Man, you’re a ferocious and mouthy bunch. You gave me links to a lot of excellent comments, and I pared them down to these eight (next time, I might cut them down more). The next step: vote by leaving a comment with the number of the nomination you like best. These are just short excerpts, you’ll have to click on them to read the whole thing.
Comments have been disabled.
DONORS CHOOSE CHALLENGE
About the Author
Freethought Blogs
- A Citizen of Earth
- A Million Gods
- Ace of Clades
- Alethian Worldview
- Almost Diamonds
- Ashley Miller
- Biodork
- Black Skeptics
- Blag Hag
- Brute Reason
- Butterflies and Wheels
- Comradde PhysioProffe
- Dispatches from the Culture Wars
- En Tequila Es Verdad
- Greta Christina's Blog
- Heteronormative Patriarchy for Men
- Lousy Canuck
- Mano Singham
- Maryam Namazie
- Near-Earth Object
- No Country for Women
- NonStampCollector
- Pharyngula
- Reasonable Doubts
- Richard Carrier Blogs
- Rock Beyond Belief
- Sincerely, Natalie Reed
- The Atheist Experience
- The Crommunist Manifesto
- The Digital Cuttlefish
- The Indelible Stamp
- The Zingularity
- This Week in Christian Nationalism
- Token Skeptic
- YEMMYnisting
- Zinnia Jones
PostsCommentsArchives
Recent Comments
- hyperdeath on But they mispronounce “aluminum”!
- Nick Gotts (formerly KG) on But they mispronounce “aluminum”!
- thedude on Mere atheism
- Nick Gotts (formerly KG) on But they mispronounce “aluminum”!
- John Morales on [Lounge #419]
FTB RecentFTB Active
FTB Recent
- We Have Special Geologist Vision by Dana Hunter
- Friday Cephalopod: Super-powers! by PZ Myers
- What have you done that atheists can't? by PZ Myers
- But they mispronounce “aluminum”! by PZ Myers
- One world. One passport. by Taslima Nasreen
- Help This Desert Kit Fox Study Get Moving by Chris Clarke
FTB Active
- [Lounge #419] by PZ Myers
- Open thread on episode #814 by heicart
- Cis people: Help me get a sense of the landscape out there! by Zinnia
- Taking it Personally: Privilege and Women in Secularism by Ashley F. Miller
- Intersectionality? It's been a privilege by Ally Fogg
- #RDFbullies by Ophelia Benson
Profile
Frequently Read Threads
Commenting Rules
The Desert Tortoises With Boltcutters Civility Pledge
[Introductions]: Meet the other commenters
The [Lounge]: a safe space; friendly chat; moderated
The [Thunderdome]: no-holds-barred unmoderated chaos

PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
• my calendar
• Nature Network
• RichardDawkins Network
• MySpace
• Atheist Nexus
• the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)
•
![]()
Chris Clarke is a science and natural history writer, editor, and
environmental protection activist in Joshua Tree, California.
• Coyote Crossing
• my writing
at KCET
• Desert Biodiversity
• Facebook
• Twitter
• Google
Plus
• Walking
With Zeke
• Walking
With Zeke (iBookstore)
I reserve the right to publicly post, with full identifying information about the source, any email sent to me that contains threats of violence.
Recent Comments
- hyperdeath on But they mispronounce “aluminum”!
- Nick Gotts (formerly KG) on But they mispronounce “aluminum”!
- thedude on Mere atheism
- Nick Gotts (formerly KG) on But they mispronounce “aluminum”!
- John Morales on [Lounge #419]
- Nick Gotts (formerly KG) on [Lounge #419]
- Nick Gotts (formerly KG) on [Lounge #419]
- John Morales on But they mispronounce “aluminum”!
- John Morales on What have you done that atheists can’t?
- Nick Gotts (formerly KG) on What have you done that atheists can’t?
- Banecroft on Help This Desert Kit Fox Study Get Moving
- Banecroft on What have you done that atheists can’t?
- Nick Gotts (formerly KG) on But they mispronounce “aluminum”!
- John Morales on Mere atheism
- thedude on Mere atheism



122 comments
Skip to comment form ↓
John Morales
5 September 2012 at 9:39 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
6
tytalus
5 September 2012 at 9:43 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
2
Caine, Fleur du mal
5 September 2012 at 9:44 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Number 4.
markr1957 Inc.
5 September 2012 at 9:44 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
4
John Phillips, FCD
5 September 2012 at 9:52 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
#5
It can’t be repeated enough. But I’ll be honest, it was difficult to pick an outright winner as they are all excellent and valuable comments, it’s just I have a thing about torture and those who twist and turn to try and justify it.
FlyingToaster
5 September 2012 at 9:52 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
7
sadunlap
5 September 2012 at 9:57 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
#7
2nd choice: #2.
Suido
5 September 2012 at 10:16 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
2.
mythbri
5 September 2012 at 10:20 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
4
chigau (違わない)
5 September 2012 at 10:25 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Is this meant to be easier?
4
Evil Laura
5 September 2012 at 10:45 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
4
Amphiox
5 September 2012 at 10:47 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
4, 8 and 6.
In that rank order.
Usernames are smart
5 September 2012 at 10:48 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
10
I was waffling between two and four when I got to ten. The “pets” part was the clincher.
despard
5 September 2012 at 10:48 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
4
rogiriverstone
5 September 2012 at 10:49 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
1 cuz not enuff of your readers r GenderQueer, so won’t vote for it. The majority is often wrong.
Usernames are smart
5 September 2012 at 10:49 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Damn, wtf. I mean 7
Crissa
5 September 2012 at 10:58 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Darn, that’s a hard choice. I don’t know if I need to choose #1, although it’s true, the ownership of ‘transgender’ to mean those with a variant gender specifically over others has fallen in disuse. I’ve made that exact speech to real people in a real venue before… But that was over fifteen years ago. Now a days we can say ‘transwoman’ and ‘transman’ without needing an asterisk or aside to define it in most conversation. The world we live in today is far more informed and awesome than the one of twenty years ago.
And then, I’ve also made the point in #3, but never so eloquently. That’s just so detailed and with depth I don’t think I’d have followed through on.
So many good nominees.
I gota go with #3 as well-thought enough to be its own blog post.
consciousness razor
5 September 2012 at 10:59 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
4
voyager
5 September 2012 at 11:05 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
#4
Badland
5 September 2012 at 11:11 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
4
katkinkate
5 September 2012 at 11:14 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
I like 6 and 2 as a second preference.
donaji
5 September 2012 at 11:15 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
4, then 3.
magistramarla
5 September 2012 at 11:26 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
#6
strange gods before me ॐ
5 September 2012 at 11:30 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Tough choice. I like 1, 8 and 4, but I learned the most from
1.
brazenlucidity
5 September 2012 at 11:31 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
5
Tuppy Glossop
5 September 2012 at 11:32 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
4
Jason Dick
5 September 2012 at 11:34 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
2
Hatchetfish
5 September 2012 at 11:39 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
4
Hammer of dog
5 September 2012 at 11:42 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
#3
That was a well reasoned interpretation of the intent of the 2nd amendment.
I am so tired of this “I have the right to bear arms well beyond what I would need for personal protection, sport/target shooting, and/or hunting. I need to have the power to protect myself from my government.” Good luck with that. Got nukes?
upagainsttheropes
6 September 2012 at 12:10 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
funny i keep coming here thinking i’ll get realtime reaction to the real world but no it’s fuckfest of self flagellation
#sandra fluke #megyn kelly
shit this ain’t twitter
wytchy
6 September 2012 at 12:12 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
6.
natashatasha
6 September 2012 at 12:12 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
#4
Quinn Martindale
6 September 2012 at 12:15 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
1
McC2lhu saw what you did there.
6 September 2012 at 12:20 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
#2 – Erista’s post was the most insightful view into genuine emotion and reasoning behind the fear and anger rape victims are burdoned by every day. Anyone unsympathetic after reading that would have to be an immensely callous and vile personality.
screechymonkey
6 September 2012 at 12:34 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
#4
shripathikamath
6 September 2012 at 12:37 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
6 (SIX). Oh c’mon, it has to be #6.
lexie
6 September 2012 at 12:44 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
4
Menyambal --- Sambal's Little Helper
6 September 2012 at 12:48 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Hey, number 3 is me. Thanks, John Morales.
I like number 7.
Avenel
6 September 2012 at 1:04 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
I have to go with #6.
redwood
6 September 2012 at 1:28 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
#5 for me.
Susannah
6 September 2012 at 1:44 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
#6
echidna
6 September 2012 at 1:46 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
4 and 5.
StevoR
6 September 2012 at 1:51 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
From later on in choice 2 there :
(Comment #478. Erista aka Eris.)
This. So powerfully highlighting the effect on real individuals when they get so much undeserved, wrong and just vile hatred spewed continually their way by truly disgusting trolls and scumbags. Powerful, moving stuff that should make anyone stop in their tracks and really think.
Especially in light of what we witnessed yesterday from Jen McCreight :
http://freethoughtblogs.com/blaghag/2012/09/goodbye-for-now/
http://freethoughtblogs.com/lousycanuck/2012/09/05/congratulations-to-team-douchebag-on-their-first-major-victory/
http://freethoughtblogs.com/almostdiamonds/2012/09/05/must-be-this-tough-to-ride/
(Warning lots of possibly triggering evidence eps. on the last link.)
So my vote is for (2) to win the New Molly Award gold medal.
With (4) as my choice for silver and the informative historical (1) getting my bronze medal place.
Beatrice
6 September 2012 at 1:56 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
4
5 (if you decide to take more than one vote per person into account)
giantpanda
6 September 2012 at 1:57 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
6
tort
6 September 2012 at 2:08 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
2 and 4
clarysage
6 September 2012 at 2:12 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
2
Paul Durrant
6 September 2012 at 2:27 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
2
piegasm
6 September 2012 at 2:34 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
#2
Maarja
6 September 2012 at 2:36 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
first choice: 2
second choice: 6
Amateur Hour
6 September 2012 at 2:54 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
#4
And, if it doesn’t win, I will still quote them at every appropriate instance.
#4
rpolak
6 September 2012 at 3:18 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
7
mikmik
6 September 2012 at 3:24 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Y’know, it’s hard enough to whittle it down to 8, let alone 1, as almost every time I read a couple of threads here, I find eloquent and brilliant comments and rebuttals. That said, this person almost never fails to do so – ever.
#6Sigh. #2 Eloquent emotion.
Nancy New, Queen of your Regulatory Nightmare
6 September 2012 at 3:24 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
7 as the tie-breaker between 2 and 4.
echidna
6 September 2012 at 3:29 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
I’ve just read 2 (again) and am kicking myself that I didn’t vote for it. There are good reasons to vote for every single one of the entries.
eachknee
6 September 2012 at 3:36 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
As one with a long list of credentials in the field, I must say #3 caught my attention immediately for its almost incredible, tragically misinformed, profoundly shallow ignorance of the history and meaning of weapon use by Homo sapiens sapiens (a knowledgeable tool-using primate– get it?). And I shall resist the urge to debate the topic here for the same reasons and with the same tenacity that certain evolutionary biologists resist debating ID with creationist fucktards. The other comments are rather good. NB: when I click on #2 it goes to #4 (#4 is great). #5 is close to me too, been there. I like #6 also……and #1, #7, #8…. OK
#5, #6
Please not #3, it is very wrong. Thanks
strange gods before me ॐ
6 September 2012 at 3:37 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Oh, if anybody feels like updating it to reflect the new process, there’s this:
http://pharyngula.wikia.com/wiki/Order_of_the_Molly
Shplane, Spess Alium
6 September 2012 at 3:43 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
#6
feedmybrain
6 September 2012 at 3:55 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
8
NuMad
6 September 2012 at 4:50 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
8.
Lyn M: Necrodunker of death, nothing but net
6 September 2012 at 5:04 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
2.
Can’t think of a better way to make the problem clear than Erista’s comment.
But I would really like to vote for them all. It was most affecting to read these comments all together. Logic, feeling, intelligence, learning, coherence, elegance. All of those in these comments.
puppygod
6 September 2012 at 5:09 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
#5
Hard to choose, there’s many good entries. Number 5, because that’s the point that needs to be reapeated – It. Does. Not. Work.
johnmorgan
6 September 2012 at 5:23 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
4
But I really dislike FPTP ballots, as there are other worthy choices here, I like both 2 and 3 almost as much as 4.
Can’t you find some geek to whip up a program for you, one containing an algorithm to perform Condorcet elections?
aleph squared
6 September 2012 at 5:59 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
4
vaiyt
6 September 2012 at 6:30 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
2
(torn between 2 and 4 actually; I like the I’m-not-taking-this-shit honest tone of 4. I considered 5 for the longest time because it puts in a good argument what I’m tired of saying about torture…)
Fleegman
6 September 2012 at 6:32 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Erista’s at #2
Fucking awesome, and I wish there were a way to get it tattooed in mirror writing to the chests of all the assholes defending that fucking “joke.”
StarStuff, a soulless cunt
6 September 2012 at 6:40 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
4 was great.
Audley Z. Darkheart: My name is Legion, for we are many
6 September 2012 at 6:44 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
4!
Alethea summed the up why the whole stupid “but what about the stupid slut who changes her mind in the 9th month??” anti-abortion “argument” is offensive and ridiculous in one righteous post.
♥
schweinhundt
6 September 2012 at 7:27 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
5. It is both accurate and succinct.
schweinhundt
6 September 2012 at 7:27 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Missed irony alert: Not making the anti-gun piece choice #2.
Loud - warm smiles do not make you welcome here
6 September 2012 at 7:34 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Number 2, definitely.
If that comment does not get through to ‘rape joke’ people, then nothing will.
billhaines
6 September 2012 at 7:52 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
6
ButchKitties
6 September 2012 at 8:03 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
4
tlorquin
6 September 2012 at 8:04 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
4 though difficult to select just one.
roxolan
6 September 2012 at 8:04 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
6
richvr
6 September 2012 at 8:14 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
7
Negathle
6 September 2012 at 8:33 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
6
Louis
6 September 2012 at 8:36 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
4 for me!
Louis
AylaSophia
6 September 2012 at 8:48 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
It was a tough call, but had to go with
6
hanchman
6 September 2012 at 8:48 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
4
Ibis3, member of the Oppressed Sisterhood fanclub
6 September 2012 at 8:49 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
#4
But I bookmarked several of the others.
nathanieltagg
6 September 2012 at 8:51 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
I love this new system. I usually don’t have the werewithal to dig into the comments section, so this is a great way to see some gems.
I’ll go with
4
carlie
6 September 2012 at 8:55 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
4
But if I’m allowed a second vote,
2
Stephen T
6 September 2012 at 9:04 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
4
Jerry
6 September 2012 at 9:15 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
5.
Second choice 2,
then 3,
then 8.
I was thinking that it is So hard to pick just one, when I realized the question must be asked…
PZ, why *are* you limiting this to just one award when there are so many so very eloquent entries? The fact that you had so much trouble deciding, as well as many of your regular commenters, means multiple entries deserve recognition. Maybe next time, there will be zero, also deservedly so.
alexanderz
6 September 2012 at 9:25 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
4
xmnr
6 September 2012 at 10:10 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Split my vote between 2 & 4.
But I’d also like to make a special note for #1.
I am exceptionally ignorant of the trans* community, and over the last few months my ignorance has been reduced by posts like #1.
neXus
6 September 2012 at 10:52 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
#5
Gregory Greenwood
6 September 2012 at 10:57 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
My first vote is for 4.
Should I be allowed further votes (pretty please), then my second vote is for 2, and my third for 6.
All the posts are great, but those are my top three.
That said, I also really like 1, because it taught me much about the history of trans* as a term…
And 3 was fantastic because it laid out the case against the claims that the notional ‘right to bear arms’ should be viewed as an inviolate so well…
Also, in an age where things like waterboarding still happen even in the US, 5 makes vital points about the inefficacy of torture as anything other than a tool of fear and oppression…
And you’ve got to love 7 – keep the Oogedy Boogedy death cults away from me too…
As for number 8, it is simply all kinds of win, pointing out the strengths of the scientific method whilst simultaneously calling Joey to account for arguing in bad faith and not knowing what ‘playing devil’s advocate’ actually means – what’s not to like…?
OK, I have to stop now.
4, 2, 6 – those are my picks. I am going to leave before I am tempted to change my mind again, or I take it into my head to rank all eight comments and try to squeeze in a vote for each…
Actually, now that I think about it, that’s not such a bad idea…
chrisj
6 September 2012 at 11:28 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Ouch; that’s a hard choice. Why so many smart people saying interesting, well-thought-out, and solidly evidenced things? Is this [looks around suspiciously, takes straw out of mouth] some kind of sciency place?
That said, number 4 gets my vote.
baal
6 September 2012 at 11:34 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
#7 please and thank you.
twincats
6 September 2012 at 11:37 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
#6
Randomfactor
6 September 2012 at 11:39 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
4.
eriktrips
6 September 2012 at 12:13 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
2.
second choice:
4.
Krasnaya Koshka
6 September 2012 at 12:22 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
4
woodsong
6 September 2012 at 12:25 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
So hard to choose! I do like them all.
I’ll go with 4, 2, 3 and 5, in that order. And I secobd the call for multiple awards!
Jamie
6 September 2012 at 12:33 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Good choices. I’d rank them 5,6,2,8. If I had to go with one, I’d just pick 5.
Also, did I miss a post where quotes were submitted for Phase II of the new Mollies? I had some choice quotes I’d saved somewhere.
cicely (Something Dark and Humorously Mordanted)
6 September 2012 at 12:35 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Damn, this is a tough choice to make!
*reading entries*
Oh, man….
*re-reading entries*
I’m going to go with Anne C. Hanna’s performance in #6, “The demands religion makes on human sexuality are unreasonable.” My second choice would be #4, “Why are you so damned insistent on finding that one special circumstance when it’s morally OK for you to do something horrific to me?“, by Alethea.
-
That’s the problem….
-
bluescreenlife
6 September 2012 at 1:23 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
#4
jefrir
6 September 2012 at 1:53 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
4, closely followed by 2.
Also, you all need to stop being so fucking awesome, you’re making it hard to choose.
fastlane
6 September 2012 at 2:58 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
I’m going to buck the tide and vote #2.
Wild old caveman, now less rancid
6 September 2012 at 3:15 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
7
jedimasteryoda
6 September 2012 at 3:44 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
4
That post and thread really brought home to me why pontificating about hypothetical situations can’t inform or change a bodily rights based (the only one that matters) prochoice position.
Stevarious
6 September 2012 at 3:47 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
4
carovee
6 September 2012 at 4:15 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
#2 hands down. Hand me in tears.
meandmine
6 September 2012 at 5:10 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
6
ladyh42
6 September 2012 at 5:40 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
#4
opposablethumbs
6 September 2012 at 5:52 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
4
Tethys
6 September 2012 at 6:22 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
4
6
cm's changeable moniker
6 September 2012 at 6:34 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
4
44
4444
4444444444
(Sorry, I’m channeling Data in Cause and Effect. Except 4, not 3.)
Margaret
6 September 2012 at 6:52 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
4. If I get a second vote, then 2.
joed
6 September 2012 at 7:27 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
5
verbascum
6 September 2012 at 8:26 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
4
Larry Poppins
6 September 2012 at 9:01 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
#4
Hekuni Cat, MQG
6 September 2012 at 9:34 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Number 4
echolocation
6 September 2012 at 9:39 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
3
WMDKitty (Always growing and learning)
7 September 2012 at 12:42 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
4
Marie the Bookwyrm
7 September 2012 at 1:56 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Still taking votes?
NUMBER 4!
katchen
7 September 2012 at 3:58 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
6, by a whisker; 2 and 4 if we get multiple votes – 1 was also an outstanding comment.
Not an easy choice.
didgen
7 September 2012 at 4:20 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
2
Crip Dyke, MQ, Right Reverend Feminist FuckToy of Death & Her Handmaiden
7 September 2012 at 1:43 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Okay, I’ve read them all now, and some of the context precomment for almost all.
Here’s what I’ve concluded & I wondered if anyone else noticed:
When you combine #4 with #5 you think that they belong in exactly the same thread. Hypothetical fantasies about when I can take over your body w/ regard to sex, pregnancy, and (ultimately) rape in one bleed over using the concept of assault into hypotheticals about, “Can’t I just torture the bearded guy if we assume X?” It’s another hypothetical obsessing over what opportunities one might have to do horrible things because someone is just not satisfied with the answer, “Never. Never are you allowed to do horrible things to another person.” They just have to have their hypotheticals because it is somehow obscenely important to preserve *their rights* to do horrible things to unconsenting other parties.
I can’t separate #4 & #5 because they seem like perfect complements to each other. Therefore I put my vote for the gestalt of the two.
AtheistPilgrim
7 September 2012 at 8:30 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Number 4, but I also really like number 7.