Aug 23 2013

God-men thingy should be abolished

God-men system should be abolished. Most God-men exploit people. Many God-men rape. They also rape minor girls. Most rapes are not reported.

Devadasi system has been abolished. God-men system can be abolished.


Skip to comment form

  1. 1
    Faisal Rafiq

    It will be so unfair to say that those who associate themselves with religion commit more crimes. The religion is not responsible, the people who call themselves the followers of the particular religion are responsible which they don’t actually follow and practice in real life.

    1. 1.1
      Ramesh Barah

      My friend Faisal Rafiq as you stated yourself that, the people are the followers of religion, so obviously they put in practice what they only learn from religion which are murder, enslave, misogyny, social inequality, and so on. On the contrary those who do not follow will not commit such atrocities and prejudice in the society.

      1. Syed

        Dear Friend the more a person practice a religion in real sense the more good person he is
        you can look at the examples of those great personalities in every religion who are good because
        of practicing the teachings of the religion they follow.

      2. UJJAL

        It is the religion to be blamed, not the people who practice. They practice what they learn from the religion. If religion teaches good and peace then why is the world full of violence ? Why cannot religion teach them to be good citizens?

        1. Syed

          I can’t understand what does “To Practice Religion” Means for u.
          If u think just keeping the name of particular community and doing some
          visible rituals than u r correct.

          Following a religion and practicing it is different. Hope u understand.

    2. 1.2
      steve oberski

      I love the smell of the “no true scotsman” fallacy so early in the morning.

  2. 2
    Urmila Mathonkar

    Penis is solely responsible for rape.

  3. 3

    This isn’t my blog and I have no say in how it’s run, but if this statement stands without further challenge, I am opting out of reading it.

    1. 3.1

      “Reply” didn’t work when I signed in. I was referring to Urmila’s statement on Aug 23 at 1:46.

      1. Syed

        I dont think the user’s name is correct . the idea reflects some things else.

        1. badgersdaughter

          I’m sorry, I don’t understand what you mean by that. Could you please explain?

          1. Syed

            Those vulgar comments are not likely from female’s they can be of male’s..
            F are more sensible as compared to M.

            “Urmila Mathonkar” comment.

    2. 3.2

      So go ahead and reply, why are you asking others to do what you want?

      1. badgersdaughter

        I’m not asking people to do anything. I’m just curious to see whether anyone else has problems with the statement. Since they obviously don’t, this is not the place to air my criticisms.

  4. 4

    Let us become adults and civilized. Using a penis everyday is not an issue but writing or reading it is wrong ? What double standard views. It is fully cultured and civilized to call a penis, a penis and nothing else.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>