Sex, Slaves, & Inconvenient Truths


What we see in the great cultural divide of 2018 is a society shaken by a dual worldview. The church represents tradition and reliance upon ancient codes for defining right or wrong. That attitude is frozen in place by traditions and authoritarian dominance. The reasoning that created those rules is defunct, making them irrelevant in the current culture while they continue to be enforced by an enduring moral designation of ‘bad’. All of Christian authority comes from the long tradition of having placed, at some point in time, the designation of ‘good,’ or ‘bad’ on every aspect of life. The current mode of Political Correctness uses a different set of criteria. PC has no need of judgment regarding an ultimate right or an ultimate wrong in the sense of good vs. evil; PC criteria is focused on whether individuals and thereby society are being harmed or not. If you actively harm others your PC ranking sinks. 

Bigotry harms other people. Bigotry is immoral. Why then do evangelicals support Trump given his support of bigotry? Neither Jesus nor Paul condemn slavery despite its omnipresence in their time. Paul even returned a slave to his master; I’d call that support. So, are we still fighting the Civil War? Yes, it seems we are. But, before we get to far afield here let’s look at sex, too. Sexuality has changed a lot since the Bible was compiled. We now know an incredible amount of detail that seems to change some ancient declarations of sexuality from ‘bad’ into ‘good,’ or at least a harmless, ‘Okay.’ Biblical sexual morality has little relevance to modern social existence though rape and the like remains evil. Many sexual condemnations seem bellicose, hyperbolic and impotently unreasonable.

So, once again it seems kind of pointless to make these remarks when Evangelicals are creating the greatest fuss. They condemn, using antiquated moralities, while endorsing the most infamous counter-example, Donald Trump. The people supporting these old biblical canards, such as The Alliance Defending Freedom, are over-the-top. They acquire the designation, ‘hate group’ for their manic behavior. Yet they seem to thrill to the amoral behavior of the current president. Is hypocrisy the best description for this? I mean If Jesus throughout his life barely discussed the obvious immorality of slavery, at a time when it was omnipresent in society, why do evangelicals ignore the immoralities of Trump? It is obvious, their master, Jesus, taught them how to do it and by example condones the behavior. Trump is the new Christ.

Did Jesus teach child abuse too? You would think so if you live in Pennsylvania this week. Who teaches child abuse to the priests and how does someone like Archbishop Wuerl learn the techniques of shuffling abusive priests to other parishes like pawns on a chess board? Is this like ignoring slavery because it is convenient? Perhaps Political Correctness is the wrong course of action; “God” in truth, actually prefers slavery and child rape–it is as plain as the nose on their theological face.

Wedding Cake Harbinger

 

The Vagaries of Religion are Protected by the Constitution

The time is here to become a Pastafarian. The constitution protects religious: fluctuations, variations, quirks, peculiarities, oddities, eccentricities, unpredictability, caprice, foibles, whims, whimsy, and fancies under the guise of “deep and sincere religious beliefs” especially when it comes to pastry. The constitution makes no allowance for the absurdity, inhumanity or diabolical behavior of the belief. There is no scale to judge the merit of the core faith. If people call it a religion then it has constitutional protection. It must be respected under the law. If your religion hates Christians then it must be accommodated by law. Or so the recent ruling about baking religiously sensitive cakes by the Supreme Court seems to say. Open mockery of the flights and fancies of some religion shows disrespect, you can’t do that. Satanists, Witches, Vampirism, Jediism, must all be given equal and complete respect within the judicial and enforcement communities so the holy baker wins.

Of course, LGBT people deserve the same respect. So, Once more into the mildewed beast my friends, Leviticus 20:13 “If a man lies with a man as with a woman, they have both committed an abomination They must surely be put to death” has equal status with – “We’d like a wedding cake because we love each other and want to get married.” Who wins? Well that isn’t part of this decision. The battle continues, but just look at how often the phrase “deep and sincere religious beliefs” or something similar is used in the decision. That is the harbinger we face now.

An Authoritarian’s Authority

What authorizes an authoritarian to be an authority?

There are two ways to be an authoritarian: one is to be the follower of a particular authority, the other is to be the authority. The passives submit to the authority and defend the authority’s stature in society. They don’t lead, yet with extreme devotion they blindly follow those who take charge. They mimic the arrangement within their own families, using the tradition of a man in charge, and the women and children who submit to his will.

Gigantic evangelical super-churches with thousands of members who flock to highly populated services where they passively follow the show-biz leader’s televised, amplified, melodramatic moralizing illustrate the Evangelical authoritarian theology. They present glossy showmanship and scripted passions. They speak to the ‘audience’ not the individual. People enjoy the show-like ‘service.’ They don’t want fellowship, where everyone knows their name, they want the society of a fast food joint. They walk in, encounter strangers, watch some moralish show-biz presentation and then leave. No muss or fuss. Passions are best raised when someone else is being condemned. Pick on outcasts to develop serious passions and genuine animosity in the crowd. It sells even better than speaking in tongues! The audience walks away having felt something significant. Their prejudices and fears have been justified. They shared a commonality with a big room full of strangers. And guess what, no thinking! This wan’t complicated, it was simple and powerful. The band was great, the lighting spectacular and the sermon was funny and did you see that hairdo? And, Oh yeah, they said, “Jesus” a lot.

Rock Religion

Church or Rock Concert?

This whole event accommodates the anonymity of those in attendance. The edge of the stage, which serves as a barrier between performer and audience prevents genuine interaction. The social pressures of ‘political correctness’ can easily be dismissed in this environment. So, while the spectacular service is a far cry from a KKK rally, similar sentiments can thrive. They condemn the LGBTQ population with a particular vehemence that parallels the rhetoric of the KKK. This creates a specific “us” (the Christians in the room) and places them in opposition to both the specific, and often un-named “others” who exist “out there.” Muslims? Fags, People of color? Immigrants? Whatever frightens you are the enemy. Evangelicals get away with blatant bigotry under the guise of a moral, god-sanctioned, charlatan-lead, feel-good scam. Want fries with that?

I have spent my life in showbiz, both commercial showbiz and fine art, non-profit theatre, ballet and opera. I know the high-end tricks of the trade so to speak. I know the cheap tricks too.  We use the full range of theatrical techniques to accommodate the needs of what is being communicated; we search for subtext and implied meanings of the presentation to find the appropriate level of spectacle required. Rock shows are all spectacle. Industrial trade shows are meant to sell something, they use gimmicks and cheap theatrics and spectacle. Serious art uses the sophisticated, subtle dramatic effects sparingly, only in accordance to the needs of the show and not for the sake of spectacle alone. When a church starts using mindless spectacle to sell its product, that is the sign of a lack of substance and a commercial intent.

Now, a glorious cathedral with incense and music and costumes and grand architecture and cannibalistic rituals (eating the body and blood of a man/god) is a spectacle. But, this spectacle is focused on the teachings of the church, it is the same at every performance whether five or five hundred people attend the service. What ever opinion you may have of the event, it is always coherent and purposeful. The showbiz spectacle of megachurches seems to be focused upon a more commercial intent. Their goal is numbers and dollars and if some moral imperative is not popular, like say divorce, well it kind of disappears from the program. The people on stage aren’t interchangeable the way priests are. The personality is the draw; so star personalities are the selling point not the principles of the faith.

I have been going to USITT conferences since the mid 1970s. This is the US Institute of Theatre Technology. At some point in the 1990s perhaps, I recall, a major shift that added the category of ‘religious theatre’ technology to the concerns of the Institute. It was a clash of cultures to start, but once the realization that money was readily available from evangelical churches for equipment, technology and employment they started to fit right in. Rock-shows had always been the big money innovators in lighting and sound technology. Suddenly, these churches had more cash and desire to buy the tech than fine art theatres did.

So, a Mass is a Mass, but a megachurch is not another megachurch, they are selling different

pay to sin

entertainments and their message is flexible. A lot of money is involved and their flexible moral foundations allow for mulligans for horny politicians the way Catholics sold indulgences in the middle ages. Trump is the perfect star for this kind of production. His salesmanship and showmanship provide the ultimate con for gullible and unthinking followers. Trump is the Pied Piper of the submissive authoritarian Evangelicals.

 

So, while the Catholic Church is authoritarian in the sense that it is autocratic, dictatorial, tyrannical, draconian, oppressive, repressive, illiberal, undemocratic; disciplinarian, domineering, overbearing, iron-fisted, high-handed, peremptory, imperious, strict, rigid, and inflexible, it relies upon adherence to a legalistic and clearly defined set of rules. The head of the church is more or less trapped by the established codes and mandates of the 2000 year old institution. His status has been achieved by surviving a political bureaucracy.

anti-gay megagay

The cult-like following of a megachurch leader is personality-driven and that translates into dollars. The codification of the theology is in its infancy so there is no permanent legalistic formula for compliance. The charismatic leader is likely to teach what he feels rather than what some academic theologians have concluded so the theological infrastructure is already on shaky ground. When times get rough, hate rhetoric is the tie that binds the allegiance. It is more emotive than say, God is Love; they may agree with that aphorism but faggot enflames them to the core. Passion = dollars and butts in pews.

Anti-Gay Tract

It takes a lawyer to read and comprehend the details of Pope Francis’ APOSTOLIC EXHORTATION on LOVE. He did make an effort to dress up the language, to make it readable, but that merely confuses the vile attitude toward LGBTQ folks in the document. The Catholic approach uses a thinking person’s bigotry as a foundation while still relying on the awe of the cathedral, the smell of the incense, and the glorious music to sell their spiritual bureaucracy.

 

The Evangelical approach is pure passion, no need to read or translate anything. This is from a 2010 Guardian article on the Saddleback Megachurch:

…popular evangelical Christianity is religiously vacuous. It is directed to secular ends which, arguably, should be promoted by secular means. Saddleback is religion for people who don’t like religion: transcendence is not on the menu.

Evangelicals live in Madonna’s Material World and they are material girls (metaphorically). Her song is about choosing a mate but the criteria is cash, and love is never mentioned. Donald Trump is the ultimate material guy. Trump needs God the way a material girl needs love. She doesn’t.