Watch Fariborz Pooya’s new weekly TV programme called Secular Society. In this week’s programme, he interviews Hamid Taqvaee on the role of state in a secular society and the question of neutrality of state towards religion and Maryam Namazie on the comments made by Bishop of Rochester, Nazir Ali, on the question of ‘no go areas’ in Britain.
Jan 23 2008
New TV programme called Secular Society
This post has no tag
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
About the Author
Freethought Blogs
- A Citizen of Earth
- A Million Gods
- Ace of Clades
- Alethian Worldview
- Almost Diamonds
- Ashley Miller
- Biodork
- Black Skeptics
- Blag Hag
- Brute Reason
- Butterflies and Wheels
- Comradde PhysioProffe
- Dispatches from the Culture Wars
- En Tequila Es Verdad
- Greta Christina's Blog
- Heteronormative Patriarchy for Men
- Lousy Canuck
- Mano Singham
- Maryam Namazie
- Near-Earth Object
- No Country for Women
- NonStampCollector
- Pharyngula
- Reasonable Doubts
- Richard Carrier Blogs
- Rock Beyond Belief
- Sincerely, Natalie Reed
- The Atheist Experience
- The Crommunist Manifesto
- The Digital Cuttlefish
- The Indelible Stamp
- The Zingularity
- This Week in Christian Nationalism
- Token Skeptic
- YEMMYnisting
- Zinnia Jones
PostsCommentsArchives
Recent Posts
- Away until 22 May 2013
- Message from Imad: In Mickey Mouse we Trust
- I support International Imad Day
- Evening drinks in London with Gita Sahgal
- Today’s Altab Ali Day 2013
- Amina: No more moral lessons
- International Imad Day
- Fitnah targets Islam; “ready to cause affliction”
- Abuse of worker rights hallmark of Iranian regime
- Saudi advertising campaign not enough
Recent Comments
- gunluk kiralIk evler on Away until 22 May 2013
- Quintin Weisz on We have changed with the revolution and will not go backwards
- Hannes Uys on NUDE CALENDAR
- Carroll Boerst on It will not break our spirit
- ofeeaz on I support International Imad Day
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
FTB RecentFTB Active
FTB Recent
- Wolf: "Do You Thank The Lord?" by Cuttlefish
- Why “Thank God I survived” or “God knows best” is a terrible thing to say in the aftermath of a fatal disaster. by Yemisi Ilesanmi
- Zoooom! He's off again! by PZ Myers
- CFI's Michael De Dora by PZ Myers
- Hags of Lag - *Thunderfoot doesn't get Regressive Crap II - Electric Boogaloo by Avicenna
- In the lobby by Ophelia Benson
FTB Active
- I think we call that an own goal by PZ Myers
- Open thread on episode #814 by heicart
- More documenting the harassment by Ophelia Benson
- Leave Dan Brown Alone! by Ed Brayton
- Cis people: Help me get a sense of the landscape out there! by Zinnia
- We don't call this sexism, we call it, err... by Ally Fogg
Recent Comments
- gunluk kiralIk evler on Away until 22 May 2013
- Quintin Weisz on We have changed with the revolution and will not go backwards
- Hannes Uys on NUDE CALENDAR
- Carroll Boerst on It will not break our spirit
- ofeeaz on I support International Imad Day
- AMINA, LA FEMEN CHE SFIDA I SALAFITI | L'indiependente Webzine on 4 April 2013: International Day to Defend Amina; she represents us
- Theressa Marcial on Fitnah targets Islam; “ready to cause affliction”
- Eleonora Devilbiss on I’m back blogging
- Tom Monticello on Nude photo of Egyptian blogger is a scream against Islamism
- Viktor Nilsen on International Imad Day
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006

3 comments
Mehmet Çagatay
January 23, 2008 at 2:03 pm (UTC 1) Link to this comment
Hello,I agree with your views in general but I would like to make a contribution with overstepping the mark. You implied that you are not completely content with conventional secularism (separation of church and state) by positing it as the minimum solution. Then you put forward direct intervention of state as the “real secularism”: “state cannot be natural to religion… it needs to be regulated… it needs to be controlled… it needs to be taxed”. I think the major paradox of secularism is that it demands from the religious society to give up their illusions about the world in the political field. This is a very feasible solution as long as the society is free of contradictions… i.e. only if there was no other religion, gays, women, laborers, etc, etc. Even it was a “real secularism”, regulation of religious field by state, the subjectivity of statesmen overrides the quality of secularism to be promoted as real. So, even the “real secularism” is a derivative of minimum solution. In the sense of state neutrality to religion the real solution is, I am very serious, Atheism. I know it sounds strange (and there is a misunderstanding that Marx criticized both religion and Atheism at the same degree) but only Atheism could ensure the neutrality of “state”. So let me set up a dialectical formula (!): secularism is the abstract negation of Christianity in political field, Atheism is the concrete negation of both religion and secularism, socialism is the complete establishment of social objectivity as there is no need for Atheism to solve the contradictions.Best Regards,
Cosmic Dancer
January 23, 2008 at 4:23 pm (UTC 1) Link to this comment
Name me one area that Islamic extremists have turned into a no-go area for people of a different faith or race?I wrote a comment about this episode on my blog – and frankly I think the Bishop is talking nonsense.
Frank Partisan
January 23, 2008 at 10:50 pm (UTC 1) Link to this comment
I like Mehmet Çagatay’s comments. I never thought that way before.