (May be the most complicated at the cellular and molecular level, but both efficient and versatile. Works for mimics of non-poisonous species too. Added bonus: no phylum limit!)
Sounds safe, unless of course your predators are those pesky Homo sapiens with their stereo vision and high pattern recognition.
billygutter01
13 January 2012 at 2:57 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
I’m attempting to mimic a Pharyngula commenter who has something insightful and witty to add:
……………..
*sigh*
I fail as a mimic and a vertebrate.
Brownian
13 January 2012 at 3:01 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
That’s a pretty tall order. I avoid the issue by mimicking a Pharyngula commenter who has something smartassed and profane to add. Most of the time I simply aim for one or the other.
laurentweppe
13 January 2012 at 7:21 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
That’s because Homo Sapiens went for methods E:
Evolve a big brain, cheat by inventing tools which will always make you the strongest kid on the block, then take over the top of the food chain by either exterminating or domesticating anyone who got a shot at eating you Extremely efficient, although whether it can remain so on the long term as yet to be ascertained, as being the almighty super-predator seems to give the species a tendancy to slaughter itself, exhaust its ressources and screw up its own ecological niche.
billyjoe
13 January 2012 at 8:16 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
I’m amazed everyone picked up on the fact that this is an example of mimicry of mimicry.
jstackpo
13 January 2012 at 9:31 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
#9 BillyJoe:
No call for amazement. Catlover Coyne ran the same video a few days ago:
http://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2012/01/05/fish-mimics-a-mimic-octopus/
craigore
14 January 2012 at 1:11 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
That is a beautiful mimic right there. “just a little closer and I HAVE you.”
craigore
14 January 2012 at 1:57 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
@Irene,
“Sounds safe, unless of course your predators are those pesky Homo sapiens with their stereo vision and high pattern recognition.”
also we pesky anthropos make the best mimics. we have become quite studied through intense ongoing documentation and manipulation of the environment to figure out what it takes to succeed at it.
josephgoodrich
14 January 2012 at 7:17 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
ZELIG!