Is ISIS’ cause a true act of fana ?


Religious fanaticism has a new name. It’s called the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham, or as we know it, ISIS. Just the other day, ISIS imposed a ban on namaz during eid in Mosul. In their words, “Namaz during eid has got nothing to do with islam. True muslims never offered namaz during eid”. Therefore, they decreed that no muslim inhabitant of Mosul had any right to namaz on eid. Anyone choosing to do otherwise was threatened with summary execution.

Iraq is held captive by armed fanatics professing to be the pillars of islam, a religion that is no longer preached through love, but imposed through naked aggression and violence.

Over the time that it has held the people of Iraq hostage in the name of faith, ISIS has destroyed relics, masjids and museums showcasing islam’s rich heritage. In deploying terror in the cause of islam, it has gone against the very tenets of a once-tolerant faith.

This is why, we need to ask if, one day, ISIS will eradicate the practise of namaz altogether, citing that infidels and not the religiously inclined offer prayers to god? Will it insist that the jews and christians worship the divine by bowing down in reverence, and therefore, such an act is unislamic in nature?

In insisting that all places of worship must be demolished, they have said masjids are a replication of idolatry in the garb of islam and have no religious sanction. There are hundreds of advocates of such a cause, arguing that ISIS alone can return islam to its pristine state, as it existed a thousand and four hundred years ago,

If ISIS succeeds in eradicating many of the islamic traditions and customs that are practised worldwide today, citing that these are corruptions brought in by the infidels, and therefore, unsuitable for a true believer of the faith, I wonder if there would anything left in islam to practice. From food habits to prayers, everything can be cited as a corruption introduced by another religion and banned. After all, the story of Adam and Eve too was introduced by heretics and must, therefore, be silenced. This, when the fact is that islam has not only picked up several practices from the other faiths, but is itself derived from another religion. If we were to return everything that we have acquired over the years, the religion itself would have to be abolished.

In the modern age, no voice of reason will ever insist on reverting to the practices of a bygone era. Society is meant to progress and not revert to the regressive ways of the past. It is the civilisational need of our times to insist on educating women, placing our faith of science and discoveries and technologically leapfrogging into the future, rather than get stuck with religious obscurantism. There can never be a positive outcome of harking back to the past.

Humans have a right to their faith; each one of us is entitled to our native beliefs. Despite being an atheist, I support the right of everyone to choose his or her faith. If there are downsides to religious beliefs, that must be debated, not condemned.

What surprises is that muslims are not vocal in protesting the atrocities committed by ISIS. Why do they not take it upon themselves to wage a war against the ISIS, as it threatens their religious integrity? Why do they join a cause that by its own logic must annihilate the religion they profess? Do muslims, the world over, believe the cause of ISIS, as their cause of conviction? Do they see in it the true act of fana, that Sufis otherwise see as an act of annihilation of the self? Or are they drawn to ISIS by the unbridled power that comes from dehumanising society?

Comments

  1. alex jones says

    IS did NOT ban Eid prayers, in fact, it published photos of them being performed. And it has not demolished masjids, rather it has demolished Shiite temples.
    This whole post, therefore, has no factual basis whatsoever.

  2. Truth hurts says

    This blogger is a stupid bitch with her fake information and made up sources. Get a life you prick and stop trying to be something your not as you will not get accepted by the society… You know what I mean cow face.

    • africanatheist says

      There was the option to provide a counter argument and show how the “sources” in this blog are made up. Instead you went with this, leaving me to wonder, just what are you?

  3. NoOne says

    alex jones says

    “IS did NOT ban Eid prayers, in fact, it published photos of them being performed. ”

    Please provide a link.

    ” And it has not demolished masjids, rather it has demolished Shiite temples.”

    Well that makes it better.

  4. Pierce R. Butler says

    Truth hurts @ # 2 – a ‘nym used by someone in total bliss (or probably just complete anesthesia).

  5. swapnil jagtap says

    Taslima ji, aapse milna hai baht dino se koshish kar rahe hai, aapko twitter pe bhi contact kiya hai, “ClickPune” ye mera twitter account hai, aapse milna hai ji, plz revert, thank you 🙂

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *