Ah yes, the inevitable small government BS regularly regurgitated by conservatives whenever there’s a program helping regular folks they would rather redirect to the offshore accounts of uber-rich people, like Romney. Wherein people hear small government and think maybe there’ll be less in the way of speeding tickets or red tape at the DMV, and actually end up with dirtier water and air, and less protection for their hard-won rights and savings. And that’s assuming Mittens’ means it, which given the video below, is debatable.
Oct 05 2012
Romney’s back on the small government kick
This post has no tag
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
About the Author
Freethought Blogs
- A Citizen of Earth
- A Million Gods
- Ace of Clades
- Alethian Worldview
- Almost Diamonds
- Ashley Miller
- Biodork
- Black Skeptics
- Blag Hag
- Brute Reason
- Butterflies and Wheels
- Comradde PhysioProffe
- Dispatches from the Culture Wars
- En Tequila Es Verdad
- Greta Christina's Blog
- Heteronormative Patriarchy for Men
- Lousy Canuck
- Mano Singham
- Maryam Namazie
- Near-Earth Object
- No Country for Women
- NonStampCollector
- Pharyngula
- Reasonable Doubts
- Richard Carrier Blogs
- Rock Beyond Belief
- Sincerely, Natalie Reed
- The Atheist Experience
- The Crommunist Manifesto
- The Digital Cuttlefish
- The Indelible Stamp
- The Zingularity
- This Week in Christian Nationalism
- Token Skeptic
- YEMMYnisting
- Zinnia Jones
PostsCommentsArchives
Recent Posts
- We don’t need no sinking regulations
- The glory & structure of planetary nebula
- Pope gives atheism a nod
- Fundie nutcases hack up UK soldier in the name of Allah
- What others say about FTB
- Newest pics of Saturn and system
- Needless to say, dixie wingnuts love them some E. W. Jackson
- An atheist tornado survivor!
- Humans “benefited” from climate change is a dicey way to say it
- IRS hearing tomorrow has what conservatives crave
Recent Comments
- Zinc Avenger (Sarcasm Tags 3.0 Compliant) on We don’t need no sinking regulations
- evilDoug on We don’t need no sinking regulations
- Trebuchet on We don’t need no sinking regulations
- kraut on Fundie nutcases hack up UK soldier in the name of Allah
- This week in science: Perspective | Politifreak - Political Blogs and News on Humans “benefited” from climate change is a dicey way to say it
FTB RecentFTB Active
FTB Recent
- How to be a Real by Ophelia Benson
- Help Imad by Ophelia Benson
- The rise of masturbation by Mano Singham
- The actual photo by Ophelia Benson
- Hands off our Amina! by Maryam Namazie
- Support those defying Islamism by Maryam Namazie
FTB Active
- [Lounge #419] by PZ Myers
- Open thread on episode #814 by heicart
- More documenting the harassment by Ophelia Benson
- Intersectionality? It's been a privilege by Ally Fogg
- Taking it Personally: Privilege and Women in Secularism by Ashley F. Miller
- Vacula v. Silverman by Stephanie Zvan

2 comments
Skip White
October 5, 2012 at 11:38 am (UTC -6) Link to this comment
The problem isn’t necessarily the size of government, or the number of government employees in many cases. Want shorter lines at the DMV? Expand operating hours, hire more workers, and encourage online filing and printing of forms. Small-government types always seem to forget that government jobs are still jobs, and that cutting spending across the board will end up cutting jobs. The solution in a lot of areas is better communication between agencies, restructuring to eliminate redundant layers of government, and targeted funding cuts when accusations of waste are sufficiently supported by evidence. Of course, that takes several sentences, whereas “SOCIALISM!” is one word.
gshelley
October 5, 2012 at 3:53 pm (UTC -6) Link to this comment
Small government, unless it involved government employees losing their jobs, in which case he seems to be against it. Or at least is happy to use that as something to criticise Obama