Bread and Roses: Gay marriage vote in Ireland a gain for humanity

Gay marriage vote in Ireland a gain for humanity
Bread and Roses with Maryam Namazie and Fariborz Pooya
Interview with Michael Nugent, Chair of Atheist Ireland
Background: In a referendum, 62% voted in favour of changing the Irish constitution to allow gay and lesbian couples to marry. The landmark decision was celebrated across the world. A senior Vatican official, though, said it was a “defeat for humanity”. In fact, it as a defeat for homophobic religious values and a gain for humanity and 21st century human values.
Shocking news of the week: mass graves of migrants in Malaysia
Insane fatwa of the week: Masturbation leads to pregnant hands In afterlife
Good news: Vote for gay marriage in Ireland
Director: Reza Moradi
Translator: Mohammad B

رای ازدواج همجنس گرايان در ایرلند دست آوردى برای بشریت
نان و گل سرخ با مریم نمازی و فریبرز پویا
مصاحبه با مایکل نوجنت، رئیس ساۯمان آٺئيسٺهاى ایرلند
در يك رفراندم سراسري در جمهوري ايرلند ٦٢٪ از شركت كنندگان راي مثبت به تغيير قانون اساسي جهت برسميت شناختن ازدواج همجنس گرايان در آن كشور دادند
نتيجه اين انتخاب مهم مورد استقبال جهاني قرار گرفت
البته يك مقام بالاي واتيكان ان را “شكستي براي بشريت” ناميد
در واقع اين شكستي براي ارزشهاي مذهبي و ضد همجنس گرايان ولي دستاوردي براي بشريت و ارزشهاي انساني قرن بيست و يكم ميباشد
اخبار تکان دهنده از هفته: گورهای دسته جمعی مهاجران در مالزی
فتوای احمقانه هفته: ارۯاى جنسى مردان منجر به دست باردار در زندگی پس از مرگ
خبر خوب: رای برای ازدواج همجنس گرايان در ایرلند
کارگردان: رضا مرادی
مترجم: محمد ب

Your Muslim Friend

After every talk, there is always that one person that will challenge what I have said about Sharia courts by – wait for it – saying: “I have a Muslim friend who says Sharia is not at all as you say.” I heard this for the umpteenth time at the two-day symposium on theism in public policy at Rice University in Texas just this past weekend.

And this “argument” usually follows my talk outlining Sharia’s abuses and my criticism of the essentialising of the ‘other’…

Also, it’s usually made by humanists and skeptics who are quick to question religion’s role in the public sphere (if it’s not Islam of course)…

This argument is as silly as someone telling you “I have a Catholic friend who says Catholicism is not as you say” when you have just finished a talk criticising Ireland’s abortion laws and outrageous cases like that of Savita Halappanavar who was refused a termination and died.

In case you haven’t noticed, who your token friends are does not an argument make.

Clearly, the point though is not to make an argument but to use any means necessary to defend Sharia as the “choice” and “rights” of a minority.

Freedom and equality is only good for you lot then is it?