What is Atheism Plus a response to? »« Our local canadate

I know where that January spike came from, and it had nothing to do with TAM

Shane Brady posted a quantitative analysis of web traffic for Skepchick and Freethought Blogs using Alexa’s daily reach statistics. While this data is certainly only a subset of the actual data — a sort of Nielsons ratings for the web — it’s probably pretty close to representative of the actual data we’ve collected via StatCounter. The traffic matches extremely closely to what we’ve seen ourselves on the Freethought Blogs end, though despite common misperceptions I have no access to Skepchick’s stats, not even through the hive mind uplink.

A screenshot Shane provides for Freethought Blogs’ (admittedly short) existence:

Shane says of this:

As you can see, FreethoughtBlogs is a relatively new blog network, so we don’t have the same history as with Skepchick.org. However, FreethoughtBlogs has substantially higher traffic than Skepchick.org and spikes might be harder to detect. That said, we can see some traffic increases that seem to correlate with some posts by Greta Christina that were heavily commented and cited. The trend for 2012, though, has primarily been flat. There was a slight increase during the days leading up to TAM2012, but nothing dramatic.

Emphasis mine.

The spike he’s referring to is in early January of 2012, and the post he’s referring to is Greta Christina’s “Two Questions for DJ Grothe”.

I hate to steal Greta’s thunder, and I hate to say “no, people don’t care that DJ did something wrong and Greta pointed it out” — no, really, I truly hate this — but that’s not where the spike came from. See, at the same time as that was happening, a post of mine went so viral we actually had server outages because of it, and the webmaster and I implemented Varnish and modified Apache’s worker agents, while we were live, to fix the problem and serve pageviews uninterrupted.

(I’ve removed the hard numbers from the side in case other folks don’t want their hit counts extrapolated from this graph… not that I mind personally, it already looks horrid for my average page views!)

The spike I present here represents my one single post dwarfing Pharyngula and Dispatches’ traffic put together, and that’s no small feat since they easily represent 80%+ of total traffic on any given day. It was a post that I had written prior to having migrated the blog to Freethought Blogs: Santorum’s Wifes Abortion Was Different, You See. I made the bold claim that the time that Rick Santorum’s unborn child’s life had to be terminated (via inducing birth prematurely) in order to save Karen’s life actually represented an abortion — an abortion that, under Santorum’s dictum, would become illegal and the doctor would have been charged with murder.

The post went viral after the January 3rd Iowa GOP debate when Rick Santorum became the media’s newest darling for having “won” (e.g., for having not looked as bad as the others). Nobody could have predicted that a blog post that I’d written in June of 2011 would have taken the net by storm six months later.

And it had nothing to do with someone attacking someone else within our community over their perceived faults.

Considering that’s much of what the people complaining about “controversialism” do on a daily basis, I can’t believe that supposed skeptics are snookered in by the meme that intra-community controversy drives traffic. We bloggers know damn well it doesn’t. If you want to drive traffic, you POST CATS.

Or hit the blog lottery and have the target of your criticism become the media’s newest darling in an election cycle.

Update: There was another post on the network that went gangbusters that same week: on January 7th, Dan Fincke’s post Openly Bisexual and Non-theist Woman (Who Rejected Parents’ Mormonism) Runs For U.S. Congress, a significantly more timely post about social justice and politics like mine. The day it was posted, Dan got roughly 70% of the hits that my post did on its first day. Its reception, I believe, represented more traffic at least than Pharyngula that day.

Bear in mind that the traffic for both posts represents many first-time visitors to the network, who likely didn’t translate to very many if any repeat visitors. On neither days were traffic for Pharyngula or Dispatches down, so these represent gigantic increases in overall server traffic. And the hits trickled in for quite some time on both posts afterward, latecomers to the viral spread, so the one-day spikes aren’t the totality of the story.

Comments

  1. says

    You are being so annoying, interfering with people’s simplistic self serving one-off interpretations of reality with things like facts and stuff. Jeesh. Are no delusions safe anymore????

  2. Erista (aka Eris) says

    Yeah, stop it, Greg! Driving Jason out of the community is MY job!

    *pulls out a stick and brandishes it menacingly in the general direction of a car*

  3. says

    I can’t even take all the credit, it turns out. I’d forgotten that Dan got a post that got nearly the same sort of reception that same week. Will add to the post as soon as I can.

  4. Rob says

    Damn you Jason. Stop using reason and facts to dispel an otherwise rock solid argument! Stop it now or I’ll be forced to throw cats at you.

  5. F says

    But, those are still controversial, right? And it doesn’t matter if it works or not, you were still trying to gain hit by posting Deeprift-flavoured controversial stuff.

    I got a million of ‘em. I’ll be here all week. Don’t forget to tip your blog hosts.

  6. jamessweet says

    Hey, it’s absolutely true that getting one-time visitors can boost your traffic. My blog got linked to from Pharyngula, and even after the short-term spike had settled down, I had five to ten times the readership!

    Yeah, it went from about two readers to a dozen or two. I’m sure that strategy is totally sustainable… /sarcasm

  7. plutosdad says

    What is it with you and data, anyway? Always posting data and “evidence” from “logs”.

    Not only that, but you expect us to believe you are not sitting on mountains of ad revenue? I suppose you will use your “evidence” to deny that too.

  8. stakkalee says

    Pfft, please, everyone knows you can just fake that data that’s publicly available on a 3rd-party site! Hell, I’m not even going to bother checking Alexa, that’s how sure I am you #FTBullies are making it all up. PLEASE STOP TOTALLY RUINING MY ATHEISM!

  9. says

    Hah, thanks Veritas Knight. You certainly did a better job with my name than some of the trolls out there who think it’s spelled “Tibbydiedoh” and what-have-you. :)

    Hey, fix the name, I’ll add it to my sidebar as my first BLOG AWARD!!!1

  10. The MadPanda, FCD says

    (spit take)

    (gawps at data)

    (runs the numbers)

    (ponders)

    (grabs red telephone back to Pottsylvania)

    Hello, Fearless Leader? Ve haff an idea for Beloved New Blogathon…

Trackbacks

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>