D.J. Grothe and I tussled again in this week’s Point of Inquiry podcast, in a continuation of last week’s episode.
Pharyngula
Evolution, development, and random biological ejaculations from a godless liberal
D.J. Grothe and I tussled again in this week’s Point of Inquiry podcast, in a continuation of last week’s episode.
Uh, PZ, you’ve got an unclosed italics tag in this post,which is affecting the other posts on the main page.
And the comments here as well, apparently.
You should be a guest on this podcast – http://www.wildvoice.com/Believers_Church/Posts/Shortages-and-Crises
You see, the cause of world shortages in oil and food is… Wait for it… Evolution
How far will this italic contagion spread?
Separated at birth: A B.
Sorry, couldn’t help it.
John Emerson,
Pardon my iggerance, but who is “B”?
Grover Norquist.
I just did a terrible thing.
That was good. I have a message for Mr. Grothe: Matt Nisbet is not the voice of the social sciences.
I look forward to listening to the Austin Dacey one from 5-9 (linked to on the right). Sounds rather Kropotkinesque :).
Cephalopodcast!
Dear PZ, I listened to you and your point about the focus group method results in bland fare (takes away the flavor) I so agree. I think centrist politics does the same thing. We need to have some clear thought and opinions and go for it, even if they offend some.
Admit it PZ,
D.J Grothe recorded the whole interview at once and just chopped it into two.
>:D
Oh my fucking non-existent god.
These are the people that elected our president. We’re doomed.
For anyone who hasn’t listened to the Point of Inquiry podcast before – why haven’t you?! No, that’s not what I wanted to say. I wanted to say that on POI, DJ Grothe always asks the “devil’s advocate” questions, so much so that sometimes it’s hard to tell when he has a legitimate beef with the person he is interviewing. I actually like this approach, as it removes the personality of the interviewer from the equation.
J. D.