I’m back! I’m exhausted!


My travels are done for a whole week now (according to my calendar, I’m going to have to go to Washington DC next week), and I’m very, very tired. I’ll put up some of my thoughts on the Beyond Belief conference later (short summary: exhilarating!), but for now I’ll acknowledge the wonderful time I had at the Scripps Institute of Oceanography. It was a big audience — much bigger than I expected — and they asked really sharp questions and tossed back a few important ideas on communicating science that I appreciated. Special thanks to my host, Miriam Goldstein.

i-6679ea4020d242d0118bf2714e0f744a-miriam_goldstein.jpg

I promised to mention the Three Seas Program, which looks like an excellent opportunity for students interested in marine biology—actually, I wish I could do it—and I’m going to be sure too suggest to my students who think marine biology and oceanography are cool (we get a few of these students from the midwestern prairies every year who dream of the distant seas) that they ought to consider the Scripps for grad school.

Thanks also to Hao Ye, official photographer to the PZ Myers Southern California Tour 2007.

i-f29261521e9cfd4e8b9ecc30191d93a4-hao_ye.jpg

I can’t really thank this guy for showing up, since he missed my entire talk and therefore missed the opportunity to absorb the PZ mojo and have his IQ doubled but some of you may know who he is. If you can’t, here’s a hint.

i-f31d549e4a81bda97cc7b5b1fe341c0f-ro.jpg

Comments

  1. Sven DiMilo says

    ew! R O’B!
    strange, I always pictured him quite differently…guess it’s true: on the ‘tubes, nobody knows you’re a dog.

  2. JimC says

    oH my gosh, Robert O’Brien. He’s almost famous for being stupid. Now that I see he’s just some young clueless kid itmakes you have sympathy for his backward ideas.

  3. Sastra says

    Now be nice. I think R O’Brien looks just fine. Kinda cute … considering ;)

    What is it with people on the internet and judging appearance? If you walked by this guy on the street or sat next to him in a bar you wouldn’t think twice about what he looked like. Some folks seem to have spent too much time on the Am-I-Hot website.

  4. says

    What is it with people on the internet and judging appearance? If you walked by this guy on the street or sat next to him in a bar you wouldn’t think twice about what he looked like. Some folks seem to have spent too much time on the Am-I-Hot website.

    What is it with people who don’t read the explanation plainly written out for them? He does look like a dork, and considering what an ass he’s been, to myself and to others, I’m damn well going to say so.

    Glen D
    http://tinyurl.com/2kxyc7

  5. BruceH says

    Regarding your comment about mid-western students….

    When I was sailing the high seas as a young man, I would often hear stories about people from the mid-west dreaming of the oceans. You would hear how the teenage boys would climb high in trees or atop telephone poles and dream of being aloft on the yards of tall ships. Often these boys would take off for the nearest ocean port at the earliest opportunity to seek their fortunes as sailors.

    Appropriately, you would also hear of the old salt who, upon retiring, would walk inland with an oar on his shoulder. As soon as somebody asked him what that thing was, he would know he’d gone far enough, buy some property and start farming.

    Ah, the cycle of life.

  6. Leigh says

    Gee, you guys are pretty nasty to PZ — having a bad case of science envy today? Paying so much attention to someone’s looks strikes me as pretty shallow.

    Personally, I think he’s hot. Perhaps not as hot as Mr. Science, also the possessor of a Trophy Wife (me), but still . . .

    Then again, I’m a nerd/dork myself, so naturally I’d be attracted.

    But here’s what I look like, for anyone who’s interested in throwing more stones: http://community.beliefnet.com/?page_id=24&tgt=1136969390

    Maybe dorkiness — or beauty — is in the eye of the beholder, nicht wahr?

  7. Sven DiMilo says

    I did not judge his looks (though, like Glen and PZ and everybody else, I had long ago judged his verbal effluvia), I merely stated that he looked different than I had pictured him in my mind’s eye. The canine reference was not meant to imply that I thought O’Brien looked ugly or dog-like; it was merely referring to the famous cartoon from The New Yorker.

    Although why I’m concerned about possibly insulting R O’B I have no idea!

  8. bernarda says

    Maybe you can find someone among your friends you can translate this French text by an astronomer defending fundamental research. It is worth it.

    http://www.lemonde.fr/web/article/0,1-0@2-3232,36-974175,0.html

    One point, among others, I like is,

    “Je ne vous demande ni l’aumône ni la lune. Je vous demande des milliards d’euros.”

    I am not asking you either for alms or the moon. I am asking you for billions of euros.

  9. David Marjanović, OM says

    But here’s what I look like, for anyone who’s interested in throwing more stones: http://community.beliefnet.com/?page_id=24&tgt=1136969390

    Doesn’t work.

    Maybe you can find someone among your friends you can translate this French text by an astronomer defending fundamental research. It is worth it.

    Bit lengthy, but I might try tomorrow. Title: “Without the theory of relativity, no GPS”.

  10. David Marjanović, OM says

    But here’s what I look like, for anyone who’s interested in throwing more stones: http://community.beliefnet.com/?page_id=24&tgt=1136969390

    Doesn’t work.

    Maybe you can find someone among your friends you can translate this French text by an astronomer defending fundamental research. It is worth it.

    Bit lengthy, but I might try tomorrow. Title: “Without the theory of relativity, no GPS”.

  11. says

    It must be weird meeting someone who hates you virtually. Did you talk to him? Is he unhinged in real life too?

  12. foxfire says

    Hi PZ – glad the conference worked out well in spite of the fires! Thanks for sharing your experience and I’m looking forward to the BB II conference videos on the web. For students interested in all things Marine, also check out OSU: http://oregonstate.edu/.

  13. Leigh says

    Steve_C: “Someone just isn’t praying hard enough to the tech gods.”

    But Steve, I’m supposed to be one of the tech gods myself! Guess I must be one of the lesser gods . . .

  14. PM says

    PZ:

    Do please give some advance notice if you will be appearing somewhere in DC that is open to the public.

  15. Hank Fox says

    This is O’Brien making a video responding to comments on Pharyngula.

    It’s weird. It’s like he made a mistake by not having the microphone anywhere near his mouth, so that you can’t tell what he’s saying, but then he POSTED THE VIDEO ANYWAY.

  16. Dior says

    Next time in La Jolla, go see my old stompin’ grounds at the real Scripps, The Scripps Research Institute up the road a spell. Oh have Dr. Glen Nemerow take you out for some Adelberto’s carne asada fries, aka heart disease in a box.

  17. says

    Re: the old salt/Odysseus in #8 and #12: In 1978, when my younger brother came out West from Pennsylvania to live with us and finish highschool, he said the same thing to me, only it was a snow shovel instead of an oar. I assume he was making a classical reference; it did succeed in putting our winterlong rains into perspective.

  18. says

    Quick and dirty French translations my specialty, thanks to working for an underfunded NGO in Haiti :).

    Here’s the first half; I got this done before leaving for dinner.

    Without the theory of relativity, no GPS, by Cédric Foellmi

    Mr. President of the Republic, I am writing to speak to you about French research. Not about development, nor about innovation, but about civic and public basic research. I will spare you the brute enumeration of the consequences of chronic underfunding, although I am coming to ask you for a lot of money anyway–even more so, since I would wish for you to understand that binding basic research to its industrial applications is to ensure the destruction of the former today, but no less of the latter tomorrow.

    Know that I have absolutely no contact with any industry or business in this country nor in any other, and such contact does not interest me in the least. It is precisely my perfect direct economic uselessness which leads me to believe that my tiny example represents a large silent segment of the body of researchers in this country. I am an astronomer.

    I observe the stars. My specialty is those which become black holes. Astonishing, isn’t it? And, quite frankly, you have no idea of the degree to which you need me, Mr. President. I would like to convince you of that, while dispensing with the usual pontifications: “We must develop a knowledge economy”, or even worse, “Since the dawn of time, man has looked at the heavens.”.

    Certainly you have already used a GPS. However, there is an essential component of GPS which has its origin directly in basic research into general relativity, discovered by Albert Einstein. It’s as simple as that: no relativity, no GPS. Yet the two things weren’t made by the same people: relativity comes before GPS.

    The reason you need astronomers, Mr. President, is very simple: Earth is not large enough for our ideas. Certainly, giant laboratories like CERN and ITER exist, but that is not enough. Far from it. Yet we use the universe and the stars. It’s the only “laboratory” which lets us attain the extreme conditions of Nature necessary for the incessant fiddling with our ideas. Black holes are a perfect example: nowadays, only relativity (the same as for GPS) lets us detect them. Notably, relativity serves as the basis for models of the universe and of black holes. And also GPS. But no one found it looking for GPS. The astronomers want to understand the universe and the stars, and in doing so, slowly expand the playing field of the engineers. Not the other way around.

    (leaving the lab now; will finish at home tonight or tomorrow AM, unless someone beats me to it.)

  19. Rjaye says

    Wow, R O’B is a doofus kid. Makes one almost feel sorry for jumping down their throats. Almost.

    If their parents won’t do it, the online village must…

  20. says

    I’m going to have to go to Washington DC next week

    If you’re feeling up to meeting fans, let us know where you’ll be. I’m not above bribing you with $BEVERAGE_OF_CHOICE to have you autograph my copy of “Bad Astronomy”.

  21. says

    BruceH @ #8:

    Appropriately, you would also hear of the old salt who, upon retiring, would walk inland with an oar on his shoulder. As soon as somebody asked him what that thing was, he would know he’d gone far enough, buy some property and start farming.

    I’ve heard a similar thing about someone nearing retirement in the DC area: “I’m going to take a snow shovel and start driving south. I’ll stop every mile and ask someone what it is. The first place where they say “I don’t know”, that’s where I’ll go to retire.”

  22. says

    I can’t believe we’re using this thread to discuss how dorky Mr O’Brien looks.
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .

    Meh, just give him a dorkiness rating out of 10. It’s more concise.

  23. says

    Picking up where I left off…

    Know also that we aren’t doing “social work”-style research, in the sense that we are in no way seeking to take care of the poorest ideas. In observational astronomy alone, during the 2 years that a simple new idea takes (at a minimum) to emerge, around 25,000 other articles have already come out. The competition, the race, and the culture of results–we are very well acquainted with them, and we don’t need to take any lessons about that from anyone.

    Conversely, the civil and public system of basic research must be eminently stable. In the history of humanity, we’re the best-outfitted (GPS), but we probably think as slowly as we did in antiquity. While the increase in industrial innovation can be correlated with the number of engineers, that’s not the case with basic research and researchers. The criterion for excellence in research is not the speed at which the project is carried out, nor the number of its patents, but the freedom of its actors.

    So let us speak frankly, Mr. President. Let us speak about my freedom. My freedom of thought and of movement. How do you want me to develop quality research if my material horizon is 2 years; namely, the time it takes a single idea to be realized? How do you want me to develop research of the quality that you are going to need, when I’m paid little better than minimum wage at 33 years, having completed college + grad school + 5 years of post-doctoral study, speaking 3 languages, with ideas and ambitions, 8 years of experience abroad already, without funds to travel and without any real means to engage students? Who is going to pay me, Mr. President, if not you?

    The resources which you offer me are quite insufficient. My university is on the verge of bankruptcy. My lab, with a growth in manpower of 20%, is one of the only 2 French labs which has not seen a decrease in their miniscule basic endowment. The team in which I work will not receive a penny from my lab. Somehow or other, we’re going to recoup 10,000 euros in the national programs. My team has 16 people–625 euros per researcher this year! What color pencils would you like?

    I am not asking you for alms or for the moon. I am asking you for billions of euros. Fast. I am asking you to stop financing American research. I am asking you to stop confusing researchers for employees of Total [a French/multinational oil and gas corporation] or of the army. In return, I promise you absolutely nothing. My peers, and they alone, will judge the quality of my work and of my motivation. Clearly, a true freedom of resources will not happen without a huge change in the system. I see only one reason why that has not already been carried out: control, or steering. As much as I can understand that it is necessary to determine a scientific policy at the national level to get heavy investments involved (such as the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor), that is how much this concept is ontologically impossible and desperately exhausting at the level of the researcher. Do you want to be the pilot on my projects, Mr. President? On galactic black holes?

    I will never work for Total, nor for the next GPS. I will work doggedly to surpass Albert Einstein. For that, it will be necessary to do away with the National Research Agency (ANR), because civil and public basic research is a flow, not a collection of little boxes called “projects”. And don’t ask me to get an nth degree or authorization to direct research. Degrees, we have enough of them already. There, above all, we need liberty, the liberty of action.

    Cédric Foellmi is an astronomer at the Grenoble Astrophysics Laboratory

  24. Hank Fox says

    It’s like he made a mistake by not having the microphone anywhere near his mouth, so that you can’t tell what he’s saying, but then he POSTED THE VIDEO ANYWAY.

    Okay, maybe I should apologize for that one. Today the video sounds okay. Huh. Go figure.

    Sorry, Robert. I swear when I watched it yesterday the sound was so faint I couldn’t tell what was being said.

  25. Chet says

    Is he unhinged in real life too?

    I can assure you from personal experience that while he may come off as unhinged on the internet, in real life he’s a sniveling, contemptible jackass.

    he missed my entire talk and therefore missed the opportunity to absorb the PZ mojo and have his IQ doubled

    Yeah, well, double zero is still zero.

  26. David Marjanović, OM says

    Yeah, well, double zero is still zero.

    “You have an IQ of TWO! That’s how much the trash can needs to STINK!

    — Insult learned at school, “courtesy” one of the three Mödritscher brothers, probably Christian.

  27. David Marjanović, OM says

    Yeah, well, double zero is still zero.

    “You have an IQ of TWO! That’s how much the trash can needs to STINK!

    — Insult learned at school, “courtesy” one of the three Mödritscher brothers, probably Christian.

  28. David Marjanović, OM says

    My point was that alleging an IQ of 0 is a really unsophisticated attempt at insulting someone. :-)

  29. David Marjanović, OM says

    My point was that alleging an IQ of 0 is a really unsophisticated attempt at insulting someone. :-)

  30. says

    PZ, I can’t help it, I’m a producer. Lose the beard, you’ll look ten years younger.

    (I say that, as Broadway Danny Rose insisted, with all due respect.

  31. Louis says

    Well, whilst I am part of the “R. O’Brien esq is an internet troll and thus deserving of much contempt and derision” subscribing clan, I think bashing the cat for his looks (which are certainly not especially disasterous, and not atypical for {for example} an average physics undergrad class*. Is he a male model? Nope. Is he John Merrick? Nope. Just like most of the rest of us) is a bit beyond the pale.

    Granted he can act the tool on the webtubes, but as someone above pointed out, offline these internet troll superstars are usually more than a soupcon pathetic and almost exclusively poorly socially adjusted chaps, occasionally with an exciting array of mental illnesses. Having watched his “reply” and “turtle” videos, I’m beginning to feel more than a little sorry for the guy. I’m thinking some beers, some friends and getting laid might help him…..a lot.

    So who’s for sending Bobbie a coupon for 24 Millers and a garrulous hooker?

    Louis

    * As a postgrad when I was TAing/demonstrating to varied undergrad classes I and my colleagues noticed a strange tendancy: move towards the physics end of the science “spectrum” and the undergrads seemed to become more facially inept, whereas if you moved towards the biological end of the science “spectrum” their pulchritude increased. A “Chemistry with materials” class was usually full of mingers, however a “Biological chemistry” class was usually up to the gills with stunners. More research must be done dammit!

  32. Interrobang says

    I’ve heard a similar thing about someone nearing retirement in the DC area: “I’m going to take a snow shovel and start driving south. I’ll stop every mile and ask someone what it is. The first place where they say “I don’t know”, that’s where I’ll go to retire.”

    Be serious. It does not ever snow enough in Washington DC to rightfully drive anyone crazy from the snow. I’m surprised anyone there even bothers to own a snow shovel; why shovel a couple centimetres of snow a couple times per year…? (I have a friend in the area who bikes to work almost all year round.)

    The fact that DC shuts down because four flakes drift out of the sky says a lot about the wimpiness of people in DC, not the snow itself.

    I am speaking to you from a city where, in one storm last winter, we got >1m of snow in ~30h. And I’m profoundly glad I don’t live in Buffalo, NY.