Jul 13 2012

David Brooks Jackes Offe In Public To His WASP Prep School S&M Fantasy

Categories:

If you went to Groton a century ago, you knew you were privileged. You were taught how morally precarious privilege was and how much responsibility it entailed. You were housed in a spartan 6-foot-by-9-foot cubicle to prepare you for the rigors of leadership.

The best of the WASP elites had a stewardship mentality, that they were temporary caretakers of institutions that would span generations. They cruelly ostracized people who did not live up to their codes of gentlemanly conduct and scrupulosity. They were insular and struggled with intimacy, but they did believe in restraint, reticence and service.

Emphases added in case you are having trouble feeling his pulsating boner throbbing out of the pages of the NY Times.

UPDATE: And just to be clear, there is absolutely nothing wrong with WASP prep school S&M fantasies if thatte’s your thing. But please don’t splooge on me while you wank over them, thank you very much.

This post has no tag

7 comments

Skip to comment form ↓

1

blindrobin

July 13, 2012 at 4:05 pm (UTC -7) Link to this comment

Publishing David Fucking Brooks Constant Anointing of His Masters Balls With the Salve of Centrism Delivered in Turgid Prose is a sin against journalism. I have no idea how you have the stomach for it.
2

Drugmonkey

July 13, 2012 at 5:54 pm (UTC -7) Link to this comment

BoBo is *such* a tool.
3

hkrgtr

July 13, 2012 at 6:12 pm (UTC -7) Link to this comment

That’s a bit much, even by David Brooks’ admittedly-low standards.
4

Randomfactor

July 13, 2012 at 6:27 pm (UTC -7) Link to this comment

The best of the WASP elites had a stewardship mentality,

Which disqualifies them from winning the Republican nomination.
5

ttch

July 13, 2012 at 7:29 pm (UTC -7) Link to this comment

A recent article at Alternet may help illuminate Brooks’ attitude, because America has always been ruled by moneyed elites. The only question today is whether they will be the sons of the Yankee aristocracy raised to feel a need to (eventually) “give back” in public service, or the sons of the “New” Old South with their authoritarian hostility to democracy.

Conservative Southern Values Revived: How a Brutal Strain of American Aristocrats Have Come to Rule America by Sara Robinson. A looong quote from the beginning of the article:

America didn’t used to be run like an old Southern slave plantation, but we’re headed that way now. How did that happen?

It’s been said that the rich are different than you and me. What most Americans don’t know is that they’re also quite different from each other, and that which faction is currently running the show ultimately makes a vast difference in the kind of country we are.

Right now, a lot of our problems stem directly from the fact that the wrong sort has finally gotten the upper hand; a particularly brutal and anti-democratic strain of American aristocrat that the other elites have mostly managed to keep away from the levers of power since the Revolution. Worse: this bunch has set a very ugly tone that’s corrupted how people with power and money behave in every corner of our culture. Here’s what happened, and how it happened, and what it means for America now.

North versus South: Two Definitions of Liberty

Michael Lind first called out the existence of this conflict in his 2006 book, Made In Texas: George W. Bush and the Southern Takeover of American Politics. He argued that much of American history has been characterized by a struggle between two historical factions among the American elite — and that the election of George W. Bush was a definitive sign that the wrong side was winning.

For most of our history, American economics, culture and politics have been dominated by a New England-based Yankee aristocracy that was rooted in Puritan communitarian values, educated at the Ivies and marinated in an ethic of noblesse oblige (the conviction that those who possess wealth and power are morally bound to use it for the betterment of society). While they’ve done their share of damage to the notion of democracy in the name of profit (as all financial elites inevitably do), this group has, for the most part, tempered its predatory instincts with a code that valued mass education and human rights; held up public service as both a duty and an honor; and imbued them with the belief that once you made your nut, you had a moral duty to do something positive with it for the betterment of mankind. Your own legacy depended on this.

Among the presidents, this strain gave us both Roosevelts, Woodrow Wilson, John F. Kennedy, and Poppy Bush — nerdy, wonky intellectuals who, for all their faults, at least took the business of good government seriously. Among financial elites, Bill Gates and Warren Buffet still both partake strongly of this traditional view of wealth as power to be used for good. Even if we don’t like their specific choices, the core impulse to improve the world is a good one — and one that’s been conspicuously absent in other aristocratic cultures.

Which brings us to that other great historical American nobility — the plantation aristocracy of the lowland South, which has been notable throughout its 400-year history for its utter lack of civic interest, its hostility to the very ideas of democracy and human rights, its love of hierarchy, its fear of technology and progress, its reliance on brutality and violence to maintain “order,” and its outright celebration of inequality as an order divinely ordained by God.

As described by Colin Woodard in American Nations: The Eleven Rival Regional Cultures of North America, the elites of the Deep South are descended mainly from the owners of sugar, rum and cotton plantations from Barbados — the younger sons of the British nobility who’d farmed up the Caribbean islands, and then came ashore to the southern coasts seeking more land.

…

Read it all.
6

post-ac

July 14, 2012 at 10:53 am (UTC -7) Link to this comment

Nothing in life surprises me more than the fact that the NYT pays this guy to write garbage twice a week.
7

amhovgaard

July 15, 2012 at 1:30 pm (UTC -7) Link to this comment

Uhm… he knows scrupulosity is a psychiatric diagnosis, right?