Lady Day says
June 20, 2012 at 11:28 am
It’s a statement.
June 20, 2012 at 10:34 pm
I don’t quite get it. Is it the same plane? How is it hanging in two different orientations?
June 21, 2012 at 4:49 am
Them damn risk managers and their attractive nuisances. It’s likely that some actuary derived a statistically significant risk of damages with regards to such presumably kinetic art being displayed at that location, if it is indeed an actual installation.
Protecting the art and the cognitively challenged from one another becomes a matter of mitigating the cost of the probable resultant damage, and more significantly the litigation, not doing so would entail. Hence we cannot have nice things on public display because stupid people to stupid things and get to blame the rest of society for not protecting them form themselves.
June 22, 2012 at 1:23 pm
Hahahaha. Idiot New Yorkers need a fence to keep them from getting hurt by art. Hahahahah.
June 23, 2012 at 4:59 am
I wish I had that mobile!
June 25, 2012 at 4:12 pm
lol at Stork!
Enter your WordPress.com blog URL
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.
Notify me of follow-up comments by email.
Notify me of new posts by email.