Quantcast

«

»

Nov 22 2013

Walking a tightrope: Between the pro-Islamist Left and the far-Right

1236466622-one-law-for-all-campaign-against-sharia-law-in-britain29189_29189Opposing Sharia and Islamism in the west is like walking on a tight rope most of the time – thwarting attacks from the Left, refuting cultural relativism, preventing alliances with the far-Right, explaining the issues ignored by government and the media, mobilising support for secularism and citizenship whilst opposing racism and xenophobia, and making linkages with the many fighting Islamism on the ground in countries across the world. It’s easy to fall off the tight rope and doesn’t surprise me when it happens given all the pressures involved.

Most disconcerting for many are the pressures from the Left; it is particularly hard when your “natural allies” betray basic human principles whilst using the language of rights and tolerance to defend the denial of rights and the intolerable.

Take this past weekend’s panel discussion at the NYU Global Secularisms conference that I was on. One of my co-panellists said she opposed all fundamentalists, including secular ones, when asked about my talk and another accused me of aiding and abetting racism against Muslims and Arabs by my very use of the term Sharia (I’ll have to comment on these later).

Add to this constant demonization, the day to day difficulties of doing such work, including the threats and all the clandestine attempts at intimidation and it is quite easy to see how one can be disillusioned and fall off the tightrope. (Just this week, I was asked to reassure a ‘moderate Muslim gentleman’ – read Islamist – with the content of my talk though he wouldn’t be attending and wanted me disinvited.)

I suppose it’s easier for people like me to stay the course coming from an Iranian Left political tradition with crystal clear clarity and an uncompromising defence of humanity. The Left I belong to has opposed cultural relativism and defended universal values and hasn’t sided with the Iranian regime or Syria’s Asad like Stop the War Coalition and the Socialist Workers Party.

When faced with such betrayal, I can fully understand that, for some, staying on course becomes impossible. What I can’t understand and will never accept, though, is falling off the tightrope or even trying to stay on whilst simultaneously finding solace in and partnership with the far-Right.

The argument in favour of collaboration with the far-Right is that we need as many allies as possible in the fight against Sharia and Islamism, which means that we must be “inclusive” and “tolerant” of those whose views we may find distasteful – all for the “cause.”

Sound familiar?

Is this not what the pro-Islamist Left says in justifying its collaboration with the Islamists?

I for one already work with many groups and individuals whose views I find distasteful; it is possible to do that in specific campaigns like One Law for All. But no movement includes or represents everyone. There are limits. And there are principles that are more important than any “cause.”

Also, creating movements is not merely a numbers game. When Stop the War Coalition brought in Islamists as partners, it ignored Islamic terrorism and discrimination against women. It sided with oppressive regimes, segregated meetings and defended Sharia and the veil. It brought lots of people to the streets initially but at what cost and for how long?

Collaborating with the likes of the English Defence League (EDL) may increase numbers in the short-term, but it’s self-defeating. This isn’t only about numbers. Aims and principles matter too.

I’ve said this before and I’ll say it again. I’m against the war on Iraq as is Al Qaeda but we’re against it for different reasons. I’m against Sharia and so is the EDL and the supposedly reinvented Tommy Robinson but we’re against it for different reasons.

I oppose Sharia in Britain and everywhere because universal rights, secularism, women’s rights and equality mean something to me. The EDL and Tommy Robinson oppose it because they want to defend their “homeland” (which I am reminded is a human right recognised by the UN) from “the changes and dangers brought to it by mass influxes of people from cultures they don’t understand or recognise.” Can you not see the fundamental differences in position? Theirs is a xenophobic position that blames immigrants and minorities for everything wrong with Britain. It’s a racist perspective that sees the teeming masses as the “other” trying to change white, British, Christian culture.

But people’s “culture” is not based on their immigration or citizenship status. Not every white European represents enlightenment values – as the EDL clearly proves. Nor is every immigrant or minority a regressive theocrat. This is not about a clash of civilisations between a regressive “east” and a secularist “west” but a clash between theocrats and the religious-Right on the one hand and secularists and democrats, including Muslims and immigrants on the other.

Where we each stand is based on our politics and choices not on our “identity” or immigration status. I too am one of those teeming immigrant masses after all as are many who are at the forefront of doing much of the dirty work of defending secularism in Britain and elsewhere.

It always annoys me to no end when I hear that the EDL are the only ones speaking out against Sharia. Please, we were speaking out against Sharia when EDL/BNP-types were openly collaborating with neo-Nazis and for white supremacy. Their language may have changed but political movements and organisations are thankfully not merely judged by the duplicitous language they use.

An undue focus on Britain, “homeland” and the west means that one can only see the likes of the EDL, thereby seeking common cause where there is none.

It also means that one cannot see the real allies in this fight, including amongst the “teeming hoards of immigrants” and women and men struggling in Iran, Afghanistan, Tunisia, Algeria, Mali, Bangladesh, Egypt, Turkey and elsewhere. One Law for All and the fight against Sharia and Islamism is a continuation of their struggle and fight – not that of the EDL’s and far-Right.

The far-Right will never have a place in One Law for All. I will make sure of that.

***
As an aside, I must briefly address the fact that Tommy Robinson has left the EDL. I for one have nothing against working towards common goals with those who have left far-Right organisations – EDL or Islamist. One Law for All already works with ex-Islamists and ex-members of the BNP and EDL. However, I am doubtful that Tommy is a changed man. When Ed Hussain or Majid Nawaaz left Hizb ut Tahrir and founded Quilliam Foundation, they criticised the Islamist organisation they left and created a new position and space for themselves and others. Tommy has yet to do that. So far, all I have heard from him is how proud he is of his time with the EDL; he continues to defend the organisation. He has merely criticised certain elements within the EDL but not the organisation itself and its politics. One can’t be ex-EDL and still defend the EDL if one wants to show that they have truly changed. Islamists do this all the time by changing their organisational name and carrying on with business as usual.

Personally I think this is all a publicity stunt for Tommy to reinvent himself into a more palatable persona without any lasting change in his politics. (Notice how the BBC follows him everywhere?) For his politics to be considered different, he would need to take responsibility for the EDL’s far-Right politics during his leadership and must be judged not only by what he says but by what he does. Only time will tell whether he is the same old Tommy; I certainly hope not.

14 comments

Skip to comment form

  1. 1
    Ophelia Benson

    Yes, I’m familiar with that tightrope, though not nearly as familiar with it as you are.

    Great post. Solidarity!

  2. 2
    daniel abineri

    Oh Maryam, You just wont give Tommy Robinson a break will you? You have totally bought into the depiction by the left leaning media of the EDL as a far right racist fascists. Robinson started the EDL because he was concerned about the double standards that seem to apply to the large Muslim population in his home town of Luton. Amongst other things the tolerance of Sharia. EDL Members included West Indians, Hindus and Jews – so not so racist then. The media and politicians decided to cast the EDL as Nazis, which no doubt led to the infiltration by said Nazis (or perhaps even agitators from the far Left posing as Nazis). Anyway, Robinson was arrested for having a fight with one of these Nazi supporters, so sickened was he by their presence. Robinson then leaves the EDL and teams up with anti-Islamists Quilliam because he does not like what has happened to the EDL he started. Of course he is not going to disown all the friends and supporters who help him start EDL, this would be an act of betrayal. But he has consistently stated that the reason he left was because of the accusations of far right racism that he wants nothing to do with. Yes the BBC do follow him about. He has emerged as a warm likable man who is on a mission. The same mission as you. No to Sharia, yes to equality under the Law. I just know one day you will see all this, I just hope it’s sooner rather than later, for the sake of freedom in the West.

    1. 2.1
      Maryam Namazie

      Excuses, excuses. For the sake of the west? What about for the sake of humanity. People in the Middle East and North Africa are human too and have been dealing with Islamism for a very long time. Looking at it from the prism of Robinson is part of the problem.

      1. daniel abineri

        Maryam I think we’re on the same side. As for the ‘west’, well we happen to live here and we are both aware of the steady encroachment on our liberties by aggressive forms of Islam. Have you seen the film ‘The Silent Conquest’? Terrifying. BTW thanks for alerting me to the gender segregation issues at British Universities. I have forwarded it everywhere and it seems to be picking up great deal of interest around the net. I don’t want to row with you. As I’ve said I totally support what you are trying to achieve with One Law For All and will continue to do so. I expect, in time, you will come across Tommy Robinson in person and you can make your own mind up about his true motives.

        1. Maryam Namazie

          We’re not on the same side if you support the EDL. Full Stop.

          1. daniel abineri

            I don’t ‘support’ any organisation, political or otherwise. I fight vocally for what I believe is right and just. Whether you like it or not there is a huge crossover of ideas in terms of what you and Tommy are saying. Anyway, I’m a bit bored with banging my head against a brick wall with you. I agree with your cause – and I agree with Tommy’s. As far as I’m concerned you’re both walking the same tightrope. And I hope neither of you fall.

          2. Maryam Namazie

            Yes it is getting boring explaining our differences over and over again to those who just don’t get it. Working with the EDL is like the SWP working with the Islamists. They think both are anti-imperialist and nothing else matters. The point is the EDL is anti-sharia but we are not just anti-Sharia as it is about a lot more than just Sharia and defending England and white Britain and Christianity… I will never walk the same route as the EDL – you can be sure of that. EDL is part of the problem; I and the movement I belong to are part of the solution.

          3. daniel abineri

            I respect your position. But in case you haven’t noticed Tommy Robinson has very publicly left the EDL and now works with Muslims fighting extremism @ Quilliam. Surely you’re support what Quilliam is trying to do?

            BTW I have never supported the EDL, I only became interested in Robinson over the last couple months when he left them behind. (Which I think was a very brave thing for him to do, and was for the right reasons.) I know you’ve mocked Robinsons TV profile, so I assume you’ve actually watched ‘When Tommy Met Mo’? If not, here it is http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mz2NBT5H9sU

  3. 3
    M

    Daniel,
    Have a look – bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-24002252

    The title

    EDL leader Tommy Robinson held on east London march

    Oh, by the way, about 150 counter-protesters had been arrested, too (186 actually – that’s people who hadn’t done anything).

    How come THIS steady encroachment on our liberties does not terrify you?

    1. 3.1
      daniel abineri

      Well yes I read the BBC article and agree that it is an appalling encroachment of our liberties when Englishman are arrested for walking through the streets of London making a peaceful protest. To get an idea of how violent the so called anti-fascist crowd are, take a look at this clip from an earlier EDL charity walk http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YreJ4Qtenhg

      You say that Robinson must be judged on his actions rather than his words. Well I would say publicly leaving the EDL and joining forces with Muslims fighting extremism (Quilliam), that his actions speak very loudly wouldn’t you?

  4. 4
    radical archives

    great article – and fuck the EDL!

  5. 5
    logicthought

    @ Ophelia Benson , daniel abineri , Maryam Namazie , M and radical archives

    Do not fight each other to defeat Islam..Your fight is to wipeout islam, not to make war on each other..
    I have a good idea for you to come together and finish Islam…watch following video carefully link to your pages
    and ask every element which thinks Islam is a threat to humanity, adopt Same technology and strategy for a win over this barbaric religion called islam.

    1. 5.1
      Maryam Namazie

      No one wants to wipe out Islam. You can’t wipe out beliefs – people have a right to believe what they want – even you.

  6. 6
    daniel abineri

    Quite right. Reform is what’s needed. Anything that does not evolve eventually dies.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: