Pharyngula

Mary’s Monday Metazoan: the only angel I believe in

Aside from Mary, that is.

(via NatGeo)

(Also on Sb)

Both comments and pings are currently closed.

27 Responses to “Mary’s Monday Metazoan: the only angel I believe in”

  1. Crudely Wrott says:

    You definitely have an eye for beauty, PZ.

    And a highly developed sense of self preservation, I’d note.

    No wonder Mary loves you so.

  2. Silly little evolutionary adaptation. A lot better to believe in than something someone conjured up from a human and bird wings.

    It did make me curious as to how it swims. Not especially striking, but it works.

    Glen Davidson

  3. JohnnieCanuck says:

    So real angel wings evolved from snails’ feet. Makes more sense than those images that Christians conjured up.

    I mean, come on. An anthropomorphic creation that is a hexapod instead of a tetrapod? What were they thinking?

  4. A. R says:

    Wonderful, my week is going to be book-ended by cephalopods!

  5. PZ Myers says:

    That’s not a cephalopod.

  6. tblade says:

    Once again, the real world proves infinitely more fascinating and beautiful than supernatural mythology. What a thrill it would be to see one of these in person.

  7. 'Tis Himself, OM says:

    Both cephalopods and gastropods are mollusca.

  8. A. R says:

    Oops, thought I saw tentacles! Right Phylum though.

  9. a3kr0n says:

    It’s got foot wings?

  10. DLC says:

    Holy Paradolia Batman!

  11. @6: They have Sea Angels on display here at the Singapore Underwaterworld. I’ve seen them a few times now. They’re pretty fascinating :)

  12. F says:

    It’s. A horned angel.

  13. ChasCPeterson says:

    Video of sea angels and another (shelled) swimming gastropod. No, they’re not really “gelatinous”.

  14. chigau (違う) says:

    What does gelatinous even mean in this context?

  15. nathanieljacobs says:

    Melt Banana!!

  16. bribase says:

    Nonsense! Thats clearly some kind of prototype Russian submersible. Or an NTI.

  17. Dick the Damned says:

    Jumpin’ Jeezus on two sticks, that’s not an angel, it’s a homunculus!

  18. @JonnieC

    An anthropomorphic creation that is a hexapod instead of a tetrapod

    Worse than that, aren’t they described somewhere (Isaiah 6:1–3) as decapods!
    (six wings, a couple of arms and a leg or so)
    Why, they could almost be cephalopods. PZ take note!!

  19. CompulsoryAccount7746 says:

    Fiery… check.
    Flying… check.
    Serpent… erm, tubish and wriggly, close enough. (Hey, bats get to be birds)

  20. briancoughlan says:

    Hey! Mary is the Mother of God not an angel …

  21. Sir Shplane, Grand Mixmaster, Knight of the Turntable says:

    So you’re saying that angelfish are imaginary?

  22. scottplumer says:

    I see a face in it, wearing a mushroom cap hat… Praise Mario, it’s Toadette!!!

  23. gravityisjustatheory says:

    richardelguru says:
    31 January 2012 at 6:18 am

    @JonnieC

    An anthropomorphic creation that is a hexapod instead of a tetrapod

    Worse than that, aren’t they described somewhere (Isaiah 6:1–3) as decapods!
    (six wings, a couple of arms and a leg or so)
    Why, they could almost be cephalopods. PZ take note!!

    Clearly they must belong to the same class or phylum as the Hindu deities, and have just evolved several of their arms into wings.

    In any case, the critter in the pic is clearly a Vorlon without it’s encounter suit.

  24. endosymbiotic says:

    PZ guess how these ‘angels’ eat? Through the top of their heads! my friend in Japan sent me this footage of when this creature was featured on Japanese TV:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CiXbk3-0N_0&feature=player_embedded

  25. Sandiseattle says:

    Truly bordering on cute. But pretty cool too.

  26. thunderbird5 says:

    I vividly remember the first time I “saw” these – on David Attenborough’s superb “Life on Earth” series (on the telly, 1979). The family just sat in stunned silence. We couldn’t quite believe that something so beautiful existed and that someone had been able to film it and that we were able to see it.


Switch to our mobile site