Verdi’s La Traviata


Continuing my foray into the world of opera, thanks to the New York Metropolitan Opera company generously providing free streaming of its past livestreams during the time they are shut down due to the pandemic, I watched the fourth in the series and it was magnificent. There is no other word for it. I was simply blown away by the performance.

Unlike the other three operas I watched, the story in La Traviata is simple, as was the set that consisted of just a bed, a piano, a writing desk, and a couple of chairs. A change of backdrop and lighting between the acts shifted that same arrangement between a ballroom in Paris and a boudoir in a country home. There were just three principal singers, the courtesan Violetta, her lover Alfredo, and his father Giorgio. They sang pretty much everything, with the others in the cast appearing mostly during two party scenes and joining in the chorus. The singing and acting of these three were powerful and so moving that it choked me up on several occasions.

I have said that some opera arias are familiar to me even though I do not know where they come from. To my surprise and delight, during the first act my favorite aria of all was sung, the one that begins with Alfredo toasting Violetta. Now that I knew its origins, I could find it online and you too can see it in the clip below, which luckily is from the very same production I watched last night, so you get to see two of the principals and the set. It is beautiful. I have already watched and listened to it multiple times and I am sure to do so many times again in the future. I have also been humming it all day, it is so catchy.

It struck me how important first impressions are. I mentioned in an earlier post that my first experience with opera was as a young man seeing a live performance of Wagner’s The Flying Dutchman and it left me unimpressed and as a result I did not really seek out chances to watch any more operas. If I had happened to see La Traviata instead, who knows, I might have become an opera fan a long time ago. So my advice to people who are curious about opera is to check out this opera first if they can.

I think I will skip the next two operas (Donizetti’s La Fille du Régiment and Lucia di Lammermoor) because I have never heard of them, unless some of this blog’s readers (whom I have to come to learn know a hell of a lot about operas) strongly recommend either one. I do plan to watch Tchaikovsky’s Eugene Onegin on Sunday. Starting Monday, it will be seven straight days of Wagner that I think I will also pass on. I understand that Wagner is a giant in the opera world but his stuff is challenging and it might be of the kind that one has to slowly work one’s way up to with other operas before one can fully appreciate it.

It also occurred to me that the composer Verdi was Italian, the opera is sung in Italian, the main characters’ names are mostly Italian but for some reason he chose to set it in Paris. Does anyone know why this might be? One possibility is that the opera is based on a play by Alexandre Dumas that was itself based on his novel that was situated in France. But that seems like a weak argument since opera composers do not seem to worry much about the story itself. A more likely possibility is that the world that this opera portrays, that of courtesans who run salons and throw lavish balls and other soirees that the elite attend, was peculiar to France and Paris in particular, and would not have been possible in Italy. I am just guessing though, and those who know more may wish to chime in.

Comments

  1. consciousness razor says

    There is some good Wagner, but lots of long-winded, convoluted bullshit too….. It’s a real slog trying to listen to the whole ring cycle (Das Rheingold, Die Walküre, Siegfried, Götterdämmerung).

    If you want a much smaller taste of the other three on the menu:
    Tristan und Isolde — prelude (10:58)
    Die Meistersinger von Nürnberg — overture (10:06)
    Tannhäuser — overture (15:36)

    Those are relatively accessible. The Tristan prelude is the only really “important” one, musicologically speaking. (The harmony in the first 20 seconds pretty much sums it up.)

  2. consciousness razor says

    A more likely possibility is that the world that this opera portrays, that of courtesans who run salons and throw lavish balls and other soirees that the elite attend, was peculiar to France and Paris in particular, and would not have been possible in Italy. I am just guessing though, and those who know more may wish to chime in.

    That certainly wasn’t peculiar to France. The main concern seems to be that the censors would not have approved. Wiki:

    Piave [the librettist] and Verdi wanted to follow Dumas in giving the opera a contemporary setting, but the authorities at La Fenice insisted that it be set in the past, “c. 1700”. It was not until the 1880s that the composer’s and librettist’s original wishes were carried out and “realistic” productions were staged.[3]
    […]
    Francesco Maria Piave was engaged to write the new libretto and the two men tried to come up with a suitable subject, but the composer complained that his librettist “had not yet offered him an ‘original’ or ‘provocative’ idea”. Writing to Piave, he added that “I don’t want any of those everyday subjects that one can find by the hundreds.”[7] But at the same time, the composer expressed concern about censorship in Venice, something with which he was very familiar after his dealings with the censors concerning Rigoletto.

  3. says

    It looks like your Alfredo was Juan Diego Florez, AKA JDF, whose amazing high tenor voice has astonished audiences around the world. Speaking of ‘Daughter of the Regiment’, there is a famous aria in that work that requires the tenor to hit nine high C’s in a short period of time. Not everyone can pull it off. The late Pavoratti did it, famously (thus earning the title ‘King of the High C’s’) and JDF does it as well.
    You could probably skip this opera but it is amazing to watch JDF sing this aria:

  4. Holms says

    One of the best things about Wagner existing is that it led to this homage to him.

    (The harmony in the first 20 seconds pretty much sums it up.)

    Yeah holy shit, absolutely nothing happens in that entire ten minutes. No melody, no rhythm, all harmony. This is why some buffs scoff at the orchestral works that I favour -- the allegro movements of famous symphonies, the more rapid and eventful overtures and convertos, nothing slower than adagio. Largo and below can jump off a cliff.

  5. consciousness razor says

    Yeah holy shit, absolutely nothing happens in that entire ten minutes. No melody, no rhythm, all harmony.

    Well, taken literally that’s false, but I get that you mean it’s not so much driven by the melodic or rhythmic elements. (As an aside, lots of music today, popular or otherwise, is a little short on harmony and melody. Rhythm is just about the only thing remaining, and even that doesn’t usually mean variety … only a heavy beat.)

    I wasn’t trying to poke fun with the whole “20 seconds” thing. What’s genuinely important about it is encapsulated by the nonfunctional harmony found in that first phrase. It’s a little tempting to overstate Wagner’s huge influence on 20th/21st-century music (particularly due to Tristan), but if we’re going to be serious, others like Debussy, Mussorgsky, Rimsky-Korsakov, and Stravinsky did a lot of the heavy lifting too. Anyway, there’s no doubt that he had big impact, even if the Wagner true believers are insufferable idiots.

    That said, I do enjoy the prelude from Tristan. The whole opera is … rather depressing. If you’re looking for some “love/death” moodiness related to the Tristan mythos, and especially if you want “rapid and eventful” (and gloriously weird) from an orchestra, then nothing will ever top this:
    Messiaen — Turangalila Symphonie (1:19:49)
    Since the prevailing mood is more apocalyptic these days, I have to share one more stunning masterpiece from him. A mix of horror, sadness, just a whiff of hope, premiered in a WWII prison camp, ’nuff said.
    Messiaen — Quatuor pour la Fin du Temps (49:56)

  6. enkidu says

    Mano, I would definitely recommend Lucia di Lammermoor, one of my favourite operas. I think you would enjoy the plot, treachery, corruption lust and blood. Bit like the Trump administration really.

    Also some splendid Music.

  7. flex says

    In the related topic of opera satire, you might enjoy the work of Anna Russell. I cannot say how good she was as a singer in general as I’ve only listened to her comedy albums, but her 20-minute explanation of Wagner’s Ring Cycle is a hoot.

    I know very little about opera, so I’m reading rather than trying to contribute. But I am enjoying reading both your impressions of the operas you are watching, and the commentors who have much to add.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *