Comments

  1. says

    “We aren’t criticizing religion; we are just saying that religion doesn’t have a monopoly on morals.”

    Ugh. Yes, you ARE criticizing religion. Maybe not every one of them, but definitely the ones that matter the most to the human race.

    I hate it when people undercut the true purpose behind their messages in order to cater to believers (or undecided nonbelievers) who get offended just a wee-bit too easily.

  2. says

    “We aren’t criticizing religion; we are just saying that religion doesn’t have a monopoly on morals.”Ugh. Yes, you ARE criticizing religion. Maybe not every one of them, but definitely the ones that matter the most to the human race.I hate it when people undercut the true purpose behind their messages in order to cater to believers (or undecided nonbelievers) who get offended just a wee-bit too easily.

  3. says

    OK sorry. I have to comment about one other thing: Indiana is not in the “heart of the Bible Belt.”

    Fuckin’…most of Indiana isn’t even considered to be in the Bible Belt (yes, the map is an approximation, but the true extent could be an extension or compression of the approximation):http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible_Belt

    Yeah, nice video. Awful speakers. But at least the actual message “You can be good without God” is true (and succinct!).

  4. says

    OK sorry. I have to comment about one other thing: Indiana is not in the “heart of the Bible Belt.”Fuckin’…most of Indiana isn’t even considered to be in the Bible Belt (yes, the map is an approximation, but the true extent could be an extension or compression of the approximation):http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B…Yeah, nice video. Awful speakers. But at least the actual message “You can be good without God” is true (and succinct!).

Leave a Reply