Quantcast

«

»

Mar 30 2012

Debunking The COGIATI

I’m on vacation this week! This post originally appeared on Queereka.

My first forays into the trans internet were back in the Fall of 2001, while I was having a particularly bad “episode” of dysphoria that led, for the first time in my life, to actually conducting extensive research into what transition entailed. The e-landscape back then was a bit different than it is now. Those were the days of GenderPeace and AuthentiKate. When TSRoadmap.com was the Bible and Andrea James had yet to fall under criticism for presenting such a scary and difficult, expensive and passability-obsessed vision of transition to those at the beginning of their process. Calpernia Addams was God. Lynn Conway’s TS Women Successes was an important touchstone for demonstrating that yes, it was possible to live a happy, full life as a trans woman, and that many possibilities existed for what, exactly, that life would be (if you weren’t so terrified by TS Roadmap that you spent all your time there comparing and contrasting the levels of passability).

And amongst these various websites there was a cornerstone that promised instant, easy answers to all those who were questioning and exploring the possibility of transition. It presented itself as being able to remove your doubts, rule out the possibility that you weren’t really trans and just confused, show you just how trans you were (relative to all those super-duper transier-than-thou Troo Wimminz), and give you a sort of intellectual “permission” to finally pursue this. It was called the COGIATI (Combined Online Gender Identity And Transsexuality Inventory).

Created by Jennifer Diane Reitz, well known in some internet circles for her creation of the web-comic Unicorn Jelly, and infamous in some trans circles for the COGIATI and various personal rumours. She lives in Olympia. I love Olympia. The COGIATI advertised itself as the first prototype online test to be able to determine whether or not you were a male-to-female transsexual and ought to pursue transition and surgery. It presented itself as being able to make a rough determination of your “brain sex” and from that extrapolate the degree of gender dysphoria you are likely experiencing and the degree to which transition is or isn’t a good idea.

The COGIATI, at the time, seemed like such a blessing. A means of abdicating the responsibility for such a terrifying decision onto an external, objective-ish tool. Exactly like HIV and cancer cures and psychic surgery, 12 step programs and psychics who profess to speak to the dead, its danger lay (and continues to lie) in the enormous degree to which those taking the COGIATI will want its claims to be true.

But it’s exactly as hollow as any of the similes I provided. In essence the COGIATI is structured around some assumed basics of the differences between a “male brain” and “female brain”. It is primarily based around a set of very archaic assumptions about the relative abilities of men and women… that men (and therefore “male brains”) are good at maths and spatial reasoning, while women (and “female brains”) are good at language, reading emotions and interpreting social cues. I guess everyone on the autism spectrum can’t have a female mind? The only questions included that are in any way relevant to the actual issue of whether or not someone is trans or should transition are a few sprinkled in questions regarding self-identification and feelings about your body (specifically genitals… because apparently there’s no such thing as non-ops?).

These assumptions that certain trends in the relative abilities of men and women are somehow indicative of “male brains” and “female brains” is a crazy leap of logic. There are certainly women with good mathematic skills, and they are not “more male” than other women, likewise there are men who are good at social skills and language, and they aren’t “more female” than other men. A statistical trend is not a predictive model, (take for instance that the majority of women are sexually interested in men, but certainly there are many women who are not), nor can we say that these trends are necessarily innate rather than resultant from cultural differences (such as stereotype threat and disparate emphasis in schooling and childhood development). It’s an even further leap to suggest that the “male/female brain” hypothesis could be used as an indicator of transsexuality or the wisdom of pursuing transition.

Full disclosure: I once scored in the 99th percentile for spatial reasoning ability on a multiple intelligences test. I guess I must have a supremely masculine brain…

The test is not only flawed in terms of not being scientifically sound, but fails at even the most basic understanding of reason and scientific process. Reitz asks that people with a background in psychology or science could aid her in helping make the test more accurate, or using it as a jumping off point for their own. I’m sure the resounding recommendation from most would simply be “you could improve it by taking it down.”

As much as I completely understand the desire to be able to have an external means of determining whether or not you should transition (I took the test myself, back in 2001, hoping like everyone for a clear answer), since it’s such a terrifying, huge and complex decision, the sad truth is that there simply isn’t any such thing. Nobody can ever determine for you whether or not you should transition. That can only ever be your own choice to make. Even if in the future we are able to conduct brain scans to locate structural abnormalities associated with transsexuality, it will still ultimately need to be an individual’s own choice, own feelings and own self-identification that take precedence.

You need to be willing to give yourself permission.

Tests like this are dangerous. They can allow people to absolve themselves of the responsibility. They can play directly into self-deception. They can lead to people who probably ought to transition to push themselves deeper into denial, and can lead people who probably shouldn’t to make bad decisions. The degree to which you do or do not fit into cultural stereotypes of male or female intelligence has absolutely fuck all to do with whether or not transition will make you happier, and it is very, very harmful to perpetuate the idea that it does.

Beyond simply being potentially damaging to trans people who are in the process of questioning, it also props up archaic, sexist evo-psych concepts about the nature of men and women in general. The last thing us trans people ought to be doing is helping prop up an essentialist gender-binary. Certain transphobic rad-fems already accuse us of that anyway. Let’s not give them ammunition, okay?

The COGIATI is no longer the centerpiece it once was in web resources for people exploring the possibility of transition, but it still exists, is still up, still shows up in google searches, is still being taken, I still have people ask me about it, and is still just as dangerous as ever. This past week I received an e-mail from someone who in earnest was asking me to point them to an “objective” test through which they could determine whether or not they are transsexual. They responded rather negatively when I informed them that I could not provide them any answers, and that it had to be their own decision. This reminded me of the extreme desperation with which people want something like this, and reminded me in turn of how much scarier pseudo-science, scams and woo become when people are desperate and really, really want to believe in them.

There are many other such “brain sex” tests floating around on the internet. Many give a much stronger veneer of professionalism and “scientific-ness” than the COGIATI, and are better thought out, but they are equally based on shaky assumptions and evo-psych pseudoscience. Their professional veneer only serves to make them more dangerous and insidious, and many do not include the same overt disclaimer that the COGIATI provides. None of them should ever be trusted as a tool for determining your gender identity, and all of them should be approached as the sexist, binary-enforcing, unsubstantiated silliness they are.

Gender is nothing if not diverse. It’s a rule as defined by its many exceptions as by its occasional consistencies.

If I were to construct an online test to help someone who is questioning their gender identity and whether or not to pursue transition, I would do the following: I would select 20 fairly random and completely inconsequential questions that sound vaguely related to gender and neurological abilities. The answers wouldn’t matter. The result, regardless of how you answered the questions, would invariably be “No, according to your results, you are not transsexual and are simply experiencing a mild form of gender confusion. You should probably not pursue transition”.

Then one final question would pop up: “did your results disappoint or sadden you?”. If you answer yes, then yeah, there’s a very good chance you’re trans, you know you’re trans, and you were just looking for permission. Go get yourself to a qualified, trans-friendly therapist and take it from there. If you weren’t disappointed, then this test can’t tell you anything of value at all. But you should probably ask yourself why you were taking the bloody quiz in the first place, and go see a therapist anyway, because most cis people don’t spend a whole lot of time worrying about whether or not they’re trans.

13 comments

1 ping

Skip to comment form

  1. 1
    Miri

    Ugh… this test is so silly… but it’s kind of amusing for when you’re bored, less so when you’re relying on it to help you (which luckily wasn’t the case for me, I actually didn’t know about it until you mentioned it in another post, prior to the original posting of this one)… What’s especially ridiculous is the grading system. To be a “true transsexual” you need to get a score over 389, with anything between 130 and that making you a probable “late-onset transsexual”… way to imply that those of us who didn’t actively assert our gender identity as children as being less “real”… meh, I got 310… what rank in the trans hierarchy does that give me? Clearly not the royalty reserved for the “true transsexuals”, but surely I could be a Countess at least… :P

    Personally, despite being a joke, I think this test on HelloQuizzy is better, and it more likely to give an accurate result… it’s not based on behaviour and interests and such, but rather on how much you dislike your assigned gender, and how much you would prefer to be the gender other than this… still silly, but kind of nice in its far greater lack of value judgements applied to stereotypes…

    (disclaimer: it’s 1:30 in the morning, I’m super tired, so I may be writing sense, or a rant about star-eating planet-sized violet millipede-sheep hybrids… I’m not sure…)

    1. 1.1
      Nepenthe

      OT: Sooo…. could you try again for the planet eating violet millipede-sheep hybrid rant? I’d really enjoy that.

  2. 2
    Anders

    Looked at the scoring system. Yeah, it’s crap. Nothing more to see here, move along. The mathematical construction is probably the worst I have seen, making the final score impossible to interpret. And it has the same flaws as all sum score tests – the extreme cases are relatively pure but the closer to the middle you get, the more impossible it is to say anything about the test person.

    And that’s not even talking about the validity of the questions.

    The sexual gratification-based, fetishitic transvestite would fit Class 1
    The mostly sexual / fetishistic but slightly gender involved crossdresser fits Class 2
    The serious transgenderist fits Class 3
    The most common type of transsexual (well over 70%) fits Class 4
    The rarest, early onset, ‘classic model of early research’ transsexual fits Class 5

    So… no matter what test score you get you still are a transsexual? Yeah, that’s a useful test. :)

    Although the possibility of getting “Absolute Male” (or “Absolute Female”) intrigues me.

  3. 3
    Stentor

    _Then one final question would pop up: “did your results disappoint or sadden you?”_

    I love this. It reminds me of a strategy someone once told me for making tough decisions that are prone to non-useful overthinking: flip a coin, and pay attention to whether you feel a little twinge of happiness or disappointment when you see the result.

    As for the COGIATI, Holy Lack Of Mutually Exclusive And Jointly Exhaustive Answer Choices, Batman!

  4. 4
    Eva

    Took the test yesterday, was having doubts.
    I didn’t take it seriously exactly, however I was considering their reasoning and it was increasing my doubts.

    I hate leaving these things down to my intuition. As someone who once believed strongly in the existance of the Chirstian God, it’s hard to trust my own feelings on something so important.

  5. 5
    Andronomea

    Is COGIATI only meant for AMAB people?

    It tells me I’m a feminine male, that my internal gender identity is mostly masculine and then goes on to say “your gender issues are primarily matters of personal expression rather than a medical problem” (I’m AFAB)

    1. 5.1
      Natalie Reed

      Yeah, it’s AMAB-specific. But that’s the least of its problems, frankly. You shouldn’t put ANY weight in whatever it tells you.

      1. Andronomea

        I wish they would mention that though, it doesn’t say so anywhere …so on top of being bullshit for all the reasons you listed, it also implies AFAB people can’t be transsexual

  6. 6
    Nepenthe

    Whelp, that was a painful experience. It does, on the bright side, act as a counter example to its implication that all women are good at writing.

  7. 7
    Bill Door

    One curious thing is that some of the questions are very similar to the ones you see in online tests for Aspergers Syndrome, such as:

    “When you look at a person’s face, how well can you honestly judge what they are feeling?”

    “You are talking with a friend. Outside, far away, somebody is honking their horn regularly and endlessly. It is not very loud, you can just barely hear it in the quiet room. What is your reaction?”

    “You are told that something you said probably bothered somebody. What is your reaction?”

    Though I guess it’s not too surprising that two worthless tests would have some overlap.

  8. 8
    embertine

    COGIATI says that I am an androgyne who hates their genitals! I am a cis woman. I am guessing my many of the questions that this test is not meant for me.

    Test: How do you feel when you get an erection?
    Me: ….. Puzzled?

    1. 8.1
      Kizzy

      I believe most people get erections, whether they notice them or not is another issue. I suppose some people don’t get them at all, but there’s medication for that…

  9. 9
    lemonade

    COGIATI – and a number of other quizzes like it on the internet – identify me as male. I’m AFAB.

    “cis people don’t spend a whole lot of time worrying about whether or not they’re trans” is the most important part of this essay and something I really needed to read. Thank you.

  1. 10
    Raturday And Weekly Recap! | Sincerely, Natalie Reed

    [...] Debunking The COGIATI [...]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite="" class=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>