Solar tsunamis could be in the mail for next several years


A filament breaks free and blasts off the sun on 24 Feb 2012. This one happened on the sun's north pole and poses no danger for earth. Image courtesy NASA SoHo.

NASA scientists are closely monitoring the sun as it heads into the most active phase in its sunspot cycle. The sun’s magnetic poles flip every 22 years, meaning the field strength maxes and wanes in each polar hemisphere a little over once a decade. Each 11 year cycle produces large flares and other phenomena, and if the earth happens to lay in the path of a big one it can cause problems. That’s what happened in 1859, when large flare disrupted early communication networks and lit up skies as far south as Jamaica with rare, ghostly aurora. If something like the Carrington Event were to happen today, the consequences could be even more catastrophic:

(EIJ) — nineteenth- and twentieth-century telegraph systems were more resilient than today’s electronics. Solar flares can bake the circuitry that controls aircraft, banking, GPS, radio, TV broadcasts, iPods, and the Internet. As NASA solar physicist Lika Guhathakurta put it: “A similar storm today might knock us for a loop.” On March 13, 1989, a 90-second solar blast slapped HydroQuebec’s transmission system and left six million Canadians without electricity for nine hours. The storm cooked transformers in Great Britain and triggered 200 “anomalies” at oil-, coal-, and nuclear-fueled facilities across the US.

We could be prepared for this, at least a little. The House passed a bill in Aug 2010 that would have stocked back up transformers and other components in the event of global power failure that could take days or weeks to even partially restore. Congressman Rosco Bartlett (R-MD) noted on his website that “These transformers are not manufactured in the U.S. and cost $10 million each and take 1-2 years to deliver.” Sadly, the Senate did not follow suit and the bill now languishes.

Comments

  1. baal says

    Current fedgov is not interested in actually governing. One side is actively promoting problems and the other can’t figure out how to make that clear to the public or work around it.

  2. F says

    No, see, what we do is wait until after it happens, then issue a military response along with security theater productions and a further erosion of our civil liberties. All internet traffic will be closely monitored by the indoors-camo-wearing employees of the NSA to intercept any communications between terrorists and the sun.

  3. StevoR says

    Good article here -cheers.

    Coincidentally, I gave a talk on this topic a few weeks ago for my local planetarium group.

    There seems to be a range of opinions on just how bad solar storms could be with an article in ‘New Scientist’ magazine, (4th Feb. 2012) by David Shiga – “Earth in for bumpy ride as Sun peaks” – pointing out how much more vulnerable we are than we used to with so many more satellites, polar flights and electronic devices such as GPS being so much more important these days and making for a very worrying situation on one hand versus this excellent blog post :

    http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2011/02/the_facts_on_solar_storms.php

    on Ethan Siegel’s Starts With A Bang blog which takes the opposite, really, *really*, NOT the end of the world tack.

    I suspect the truth maybe somewhere in between as long as we don’t get a sunstorm like the eponymous Baxter-Clarke novel :

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunstorm_(novel)

    (Hope linking to other blog items is okay netiquette~wise, my apologies & please let me know if not.)

Leave a Reply