US plays good cop-bad cop with Russia


The US is clearly trying the good ‘cop-bad cop tactic’ in its efforts to have the Russians hand Edward Snowden back to the US.

In the bad cop role, we have the usual idiots like Lindsey Graham issuing what seem like daily threats to the Russians that if they grant Snowden asylum, there will be repercussions like a US boycott of the Winter Olympics. That, of course, is never going to happen. But the US congress is introducing legislation mandating some sort of sanctions to any country that gives Snowden asylum.

While Russia clearly wants to have reasonably good relations with the US, there is not a chance that someone like president Vladimir Putin, who carefully nurtures a tough guy image, will want to be seen as caving in to American threats, especially since he and his government have said in pretty unequivocal terms that they will not hand him over.

So Attorney General Eric Holder is playing the ‘good cop’, sending a letter to his Russian counterpart asking them nicely to hand Snowden back. You can read the text of the letter here.

In the letter Holder assures the Russians that the current charges against Snowden do not carry the death penalty and that even if other charges are added later, the Justice Department will not pursue the death penalty, and will follow the constitution and give him a prompt civilian public trial by jury, that he be allowed to have a lawyer, and that he will not be forced to answer questions.

This letter is remarkable for several reasons. For one, it is pathetic that the US has sunk so low in world opinion that it is reduced to publicly having to promise that it will obey its own constitution and carry out the basic requirements of due process of a civilized society.

Secondly, we have seen how ingenious the US government lawyers are at parsing language and can argue that black is white. In particular, we have seen how elastic is its definition of what constitutes torture where it is on record as saying that anything that does not cause organ failure leading to death is not torture. And even when organ failure occurs and people die because of the ‘not torture’, no one is punished for this. So the promise to not torture is particularly hollow.

Finally, we have a government that does not hesitate to flat-out lie when it serves its own interests and Holder himself has already demonstrated a willingness to engage in verbal gymnastics. So why should anyone take anything in his letter seriously?

Comments

  1. Chiroptera says

    So why should anyone take anything in his letter seriously?

    I’m sure the idea isn’t that Putin will take the letter seriously. It’s so he has the option of pretending to believe the letter if and when he decides that it’s in his and/or Russia’s best interests to hand Snowden over to the US.

    Also, more PR for the US courtier press to disseminate to the American public.

  2. jcsscj says

    Why didn’t they send a similar letter to Snowden and promise him a fair trial?

    What happened to Manning is obviously not reresentative, because that was not for a civilian court.

  3. steffp says

    Snowden is persecuted because he published evidence that the US Gov’t is lying to the general public, is lying to other governments, is infringing illegally on the rights of literary billions of people world-wide.
    He produced hitherto undisputed evidence for all these allegations.
    The US want to try him for revealing the secret that the US Gov’t is permanently breaking its own laws.
    That “secret” is not a legitimate one, not in a democratic society where the citizens make electoral choices based on the government’s behavior or misbehavior. Of course, every culprit wants his deeds to stay undetected and in secrecy. Human selfishness. But in every criminal court we see that society’s interest in punishing the wrongdoer overrides this selfish impetus.
    At present we see a defendant (accused of harming human rights in billions of cases) claiming that his wish to be treated as if he had not done his deeds, keeping them a secret is superior. To anything else.
    Instead, so the defendant continues, the prosecutor, the DA, should be sent to jail for a lifetime for accusing him. Breaking mafia-style secrets seems to be a major offense compared to the mere organized trampling on constitutional rights, international treaties, and diplomatic customs…
    Sorry to have to write that about the second Obama administration.

  4. Glenn says

    “And even when organ failure occurs and people die because of the ‘not torture’, no one is punished for this.

    And Tasers are still non-lethal weapons despite the deaths resulting from their use.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>